BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 31 Mar 17 - 05:45 AM

Plenty of them around here, Keith!

Can you cook? 🐟🐟🐟🍟🍟🍟🍺🍺🍺🍺🍺🍺

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 31 Mar 17 - 05:43 AM

"They could sue you."
No they couldn't - as you know yourself from the fact that you haven't faced charges againt the race hatred laws
We say what we wish on line
I did put up the fact that the term ;slave' appeared in inverted commas made it meaningless
You have yet to respond to the type of slavery Britain puts its name to - doubt if you will
I posted to Teribus's crassness earlier but it didn't make it
Will do later
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 31 Mar 17 - 05:41 AM

So Dave, you were only speaking hypothetically and did not have any actual person in mind.
What a pointless, silly post.

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 31 Mar 17 - 05:36 AM

The recipe is online, Dave, but she gives quantities "for six" that wouldn't feed six sparrows (haven't checked whether sparrows eat smoked haddock...), so I've put my amounts in that produced two generous dollops. I get annoyed by recipes that specify a weight of spuds without telling you whether they mean peeled or unpeeled weight. Also, she says to pour the cream into the cornflour and whisk. That was a lump-laden disaster that forced me to get the electric blender out (more bloody washing up), which is why I said to cream the cornflour first with a drop of milk before stirring in the cream. Also, she said "pouring double cream." That means double cream! I prepared it hours in advance, so all I had to do was whack it in the oven. I like recipes like that, especially if I'm feeding the arriving hordes. Gives me more drinking time!

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 31 Mar 17 - 05:26 AM

Just as we try to bring the discussion back to something sensible you go and spoil it Keith. There are plenty of people who would like to restrict freedom and want to keep people 'in their place'. I am sure they post in many places but why should I do your homework for you? Regardeless of any of that the question still stands.

Who would a sane person chose? Someone who cares about other people or someone who wants to oppress them? Nothing silly about asking that and your response is typical twist things to suit your agenda shit. If you want to practice your linguistic nonsense try someone else and stop bothering me.

DtG

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 31 Mar 17 - 05:15 AM

Jim,
Mor racist newspaper hype -

That was The Independent!
Not a racist paper and they do not do hype.
They could sue you.

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 31 Mar 17 - 05:12 AM

Dave,
Given the choice between someone does care and someone who wants to restrict freedoms for some and opposes anyone bettering themselves I wonder which sane people would chose?

Who are these people who " wants to restrict freedoms for some and opposes anyone bettering themselves "

Where do they post?
Can you quote any of them saying anything so despicable?

Don't be silly Dave. It just shows how little you have to say that you have to make shit up.

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 31 Mar 17 - 05:12 AM

I saw that Mary Berry programme, Steve, as I think I already mentioned. The haddock think looked wonderful. Guess the recipe is online? Must look it up. Mrs loves haddock as well so looks like a winner.

We went a bit left field yesterday with scrambled goose eggs. It was recommended that they are cooked in a bowl over a pan of boiling water so that is what we did. Added some shallots and mushrooms previously sweated in olive oil, some cream and seasoning. Served on plain old white toast. Highly recommended.

:D tG

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Teribus
Date: 31 Mar 17 - 01:35 AM

Raggytash - 30 Mar 17 - 11:50 AM

Try reading what your pal wrote one more time this time paying a bit more attention Raggy.

"The reason that you never saw these common signs was probably because you were too busy looking for Traveller sites to firebomb" - Jim Carroll

The "probably" relates to not seeing signs Raggy, to read it your way the sentence would have read:

"The reason that you never saw these common signs was because you were probably too busy looking for Traveller sites to firebomb."

Some points for clarification Raggy:

1: I have never in my life ever seen any of these signs that your pal Jom says are common throughout mainland UK - Now how is that if they are so common? The example of such a sign that Carroll provides a link to, that Conn Mac Gabhann took such exception to, doesn't state any such thing as "Travellers Not Welcome" as Carroll insists - It doesn't bar or ban "Travellers" at all - which is probably why the CPS took no action in that particular case.

