 sj |
||
|
||
BS: The BNP conundrum
|
|
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: Richard Bridge Date: 21 Oct 09 - 08:57 AM What's the matter Guest, opposed to the freedom of lawful speech?
Thanks. -Joe Offer, Forum Moderator- |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: Richard Bridge Date: 20 Oct 09 - 03:15 PM Great, anyone got any freeware that will convert xlsb files to, say, xls? |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: Don(Wyziwyg)T Date: 20 Oct 09 - 02:08 PM Jesus Christ Almighty. At last the Meejah has caught on to what we have known for a couple of months. The news today has featured, in EVERY bulletin, the story of the use by the BNP of the Spitfire, and Winston Churchill, to campaign for the Euro seats. They also caught on to the fact that the Spit had a Polish pilot. God, these guys are quick on the uptake, but only when four generals rub their noses in it. If you or I booked into a back street hotel with Mrs Higgins at No. 27, it would be all over the papers in twenty minutes. When they took the oily fat git to task over it, he had the nerve to say that, if Churchill was alive today, he'd be a BNP member. And pigs might fly! (Hopefully the porker that runs the BNP will try, right off Beachy Head, where he can join the other Nazis who crashed there). Don T |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: Gervase Date: 20 Oct 09 - 05:42 AM Oops - a new BNP membership list has appeared here. What a shower. Still only one Mudcat name that I recognise there, dear old BNP "I ain't saying nuffink" George. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: Fred McCormick Date: 20 Oct 09 - 05:11 AM I went to a lecture by Jonathon Porritt, the green activist, last night. A very good lecture it was too. During question time, the necessity of limiting world population came up. Porritt was in favour. After explaining why, he said something along the lines of, "You don't have to be a National Front or BNP nutter to believe that. I say that with some vehemence because the BNP took a quote of mine about population growth and pasted it on their website, saying that Jonathon Porritt agrees with the BNP. "I BLOODY DO NOT!!!" Needless to say he got a vigorous round of applause. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: Richard Bridge Date: 19 Oct 09 - 06:53 PM I note that the BNP has started to smear the two non-white known members of Thursday's "Question Time" panel - one as a "positive discriminee" and the other as a "Black re-writer of history". |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: Peace Date: 19 Oct 09 - 06:48 PM I'm sure the assholes in the KKK have passed that info on already. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: Owen Woodson Date: 19 Oct 09 - 05:04 AM I haven't been able to access Mudcat for a couple of days, so apologies if someone has mentioned this already. However, the Justice Secretary, Peter Hain, is threatening the BBC with legal action if they go ahead with the programme. His grounds for doing so are that the BNP is not a legally constituted party. Richard Bridge. "Beware: new members are not eligible for voting rights for 2 years (and still only get them if awarded) and in the meantime the BNP gets the additional subscriptions." Thanks for pointing that one out, Richard. Griffin has been touting the fact that anyone can stand for leader after five years, as evidence of the BNP's democratic credentials. Looks like you can only attain full membership on Griffin's say so. BTW., do you have any information over what consitutes an "activist" in their eyes ? Unlike any other party I've come across, "activist" is a distinct status within the BNP, and you have to be awarded that status before you can do any work for them. Activists represent about 25% of the membership, by the way. Do they represent some sort of party elite ? Re., the question of non-white people joining the BNP. I have absolutely no doubt that the mekon and his mates will find some ruse to keep them out. Perhaps they'll pull a similar stunt to states in the American deep south, where they were legally obliged to allow black people to vote, under the US constitution. I'm not saying what that ruse was in case it gets back to the enemy. But sad to say, prior to Black civil rights it was very effective. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: jeddy Date: 15 Oct 09 - 10:05 PM ah, that puts a downer on an otherwise cracking plan. just to keep yu updated it is next week that griffin will be on. should they be allowed to go on question time?..i think so, let him show the world just how stupid and rude he can be. take care all jade x x x |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: Richard Bridge Date: 15 Oct 09 - 07:18 PM Beware: new members are not eligible for voting rights for 2 years (and still only get them if awarded) and in the meantime the BNP gets the additional subscriptions. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: Lox Date: 15 Oct 09 - 04:31 PM It probably won't happen, but I can't wait for 100,000 British Nationals of Asian and African origin to sign up and, in the interests of British Nationals everywhere, vote in a whole new set of policies. I wonder what ideas for new policies folks on this site might wish to suggest. My only idea so far is that the elected leader (Nick Griffin) be required to show BNP support annually for Gay Pride by leading the parade in a pink Mankini and leg warmers, surrounded by a crack team of transvestites. He would then be sent on fact finding missions to the slums of Brazil, the Bronx, the shanty towns around johannesburg and the gaza strip where it would be his job to explain to the locals what issues he has spent his life supporting and why. