BS: BBC v. Jeremy Clarkson.

Subject: RE: BS: BBC v. Jeremy Clarkson.
From: GUEST
Date: 11 Mar 15 - 05:29 AM

off shore (correct spelling)

Subject: RE: BS: BBC v. Jeremy Clarkson.
From: OldNicKilby
Date: 11 Mar 15 - 05:27 AM

Richard is correct. An overpaid Pubic School (correct spelling) twonk He is not worth £14,500,000 a year paid of-shore to avoid the tax

Subject: RE: BS: BBC v. Jeremy Clarkson.
From: Musket
Date: 11 Mar 15 - 05:24 AM

The usua suspect managed to slip Stephen Fry in for no apparent reason, (till you read his usual homophobic bile.)

I wonder if Mudcat has franchised to Hello magazine or other supermarket checkout gossip magazines.

I love watching Top Gear. I am saddened to see that the series looks like being axed.

Anything other than that, including a suspected solicitor on this thread accusing him of an unnamed crime that merits a prison sentence...

Have some on here ever thought of sending their CV to The Daily M*il?

Pathetic.

Subject: RE: BS: BBC v. Jeremy Clarkson.
From: GUEST,Dave the Gnome
Date: 11 Mar 15 - 04:38 AM

So, if you buy a newspaper, listen to the news on the radio or watch it on the television, then you're an idiot?

No, Ed. How did you derive that? I said if you take notice. In plain English, if you let the media influence or manipulate you. They all have their own agenda. Everything they say should be taken with a very large ladle of salt.

Subject: RE: BS: BBC v. Jeremy Clarkson.
From: Big Al Whittle
Date: 11 Mar 15 - 04:32 AM

lets hope he pisses off to Latvia.

Subject: RE: BS: BBC v. Jeremy Clarkson.
From: GUEST,Ed
Date: 11 Mar 15 - 04:31 AM

Dave says anyone who takes notice of what anyone in the media tells them is much more of an idiot

So, if you buy a newspaper, listen to the news on the radio or watch it on the television, then you're an idiot?

An opinion, I suppose. But a fairly odd one...

Subject: RE: BS: BBC v. Jeremy Clarkson.
From: GUEST
Date: 11 Mar 15 - 04:30 AM

Except that marmite isn't racist.

Subject: RE: BS: BBC v. Jeremy Clarkson.
From: GUEST,Shimrod
Date: 11 Mar 15 - 04:18 AM

Jeremy Clarkson is a VERY naughty boy!

... and no more harmful than that ...

Subject: RE: BS: BBC v. Jeremy Clarkson.
From: akenaton
Date: 11 Mar 15 - 04:17 AM

As they say gurney, he's a bit like marmite.

Subject: RE: BS: BBC v. Jeremy Clarkson.
From: MGM·Lion
Date: 11 Mar 15 - 04:15 AM

Ake may not care for Stephen Fry; but I can's see what he has to do with the topic of this thread. Opportunist irrelevant random attacks on a personality one happens to find inimical are scarcely cricket in Cat terms, IMO.

≈M≈

Subject: RE: BS: BBC v. Jeremy Clarkson.
From: Gurney
Date: 11 Mar 15 - 04:12 AM

Hmm. I always thought Mudcat people would have a sense of humour. Obviously another case where I'm wrong.

And I thought the principles of free speech means that you are free to speak. Well, Richard and Akenaton, there are now more than 220,000 (as they manage to get on the petition) people who don't agree with you. Must all be wrong, eh?
Would have been more, but the site seemed to crashing/overloading often.
Latvia, Pakistan, The Netherlands, Belgium, Russia, India.....

It is the comments that are most interesting, and the places they are coming in from. Do have a look.

Subject: RE: BS: BBC v. Jeremy Clarkson.
From: GUEST,Dave the Gnome
Date: 11 Mar 15 - 04:04 AM

Even though I can see, and agree with, a lot of the criticisms of Mr C I still find him entertaining. I will not be signing any petitions, particularly if he did use violence, but it looks once again that he has been tried, found guilty and executed by the internet prior to the facts being known. I am probably completely wrong but I see him as the same sort of harmless idiot as Prince Philip and anyone who takes notice of what anyone in the media tells them is much more of an idiot than either.

Subject: RE: BS: BBC v. Jeremy Clarkson.
From: akenaton
Date: 11 Mar 15 - 03:44 AM

A typical Public Schoolboy showing his contempt for the "plebs"
The guy has no conception of the principle of free speech, simply likes to shock just for the sake of it.....and to raise his "profile" of course.

He and that other waste of space Steven Fry, are "bookends"

Subject: RE: BS: BBC v. Jeremy Clarkson.
From: Richard Bridge
Date: 11 Mar 15 - 03:32 AM

The man is a nasty bully and should be locked up.

Subject: RE: BS: BBC v. Jeremy Clarkson.
From: Gurney
Date: 11 Mar 15 - 02:57 AM

Best entertainment online tonight. www.change.org

Subject: RE: BS: BBC v. Jeremy Clarkson.
From: Gurney
Date: 11 Mar 15 - 02:44 AM

And accelerating.

Subject: RE: BS: BBC v. Jeremy Clarkson.
From: Gurney
Date: 11 Mar 15 - 02:42 AM

Make that 1000 every 15mins.

Subject: BS: BBC v. Jeremy Clarkson.
From: Gurney
Date: 11 Mar 15 - 02:39 AM

It appears that the Beeb have suspended Clarkson. - Again!
The petition to reinstate him currently stands at 165000 votes, running at about 1000 per hour, from most countries in the world.

Most of the votes seem to be in favour of political incorrectness.