2: I can swear and affirm with total honesty that I have never firebombed, or considered firebombing anything or anybody in my life, and people had best be advised that to state in written form that I have had better have solid proof or face the consequences ( See Smith v Williams 2006)

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Teribus
Date: 30 Mar 17 - 11:37 PM

Steve Shaw - 30 Mar 17 - 08:55 PM

Being civil and addressing the issues raised

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Teribus
Date: 30 Mar 17 - 11:32 PM

This sentence - "Why don't you try to be civil, address the issues raised here without your immature agenda and, well, just grow up?" - coming from "chip" munching, cheap wine guzzler Shaw is a bit rich!!

For once Shaw why don't you follow your own advice?

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: bobad
Date: 30 Mar 17 - 09:48 PM

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Jim Carroll - PM
Date: 30 Mar 17 - 08:06 PM

I rest my case.

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: bobad
Date: 30 Mar 17 - 09:04 PM

No balls eh Shaw.

As for Carroll....whoa, the wind is blowing right through those ears.

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 30 Mar 17 - 08:59 PM

Bugger. When I said sprinkle paprika on top, I should have said to sprinkle the rest of the grated cheese on top first.

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 30 Mar 17 - 08:55 PM

I don't give a shit, Jim. These people are minnows. Easy enough to deal with, like Teribus. All bluster and no trousers. And nothing to see without those trousers either, poor things. Anyway, I don't suppose you watched Mary Berry this week? She did a recipe with smoked haddock, cauliflower and spuds that I simply couldn't see working. Then I found a goodly lump of smoked haddock in me freezer that I forgot I had, so I gave it a whirl. It was a magnificent dish.

For two. You need:

Half a pound of spuds, peeled weight, cut into 3/4 inch cubes
A pound of smoked haddock, skinned and boned, cut into big chunks
One cauliflower, not massive, cut into bite-size florets
250ml double cream
A tablespoon of cornflower, creamed with a little bit of milk
Salt and pepper
Half a mugful of chopped parsley with snipped chives
100g grated cheese, cheddar will do though Mary goes for gruyere

Get a big pan and boil the spuds in well-salted water for 7 minutes.
Add the cauliflower and boil for another 5 minutes.
Meanwhile, gradually add the cream to the creamed cornflour and whisk. Avoid lumps. Season.

Drain then chuck the spud/cauliflower mix into a buttered gratin dish or something. Wot you make your lasagne in.

Sprinkle in half the grated cheese.

Add pepper. Salt maybe, but not much if at all.

Layer the haddock pieces on top. Carefully pour the cream into the cracks.

Sprinkle paprika on top

Bake at 180 fan for 25 minurtes.

You are alive again.

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 30 Mar 17 - 08:06 PM

Enough is enough
this is a politically rough and ready forum - that's expected, it comes with the territory and in a way, it can be stimulating.
When people start questioning something as serious as the state of their opponent's mental health is a different ball game altogether.
I don't have a lot of regard of what Bobad has to say - he is not particularly imaginative and tends to just repeat what others put up and confines the rest of his contributions to screeching insults at those who don't agree with him
Ake is a different matter altogether - he has questioned my sanity on half a dozen occasions now, and each time he has disappeared without being prepared to qualify his serious and deeply personal insulting behaviour.
A bridge too far, as far as I'm concerned.
If he had a shred of decency, he would withdraw what he has repeated over and over again, and apologise - or qualify his serious accusations with some examples of my mental problems.
I know, and he knows, that if he made such accusations off-line he would be liable to legal action, and if he behaved to anybody face to face he would run the serious risk of a smack in the mouth - nobody in their right mind accuses somebody of having mental problems unless they are qualified to make such an accusation.
He has already had one thread closed of late for his obsessive hatred of homosexuals and it seems that unfair that he is allowed to close another.
He won't apologise of course, nor will he withdraw his statements - he doesn't do that sort of thing.
Nor will he answer any of the arguments on any of the subjects he involves himself in - he doesn't do that sort of thing either.
If he or Bobad ever wade in the gutter with such personal insults again I will ask that they be expelled from this forum - as serious as some of us take these subjects, that is not what debating should be about.
I can put up with Bobad's mindless shrieking of "antisemite" - nobody other than his small circle of friends takes him seriously, and I suspect they find him an embarresment sometimes, but, as I said Ake is another matter, particularly because he takes himself seriously - spooky or what!!
As I said - enough is enough
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: bobad
Date: 30 Mar 17 - 07:38 PM

Just try me......sucker!

