Lyrics & Knowledge Personal Pages Record Shop Auction Links Radio & Media Kids Membership Help
The Mudcat Cafehuddy

Post to this Thread - Printer Friendly - Home
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] [54] [55] [56] [57] [58] [59] [60] [61] [62] [63] [64] [65] [66] [67] [68]


BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II

Steve Shaw 25 Jul 17 - 06:34 PM
DMcG 25 Jul 17 - 06:30 PM
Steve Shaw 25 Jul 17 - 06:21 PM
Shakey 25 Jul 17 - 06:10 PM
DMcG 25 Jul 17 - 06:05 PM
Shakey 25 Jul 17 - 05:55 PM
DMcG 25 Jul 17 - 05:49 PM
Shakey 25 Jul 17 - 05:40 PM
Steve Shaw 25 Jul 17 - 05:18 PM
Steve Shaw 25 Jul 17 - 05:08 PM
Dave the Gnome 25 Jul 17 - 05:02 PM
Iains 25 Jul 17 - 02:25 PM
Dave the Gnome 25 Jul 17 - 01:19 PM
Steve Shaw 25 Jul 17 - 11:59 AM
Keith A of Hertford 25 Jul 17 - 11:27 AM
Raggytash 25 Jul 17 - 10:49 AM
Dave the Gnome 25 Jul 17 - 09:57 AM
Greg F. 25 Jul 17 - 09:24 AM
Steve Shaw 25 Jul 17 - 05:21 AM
Dave the Gnome 25 Jul 17 - 05:19 AM
Steve Shaw 25 Jul 17 - 05:05 AM
Dave the Gnome 25 Jul 17 - 04:32 AM
Iains 25 Jul 17 - 04:00 AM
Dave the Gnome 25 Jul 17 - 02:57 AM
Steve Shaw 24 Jul 17 - 09:12 PM
Shakey 24 Jul 17 - 08:48 PM
Shakey 24 Jul 17 - 08:45 PM
Steve Shaw 24 Jul 17 - 08:36 PM
Shakey 24 Jul 17 - 08:26 PM
Shakey 24 Jul 17 - 08:17 PM
Donuel 24 Jul 17 - 08:09 PM
Steve Shaw 24 Jul 17 - 08:03 PM
Shakey 24 Jul 17 - 07:49 PM
Steve Shaw 24 Jul 17 - 07:36 PM
Shakey 24 Jul 17 - 07:23 PM
bobad 24 Jul 17 - 07:14 PM
Raggytash 24 Jul 17 - 06:31 PM
Shakey 24 Jul 17 - 06:17 PM
Steve Shaw 24 Jul 17 - 04:52 PM
Donuel 24 Jul 17 - 04:43 PM
Steve Shaw 24 Jul 17 - 04:34 PM
Dave the Gnome 24 Jul 17 - 02:40 PM
Keith A of Hertford 24 Jul 17 - 01:47 PM
Dave the Gnome 24 Jul 17 - 12:07 PM
Keith A of Hertford 24 Jul 17 - 11:12 AM
Raggytash 24 Jul 17 - 09:55 AM
Dave the Gnome 24 Jul 17 - 08:51 AM
Steve Shaw 24 Jul 17 - 08:37 AM
Steve Shaw 24 Jul 17 - 08:36 AM
Steve Shaw 24 Jul 17 - 08:35 AM
Lyrics & Knowledge Search [Advanced]
DT  Forum
Sort (Forum) by:relevance date
DT Lyrics:






Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 25 Jul 17 - 06:34 PM

Bribe, Shakey? Come off it. You could say that any manifesto commitment by any party that favours one particular sector is a bribe, even if it's intended as a correction for unfairness. Thatcher predicated her whole premiership on bribes, if that's the way you want to look at it. She bribed council house owners with massive discounts. She bribed working people by privatising utilities and selling shares at disgracefully cheap prices. Pensioners, who actually vote, have been bribed for decades. The current rash of populist politics is no more than a set of bribes. If that's the way you want to look at it. Alternatively, you could just accept that it's politics, dear boy, politics.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: DMcG
Date: 25 Jul 17 - 06:30 PM

No point in arguing, but since you have read it you will see he gives a list of ways that are not writing off the debt.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 25 Jul 17 - 06:21 PM

Cheers, DMcG. Always happy to correct myself and to have the correction reinforced!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Shakey
Date: 25 Jul 17 - 06:10 PM

Yes I had already read it.

