The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #35354   Message #483707
Posted By: GUEST,ghost
14-Jun-01 - 07:52 PM
Thread Name: BS: OH BROTHER VIDEO
Subject: RE: BS: OH BROTHER VIDEO
Clinton- I'm sorry I brought this language thing up. The language wasn't blatant and in your face as it is in many of the newer movies but more casual and certainly in keeping with the plot. Some flim makers will include bad language just for the rating that they can acquire. I am not alluding that this film is one of those. It becomes kind of an annoyance, to me, listen to so much of it coming up in so many places nowadays. It didn't bother me that it was there but it was there. Given the particular story line there seemed to be plenty of room to go in that direction (more bad language). The writer/s did not. To their praise, they were very restrained on that point which made this movie a delight to view. I'm glad it didn't go there. I did not mean to say that there was lots of it or that it was offensive. As I said I didn't even notice it the first time I watched but caught some during my second viewing. I didn't call the whole movie 'foul'. I said it was a must buy in my book. A really nice flick. I wanted to know why they didn't make more movies like it! I merely pointed out that I caught "some foul language" in it. Some, as in maybe a couple of words, no big deal. There was so little, it makes me wonder why they bothered to include it at all. The music was a joy and he story a tickle! The hoofin' a treat and the characters a hoot! Forgive me and I'll never speak another ill word about something so wonderful ever again.