McGrath, that is one stupid argument to try and put forward. Of those "over 17,000 posts" you cite, what percentage do you suppose are members with no cookies? Guests who sign their names at the bottom of their posts?

But if you really want to know how specious of an argument you are making, try clicking on catspaw's name, and you'll find he has all the anon guests combined beat.

17,914 posts.

You are so passive aggressive about the anon guest thing McGrath. It really is your Mudcat Achilles heel. Makes you look like an idiot, going on and on saying "ignore the people I'm telling you again and again and again to ignore".

It's your choice to look the fool, of course.