Old Guy;
if you really think an attack upon Iraq is not going to result in massive civilian casualties, you're even more naive than I thought before. But everytime I read your responses I see more and more the disingenuous and vague retorts of the right wing apologist.

It's not "war protestors" making things up out of thin air. The understanding that an attack upon Iraq would result in loss of civilian life is based upn the huge loss of civilian life which took lace during the Gulf War in the early 90s. Why would this be any different? Are you saying the U.S. military at that time declared they WOULD kill civilians needlessly, and now they're saying they WON'T? I am pretty sure you can't mean that. You have a lop-sided and fantasy-based understanding of our recent history. Placing your faith in "homeland security" seems foolhardy to me. Those jack-booted thugs stand for everything BUT security in my book.

heil Hitler,
Peg