If CarolC stated opinions without links to sources, wouldn't you be crapping on her for that? Dismissing provision of sources as a "link throwing match" is, to me, a concession that you are not interested in data -- damn the facts, full speed ahead. I've not been around here too long, but occasionally, when I've posted a link, I'll be damned if CarolC hasn't actually read it and commented! Not sayin' my links are particularly important, but it seems that she's reading what other people are throwing, so she's got the right to be doing some throwing herself.

Oh, what the hell am I saying...seen one vase, seen 'em all. Curse you CarolC for exchanging information! You must be one of those educated blue stocking women who've been spoiled for your real purpose by book learnin'. Please keep your opinions to yourself - this is a discussion forum fer chrissakes. And please, no more references..it's just too damn pointy-headed scholarly.