Not to beat a dead horse, but Doug, you are being very unfair and difficult about this.

Nicole was apparently damned if she did, damned if she didn't. What sort of "facts" is she expected to provide beyond the reporting of a number of respected journalistic venues? I realize journalism isn't what it used to be in Ed Murrow's day, but neither should the research and investigations of reporters for these news outlets be dismissed simply because you enjoy characterizing al of the press as "liberal." (I teach media studies and it has been my conclusion more and more recently that nothing could be further from the truth, especially given the corporate ownership of most major news outlets).

Comparing Rush Limbaugh to CNN? Please. And last time I checked the Washington Post was considered a fairly conservative paper...so where's the bias now?