BS: Hillary's EMail - again

Subject: RE: BS: Hillary's EMail - again
From: beardedbruce
Date: 01 Nov 16 - 07:48 AM

"Hillary and classified email on her server: over and done with. No prosecutions.

IT'S OVER"

No prosecutions of Nixon in Watergate- So you would agree with a declaration that he was innocent and should take no blame?





The investigation DID NOT find that she had done no wrong. On the contrary, it proved she had violated several laws. If she had been anyone else, she would have been prosecuted and convicted. But the present administration and the DOJ had control- and THEY did not want this to be a "nation of laws". Obviously, the people who agree with the present administration have a different set of standards than those who do not.
The statement issued was that the FBI would NOT PURSUE AN INDICTMENT. We also know that this was due to the meeting between slick willy and the DOJ head. New evidence is certainly admissible and the timing is the fault of the Clintons who withheld it for so long, in violation of court order.


After all, who is it that said "ALL the emails had been provided"?

Subject: RE: BS: Hillary's EMail - again
From: McGrath of Harlow
Date: 01 Nov 16 - 08:10 AM

Why the hell does any of this actually matter? It's like getting all worked up about whether she's paid library fines.

Subject: RE: BS: Hillary's EMail - again
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 01 Nov 16 - 09:04 AM

And don't you just love the double standard! Jeb used a private server in office. Condoleezza and Colin Powell both used private servers to send classified information. Dubya used a private server whilst planning to lie about WMDs - and "lost" 22 million emails.


Well, beardie? 😂

Subject: RE: BS: Hillary's EMail - again
From: Greg F.
Date: 01 Nov 16 - 09:07 AM

Perhaps Beardie an explain it to you, Kevin. He's an expert at throwing violent tantrums over nothing - but then he's only 2 years old.

You should see hin hold his breath till he turns blue!

Subject: RE: BS: Hillary's EMail - again
From: beardedbruce
Date: 01 Nov 16 - 09:27 AM

GregtrF,

I see you attack me and provide no facts as usual.
I have to presume from your support here, and the silence of more responsible liberals, that this is now approved debate practice by the Left.





In the News:

Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson: Clinton presidency 'may well end up in impeachment'

By Andrew Kaczynski, CNN

Updated 9:50 PM ET, Mon October 31, 2016



    "I think unquestionably if [Clinton] takes office she is going to be under criminal investigation," Johnson said.
    "This is Watergate kind of stuff," Johnson said.

(CNN)Libertarian presidential nominee Gary Johnson says he thinks Hillary Clinton could face impeachment over the continued FBI investigation into her private email server if she is elected president.
Johnson made the comment Saturday on KNUS radio in Colorado when asked about FBI Director James Comey's revelation on Friday that the bureau was pursuing an investigation into recently discovered emails belonging to longtime Clinton aide Huma Abedin.

What's next: FBI unlikely to conclude Clinton email review prior to election
"I think unquestionably if [Clinton] takes office she is going to be under criminal investigation, unquestionably this is going to be the nation's agenda for the entire time she is office and it may well end up in impeachment," Johnson said on "The Craig Silverman Show."
"This is Watergate kind of stuff," he continued. "This is really, really deep, real stuff and all you have to say, all you have to recognize is the FBI would not have done this -- this is not political, this is anything but political, because of the fact they dropped this investigation in July, saying, to clear the decks for the election. That was also clearly, I don't even want to call it a political move, as much as a move that would clear up the election, that people would feel like this was not overhanging. Well, now it's overhanging, and it's overhanging for a reason. There's so much smoke in the room that it will never, ever get ventilated over the next four years. Never."
Earlier in the interview Johnson said the FBI's late announcement of the discovery showed the gravity of the situation.
"Let me just point out the obvious: the FBI is not doing this lightly, they recognize just what a bombshell this is, especially having exonerated her in July," Johnson said. "To come back and say this with 11 days to go, knowing that there will be no resolution prior to election, but knowing if they don't release this, knowing how damnable all of this is, this is the horrible situation that the FBI has placed itself in it just points to the gravity of the situation."

Subject: RE: BS: Hillary's EMail - again
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 01 Nov 16 - 09:34 AM

The barking mad quoting the barking mad.

Subject: RE: BS: Hillary's EMail - again
From: McGrath of Harlow
Date: 01 Nov 16 - 09:36 AM

Isn't Johnson the bloke who asked "what is a leppo?" ?

Trivia is trivia whatever fuss gets made about it.