Now what do you think he meant with "deal with it"? He was basically promising the (ex)students that they wouldn't have to pay it back; it's called a bribe.

It's politics, dear boy, politics


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: DMcG
Date: 25 Jul 17 - 06:05 PM

Yes. Here is a lengthy clip out of the NME interview:

"Yes, there is a block of those that currently have a massive debt, and I'm looking at ways that we could reduce that, ameliorate that, lengthen the period of paying it off, or some other means of reducing that debt burden. I don't have the simple answer for it at this stage – I don't think anybody would expect me to, because this election was called unexpectedly; we had two weeks to prepare all of this – but I'm very well aware of that problem. And I don't see why those that had the historical misfortune to be at university during the £9,000 period should be burdened excessively compared to those that went before or those that come after. I will deal with it."

See? No promise to repay the debt. And a clear admission he didnt have a simple answer at that point. The only promise is to look at it and 'deal with' a lack of balance between those on £9000 a year compared to other years.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Shakey
Date: 25 Jul 17 - 05:55 PM

I think in the NME he said that Labour would deal with the debt problem.

Can you clarify what he meant?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: DMcG
Date: 25 Jul 17 - 05:49 PM

Steve's more recent post is correct. On page 43 it says "Labour will reintroduce maintenance grants for university students, and we will abolish university tuition fees."

It says nothing about debts built up because of past fees. Claims it did are either mistaken or a delibwrate distortion. In particular the NME interview did not claim Labour would cancel those debts.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Shakey
Date: 25 Jul 17 - 05:40 PM

there was no promise apropos of tuition fees in the Labour manifesto. Check it out.

To clarify, there was the promise to abolish tuition fees


Well that's cleared that up


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 25 Jul 17 - 05:18 PM

To clarify, there was the promise to abolish tuition fees but no promise to cancel student debt.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 25 Jul 17 - 05:08 PM

Any improvement on the Standard and the Mail? 😂😂😂

Presumably I don't need a link to remind you that Cameron said that Article 50 would be triggered the day after the referendum. Or that Theresa May said she would not call an election. Grow up, Iains. It's politics, dear boy, politics. By the way, there was no promise apropos of tuition fees in the Labour manifesto. Check it out.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 25 Jul 17 - 05:02 PM

And even with all these stories from the likes of the Daily Heil they still wiped out the Tory majority. I suspect thst is what rankles our pet right wingers on here most of all. :-)

DtG


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Iains
Date: 25 Jul 17 - 02:25 PM

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4728138/Nick-Gibb-says-Corbyn-apologise-student-debt.html

From the Labour manifesto:
The abolition of tuition fees and reintroduction of maintenance grants, at a cost of £11.2bn
(Latest revision 100billion+)
Labour always has been careless with other people's money!

George Osborne's Evening Standard has splashed on Guido's student debt scoop from this morning. Team Corbyn have a new line: that frontbenchers Imran Hussain and Sharon Hodgson were "mistaken" about Labour's policy and shouldn't have said that Jez was planning to wipe out debts. If Corbyn's own top team were mistaken, not sure how voters were meant to understand it.

and the icing on the cake is discredited blair's foundation poll results below.

https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-mail/20170717/281814283912770


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 25 Jul 17 - 01:19 PM

I have said my piece on antisemitism in the Labour party and on Naz Shah, Keith. No need to repeat it. And yes, I do refuse to drawn any further into you little point scoring game.

I am willing to offer a suggestion though. You believe you have won something or another so carry on believing that. I believe that you are barmy so I will carry on believing that. Neither of us are doing anyone any harm. We are both happy. It is a win-win situation and everyone can get on with talking about more interesting things.