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 30 Mar 17 - 07:31 PM

No you haven't, and you know damn well that those of us who receive PMs are honour-bound not to reveal them in public. Why don't you try to be civil, address the issues raised here without your immature agenda and, well, just grow up? And haven't you bothered to notice that you get no support whatsoever from your allies when you accuse
people of being Jew-haters, when you accuse people of being mentally ill and when you stalk people with your silly three-turd rubbish? Their silence speaks volumes.

Do feel free to respond. For now, that's my lot. You're a waste of space.

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: bobad
Date: 30 Mar 17 - 06:39 PM

I have a PM from one moderator expressing concern about his bad behaviour

As I one of yours Shaw, so fly your flag of self righteousness if you must but I will call your bluff.

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 30 Mar 17 - 05:21 PM

Not only that, Jim - he's a stalker. Count how many times he's followed one of us around in the last few days only to post something akin to 💩💩💩 and nothing else, or to insult, but NEVER to make anything remotely resembling a debating point. Now he's making accusations of mental illness. He's desperate, Jim - and you've no need to guess what will follow this post. I note that he's cut out the childish "three turd" stuff after I accused him of stalking. Coward. Let him get on with it. I have a PM from one moderator expressing concern about his bad behaviour and asking me to draw their attention to his stalking. I haven't acted on it as yet. It would be nice if the mods saw these threads but I doubt that they bother with us. Pity. Bobad's days are probably numbered here. Just keep letting him have the rope. Matter of time.

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: bobad
Date: 30 Mar 17 - 05:17 PM

By your posts ye shall be known. As the modern day immortal bard writ:

"You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows."

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: bobad
Date: 30 Mar 17 - 05:11 PM

You Carroll, and your friend Shaw, can dish it out, ascribing all sorts of lies, distortions and calumnies about others but cry foul when you get back in kind. You are both hypocrites of the highest order and obsessive sickos.

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 30 Mar 17 - 04:53 PM

"He has a pathologic obsession with me. It is a mental illness.
You are one of the gang Bobad - isn't that what you accuse us of?"
If yoiu ccuse me or anybody of mental illness again I shall demand you are removed from this forum
Who the fuck do you think you are - both you and Your homophobic friend
THat level of personal insult makes you the sicko you are
Again - no moderator when you need one
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: bobad
Date: 30 Mar 17 - 03:55 PM

As for you saying that it should get me expelled Shaw...........give me a f*****g break already. How often have you seen someone, even a mod, post that someone is off of their meds. You do know what they are implying, don't you. If you think anyone should be expelled I can give you a list of who is most deserving.

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: bobad
Date: 30 Mar 17 - 03:46 PM

Read his recent posts Shaw, Carroll inserting me into them even though I have not made a single comment on the topic. He has a pathologic obsession with me. It is a mental illness.

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 30 Mar 17 - 03:38 PM

""Police rescue three male 'slaves' from traveller sites "
Mor racist newspaper hype - though the er, comes in inverted commas
Go look up an account of the dcharges and tell me how many times the term slave appears
Utterly meaningless newspaper hype and you know it - and racist to suggest otherwise.
These are the crimes of fout criminals - the fact that they are Travellers is immaterial

IS THIS AN EXAMPLE OF SETTLED SLAVERY

OR THIS?

https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2010/aug/30/migrant-workers-modern-day-slavery
Domestic
http://www.thenews.coop/98851/news/co-operatives/worker-co-op-sheds-light-britains-legal-slaves/
We fill our shops with goods made by workers working in comparable or worse conditions

SUCH AS THESE

OR THESE
OR EVEN WORSE
We are still a nation that thrives on slavery and people like you whine when people from these countries come to Britain to escape the conditions you help create
"Jim's posts in the last few months have become more irrational than usual.....disturbingly so."
And yours become more and more cowardly
I put up backing to what I say
When asked to substantiate your statements you do a rummer
I ask now - substantiate your accusation and let's see what happens
Spineless troll - let's see how fast you run from this one
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 30 Mar 17 - 02:46 PM

Yes, I guess from that side of the fence caring about people and wanting equality for all may seem deranged. Given the choice between someone does care and someone who wants to restrict freedoms for some and opposes anyone bettering themselves I wonder which sane people would chose?

