Couldn't possibly agree more John. If you look at the history of the FA, it has moved away from it's beginnings and over time and at this point seems to be just another "trade show." Because a significant part of the original idea was in fact the "showcase" concept, then perhaps I am wrong. It just seems to me that any "politicism" which was alos a part of it's roots have been diminished over time and are now pretty non-existent.

If this is the choice of the membership then the conference should go on and perhaps another organization will spring from the grass roots with similar goals of the original FA. Considering the Mission Statement of the FA at this time, I'd say the conference is a sure thing.

GOALS OF THE FOLK ALLIANCE

To increase understanding of the rich variety, artistic value, cultural and historical significance, and continuing relevance of folk music and dance among educators, media, and the general public.

To provide a bridge to and from folk music and dance organizations and needed resources, and to help those organizations link with their constituencies.

To influence decision makers and resource providers on the national, state, provincial, and local levels, insuring the growth of folk music and dance.

To support and encourage the development of new and existing grassroots folk music and dance organizations. To strengthen the effectiveness of folk music and dance organizations by providing professional development opportunities.

Nothing I see there would lead me to believe that any form of political activism is a part of that organization........in which case, the whole discussion here and elsewhere is moot.

Spaw