The Universalists like to dally with the notion of the circle whose center is nowhere, and whose perimeter is everywhere....

This particular referent does have a "place in existence". It simply does not have location (physical x,y,z coordinated location) as an attribute.

To reduce is to semantic wishwashand make semantic silly putty is to deny the Quality of it.

This is no more "absolutist", as Carol complains, than it is to say that water is wet. it isn't wet because some think it is, and not because others think not. The wetness of water is a fact, not an opinion.

If you want a more acceptable answer to the question, try, "In the mirror". It's a silly question.

A