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: Owen Woodson Date: 15 Oct 09 - 08:35 AM Mrs.Duck "BBC news just announced BNP have been instructed by the Equality and Human Rights Authority to open their membership to all regardless of ethnic origin." The BNP's response has been to put it to an EGM. Since they want to stay in business, they will doubtless agree. The question will then arise, what tactics will they adopt in order to continue the ban informally? |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: Mrs.Duck Date: 15 Oct 09 - 08:07 AM BBC news just announced BNP have been instructed by the Equality and Human Rights Authority to open their membership to all regardless of ethnic origin. Could be interesting! |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: Peace Date: 14 Oct 09 - 07:21 PM The BNP is losing support. Keep at it, Richard. Shove a candle up their collective arse and light it. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: Richard Bridge Date: 14 Oct 09 - 03:50 PM Compere? What's that about IQ again? Oh, yes, Fakebook. What's that? 1 million united against the BNP? Nearly 700,000 so far. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: Owen Woodson Date: 14 Oct 09 - 09:51 AM The new edition of the Radio Times has announced that Bonnie Greer will be part of the panel 'fronting Nick Griffin, along with Jack Straw. The other two panellists have not yet been named. BG is an interesting choice, in that she is a feminist, a Black American, and can be decidedly fiesty when she chooses. She is not going to take kindly to Griffin. We may get a few fireworks after all. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: Smokey. Date: 13 Oct 09 - 02:45 PM but when you compere facebook to here, which site has the larger audience ? It really is all about spreading the word. Casting a casual eye around Facebook, I'd say the majority of their users wouldn't know which end of the crayon to use in a polling station. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: Owen Woodson Date: 13 Oct 09 - 05:11 AM "It seems that on average the BNP have the most stupid voters - or at least did in 2001." Sounds like nothing much has changed. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: GUEST,Den Date: 13 Oct 09 - 03:52 AM Maybe Richard, but when you compere facebook to here, which site has the larger audience ? It really is all about spreading the word. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: Richard Bridge Date: 13 Oct 09 - 03:31 AM An article from the Guardian. It contains a link to an abstract of the research paper discussed. It seems that on average the BNP have the most stupid voters - or at least did in 2001. http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/blog/2008/nov/03/greenpolitics-liberaldemocrats |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: Richard Bridge Date: 11 Oct 09 - 07:51 PM Yes, it did occur to me! |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: Don(Wyziwyg)T Date: 11 Oct 09 - 04:00 PM Dead giveaway that! "If you know Nick, add her as a friend" Or is there something about Nasty that we haven't been told, and is that why he surrounds him/herself with thick ear musclemen? It's going to take serious counselling to get rid of the mental image of that in a frock. Don T. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: Richard Bridge Date: 11 Oct 09 - 07:04 AM So long as you knw it's fake, nameless guest. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: Richard Bridge Date: 11 Oct 09 - 07:03 AM 400 again after deletions! |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: Richard Bridge Date: 11 Oct 09 - 06:41 AM Look what I found. A fake Nick Griffin. http://www.facebook.com/inbox/readmessage.php?t=1109113661570#/profile.php?id=1793358901 ROFLMAO |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: Richard Bridge Date: 10 Oct 09 - 03:07 PM 400 |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: Owen Woodson Date: 10 Oct 09 - 11:33 AM Police have reprotedly arrested someone on their way to the EDL demonstration, for carying cocaine and distributing racially aggravated material. Let me guess. He's not a racist, he's not a member of the BNP, the cocaine appeared on him by accident, and the entire pig population has just taken wing and flown. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: Keith A of Hertford Date: 09 Oct 09 - 07:34 AM I did change my mind. I was drawn in to the debate Mr. Happy. Was that worth a post to point out? |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: Mr Happy Date: 09 Oct 09 - 07:20 AM Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: Keith A of Hertford - PM Date: 27 Sep 09 - 07:47 AM So anyone who has any reservations about an unprecedented scale of immigration is "scare mongering scum" and can only have been duped by BNP propaganda. I do not think that I will join this debate. keith. ************** Judging by the number of your posts, your position's hardly credible! |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: Don(Wyziwyg)T Date: 08 Oct 09 - 02:46 PM Done. Times three. Don T |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: Owen Woodson Date: 08 Oct 09 - 09:33 AM Hope Not Hate are sending a letter to the Daily Mirror deploring the fact that the English Defence League plan to demonstrate in Manchester on Saturday. They are asking people to sign it. Youy can read the letter, and add your signature at http://action.hopenothate.org.uk/page/s/together |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: Fred McCormick Date: 08 Oct 09 - 04:16 AM Jeddy, "i am sitting here watching panrama, on bbc news 24. http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00n6x4f/Panorama_Migrants_Go_Home!/shocking video footage." I watched it a couple of nights ago. Horrifying. Who needs the BNP when people in supposedly legitimate authority act and talk like that. