Georgiansilver/Martin Gibson

Subject: RE: Georgiansilver/Martin Gibson
From: Once Famous
Date: 11 Aug 04 - 04:04 PM

Fuck you, Guest.

Subject: RE: Georgiansilver/Martin Gibson
From: Blackcatter
Date: 11 Aug 04 - 05:01 PM

Good god.

someone has wakened the Giant.

Where ya been MG?

Subject: RE: Georgiansilver/Martin Gibson
From: Once Famous
Date: 11 Aug 04 - 05:23 PM

Away fro a week on vacation, then digging out of a big hole recovering from being gone.

Nice to be missed. In reviewing most of the postings, it was getting quite dull (as in John from Dull) here.

I'm baaaaaaaaaack.

Subject: RE: Georgiansilver/Martin Gibson
From: GUEST
Date: 12 Aug 04 - 03:29 AM

And that's where assholes belong - at the back!

Subject: RE: Georgiansilver/Martin Gibson
From: Once Famous
Date: 13 Aug 04 - 12:17 AM

Guest, do you find your prick by cutting hairs until you find one that bleeds?

Subject: RE: Georgiansilver/Martin Gibson
From: GUEST
Date: 13 Aug 04 - 12:48 AM

You seem to be an expert on finding your prick that way, Martin. Maybe you are one. You are definitely a male chauvinist too, as you always assume that others are male.

Subject: RE: Georgiansilver/Martin Gibson
From: Blackcatter
Date: 13 Aug 04 - 01:25 AM

What the hey - it's safe to assume annoying GUESTS are male - Nearly all mass muderers are male. Nearly all rapists are male. Nearly all dictators are male. GUESTS often times all into one of those categories.

Subject: RE: Georgiansilver/Martin Gibson
From: Strollin' Johnny
Date: 13 Aug 04 - 07:10 AM

Nearly all rapists are male? Aren't they ALL male? Women don't have the equipment, at least none of the ones I know do! :0)
SJ

PS - definitely not treating rape as a joke. Just can't see how a woman can commit rape.
SJ

Subject: RE: Georgiansilver/Martin Gibson
From: Wolfgang
Date: 13 Aug 04 - 11:44 AM

SJ,

I don't know your law but I know ours. Before a recent change only women could be victims of a rape. Even then a woman could be guilty of rape even without having touched the woman that was victim of a rape.

That's how it goes (it was a trick question for the really good students): A woman let's say armed with a pistol forces another woman and a man that are not married to each other to have intercourse. Let's say she looks very serious when she threatens to shoot them if they don't do what she wants and the two rather have intercourse than risk being shot.

Then the woman was a victim of a rape, the man also was a victim though in our old law that wasn't called rape. The rapist however was the woman with the gun.

The definition of rapist in most European laws is the one who enforces a penetration and not the one who penetrates. In 99,99 % of all cases both the enforcer and the penetrator were (1) male and (2) identical. But in the tiny rest...

Anyway, women have been guilty of raping a woman in the history of German law, but extremely seldom.

Wolfgang

Subject: RE: Georgiansilver/Martin Gibson
From: Strollin' Johnny
Date: 14 Aug 04 - 02:16 AM

Thanks for the explanation Wolfgang - just goes to show what a strange lot you Germans are! :0) LOL! Only kidding mate!

I'm amazed how much stuff you can learn from Mudcatters.

SJ :0)

Subject: RE: Georgiansilver/Martin Gibson
From: The Fooles Troupe
Date: 14 Aug 04 - 06:24 AM

Technically, a female can, er, well, use an object such as a drink botle on a guy in a forceful manner, and that would be charged as an aggravated assault. What name you want to give it is up to you.

Subject: RE: Georgiansilver/Martin Gibson
From: Strollin' Johnny
Date: 15 Aug 04 - 02:38 AM

Yep Foolestroupe, I'd already thought about that one. I suppose she could do it to anoter woman too. Not nit-picking here, but the name it's given is determined by the law, not by me or any other individual. :0)

I just queried the assertion that MOST rapes are carried out by men - I may lead a very sheltered existence here in my little backwoods corner of darkest Lincolnshire, but I don't recall EVER hearing of a case like the one Wolfgang described, or of one like the one we're discussing now. I've never heard of a case of rape committed (by whatever means) by a female, so I'd postulate that ALL rapes are carried out by men.

Or maybe I've missed something.

Subject: RE: Georgiansilver/Martin Gibson
From: Strollin' Johnny
Date: 15 Aug 04 - 02:41 AM

And BTW I'm absolutely not trivialising the appalling nature of the crime.

Subject: RE: Georgiansilver/Martin Gibson
From: GUEST,Judge Dread
Date: 15 Aug 04 - 08:02 AM

Is true rape really possible by a woman? by inserting false items into a person, in UK anyway, this is aggravated indecent assault.
Rape has to have a penis in use. Therefore if a woman rapes a man his penis would have to be erect. If this is so then surely there would have to be some complicity by the male, as if he were in fear, what would really happen?