It's a bit difficult to know which to reply to: "Sky is falling" or "Tempest."

I guess I'll stick to the subject of the thread though.

Wolfgang: Thanks for posting the update. No new evidence that the story is true, is the most interesting point in the update to me. The balance is intended, I believe, to justify them printing a story they had not completely researched. They probably know that there is an audience for such alarming tales whether or not they are true anyway. This time they just got caught at it. Otherwise they would not have gone to such lengths to try to explain why they went with the story.

If the offended "Party" wanted to preserve his privacy, and not be interviewed by the mainstream press, why did he submit the story to 2600 in the first place?

DougR

DougR