DtG

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: akenaton
Date: 30 Mar 17 - 02:18 PM

Jim's posts in the last few months have become more irrational than usual.....disturbingly so.

Every post contains the same pejorative expressions and charges for which he has no evidential validation.

His latest outrage against Teribus of perhaps being capable of firebombing travellers camps, is fairly typical of a deranged personality.

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 30 Mar 17 - 02:13 PM

"Police rescue three male 'slaves' from traveller sites "


I am sure you will notice that the word 'slaves' is in quotes. I suggest you ask ake about quotes. They mean that the word between them is not necessarily being used in the standard way.

DtG

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 30 Mar 17 - 01:34 PM

I think that accusing someone of mental illness on an internet forum should get you expelled. The accuser is generally not a doctor, and, even if he is, he is not the doctor of the person he's accusing of being mentally ill. It's a shabby and immature tactic which marks you out as a loser.

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 30 Mar 17 - 01:33 PM

Jim,
iIt is inaccurate - none of the four were convicted of keeping slabves - or did I maiss something

Yes you certainly did Jim!
The Independent
Headline, "Police rescue three male 'slaves' from traveller sites "

"Three men have been rescued after apparently being forced to live in squalid conditions and work for little or no pay in a new case of alleged slavery on travellers' sites."

"Detectives are investigating possible links to Irish traveller groups on sites elsewhere in the UK, where vulnerable men from Britain and abroad are said to have been kept enslaved in the face of threats of violence."

"The arrests follow a number of cases involving the forced labour of the vulnerable at traveller camps that have gone to court over the past two years,"

"In the first case of its kind, four people were jailed last year after a raid at Bedfordshire site in 2011 revealed the existence of 23 dirty and emaciated men who were forced to work under fear of extreme violence.
A powerful traveller family made money out of the victims who were addicts they picked up from the streets and soup kitchens and forced to work for little money.
In a separate case, five members of an Irish traveller family were found guilty in December last year of keeping their own private workforce in Gloucestershire, Leicestershire and Nottinghamshire and paying them as little as £5 a day for their work."
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/police-rescue-three-male-slaves-from-traveller-sites-8991784.html

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 30 Mar 17 - 01:30 PM

"Jom, on the subject of the firebombing of Travellers Camps it would appear from the examples I have read about, the culprits are "fellow" feuding Traveller families."
There you7 go again
You should cancel the BNP literature you are reading
Firebombing sites is as old as pouring petol though the letterboxes of Muslims
Feuding among Traveller families, what there is of it, is largely confined to barefist fighting (same as happens in yor pubs around closing time - or on any street or city in Britain after closing time)
Serous feuding is extremely rare and is often related to a shortage of
sites)
It hits the media because it's considered a good way to denigrate a minority - siort ofd like Big Far Gypsy Weddings.
Your obvious hatred of Travellers is obvious and, if it is something you don't indulge in, it encourages those who do.
But please keep your racist stereotyping up - expose you both as bigots it's not a bad way to end the day
You pair really need a site meeting to get your story straight - one minute your not racists - next minute this filth.
Wot Raggy says - I don't lie - especially when I describe you as racists
Keep it coming
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Raggytash
Date: 30 Mar 17 - 11:50 AM

Jim did not claim you were firebombing anyone, he said you were PROBABLY looking for sites to do so.

As someone who is so insistent on accuracy I thought I would point this out to you.

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Teribus
Date: 30 Mar 17 - 11:43 AM

Jim, on the subject of the firebombing of Travellers Camps it would appear from the examples I have read about, the culprits are "fellow" feuding Traveller families.

