Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: Peace Date: 20 Feb 05 - 05:14 PM Springs may have been the next-door neighbour, no? |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: Bunnahabhain Date: 20 Feb 05 - 05:24 PM I'd thought of that, but spring sounds like a name for an animal, rather than a person, and I really didn't want to go there... |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: chazkratz Date: 20 Feb 05 - 05:26 PM Seems like you guys have had your eyes shut for the last decade or so: what I find impossible to ignore is what's between a short T-shirt and low cut jeans. What a relief retirement from teaching has been! --seed |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: Liz the Squeak Date: 20 Feb 05 - 05:27 PM Spring is here, Suhpring is here... life is skittles, life is beer..... LTS |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: Cluin Date: 21 Feb 05 - 03:13 AM How do you make 2 lbs of fat look good? Put a nipple on it. |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: GUEST,Mr Red with the Booby Prize Date: 21 Feb 05 - 05:30 AM Front bottoms or bottoms? If there is a mind to look into, the EYES have it. |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: Bunnahabhain Date: 21 Feb 05 - 08:49 AM Cluin, you're wrong... NotHow do you make 2 lbs of fat look good? But How do you make 2 lbs of fat feel good? Put a nipple on it. |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: GUEST,Erectile Date: 21 Feb 05 - 10:14 AM A well formed pair of boobs is a gateway of pleasure |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: GUEST,jealous Date: 21 Feb 05 - 10:15 AM If men had boobs they would be playing with then all day. |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: Layah Date: 21 Feb 05 - 11:31 AM I think two pounds of unattached would neither look nor feel good, even if they had nipples on. There's the important matter of being attached to a woman (a living one at that) covered in skin, all that kind of stuff. I mean otherwise you could acheive that with a few sticks of butter and a nipple. God that sounds disgusting. |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: beadie Date: 21 Feb 05 - 02:30 PM While it is true that "wandering eyes" seems to be a year-round problem to one degree or another, it is made more evident (and problematic) in Spring here in the northern latitudes. Warmer weather and the resulting tendency of folks to don less camoflaging outerwear improve the ogle factor by an enormous amount. The ladies' renewed sense of freedom brought on by the coming of Spring allows us to recall that all of these delightful shapes really are still there, they have only been hidden under parkas and overcoats and cable-knit sweaters for the last three or four months. |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: Layah Date: 21 Feb 05 - 03:06 PM I'd like to hear more about this coming of spring. Back home in California we don't particularly get winter, so spring isn't very noticable. Here in Edinburgh it snowed today (Yay!). Neither of these experiences have given me any indication of what the coming of spring might look like. I always thought winter took place in between Chirstmas and New Years. Here it is the end of February and it still looks like winter to me. |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: Davetnova Date: 21 Feb 05 - 03:21 PM Layah - Look again. Snowdrops are out, crocuses are starting Spring is here! |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: Layah Date: 21 Feb 05 - 03:28 PM Well, I don't specifically recognize any particular types of flowers, but the ones I see now I saw about the second week of January, so I figured they don't count as a sign of spring. Unless spring starts in January? Not that I mind snow, it's the cold without the snow I don't like. I thought it was getting warmer last week, but it did not last. |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: Liz the Squeak Date: 21 Feb 05 - 04:23 PM Winter starts on Dec 21st, Spring starts in March and lasts until 1st May, the first day of summer.. Midsummer is June, autumn is September - December. I've got 10 different flowers blooming in my garden at the moment, including a rose, a snowdrop, the holly, rosemary and periwinkle... so relying on which flower is out to give you a season isn't sensible. LTS |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: GUEST,Peter Woodruff Date: 21 Feb 05 - 04:38 PM Although "fat-bottomed girls make the world go 'round," friday is "Bounce Your Boobies" day on Air America Radio's Randi Rhodes Show. If you see it on radio, you see what you really want to see. Peter |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: Layah Date: 21 Feb 05 - 05:22 PM Haha, I was wondering how long this thread could remain sidetracked. 5 posts, not bad considering people were distracted from boobs and butts with spring discussions. |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: GUEST,Peter Woodruff Date: 21 Feb 05 - 05:32 PM Layah, Did I say anything wrong? I was just responding to this thread. Peter We need to talk |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: Peace Date: 21 Feb 05 - 05:58 PM Ommmmmmmmmmmmmm |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: Peace Date: 21 Feb 05 - 06:00 PM Ummmmmmmmmmmm |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: Layah Date: 21 Feb 05 - 06:00 PM Peter, you didn't say anything wrong. I'm just attempting to be funny, and hopefully not failing too miserably. |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: GUEST Date: 21 Feb 05 - 06:01 PM Ommmmmmmmmmmmmm! |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: Peace Date: 21 Feb 05 - 06:03 PM Yrglsetucrdel |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: