BS: For Fuck's Sake

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: Ed T
Date: 01 Oct 15 - 09:34 AM

""When someone puts an end to something, it doesn't mean that he gave up, it means that thing is not taking him anywhere.""
― Michael Bassey Johnson

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: Raggytash
Date: 01 Oct 15 - 09:26 AM

Your quite correct Backwoodman, but it's like a scab I tell myself not to pick it but still do so. Promise I'll try to stop.

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 01 Oct 15 - 09:01 AM

To quote the technical term, the fucking fuckers fucked...

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: Backwoodsman
Date: 01 Oct 15 - 08:52 AM

He's one of the leaders, but there are others who need to grow the fuck up and stop reacting to the fucking idiot.

For fuck's sake...

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: GUEST,punkfolkrocker
Date: 01 Oct 15 - 08:49 AM

"Raggytash - I would further suggest that all you are trying to do is ferment an argument. "

Being objective - what is an observable and testable 'truth',
is that keith is an obsessive shit stirrer who seems to have a pathological need to 'ferment argument' ad infinitum............

It does seem rather pathetic, a grown 'mature' adult persistently acting like a primary school classroom 'sneak'.

Teacher's goody-two-shoes, provoking other kid's into fights to get them into trouble,
telling tales to get them into trouble,
accusing other kids of being bullies to get them into trouble,
playing the wounded innocent victim if they react and push back,
to get them into trouble...ect.. etc..

I think you should get the drift....



Whatever your 'need' is keith, you should be embarrassed and ashamed for acting like a prissy 6 year old............ 😣

I see more threads ruined and ended by you and your petty childish arguing
than probably any other mudcatter....???

What is a shame, is that on rare occasions you can display insight and wisdom,
and make seriously good points in a debate....

But you are your own worst enemy, constantly acting like a pernicious distracting disruptive twat.....

please have a rethink.

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 01 Oct 15 - 08:00 AM

Guest neatly sums up the attitude that an anonymity allows him to do what he likes with no fear being found out.

Well done Mudcat
(for giving people with no backbone the perfect stage)

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: GUEST
Date: 01 Oct 15 - 07:54 AM

read the thread once again its about you being sensitive caring decent people and the rest of u being a bunch of cunts.

Big Al neatly sums up not only the posts in that thread but the attitude manifested in the majority of that tosser and his mates' posts.

Well done Al.

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 01 Oct 15 - 07:50 AM

No, Sol. I said earlier you couldn't make this shit up :-)

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: GUEST,Sol
Date: 01 Oct 15 - 07:46 AM

Is this thread a stolen script from East Enders or Constipation Street? Just wondered. ;-)

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 01 Oct 15 - 07:46 AM

read the thread once again its about you being sensitive caring decent people and the rest of u being a bunch of cunts.

Seeing as I did not post to the thread in question I have no axe to grind here but, in my opinion, there was a lot of nastiness on the thread. None of it was from Steve so I am not sure what relevance the above comment has. Who should be shoving what up their bums, Al?

But, after all that, BWM, I agree. Your thread, your call. May I suggest you PM one of the mods as I think they may be reluctant to do so considering your earlier remarks on moderation policy.

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: Backwoodsman
Date: 01 Oct 15 - 07:27 AM

There's a group of pages on Facebook called 'Parking Like A Twat In {place name}.
There should be one called 'Behaving Like A Twat On Mudcat'.

FOR FUCK'S SAKE, SOMEONE PLEASE CLOSE THIS THREAD.

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: GUEST,Raggytash
Date: 01 Oct 15 - 07:13 AM

Yes I saw that. I also saw that Steve Shaw at no time made any adverse reference to Spaw which seemed to be the thing that upset Oldude

The references to Spaw initially came from Oldude himself, MGM Lion, Gnu and Oldude again.

Steve's only reference to him is to state he never mentioned him.

If that is what upset Oldude it was not Steve's doing and thus your attack on him is unjustified.

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: Big Al Whittle
Date: 01 Oct 15 - 06:58 AM

read the thread once again its about you being sensitive caring decent people and the rest of u being a bunch of cunts.

one of these days you should forget the mote in other peoples eyes - remove the plank from your own, and the shove it up your bum.

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 01 Oct 15 - 06:57 AM

Rag, I only know what he said.
See my post 30 Sep 15 - 09:02 AM

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: GUEST,Raggytash
Date: 01 Oct 15 - 06:37 AM

Have you spoken to oldude, do you truthfully know the reason he has decided to refrain from posting or are you making assumptions.

I would suggest the latter.

I would further suggest that all you are trying to do is ferment an argument.


Again.

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 01 Oct 15 - 06:29 AM

It was not the discussion that drove Olddude off, but Steve's hectoring belligerent aggression.

I also posted disapprovingly of the child's behaviour, but my style is different.

