Less Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations

Subject: RE: Less Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations
From: GUEST
Date: 22 Dec 05 - 09:21 PM

Montreal is the city in which I grew up. Please keep Shatner where he is. The city didn't do anything to you, did it?

Subject: RE: Less Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations
From: Little Hawk
Date: 22 Dec 05 - 09:22 PM

Now, now! No one can say stuff like that about the Great Shatner on this forum without seriously damaging his credibility, pal. Just watch it.

Subject: RE: Less Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations
From: GUEST,Mr Masculinity
Date: 22 Dec 05 - 09:36 PM

Shatner is a cultural microbe, beneath my contempt. I spit in his general direction. As for you, Martin, you incompetent dim-witted whelk, you pathetic discarded merkin, you nattering incestuous insect, I have no doubts that I would exceed you in any contest of masculine virtues. You cannot even spell the word "masculinity". That settles it. Does your wife know that you play with your stuffed Barney dinosaur when she's out buying your smelly pickled oysters so you won't snivel and whine incessantly?

Subject: RE: Less Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations
From: Peace
Date: 22 Dec 05 - 09:40 PM

Yep. The Marijuana Party.

Subject: RE: Less Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations
From: Lanfranc
Date: 23 Dec 05 - 05:32 AM

Lest we forget from whence he derives his soubriquet Shambles

Personally, I always fancied a Janet Reger Party, but could never get an invite.

Remember: "Sticks and stones can break my bones, but names can never hurt me!"

Alan

Subject: RE: Less Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations
From: The Shambles
Date: 24 Dec 05 - 04:54 AM

You may have missed this editing comment as it was inserted into my post and did not refresh this thread.

Subject: RE: Law prevents carol singing. (England)
From: The Shambles - PM
Date: 21 Dec 05 - 02:07 AM

Can who ever inserted 'England' to this thread's title please remove it?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I won't bother finding out who made the title change, but I can see no good reason for the change to have been made - so I changed it back. I would expect to see a location added to titles of threads about concerts or tours, not for every damn thing.
-Joe Offer-

[the above editing comment was in small brown writing and still being inserted into my post without my permission and against my wishes]

Merry Christmas

Subject: RE: Less Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations
From: John MacKenzie
Date: 24 Dec 05 - 06:10 AM

I hope you're not including everybody in you Merry Christmas, I didn't ask you to wish ME Merry Christmas, by what right do you take upon yourself to wish everybody a Merry Christmas?
Who elected you, this is an egalitarian site, and nobody has any more right than anybody else to wish Mudcatters a Merry Christmas.
I want to be told the names of all those anonymous Mudcatters who have the right to wish ME a Merry Christmas.
Remember this is our site.

Giok


Happy New Year BTW.

Subject: RE: Less Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations
From: Don(Wyziwyg)T
Date: 24 Dec 05 - 08:01 AM

LOLOL

Subject: RE: Less Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations
From: The Shambles
Date: 24 Dec 05 - 03:14 PM

Subject: RE: Law prevents carol singing. (England)
From: The Shambles - PM
Date: 22 Dec 05 - 06:42 AM

Shambles,

Why should the person who added England remove it, as it makes clear the fact that this does not affect the USA, or Canada, or indeed many other countries, including Scotland.

Don T.

I do not say they should. I simply, respectfully and politely asked if they could. If I had thought it to be a good idea to include this in the title - I perhaps would have included it.

As I did not - a simple PM asking why and if I would object to any change being made to my chosen thread title would I think, to have been the polite, respectful, polite and classy way to proceed.

Subject: RE: Less Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations
From: Peace
Date: 24 Dec 05 - 03:21 PM

They let you out again, didn't they!

Subject: RE: Less Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations
From: The Shambles
Date: 24 Dec 05 - 03:30 PM

Peace

Irony lives.

Subject: RE: Less Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations
From: Peace
Date: 24 Dec 05 - 03:33 PM

Yes, it does. A grenade exploded near my leg and now my leg is very irony.

Subject: RE: Less Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations
From: Peace
Date: 24 Dec 05 - 04:02 PM

Hey, BTW, Shambles. If you get arrested for anything over the holiday season, I promise to start a minimum of six threads about Censorship. I wouldn't want you in jail having to fret over that.

