Well, guys, I have thought this over for a good part of this lifetime at the very least, and the answer is that the question is profoundly flawed. When you pose a question so deeply flawed as this one, it opens you up to infinite regressions, chasing ne'e'r-do-wells and wills-o'-the-whisp in the belief that you are finding answers. But the simple fact is that the semantics in the question are malformed, do not map to the territory, and lead to no conclusion of the answering sort.

A