BS: mudcat law

Subject: RE: BS: mudcat law
From: CarolC
Date: 29 Oct 01 - 06:10 PM

Well then, Jack the Sailor, thank you very much.

Subject: RE: BS: mudcat law
From: Steve in Idaho
Date: 29 Oct 01 - 08:36 PM

Great thread!! When I've asked a question it has always been answered in good form I think. I know some of the old timers get upset with the fact that, I'll stick to me and not generalize, I don't always look up old threads that pertain to what my interest is. The other side of this coin is the numerous threads I haven't posted because I did look up the old threads.

And now that I know some of the Paltalk names - I have been in the rooms with them - didn't know it at the time. A couple have introduced themselves, which is always nice, so that fleshes out my perspective greatly - Thanks Sir!!

I've come to respect several of you and your abilities. If reposting a request has offended in any way I certainly apologize for that. Sometimes it is simply a matter of time, as someone pointed out earlier, as with a full-time job, a full time horse operation, a full time volunteer position, and on-call activity it just doesn't seem to leave a lot of time after work. The last several weeks have been easier but who knows. Most of my clients are off fighting the war right now. When they come home things will change.

Sorry to be so long winded here - but I wanted to reiterate - I appreciate this place and those who frequent it for the most part. I'd pay dues to be a part of it - and I'm a cheapskate.

Steve

Subject: RE: BS: mudcat law
From: Rt Revd Sir jOhn from Hull
Date: 29 Oct 01 - 08:56 PM

I agree with WYSWYG, just because you dont use any big words it doesent mean you are thick.john

Subject: RE: BS: mudcat law
From: MMario
Date: 29 Oct 01 - 09:07 PM

eating crow

another version

Subject: RE: BS: mudcat law
From: Jon Freeman
Date: 29 Oct 01 - 09:23 PM

Norton, just looking and drifting again toward the Paltalk list. I'm not going to keep updating it but I realise I missed someone who deserves a mention - that is Jim/JAB/Gut Buketteer. He was the one who put us all onto Hearme and started the interest here - seems ages ago but from a Mudcat perspective, that was where it started for many of us.

Jon

Subject: RE: BS: mudcat law
From: GutBucketeer
Date: 29 Oct 01 - 10:20 PM

Thanks Jon for remembering. I've been trying to sing and do more in 3D of late, so I haven't been on Paltalk. But, without Hearme, Paltalk, and the encouragement of Mudcatters,I never would have gotten the courage to actually perform for anyone.

I only planted the seed. You and others tended the garden and made it work.

JAB

Subject: RE: BS: mudcat law
From: Jon Freeman
Date: 29 Oct 01 - 11:04 PM

Still drifting... JAB, that is great. I'd like to think that the Hearme/ Paltalk thing has helped others in that way, whether it be 3d or even just feeling comfortable in on-line sessions. It is a very importnt part of the whole thing.

From my side, and drifiting further - even off folk, I remember a couple - not Mudcatters - that had no idea of live rooms, coming in and suddelnly finding they COULD sing accapella as well as using the karaoke they were used to...

Jon

Subject: RE: BS: mudcat law
From: Steve in Idaho
Date: 30 Oct 01 - 10:20 AM

Jon

Thanks for following up on this - and this thread has drifted a bit - if it weren't for the Mudcat and the folks who first invited me into the Paltalk I'd certainly not be playing a tenth as much as I now am. As far as performing, I do in the rooms and am even considering playing our local coffee house this winter. A FAR stretch for me!

I haven't been in front of an audience since 1975. And I was a backup singer and lead guitar player. Didn't require any up front work so it was fairly safe.

Steve