Now where is that evidence of me ever having been involved in such an act? Or is this just another Jim Carroll LIE.

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 30 Mar 17 - 11:08 AM

"Mental illness will do that to you."
Mada as I may be, I'm running rings around Laurel and Hardy here
I've dragged them both out of their racist closet, one is saying the other isn't carrying on a campaign against Travellers while the other is saying that he is.
Now I've managed to drag out another two trolls from under their bridges, you the antisemite and Ake the homophobic racist Trumpeter - to try and get them out of the hole they've managed to dig for themselves
Not a bad days work really
You want to add anything here, like all Travellers have got enormous penises and lust after our women
That's the level of argument at present
G'arn - make my day!!
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: bobad
Date: 30 Mar 17 - 10:00 AM

Please excuse his lunatic ravings, he's just having another bad day. Mental illness will do that to you.

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 30 Mar 17 - 09:36 AM

"Carroll is odd his meds again - have some pity."
Full house!!
Perfect
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: bobad
Date: 30 Mar 17 - 09:28 AM

Carroll is odd his meds again - have some pity.

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 30 Mar 17 - 09:12 AM

"It is true of some, and not racist to say so."
iIt is inaccurate - none of the four were convicted of keeping slabves - or did I maiss something
It is racist to use the actions of four criminals to smear an entire community - as you well know, having had that pointed out to you over your Muslim claims
T=eribus did just that and you defended him for doing it - making you both racist scum
It hasn't taken too long to move from "I didn't see the signs so they can't be common and are an invention of "Mudcat's liar, Carroll" to branding Travellers as criminals because of the actions of four criminals, has it?
This is what it has been about from the beginning - you should have said so instead of wasting so much time and effort over several threads.
I really am enjoying this now
Carry on Keith
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Teribus
Date: 30 Mar 17 - 09:03 AM

Hi there Jim, care to fill in some of the gaps?

When was it that I have ever tried to fire bomb anything again? Lead such a busy and eventful life I must have forgotten. As you stated the following - "The reason that you never saw these common signs was probably because you were too busy looking for Traveller sites to firebomb." - You had best have proof of that Jimbo, as throwing those sorts of unfounded accusations about can get one into trouble these days. Oddly enough though I do recall why I have never seen any of those signs you keep wittering on about. It is because, counter to what you claim, they are NOT really all that common at all, in fact if they exist at all they are extremely rare.

By the way Jim, can you tell me the significance of a drawing, sketch, cartoon or painting in which a mouse, or a rat, with a knot tied in its tail appears?

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 30 Mar 17 - 08:02 AM

Jim,
you racism that te Traveller communitry are slave owners

It is true of some, and not racist to say so. They have been massively over-Represented in recent convictions for slavery.

To blame an entire community for the crimes of a tiny handful of criminals is racist

It is but no-ne has.

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 30 Mar 17 - 07:31 AM

"Travellers in Scotland are not a "race", "
THey may have not been designated a race yet, but DMA tests in Britain have found them to be a genetically identifiable group going back at least a thousand years - the British establishment have yet to get their heads around that fact
Ironically, Travellers living around British cities have been residents in their territory for centuries longer than the newcomer commuters who spend time and energy trying to drive them out.
Ireland has an appalling record of treatment of Travelers, but a couple of months ago it took the first tottering steps to rectifying it by officially announcing in Parliament that Travellers were an ethnic minority
Their lifestyle is not "chosen" (another racist misnomer) - it is one Travellers have been born into for many centuries.
Up to relatively recently, Travellers have been an accepted and essential part of rural life - 'modernisation' has left them in limbo.
They no longer have a protection afforded to them by the Caravan and camping laws which were repealed in 1994 by John Major, they are constantly being moved off unused sites, attempts to make their own sites, like Dale Farm are met with prejudice and hostility, and many Travellers who attempt to settle have been driven out by people who don't want than as neighbours
The woerfully inadequate (in every way) Traveller homes all little more than walled ghettos
Basically, most travellers are deprived of electricity, clean water, sanitation and the right to educate themselves or their children.
Their life expectancy is considerably shorter than that of the settled community.
Nice to have you here Ake - all we need now is Bobad for a full house
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: akenaton
Date: 30 Mar 17 - 07:11 AM

The blame of course lies in the application of "Special status" to any minority grouping, not to the majority of travellers who in general behave reasonably well.