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: mandotim Date: 08 Oct 09 - 04:08 AM Thanks Don; it was the 'mandolin' bit that trhrew me! It looks like a Gibson ES335 copy to me! Tim |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: jeddy Date: 07 Oct 09 - 11:51 PM i am sitting here watching panrama, on bbc news 24. http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00n6x4f/Panorama_Migrants_Go_Home!/ shocking video footage. take care all jade x x x x |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: jeddy Date: 07 Oct 09 - 06:36 PM shit!!!! thats really worrying don. surely facebook must do something about that. being cloned is one thing, but them, having and giving your number out are two very different things. i wish you luck my friend. lots of love jade x x x |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: Don(Wyziwyg)T Date: 07 Oct 09 - 06:29 PM Not gone, I'm afraid, Tim. Log in to FB and type Mudcat (not Mudcat Cafe) into the search window. You will see a Mudcat profile with a red mandolin logo. It has 23 fans. Click on the logo and open up view all fans. Hoff Bridge, Don Thompson, Fred McCormick, Wysiwyg Thompson, and one called Norman Smith which has my home phone number plastered across a union jack. Don T. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: Don(Wyziwyg)T Date: 07 Oct 09 - 06:14 PM ""has anything else been said about their policy court case?"" I don't know the length of the adjournment they got, to prepare their case, Jade, but nothing will happen till they re-convene. Don T |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: jeddy Date: 07 Oct 09 - 08:55 AM we know that owen, welcome to the world of being cloned!!! sorry to say folks that not only is the fake mudcat still there, sam hudson has come back. now back to the real BNP. things have been rather quite about them lately, does this worry anyone else? has anything else been said about their policy court case? take care all jade x x x |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: Owen Woodson Date: 07 Oct 09 - 06:44 AM I am most definitely not a member of the BNP! |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: GUEST Date: 07 Oct 09 - 03:58 AM Hi Don; I tried to find the fake Mudcat, but it appears to have gone. Good riddance? Tim |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: Don(Wyziwyg)T Date: 06 Oct 09 - 07:33 PM NOTE TO SELF! Use spellcheck DT |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: Don(Wyziwyg)T Date: 06 Oct 09 - 07:31 PM Fred McCormick, and Owen Woodson, there are BNP profiles using both your names on Facebook. Owen Woodson the BNP member put a friend request to me, and I came within an inch of accepting it, then looked at his profile to find he is a BNP member. If you open Facebook and go to the false Mudcat (the one with the picture of a mandolin), click on the logo, then when you enter the profile select the discussion tab. There you will find all the old suspects from stupid Sam to Loopy Leah, and all the little twits in between. They've put you in there fans folder, and are busy saying how much you are doing for the BNP. They've got me down as doing free gigs for BNP rallies all over the country, just as I am stuck without transport, and waiting for a knee op. You've got to admire that level of bad timing, not to mention the mindblowing stupidity of sending friend requests to a member of "Folk Against Fascism". Don T. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: Fred McCormick Date: 06 Oct 09 - 02:56 PM Okay, so who's been phishing my email? I've just received the following message from the Canadian Pharmacy. "A BNP MEDIA EVENT Copyright © 2009 by BNP Media. All Rights Reserved 2401 W. Big Beaver Rd. Suite 700 Troy, MI 48084 You have received this notice because you are a qualified industry professional who subscribes to a BNP Media product. If you do not wish to receive business-related offers from BNP Media regarding information relevant to your industry, please follow this link to be removed from the list." Turns out they're selling nothing more exciting than viagra at an 80% discount. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: Peace Date: 06 Oct 09 - 01:08 AM If the bloody BNP's parents had used conundrums we wouldn't have that trash around today. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: Azizi Date: 05 Oct 09 - 09:39 AM Owen Woodson, I confess to adding those posts this morning before reading your comment requesting that people not post any more comments about eugenics on this thread. While I believe that eugenics (or whatever present day followers of that pseudo science are calling it) is intricately connected to the subject of the BNP, I'll honor your request and I won't post any additional comments about eugenics on this thread. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: Richard Bridge Date: 05 Oct 09 - 07:58 AM I see Guest Helen B came and went. She is probably the same as the BNP Helen Butcher on Facebook and so is soi-disant BNP. If she thinks that the adoption by the conservatives of a BNP policy (if they are so adopting) makes the BNP respectable or acceptable she is even more barking mad than I thought. If, on the other hand one reframes it, if her input informs us as to the source of conservative theories beliefs and policies, then it serves as a valuable expose. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: Keith A of Hertford Date: 05 Oct 09 - 07:56 AM But he and they don't do eugenics Richard. If you have anything on them, do tell us. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: Richard Bridge Date: 05 Oct 09 - 07:52 AM Oh FFS! The Galton Institute is the Eugenics Society with a new name (like the BNP is the National Front with a new name). Coleman is their leading light. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: Keith A of Hertford Date: 05 Oct 09 - 07:49 AM Er, I did not ask a question about eugenics Richard. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: The BNP conundrum From: Richard Bridge Date: 05 Oct 09 - 07:43 AM Does that answer your question about eugenics, Keith? |