Lyrics & Knowledge Personal Pages Record Shop Auction Links Radio & Media Kids Membership Help
The Mudcat Cafesonny

Post to this Thread - Printer Friendly - Home
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]


BS: UK nuclear subs

Jim Carroll 20 Feb 17 - 08:37 PM
Jim Carroll 20 Feb 17 - 07:40 PM
Steve Shaw 20 Feb 17 - 06:42 PM
Dave the Gnome 20 Feb 17 - 06:34 PM
Steve Shaw 20 Feb 17 - 06:04 PM
Raggytash 20 Feb 17 - 05:33 PM
Teribus 20 Feb 17 - 04:19 PM
Jim Carroll 20 Feb 17 - 03:53 PM
Raggytash 20 Feb 17 - 03:37 PM
Teribus 20 Feb 17 - 03:37 PM
Jim Carroll 20 Feb 17 - 02:55 PM
Teribus 20 Feb 17 - 02:45 PM
Raggytash 20 Feb 17 - 02:16 PM
Steve Shaw 20 Feb 17 - 02:14 PM
Teribus 20 Feb 17 - 01:57 PM
Jim Carroll 20 Feb 17 - 01:18 PM
Keith A of Hertford 20 Feb 17 - 12:47 PM
Raggytash 20 Feb 17 - 12:26 PM
Keith A of Hertford 20 Feb 17 - 12:14 PM
Jim Carroll 20 Feb 17 - 11:25 AM
Steve Shaw 20 Feb 17 - 10:48 AM
Raggytash 20 Feb 17 - 09:40 AM
Keith A of Hertford 20 Feb 17 - 09:24 AM
Keith A of Hertford 20 Feb 17 - 09:21 AM
Raggytash 20 Feb 17 - 08:47 AM
Jim Carroll 20 Feb 17 - 08:32 AM
Jim Carroll 20 Feb 17 - 08:26 AM
Raggytash 20 Feb 17 - 07:52 AM
Keith A of Hertford 20 Feb 17 - 07:46 AM
Keith A of Hertford 20 Feb 17 - 07:45 AM
Raggytash 20 Feb 17 - 07:40 AM
Keith A of Hertford 20 Feb 17 - 07:36 AM
Keith A of Hertford 20 Feb 17 - 07:29 AM
Jim Carroll 20 Feb 17 - 07:18 AM
Keith A of Hertford 20 Feb 17 - 06:56 AM
Keith A of Hertford 20 Feb 17 - 06:53 AM
Jim Carroll 20 Feb 17 - 04:10 AM
Jim Carroll 20 Feb 17 - 04:02 AM
Teribus 20 Feb 17 - 03:59 AM
Jim Carroll 20 Feb 17 - 03:54 AM
Keith A of Hertford 20 Feb 17 - 03:28 AM
Jim Carroll 19 Feb 17 - 09:43 AM
akenaton 19 Feb 17 - 05:52 AM
Jim Carroll 19 Feb 17 - 04:44 AM
Keith A of Hertford 19 Feb 17 - 04:01 AM
Jim Carroll 19 Feb 17 - 03:40 AM
Teribus 18 Feb 17 - 09:45 PM
Steve Shaw 18 Feb 17 - 05:22 PM
Keith A of Hertford 18 Feb 17 - 03:29 PM
Jim Carroll 18 Feb 17 - 06:56 AM
Lyrics & Knowledge Search [Advanced]
DT  Forum
Sort (Forum) by:relevance date
DT Lyrics:






Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 20 Feb 17 - 08:37 PM

Muslim Paedophelia in context
Jim Carroll
SCALIA COVER-UP
ONE IN THIRTY FIVE BRITISH MEN POTENTIAL PAEDPHILES
BRITAIN'S WORST PAEDOPHILE _ DEVOUT CHRISTIAN
BRISTOL PAEDOPHILES RAPE TODDLERS
MI5 and THATCHER COVERED UP PAEDOPHILIA IN HIGH PLACES
HIGH UP PAEDOPHELIA - 1970s//80s


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 20 Feb 17 - 07:40 PM

"Abduction of children, Rape of children, Torture of children, Sex trafficking of children."
Now an openly ranting racist - no wonder the B.N.P. expelled you for being a risk to their respectability
Jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 20 Feb 17 - 06:42 PM

On the Wheatcroft thing Shaw, the two historical works you were using to support your argument were described by Wheatcroft as being vulgar (That was A.J.P.Taylor's book) and fraudulent (That was Clark's). Personally I couldn't care a toss which was which, what was important was that it helped demolish your case and having done that all Shaw was left with was this petulant, pedantic bleat that has been going on now for years - what a sad b*****d you must be Shaw.