:D tG


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 25 Jul 17 - 11:59 AM

Please back up your assertion that many prominent members of the Labour Party have said that the party is "more antisemitic than any other." I want their names and I want the quotes from them clearly to that effect. And I'm expecting many, which is more than several. You are the master of the throwaway remark that assumes that we're all stupid and that you'll get away with it. So, names and quotes, please. It should be a fairly lengthy post, considering that there are so many. According to you.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 25 Jul 17 - 11:27 AM

Dave,
The Labour party is no more antosemitic than any other

That is your opinion, but many promininent members have said that it is. There have been no complaints from Jews in other parties.

I said that Shah was a prat (note not just a prat) but you did not believe that.

I think that making racist comments is worse than being a prat.
You did not say she was anything but a prat, so just a prat to you.

What you refuse to say is if you believe as Jim and Steve do that her remarks were not anti-Semitic and she did not advocate the transportation even though she freely admits she did.

Will you now?
Why not?
Nothing circular or repeated. Entirely new.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Raggytash
Date: 25 Jul 17 - 10:49 AM

I fail to see how posts to this thread prevent other posters enjoying the other threads in the be section. Perhaps you could enlighten us.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 25 Jul 17 - 09:57 AM

Hamster? HAMSTER? Bloody luxury. I used to dream of being a hamster...

:D tG


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Greg F.
Date: 25 Jul 17 - 09:24 AM

Not a Hamster, are ya Dave? ;>)


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 25 Jul 17 - 05:21 AM

Hang on, I'll pass you a snorkel...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 25 Jul 17 - 05:19 AM

I can't hear you, Steve. I am up your a***s apparently. Although how you acquired multiple ones, which one I am up and how I got there is a bit of a mystery.

:D tG


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 25 Jul 17 - 05:05 AM

If you want a shining example of what drives people away, read today's 04.00 am post on this thread. Clearly, the irony has escaped its author. And it not the most abusive of his many abusive posts by a long chalk.

It's also odd that he claims that we have driven people away. After all those years of absence he was atttracted to return to join the fray, as was Shakey. I think we may actually draw people in, Dave. Not necessarily life's greatest desirables...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 25 Jul 17 - 04:32 AM

Another post full of sweetness and light from Inanes. Strange that it follows the unusual 'coincidence' that I highlighted :-) He has neither the knowledge or imagination to create a really good diatribe though.

Hope you are taking note, Keith.

DtG


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Iains
Date: 25 Jul 17 - 04:00 AM

Well wrinkled little gnome we probably don't have a compulsion to post as frequently as you and your odious little mates. Unlike some I am not obsessed by mudcat. I will admit to responding to the ridiculous stances taken by your mob and I take pride in responding to your constant insults and bullying.
   There is a reason few people contribute below the line these days. That reason is you and your little mates insisting you control the content and the direction the dialogue travels. Any counter views are belittled, mocked, bullied, ganged up on.................
Do you get the message gnome? You have a disgusting technique of playing the innocent before popping up and firing-quite the coward are you not? In reality you are so far up shaw's a***s you could have a second career as a suppository.
   When you and you pathetic little mates clean up your act we could have far more interesting debates with much wider participation.
You can hand it out but the least whiff of a response and you all start screeching, normally led by jimmy the ranter who pops up in all sorts of places just to criticise. I wonder how many appeals to the mods you all make between yourselves. The typical response of bullies.
Sad little people really, are you not? and we must not forget greg. A man with a severe medical problem of incessant trumping. Someone should tell him there is a cure for flatulence. According to recent rumours he is so full of shit he requires 2 assholes, this may account for the flatulence I suppose.
Have a nice day


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 25 Jul 17 - 02:57 AM

Iains - No posts between Aug 00 and Apr 16

Shakey - No posts between Sept 05 and Jul 17

Iains - Stops posting on this thread 24-Jul-17 - 06:45 AM

Shakey - Starts posting on this thread 24-Jul-17 - 06:17 PM

Not that I am one for conspiracy theories or anything...