I raised this issue here only because Steve actually accused me of being "hectoring!"

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 01 Oct 15 - 04:51 AM

god alone knows what you said to produce that reaction.

Not god alone, Al. The many people who read the thread. All you have to do is put 'bugs' in the filter box and change the search to 30 days to see it yourself. In fact, to save you having to do it, here is a link. You will see that all Steve says on 30 Sep 15 at 06:33 PM is true. looks very much to me like someone storming off in a huff because they have no real argument. Sound familiar?

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: Big Al Whittle
Date: 01 Oct 15 - 04:42 AM

same old gang going -not me guv

Old Dude is a loss to this forum.

he was gentle and creative - god alone knows what you said to produce that reaction.   however having been on the end of that noxious abuse, i can imagine.

well done lads.

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: GUEST,Oldude
Date: 01 Oct 15 - 03:56 AM

Would they?

:D

---

This message was posted by Dave the Gnome

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 01 Oct 15 - 03:48 AM

Keith, not just in this thread either, appears to be fixated on his notion that I drove this old-timer away from this board.

Not my notion.
Olddude said it himself.
And it was him. If an imposter started using his name on his thread, he would have noticed and the mods would have deleted the imposter.

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 01 Oct 15 - 02:57 AM

BTW - I read Terry Pratchett's last novel "The Shepherd's Crown" over the last couple of days. I was reminded of a concept that popped up in an earlier book, Pig Boring.

Can't think why it reminded me of something...

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 01 Oct 15 - 02:36 AM

Is that Johnny Rotten?

No! I have only used it 3 times...

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: GUEST,punkfolkrocker
Date: 30 Sep 15 - 07:50 PM

Talking of cranky old codgers...

just watched this:

Piers Morgan chats to John Lydon - aka Johnny Rotten of the Sex Pistols - about his controversial rise to fame
in the band that sent shock waves through the nation.

still available to watch on ITV catchup....

Mr Rotten is just a couple of years older than me... 😜

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: GUEST,punkfolkrocker
Date: 30 Sep 15 - 07:37 PM

iPads or sanity towels...????? 😈

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 30 Sep 15 - 07:23 PM

Hang on. The sane do not use iPads.

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 30 Sep 15 - 07:22 PM

Oi, we're too bloody old to hang in to any notion of sanity,...

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: GUEST,punkfolkrocker
Date: 30 Sep 15 - 06:57 PM

" Keith, not just in this thread either, appears to be fixated on his notion........."



If mudcat is a microcosm / bedlam.....


Keith - The petty nit picking shit stirring vindictive tit for tat bickering behaviour of yourself and some other senior citizens here

really puts me serious fear for my sanity if I ever end up incarcerated in an old folks home... 😱

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 30 Sep 15 - 06:33 PM

I tend to avoid commenting about old killed threads, but let me just say this about the "Bugs!" thread. Along with a good number of other posters, the idea of butterflies being released at a wedding, then chased and stamped on by a child, did not appeal to me, and I said so. I thought that's what discussion forums were for. I've reviewed my posts on that thread and I found they were a mixture of quite gentle demurral, information about butterflies and a touch of whimsy here and there. I did not abuse OldDude, though I can't say the same about his behaviour towards me. No problem there, however. Keith, not just in this thread either, appears to be fixated on his notion that I drove this old-timer away from this board. All I can say to that is that I invite anyone here who's tempted to agree with him to take a good look at that thread, top to bottom. Dan made a pretty bad call in starting that thread, misjudging the likely mood of many members here. Yes, embarrassing. But not terminal, unless he himself decided it needed to be terminal.

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: Bonzo3legs
Date: 30 Sep 15 - 05:00 PM

A lot of USAians aren't wankers!

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: Greg F.
Date: 30 Sep 15 - 04:31 PM

Keith also is in desperate need of a brain. " Just Sayin' "

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: GUEST,punkfolkrocker
Date: 30 Sep 15 - 03:59 PM

Keith needs another more productive hobby... 😜

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: GUEST,Raggytash
Date: 30 Sep 15 - 03:55 PM

Just a correction Olddude posted to the Bugs thread both as a member AND as a Guest. Presuming of course it was the same person posting.

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 30 Sep 15 - 03:55 PM

He posted to that thread as a member until he resigned his membership. There is no question it was him.

Yes there is. I just questioned it. There is no such resignation of membership in place. Log out if you like but your account and all your postings remain in place.

Desperate ploy failed Dave.

No ploy, desperate or otherwise. What ploy do you think it is Keith? Do you have any proof of anything or is this yet another scurrilous claim?
Getting exceedingly tedious now anyway. Think I will call it a day. Accordion practice first, then beer.

Any odds on the thread remaining open until morning in England?

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: Greg F.
Date: 30 Sep 15 - 03:45 PM

And Keith...Stop being ridiculous.

Good luck with that, Steve.

