> Why SHOULD he make a good cowboy, or anything else?

I'm not saying GWB *should* make a good cowboy. I'm just trying to correct the popular misperception that the Iraq invasion is an example of "cowboy diplomacy". According to Gene Autry and Roy Rogers, cowboys wouldn't do what we're doing in Iraq right now.

Maybe "outlaw diplomacy" or "gunslinger diplomacy" or "Wild West diplomacy" is more accurate.

Just a thought...