Something about you brings then out of the woodwork Steve :-)

DtG


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 24 Jul 17 - 09:12 PM

Well in a way I suppose that independently-minded people always have a sort of arms-length relationship with anything they decide to join, whether it's the pub session, the bowling club, a trade union or a political party. On the whole, though, you might have thought that the person joining would see at least some good...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Shakey
Date: 24 Jul 17 - 08:48 PM

I did of course count the number of paces to the shed just in case I ever need to dig it up

:-)

Nighty night


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Shakey
Date: 24 Jul 17 - 08:45 PM

Hatchet has been buried and I've even laid a nice piece of turf over it so you can't even tell it's there.

Yes I've had a strange relationship with LP, no I'm not going to go into it now.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 24 Jul 17 - 08:36 PM

I'm a very simple man, Shakey. You told us that you've been a member since 1976 yet you haven't had a single good word to say about it. Forgive me for thinking that your standpoint is distinctly odd. I don't generally play word games and the only tactic I tend to employ is to ask people what they actually mean by what they've said. I invite you to clarify your apparently strange relationship with the Labour Party. If you don't bother, I won't say another word.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Shakey
Date: 24 Jul 17 - 08:26 PM

You used the word hate twice in quick succession when actually I never said it once.

You've just told us that you've been a member of a party you appear to hate for forty years.

Now did you mean this, if you did please quote where I've said I have hated the LP for 40 years.

Or did you mean

You've just told us that you've been a member of a party for forty years you appear to hate

which I think you'll agree has a different meaning. No matter but if this is what you meant then please quote where I simply hate the LP - slightly easier except that I never said that either did I?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Shakey
Date: 24 Jul 17 - 08:17 PM

That's an interesting debating tactic you have Steve, first criticize someone and then ask for their standpoint.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Donuel
Date: 24 Jul 17 - 08:09 PM

Steve thank you, Out of character I stole that joke from Steven Colbert


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 24 Jul 17 - 08:03 PM

You've just told us that you've been a member of a party you appear to hate for forty years. You tell us what you hate but there's not a word about what you've done to change things. Do apprise us.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Shakey
Date: 24 Jul 17 - 07:49 PM

"Or do what you do, stay put and whinge."

You have no idea what I do, I have no idea about you but I'm learning.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 24 Jul 17 - 07:36 PM

Well why are you in it, then? Get out there and bloody well fight to get it changed. Get down to your local branch and meet the grassroots members and give them hell. The Labour Party is not bigger than its grassroots. I've never in my life been a member of anything that there wasn't a lot wrong with. You have a choice. Roll your sleeves up, get involved and change it. Or just get out. Or do what you do, stay put and whinge. The latter is known as the Chuka Umunna syndrome.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Shakey
Date: 24 Jul 17 - 07:23 PM

I remember the '80s, the idiot in Coventry, the idiot in Liverpool. I won't dignify them with names but I understand at least one of them has applied to re-join. Jesus it was a struggle to remove MT & clean up the party and now it has to be done again.

But they won't win in the end 'cause they're wrong :-)


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: bobad
Date: 24 Jul 17 - 07:14 PM

Nice to see an LP member with integrity on the forum, Shakey.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Raggytash
Date: 24 Jul 17 - 06:31 PM

Meanwhile here on the Connemara there have been sessions going in eight of the pubs, three of which are still on-going at 11.30 and will be for a while yet.

The sun has been shining all day, good conversation in the bars, no bitterness no bile ..........

Now which would I prefer to discuss ............ no contest the beauties of this area without doubt.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Shakey
Date: 24 Jul 17 - 06:17 PM

I've been member of the LP since '76, currently it's a cesspit with idiots in charge.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 24 Jul 17 - 04:52 PM

I'm a member of the party, I can spell its name and I'm critical about a lot of what goes on. But I'm not giving the likes of Keith the oxygen he needs to go to town on the party
because he has a one-track mind and he's a bigot. I like your posts, Donuel, but this last one is not your finest hour.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Donuel
Date: 24 Jul 17 - 04:43 PM

Has this ever been about the labor party?

I think you are all blind.
If you are blind you do NOT SEE.