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 30 Sep 15 - 02:52 PM

Like I said, they work in mysterious and occasionally disagreeable ways, but any sense of proportion I still retain tells me that an Internet forum is (a) not my gig, (b) not real life! Well, it's not my real life anyway...

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: Backwoodsman
Date: 30 Sep 15 - 02:21 PM

I can understand all that Steve, but my complaint was about one of them closing a perfectly goo, and good-humoured thread.

But you're right - there's a pub-full of people (including a Musket) waiting for me to join them in musicke and song. Much more fun than trying to understand anonymous Americans here! 👍😎

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 30 Sep 15 - 01:56 PM

Can anyone confirm that Guest,Oldude is the same as member oldude?

He posted to that thread as a member until he resigned his membership.
There is no question it was him.
Desperate ploy failed Dave.

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 30 Sep 15 - 11:44 AM

Backwoodsman, as it see it there are several reasons why moderators will not usually provide explanations for individual deletions. First, there aren't enough of them to keep up with the forum ratbags. Second, they are volunteers, not forum careerists. Third, and most importantly, when they do give their reasons they get drawn into meta-squabbles with those who take umbrage with them and this ends up in exchanges of long PMs as well as a load of pointless back-and-forth on the forum. Life's too short as it is. There's a lot I don't get about the attitude of mods here at times, but I do get that much. I mean, how important is it really if your post gets trashed? I've had tons of mine consigned to the bin but I just shrug and get on with life. Best bet.

And Keith, we've been here before, haven't we. Stop being ridiculous.

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: Ed T
Date: 30 Sep 15 - 11:40 AM

""I'm an 'intelligent' sociopath. I don't have problems with drugs, I don't commit crimes, I don't take pleasure in hurting people, and I don't typically have relationship problems. I do have a complete lack of empathy. But I consider that an advantage, most of the time. Do I know the difference between right and wrong, and do I want to be good? Sure. ... A peaceful and orderly world is a more comfortable world for me to live in. So do I avoid breaking the law because it's 'right'? No, I avoid breaking the law because it makes sense.""
― M.E. Thomas, Confessions of a Sociopath: A Life Spent Hiding in Plain Sight

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: Ed T
Date: 30 Sep 15 - 11:39 AM

""Indifference to me, is the epitome of all evil.""
― Elie Wiesel

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: GUEST,punkfolkrocker
Date: 30 Sep 15 - 10:47 AM

2 or 3 decades from now I'd like mine to be

"Nurse what lovely breasts.. may I feeeeeeelrrrruughh" 😜

[inspired by the death scene in the 1970s BBC series "Casanova" - well inspired me when I was a schoolboy]

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 30 Sep 15 - 10:42 AM

I want my dying words to be "My round I think..." :-D

Copulating Coypus?

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: Donuel
Date: 30 Sep 15 - 10:13 AM

In the scheme of things why take it personally?

If they were your dying words maybe deleting them is evil but dying words are usually "oh crap shit for fuck's sake" or "uggug".

Mods too have delusional self absorbed moments of misinterpretation or the ear of a chronic complainer.

Its not like democracy and the constitution have been hacked and raped to death. That is already the ambition of ego maniacal fascists.

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: GUEST,punkfolkrocker
Date: 30 Sep 15 - 10:00 AM

oh.. and I shouldn't really in view of the sensitive controversial local culls...

but wot the'eck.... buggering badgers....

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: GUEST,punkfolkrocker
Date: 30 Sep 15 - 09:56 AM

oh.. I dropped out of alliteration - that bit was me being serious..

the filthy furry ferile fuckers !!! 😜

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 30 Sep 15 - 09:52 AM

Damn! Forgot to change hands.

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 30 Sep 15 - 09:51 AM

Oralsexing Otters? Masturbating Martins? Pissing Polecats?

filthy depraved bunch of mustelids doesn't alliterate at all. I was disappointed by that one :-)

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: GUEST,punkfolkrocker
Date: 30 Sep 15 - 09:42 AM

Alliteration - fucking ferret.. wanking weasel.. sodomising stoat.. mingemunching mink..

[otters, martens, polecats - if any one else wants to have a go..]

what a filthy depraved bunch of mustelids...

ps.. I bagsy "The Wank Weasels" as a folk band name...

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: Backwoodsman
Date: 30 Sep 15 - 09:37 AM

yeah.....

I like the title of this thread "For Fuck's Sake"

It succinctly denotes raw exasperation with both inconsistent erratic arbitrary modding;
and the selfish narcissistic social inadequates who relentlessly ruin any interesting discussions & threads.......... 😠

Spot on, pfr- you got it!

Subject: RE: BS: For Fuck's Sake
From: GUEST,Raggytash
Date: 30 Sep 15 - 09:36 AM

Beer sounds good Dave. Time of a pint of the black stuff methinks.