The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #35431   Message #487952
Posted By: GUEST
20-Jun-01 - 12:31 PM
Thread Name: BS: Dubya vs. Whom in 04?
Subject: RE: BS: Dubya vs. Whom in 04?
I wonder if Ted's defense of the 2nd ammendment includes and understanding that his constitutional right to "keep and bear arms" is contingent upon his belonging to a "well regulated militia".

I hope he understands its the "security of a free state
that's protected not his right knock off Bambi.

The language of Mr. Madison's ammendment is crystal clear.

He keeps his "thirtyoughtsix" at the discretion of the community; and, notwithstanding the aforementioned exception, appeals to the second ammendment should are pure hogwash.

Just a reminder that a few us us are still still hangin' in there on this gunthing.

I keep quiet on this, as promised, except when the 2nd ammendment is construed in any fasion as bestowing an unlimited "right" to keep firearms.

Sorry.