I always thought that Bob Dylan was a luckier person than was Stan Rogers.I say the because when Stan did his songs, the presentation was so "good" that it could never be topped. Stan Rogers NAILED IT every time he sang a song pretty much. Dylan, on the other hand, as we all know, had a less easy-to-listen-to voice. Like strong single malt scotch, he is an acquired taste. His renditions were often wonderful and emotional. But they were very rarely "pretty". Such is life. But I'd bet this is one reason why more folks try to sing, and have recorded/covered, Dylan's songs than Rogers songs. Hell, anyone can do 'em better'n Bob !
Art Thieme