Subject: RE: Less Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations
From: The Shambles
Date: 24 Dec 05 - 06:00 PM

Subject: RE: In the UK......? (thread title change complaint)
From: catspaw49 - PM
Date: 27 Aug 05 - 03:46 PM

Screw that! What we really need here is another new prefix. I propose the prefix CBRSS.......Contains Boring Repetitive Shambles Shit. Or maybe we could just put in one of those toxic waste warning signs for any thread the little dude posts to!!!

Spaw

Subject: RE: Less Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations
From: Peace
Date: 24 Dec 05 - 06:04 PM

That about sums it up.

Subject: RE: Less Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations
From: Peace
Date: 24 Dec 05 - 06:09 PM

No, I don't mean that.

Your repetative shit about censorship is a pain in the ass. You made a few racist remarks to a friend of mine on a thread and for that I think you suck. But everything you post isn't such. I just took a cheap shot and I don't think it's right to do that. My apologies for the post above this one. Not for this post however.

Subject: RE: Less Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations
From: The Shambles
Date: 17 Feb 06 - 06:10 PM

I don't think we want to go there, "Peace"/Brucie/Bruce Murdoch. Just resist the temptation to post to the troll threads, and Mudcat will be a much happier place. You are by far the worst compulsive poster I have ever seen. You have posted over fifty messages in the last twenty-four hours, and there are many days when you post far more than that. There are almost 18,000 messages posted under your registration; and that doesn't count all the anonymous messages you post, or the hundreds I've deleted. While most people can say what they have to say in one message, you post ten. And when you get tired of posting under your own name, you post anonymously. You are the only "regular" Mudcatter who posts anonymously with any frequency. It's high time that you stop.
-Joe Offer-

Subject: RE: Less Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations
From: The Shambles
Date: 18 Feb 06 - 06:15 PM

Yes, Bruce, we do allow visitors to drop in and post as Guests. This privilege is supposed to be for visitors, although we do have some people who abuse the privilege. When regular, registered Mudcatters log out and post anonymously, that's outright deception - and the only Mudcatter who does that on a regular basis is Bruce Murdoch. There have been times when I have seen your "Peace" personna post messages arguing with your anonymous personna. It appears that you may even have posted a couple of pro-Nazi messages when the British Nationalists weren't posting enough to keep the argument going.
You have no defense, Mr. Murdoch. You have abused Mudcat and taken advantage of the good will of the Mudcat community, and you are not to be trusted.
-Joe Offer-

Subject: RE: Less Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations
From: The Shambles
Date: 18 Feb 06 - 06:17 PM

Yes, Mr. Murdoch was warned numerous times, over a period of more than a year. Again, the offense is not simply anonymous posting - it is manipulation caused by anonymous posting, often posting anonymously and as "Peace" in the same thread, within minutes. No, Mudcatters do not have a right to post anonymously when they want to cause trouble. Most Mudcatters don't do it - but Mr. Murdoch does it habitually. In doing so, he has betrayed the trust of the Mudcat community.
I resisted the tempatation to "out" Mr. Murdoch's anonymous posts until today, when he started a thread to complain about Mudcat "allowing" Nazi posts - some of which it appears he had posted himself - as "BNP Supportor."
Bruce has had a good reputation in the folk community. I can't understand why he has decided to take advantage of Mudcatters by this sort of manipulative behavior.
-Joe Offer-

Subject: RE: Less Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations
From: The Shambles
Date: 19 Feb 06 - 04:21 AM

For the record, I have already asked Max to make Members-Only posting in the "BS" section, and I think membership should be granted only to those with verifiable e-mail addresses (you register, and then get a password sent back to you). So far, Max hasn't said anything about being ready to make the change.
I don't like the Nazi threads, either, but if you can just resist temptation and not post to the Nazi threads, I can close or delete them quietly....
Making a big public deal of banning them and refuting them and all that, just serves to provoke them.
Yes, we are opposed to racism, and we are opposed to Nazis, and we don't like Martin Gibson when he's a bad boy. Or Tarheel, either.
So, PEACE, Peace.
-Joe Offer-

Subject: RE: Less Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations
From: The Shambles
Date: 14 Mar 06 - 08:26 AM

Subject: RE: BS: Are all bigots male?
From: Big Mick - PM
Date: 26 Feb 06 - 01:41 PM

No, Roger. You are confusing intolerance with bigotry. It is not a male thing, but you knew that when you set the bait in this thread. And intolerance is not always a bad thing, where bigotry is always bad, IMHO. For example: I am very intolerant of your manipulative, whiney, pathetic need to be abused and abusive. I am intolerant of your need to cry, piss and moan that you don't get the respect that you seem to think you deserve in spite of your penchant for disabusing anyone who doesn't agree with you. You give no respect, yet you demand it. In short, I am intolerant of you and wish you would seek counseling and leave this place. All of this does not make me a bigot. It makes me dislike you and all of your posts.

