In this thread alone I've seen evidence that those who choose to post as unnamed GUESTS get grief for it. Though some of those posts involved speaking critically or, as mentioned, provocatively, none struck me as being beyond the bounds of decency or respectful discussion. I think the badgering of GUESTS on this thread is out of proportion to statements in their posts.

One GUEST explained his concerns about security. Several responders didn't share those concerns. It's fine to disagree, but was there any call for the ridicule and belittlement in some of the responses? I think they were out of line.

I understand, and support, being wary of "GUEST" posts. I don't believe, however, that said wariness should preclude giving some benefit of the doubt and some attempt to see things from another's point of view. I have seen scant evidence of that sort of openmindedness.

It is a bit disconcerting sometimes, responding to a GUEST, especially if there is back and forth discussion and possibly more than one person appearing as GUEST. I just don't think that antagonistic posts improve the situation for anyone. Surely we can do a bit better.