Subject: RE: BS: Hillary's EMail - again
From: Greg F.
Date: 01 Nov 16 - 09:46 AM

Its worse than "trivia" Kevin - folks like Beardie have a pathological need to bash the Clintons with made-up bullshit and fake "sacandals" at every possible opportunity; from Whitewater to Vince Foster to Benghazi and the thousand other idiocies they've come up with over the last quarter-century. Its a fantasy game they play for their own validation and amusement.

(And then they complain that the Clintons are "secretive"......)

Subject: RE: BS: Hillary's EMail - again
From: Greg F.
Date: 01 Nov 16 - 10:01 AM

Hey, Beardie! Never mind your fantasist idiot Johnson.

Educate yourself (aassuming that's remotely possible):

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/31/opinion/no-emailgate-is-not-worse-than-watergate.html

http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/29/politics/bernstein-its-not-watergate/

http://www.rawstory.com/2016/10/totally-absurd-watergate-prosecutor-slams-trump-claim-clinton-emails-are-bigger-than-watergate/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/10/30/trumps-bizarre-claim-that-the-clinton-email-controversy-is-bigger-than-watergate/

Subject: RE: BS: Hillary's EMail - again
From: McGrath of Harlow
Date: 01 Nov 16 - 11:12 AM

Nine days wonder sure enough

But the election is on Nov 8.

Brilliant timing.

Subject: RE: BS: Hillary's EMail - again
From: beardedbruce
Date: 01 Nov 16 - 11:13 AM

So, Stevie and McGrath,

What level of government clearance have you held?



GregtrF,

Sorry, I invoke the SRS rule- none of those posts are acceptable to me as factual.

Subject: RE: BS: Hillary's EMail - again
From: Greg F.
Date: 01 Nov 16 - 12:04 PM

I invoke the SRS rule- none of those posts are acceptable to me as factual.

No surprises there, Beardie - REALITY isn't acceptable to you as factual.

Subject: RE: BS: Hillary's EMail - again
From: beardedbruce
Date: 01 Nov 16 - 12:16 PM

Reality, GregtrF?

Right- like YOU saying that I called someone a "Dirty Ni**er" because someone else said someone was "Black, and a Democrat".

Reality is that YOU are the only one here that reads "Black" as Ni**er"

Subject: RE: BS: Hillary's EMail - again
From: Greg F.
Date: 01 Nov 16 - 12:23 PM

Take your meds, Beardie- you're right on the verge of one of your psychotic episodes. And its not just me that realizes it.

Now, back to reality & the points under discussion:

Nine days wonder indeed, Kevin - but the Republicruds specialize in those & you probably ain't seen nothin' yet with the Trumpists on the loose.

Subject: RE: BS: Hillary's EMail - again
From: beardedbruce
Date: 01 Nov 16 - 12:34 PM

I note you have stopped denying the facts about your lies.

About time you recognized that the documented proof out-weighs your lies.

Subject: RE: BS: Hillary's EMail - again
From: beardedbruce
Date: 01 Nov 16 - 01:48 PM

"Back to Topic A: commentators say Hillary's scandal is the worst since Watergate. Not so. Hillary's mess is far worse than Watergate. RN, the greatest peacemaker in the national history, is alleged to have attempted to obstruct justice one time. No conviction. Just allegations. Hillary and her pals actually destroyed 33,000 emails under federal subpoena, smashed her computers with hammers, used super tools to wipe clean her hard drive, lied about it repeatedly to the FBI — and mysteriously were friends with a lot of witnesses who turned up dead.

RN was a small time parking violator compared with Hillary's Al Capone."

http://spectator.org/thinking-about-hillary-at-the-watergate/

Subject: RE: BS: Hillary's EMail - again
From: Greg F.
Date: 01 Nov 16 - 01:58 PM

I note you have stopped denying the facts about your lies.


No, Bruce, I am simply following the old adage that "He who wrestles with a turd will be beshit".

Now, take tyour meds, and go back and re-read the factual info provided at Date: 01 Nov 16 - 10:01 AM instead of posting far-right-wing assholes' fantasy BS ad nauseum.

Subject: RE: BS: Hillary's EMail - again
From: beardedbruce
Date: 01 Nov 16 - 02:34 PM

So, arguing with you, I am covered in shit- THAT is what you are saying...

You are such a bigoted turd I wonder how even the liberals here can stand it.

You make Trump look like a fine, upstanding person, for all his lies, nastiness. and NY attitude.