The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #56371   Message #881117
Posted By: GUEST
03-Feb-03 - 02:55 AM
Thread Name: BS: Is 'conspiracy GUEST redundant?
Subject: RE: BS: Is 'conspiracy GUEST redundant?
Something I've tried to research but haven't had much luck with is this:

I heard the same air traffic controller that was on duty when the Egypt Air 990 went down (and they said the co-pilot went nuts and ran it into the sea)...the same controller was on-duty in New York state on Sept. 11, and two of the hijacked aircraft passed directly over his station...crisscrossed...on the way to their targets.

If this is so, he could have taken over remote control at that time. The Egypt air crash...the family of the co pilot is still adamant that he wasn't depressed or a religious fanatic, etc., like the final report made him out to be. So an over-ride of the controls could have been the reason for the crash.

And if you look at the second plane hitting the WTC, it is exceeding it's structural capabilities. Banking too fast and traveling too fast. From what I've read, that plane cannot exceed 1.5 g's...unless it's computer system has been tampered with. And estimates are that, as it made a frantic bank to hit the tower, it was breaking apart at 5 g's.

So, were the planes remote controlled? A couple days after Sept. 11, GWBush blathered about how they could take off and fly a 747 by remote, and his handlers got him away from the mics.

Anyway, that air controller was on duty in a town in New York on Sept. 11, and some people say the Egypt Air flight was just a warm up. And on Sept. 11, the Arabs got on the plane without the proper expertise, and a pro took over the remote controls.

I really would like help on finding the guy's name and whereabouts on both dates. The piece of interview I heard...the reporter was adamant about it.