Steve; a NOT SEE
Greg; a NOT SEE
You're all NOT SEES ;^)


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 24 Jul 17 - 04:34 PM

We "comment on the issues" until we're blue in the face. Been there, done it, got ten thousand t-shirts. There comes a time when sane people realise that you are not worth discussing things with. Your mind is fixed from the outset. You think that you're the debating dog's bollocks. You tell people who disagree with you that they lose. It's stupid, Keith. You're on your own. Why don't you ring Naz and ask her to marry you?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 24 Jul 17 - 02:40 PM

I have commeneted on the issues many times. The Labour party is no more antosemitic than any other organisation. I have linked a survey that backs that up but you did not believe that. I said that Shah was a prat (note not just a prat) but you did not believe that. A discusion such as this also calls the contributors to account. I have done that but you did not like it. I wish to calm things down by discussing things far more pleasant than politics. You don't. I refuse to be drawn into circular arguments about things I have already made clear. You, for some reason, want to repeat the same old shite ad infinitum. You want to play by your own rules. I don't. End of.

DtG


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 24 Jul 17 - 01:47 PM

Agree? Not with you.
I do not approve of abuse.

Please tell us if you agree with Steve that Shah did not advocate transporting Jews when she freely admits she did?

Why do you come to this thread when you never comment on the issues, only on the contributors?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 24 Jul 17 - 12:07 PM

Just so long as you agree that all abuse is wrong, the reason for it does not matter. The volume of it does and if you check the ammount emenating from inanes against that emenating from anyone else I think you will be quite alarmed to have him as an ally.

DtG


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 24 Jul 17 - 11:12 AM

Dave, I disapprove of abuse, but Ians' can not be linked to losing a debate as yours can.
Steve, one thing I do have in common with Ians is a contempt for your bullying attempts to dominate this thread as so many others.

That's just a random piece of opinion from The Times, Iains,

No Steve. Corbyn has been criticised widely for changing his stance on student debt.

guardian,
"Jeremy Corbyn denies promising to wipe graduates' student debts
Labour leader said before election he would 'deal with' debts, but now says that was not a commitment to write them off"
https://www.theguardian.com/education/2017/jul/23/jeremy-corbyn-denies-promising-to-wipe-student-debts


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Raggytash
Date: 24 Jul 17 - 09:55 AM

Another great day at the Regatta yesterday, the weather was sublime, barely a cloud in the sky and the sight of Galway Hookers (no naughty comments please) racing down the bay keeled over in the breeze was breath-takingly beautiful.

They are truly fantastic vessels and achieve a very good rate of knots, some of those racing were over 100 years old though you'd not know it to look at them.

In addition there were some Naomhogs a smaller version of the hooker and plenty of currach racing.

A lovely, lovely day.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 24 Jul 17 - 08:51 AM

Good bit of albatross with some abuse thrown in here

Monty Python live at the Hollywood Bowl

:D tG


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 24 Jul 17 - 08:37 AM

...to claim post 3310, The Saddle! Next stop, Liathach at the magic number 3456!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 24 Jul 17 - 08:36 AM

And I am now swooping in....


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 24 Jul 17 - 08:35 AM

Your Mam Tor one was a masterstroke, Dave! Eyam peeved I didn't think of it first!

You have a lot more in common with Iains than you think, Keith. I know how embarrasssing it must be.

That's just a random piece of opinion from The Times, Iains, which comes from the same stable as The Sun. I see that the right wing still haven't learned their lesson from the election campaign that trying to tie albatrosses around Corbyn's neck was the shortcut to losing a Commons majority. They all seemed to fall off, didn't they. Including the one that poor Keith is still trying to reattach with a piece of sellotape.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate
Next Page

 


You must be a member to post in non-music threads. Join here.


You must be a member to post in non-music threads. Join here.



Mudcat time: 25 July 6:48 PM EDT

[ Home ]

All original material is copyright © 1998 by the Mudcat Café Music Foundation, Inc. All photos, music, images, etc. are copyright © by their rightful owners. Every effort is taken to attribute appropriate copyright to images, content, music, etc. We are not a copyright resource.