Just one of the negative effects of "liberalism".

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 30 Mar 17 - 07:04 AM

Thanks for confirming you racism that te Traveller communitry are slave owners and people and Keith was lying when he claimed you were being "iroonical" - all I needed to confirm the motivation for your argments about Travellers here.
To blame an entire community for the crimes of a tiny handful of criminals is racist and to suggest that they kenew what was going on is totally without basis - and no court or no newspaper or media commentator has ever made such an accusation.
To suggest that a priest who has dedicated his life to help Travellers should find something better to do is racist.
You are a racist scumbag and so is Keith for defending you.
The reason that you never saw these common signs was probably because you were too busy looking for Traveller sites to firebomb - that appears to be the type of people you are.
The four (FOUR) criminals were convicted of illegally detaining workers - not of "slavery" or "people trafficking" - that was the racist spin invented by the gutter press and taken up by racists like yourselves.
Half a million Travellers were exterminated by the Nazis, who used arguments like yours to carry out their mass killings.
You accuse a few of us on this forum of having a "team" - take a look at your own nasty little pack - A pair of openly declared racists with Travellers, Muslims and Irish in their cross-hairs, Ake, who, when he isn't persecuting homosexuals and asylum seekers, is defending Trump the Fascist in the White House, and Bobad, who spends his time hysterically implicating The Jewish People by pinning the crimes of the Israeli regime on them.
All you need is a uniform and an insignia.
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: akenaton
Date: 30 Mar 17 - 07:01 AM

Travellers in Scotland are not a "race", most of them are from the same stock as myself, but are regarded as a "Special group" due to their chosen lifestyle.

The "special status" accorded to these people has resulted in their encampment moving beyond the law, having to be closed under the pretext of refurbishment and the inhabitants moved to social housing in this area.

Families in this encampment were involved in serious crime which I have documented on other threads. The "special status" allowed this activity to continue unhindered and the police were unable to carry out their normal procedures in fear of discrimination charges.

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Teribus
Date: 30 Mar 17 - 06:43 AM

See the "Great Leader" has spoken about his support for a "United Ireland" referendum in Northern Ireland based on Brexit. Good I'm all for it, pity that Jezzer doesn't realise it might not lead anywhere as he appears not to have realised that if the result of that referendum in Northern Ireland was for unification, then there would be a second referendum in the Republic as to whether or not they would accept union with the North and the result of that referendum at the moment would in all probability be NO (The Republic of Ireland at the moment just could not take on the running costs of the North).

While he would appear to be all for such a referendum in Northern Ireland Jezzer is dead set against a second independence referendum for Scotland at the moment, he backs Theresa May in saying that any such referendum should only be held after Brexit has been negotiated. Again I totally agree with him.

BBC coverage of the announcement on triggering Article 50 last night was tremendously "Remoaner" biased particularly in Scotland. I found it incredibly strange that no-one seemed interested in explaining the time lines involved. They were discussing things as though things would happen immediately:

29th March, 2017 Article 50 triggered means that the UK will be out of the EU 18 to 24 months hence - so that takes us to 28th March, 2019 before an Bill could be introduced to grant a second independence referendum for Scotland.

The last one granted took just over two years between the Act and the actual referendum so the earliest a second Scottish Independence Referendum could take place would be the summer of 2021 by which time Scotland would definitely NOT be a member of the EU, Scottish businesses (Less than 1/5th of them) who trade exclusively with Europe would have made what adjustments were required to stay in business or market elsewhere between Spring 2019 and summer 2021, while the remainder of Scottish businesses would have been carrying on as normal trading with the rest of the UK and the rest of the world. The electorate of Scotland would not have to listen to the SNP's ludicrous and fantastic claims of "how life would be" as they all did between 2012 and 2014. The result of a second Scottish Independence referendum in the summer of 2021 would IMHO be a resounding NO to independence, but for arguments sake let us imagine that it was YES.

