Hey, remember, the country worked pretty good without the amendment. We're not talking about revoking the Bill of Rights here. On the other hand, two for life has worked pretty well too and I don't really see a big difference between two consecutive and two for life. Clinton says it probably wouldn't apply to him, but only because it could never go through in time. What he's really thinking is he's the only Dem with a hope in Hades of beating Bush in 2004!