McGrath, because Saddam invaded Kuwait "after it understood that US diplomats had given it the green light to do so" Does not mean that the US actually said OK. It means that Saddam THOUGHT that's what they said. Or so he says.
And " Its use of poison gas was colluded in by the then US government."
You of course have documentary evidence to back this statement up?
Bobert: " If Saddam has nuclear weapons that can't be delivered than we have a problem, 'cept he don't. Bush even knows he don't."
Please provide hard evidence to back up this statement.
If you have such hard evidence, (not some newspaper article or radio report thank you) why not publish it here and now and save the world a lot of grief.
If the situation is more one of you hope and pray Saddam doesn't have nukes, then say that.
You are a lawyer.
You know the difference between hearsay and eyewitness evidence. Why not apply the same rules to your writings on the Forum as you would to a brief?

troll