Scotland would have to create it's own currency, or adopt one over which it would have absolutely no control. The SNP Manifesto position is that they firmly back Scotland joining the EU - That after all is this major change that wee nippy keeps stating is the basis for this new referendum. Fast tracked it would take Scotland somewhere between 5 to 10 years to gain entry and membership of the EU and it would have to adopt the Euro as it's currency. So an independent Scotland would become an EU member sometime in the summer between 2026 or 2031. Immediately on joining Scotland would put 65% of it's businesses at risk and suddenly find itself not independent at all because it would have to comply in all respects with the EU that will exist in 10 to 15 years in the future NOT the EU of today - a great deal can change in 10 to 15 years and such change may well not be for the better.

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Teribus
Date: 30 Mar 17 - 05:58 AM

No "claim" Jim, those named in the article posted were all tried, found guilty, convicted and jailed. The "traveller Sites" they operated from were not solely inhabited by members of this family. You tell me how on a small site with people living on small pitches you would completely miss out on the fact that your next door neighbour kept 22 people locked up in a filthy caravan, or unheated container, without washing or toilet facilities for essential human hygiene. And they reckoned that this had been going on for 20 years at least!!

The only "racists" here are the Travellers who deem themselves to be above the law who think they have a "right" to get away with this sort of shit and yell discrimination whenever criticised.

As for Father Con Mac Gabhann we all know how good Roman Catholic Priests are at looking into transgressions committed by their own and their own flock don't we. Possibly 15,000 vulnerable people in the UK being ruthlessly exploited as slaves and being kept in inhumane conditions is nothing compared to signs in pubs that by all accounts appear to be rarer than "Rocking-horse shit" that might, just might, cause offence. Think as a self-proclaimed humanitarian and committed "socialist" Jim you want your priorities recalibrated.

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 30 Mar 17 - 05:25 AM

"Keeping a low profile and not drawing police attention to yourself also becomes quite essential when you are engaged in human trafficking and slavery too Jim."
"Nothing racist has been said here by anyone."
There you go
One seig heiler describes the Travelling community as human traffickers abd slaveers - the other says it isn't racist to make such a claim
What more can a girl ask for - the start to a perfect day!!
Two racists wiith one stone
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 30 Mar 17 - 04:16 AM

Jim,
You are a pair of racist scumbags

Same old Jim, resorting to vacuous name calling because you have no answer or actual argument to make, except "Bye---eeee"
Nothing racist has been said here by anyone.
None of us who live here have seen a single one of those "common throughout Britain" signs in our lives.

Re Labour Party,
Today is Livingstone's suspension hearing over alleged anti-Semititism.
And,
Telegraph 28 March 2017 • 8:23am
"The Labour party have lost 10,850 members over the last four weeks, official party documents have revealed."

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Teribus
Date: 29 Mar 17 - 10:59 PM

A Tale of Simple Traveller Folk

On reading stuff like this one wonders if the Old Testament didn't have it right. The punishment I'd hand down to these animals (Believe me read the article and you will find that to refer to those arrested as animals actually insults animals) would be a term of 20 years (No Remission) with the condition that they be held together in conditions identical to those they held their captives and that they be worked as ruthlessly and relentlessly as their victims were for absolutely no reward at all. Additionally I would seized all their assets which would go towards compensation payments to their victims.

Very true that the above linked article names only four people, however it details a similar number of sites described as "Traveller Sites" - Every single Traveller living on those sites would have had knowledge of exactly what was going on and as they permitted it to continue (Over a 20 year period at least) they, in my mind are as guilty as those arrested. By NOT acting and doing what they must have known to be RIGHT they make themselves guilty by association.

The estimated number of people in the UK being held and treated in the conditions described number between 12,000 & 15,000. It is an absolute f**kin' disgrace, pity the likes of those such as Traveller's Priest Com Mac Gabhann couldn't tear himself away from searching for pub signs that some might take offence to, to address a real problem!!