Bunnahabhain Date: 21 Feb 05 - 06:32 PM OK, who taught Brucie to make links? None of you are leaving here until the guilty party owns up. Come on, I know it's one of you, and he's been pestering us for weeks with them. You'll be sent to your rooms without dinner until I get an answer.... |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: Peace Date: 21 Feb 05 - 06:34 PM It was GUEST. Seriously. |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: Layah Date: 21 Feb 05 - 06:37 PM GUEST is always causing trouble around here. Whenever anything happens, it's always GUEST's fault. Is he/she really that bad, or just a convenient scapegoat? =) |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: Peace Date: 21 Feb 05 - 06:48 PM Did you say . . . the G word? |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: Layah Date: 21 Feb 05 - 06:55 PM Now your trying to tell me GUEST is a GOAT? |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: GUEST Date: 21 Feb 05 - 07:04 PM Baaaaa! And you tell me what noise a goat makes then! |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: Layah Date: 21 Feb 05 - 07:36 PM "Goats, when content and in good health, are usually quiet creatures of habit...From my own experience, there are four reasons why a goat will make an excessive amount of noise: hunger, thirst, breeding season (or pregnancy) and illness" from http://www.goatworld.com/articles/sickgoat.shtml So which one of those is your problem, GUEST? |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: GUEST,, the literate goat. Date: 21 Feb 05 - 07:50 PM I was upset at brucie publishing that obscene photograph of my significant other! I am available to goatworld as an expert consultant at $100 an hour, and a sack of rutabaga or manglewurtzles... |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: Layah Date: 21 Feb 05 - 08:03 PM Well, if I could speak for goatworld, which I can't, I would hire you except the price is just a bit too steep. The $100 I could deal with, and maybe even the rutabegas, but manglewurzle is just too much for me. Anyway, I hope you weren't that other GUEST asking what sound goats make, because if I found out you're the same goat, there's no way you would get a consulting contract. Don't even know what sound goats make... |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: GUEST,literate, and now irate, goat! Date: 21 Feb 05 - 08:20 PM Of course I know what noise I make. The ignorant guest is clearly a troll, out to cause trouble. I have experience in dealing with trolls, and I have a high bridge. I also have extensive legal training, which although less traditional is also very effective, and rather more prolonged. B.G. Gruff, for Gruff, Ramm and Butt. |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: GUEST,Onlooker Date: 21 Feb 05 - 08:31 PM Why do all your folkie postings end up nearly always with bestiality? |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: GUEST,litigious goat. Date: 21 Feb 05 - 08:38 PM |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: GUEST,litigious goat Date: 21 Feb 05 - 08:38 PM |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: GUEST,litigious goat Date: 21 Feb 05 - 08:45 PM The mere suggestion of bestiality has so angry I need to start three time before I can manage a word! I am a goat, and so the desire to make love to a goat is entirely natural. If you have some difficult accepting this, I suggest you see a qualified professional, or failing that, a sheep. Leave me and my kind alone. |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: GUEST,Peter Woodruff Date: 21 Feb 05 - 11:13 PM This thread has turned ugly! What was once a dicussion of "Boobs and bottoms" has turned into a thread about goatfucking. I object! Peter |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: Peace Date: 22 Feb 05 - 12:10 AM Bunch a bleating heart liberals is wot you are. Mildly erotic, no? |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: Peace Date: 22 Feb 05 - 12:30 AM "but manglewurzle is just too much for me." Sounds as if that would hurt like hell. |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: GUEST,nips Date: 22 Feb 05 - 03:49 AM I like hard long nipples, you cant beat a good suck |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: GUEST Date: 22 Feb 05 - 02:49 PM I love someone and so much that I don't really care about her boobs and bottom. What freedom it is. |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: Liz the Squeak Date: 22 Feb 05 - 04:58 PM Sheep go Baaaa, goats go Maaaa, but only if you don't hold them down. LTS |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: Cluin Date: 22 Feb 05 - 11:52 PM After a while, you notice there's something written on her T-shirt. |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: Folkiedave Date: 23 Feb 05 - 05:15 PM Suddenly it springs. Dave |
Subject: RE: BS: NIPPLES OR SLITS From: Peace Date: 23 Feb 05 - 05:59 PM Decisions again. |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: GUEST,LumpenProle Date: 24 Feb 05 - 10:34 AM Twas on the mound of venus By god you should have seen us. |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: The DeanMeister Date: 24 Feb 05 - 11:13 AM Definitely bums over boobs. But it must be connected to a beguiling smile and twinkly eyes.... |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: GUEST,Lizy Lion Date: 24 Feb 05 - 12:02 PM The only worthwhile woman is between the ages of 25 and 40, measures 36-24-36, sucks like a Hoover and shuts the hell up. |
Subject: RE: BS: Boobs or bottoms From: Liz the Squeak Date: 24 Feb 05 - 12:11 PM Does it have to be 36-24-36 in that order? I *do* have an hourglass figure.. it's just that most of the sand has slipped to the bottom. LTS |