Subject: RE: Less Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations
From: The Shambles
Date: 14 Mar 06 - 08:29 AM

Subject: RE: BS: Proposal for members only posting of BS?
From: Wolfgang - PM
Date: 27 Feb 06 - 03:58 PM

I always wonder that there are still people trying to argue with Shambles as if he was engaging in a real conversation with a point. On the surface it ´may look like it but it is just self serving pompous hollowness.

Catspaw, your insults work with most people, but not at all with Shambles. He needs them, they are his elixir of life, he collects them to show them at later times proudly as a substitute of an argument. If it makes you happy to call him names so be it but you should think of the orgiastic feelings he gets out of each new insult. Do you really want to serve that masochism?

Wolfgang

------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: RE: BS: Proposal for members only posting of BS?
From: Little Hawk - PM
Date: 27 Feb 06 - 04:03 PM

Perfectly expressed, Wolfgang.

Subject: RE: Less Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations
From: John MacKenzie
Date: 14 Mar 06 - 09:12 AM

You really are a nasty piece of work Roger, and you must be the biggest grudge bearer in the world.
Your previous 6 posts are chldish mean spirited and self defeating.
Giok

Subject: RE: Less Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations
From: The Shambles
Date: 14 Mar 06 - 09:17 AM

Subject: RE: Gallery of Mudcat Quotations
From: John 'Giok' MacKenzie - PM
Date: 24 Nov 05 - 04:21 AM

Shambles you are a :-
Self obsessed, self interested, self important, supercilious, pompous priggish, paranoid, prat. Deluded, devoid of humour, dreadfully boring and disgustingly repetetive.
No need to reply.
G.

Subject: RE: Less Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations
From: John MacKenzie
Date: 14 Mar 06 - 09:27 AM

Hee hee, Roger you are so boringly predictable. Thanks for reposting that BTW, I thought I captured you perfectly in that post, so it's nice to see it again.
G.

Subject: RE: Less Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations
From: SINSULL
Date: 14 Mar 06 - 09:40 AM

For the sake of saving bandwidth, I am proposing that Quotes used more than once anywhere on the Forum be numbered. Then, to save time and effort, you can post say #36 and all will nod their heads in agreement or post comments to prove you wrong. Let's try it.

46!

Subject: RE: Less Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations
From: SINSULL
Date: 14 Mar 06 - 09:41 AM

3!
with a 52 to back it up!

Subject: RE: Less Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations
From: SINSULL
Date: 14 Mar 06 - 09:42 AM

17

Subject: RE: Less Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations
From: SINSULL
Date: 14 Mar 06 - 09:43 AM

17
without the unwarranted editing by an anonymous, power hungry clone!

Subject: RE: Less Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations
From: SINSULL
Date: 14 Mar 06 - 09:44 AM

17 17 17 17 17

Subject: RE: Less Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations
From: SINSULL
Date: 14 Mar 06 - 09:44 AM

26 which proves 17

Subject: RE: Less Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations
From: SINSULL
Date: 14 Mar 06 - 09:45 AM

Isn't anyone listening? I am I the only one willing to speak out for what is right and just??????

Subject: RE: Less Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations
From: John MacKenzie
Date: 14 Mar 06 - 10:48 AM

42 is the answer to Space the Universe and everything, except Roger!
G.

Subject: RE: Less Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations
From: SINSULL
Date: 14 Mar 06 - 11:04 AM

42 is a catch-all and means nothing and everything.
17 is a jumoing off point for discussion.

Subject: RE: Less Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations
From: Joe Offer
Date: 14 Mar 06 - 11:32 AM

I've said it one time, and I'll say it again: 48!
So THERE!!
-Joe Offer-

Subject: RE: Less Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations
From: Gervase
Date: 14 Mar 06 - 11:46 AM

Blimey, I missed this thread first (second and third) time around. It's really a place for the Shambles to play with himself, isn't it?
Careful where you sit, and mind you have some Kleenex about your person!

Subject: RE: Less Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations
From: John MacKenzie
Date: 14 Mar 06 - 12:10 PM

Are you accusing him of Onanism?
Giok.

Subject: RE: Less Noteworthy Mudcat Quotations
From: SINSULL
Date: 14 Mar 06 - 12:41 PM

69