Cheers for the gratuitous insult.

However.

You may not "give a toss" which was which, but your mate Keith clearly did. He stated that "the Guardian" described both authors as "fraudulent," whereas in fact Wheatcroft (not "the Guardian") described Taylor's as rather vulgar and Clark's as largely fraudulent. Even you can't get that quite right, can you? Wheatcroft, note, Teribus, not "the Guardian." Wheatcroft did not describe Taylor's as fraudulent, contrary to what Keith asserted, an assertion which, after all this time, he still won't retract. It's pretty simple, Teribus, and it's staring you in the face, no matter how much you want to close ranks with Keith. Keith's defence of himself in this thread simply doesn't stand up. You pick the rest of us up on our transgressions, no matter how slight, yet you want to give Keith a bye on this blatant piece of dishonesty. And you call US a gang. Wow.

Er, and I didn't "have a case" in that thread, Teribus. Read it again. It's very simple. Keith misquoted from the Guardian. I take the Guardian every day (have done for forty years), I'd read the piece on the 9th that Keith quoted a week later. I suspected a misquote. I checked. I was right. I took him up. He denied it. He was lying. He had every chance to correct himself. He wouldn't. He neither confirmed nor denied any "case" because I didn't have one. All that is lies too. Go on, go back and check. You won't, because you don't "give a toss," in your words. You think that something that was wrong two years ago will somehow be all right today. Lies go away if you wait long enough, eh? You don't "give a toss" who's telling lies as long as it's someone on your side. I dare you. Go through the thing forensically, like you do with me and Jim. You won't like what you find. Though of course you've probably already found it. And just not sayin'. Because you don't "give a toss." For the truth.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 20 Feb 17 - 06:34 PM

Are your "debating" skills not up to countering those facts?


But did you not say elsewhere, Teribus, that this is not a debating forum but a discussion forum? Why is it that, when it suits you, you introduce debating rules but when it goes against that, you state that this is not a debate?

Just wondering.

DtG


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 20 Feb 17 - 06:04 PM


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Raggytash
Date: 20 Feb 17 - 05:33 PM

As you like "research" so much Teri the people and cases I mentioned have been much covered in the national media. Look them up.

Your attempts to sidetrack the main issue here won't work.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Teribus
Date: 20 Feb 17 - 04:19 PM

So let me understand you Raggy, you just state that something is similar, without there being anything to substantiate it, and we, for some reason must be obliged to believe you. Sorry neither discussion or debate works like that. YOU said similar abuse didn't you? As it was you who set the bounds, the least you can do is put some effort into countering the evidence put before you. While you are at it best to remember it was those who conducted the enquiries into the Rotherham, Bristol and Oxford that called attention to the predominance among the perpetrators of their "cultural" background and the reason the abuse went on for as long as it did was due to institutionalised political correctness.

What similarities we are looking for are as follows:

Abduction of children
Rape of children
Torture of children
Sex trafficking of children.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 20 Feb 17 - 03:53 PM

"Quite a list - or is anybody about to deny it ever happened?"
Those tried and convicted for these crimes number in the hundreds - ot of a population of around a million and a half - some implant
In 2015, when these arguments started, there were 6,400 cases of pedophilia up to March,
As less than 100 of those were of Asian origin it must be assumed that the rest where Caucasian, overwhelmingly indigenous - paedophilia in Britain is overwhelmingly a White, Christian crime.
What is it about those statistics that disturbs you?
Jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Raggytash
Date: 20 Feb 17 - 03:37 PM

The important phrase Teri was that the professor BELIEVED that Pakistani males had a culturally implanted tendency to abuse children.

He stated he BELIEVED this was the case, no if's, no but's, no maybe's.

Now correct me if I'm wrong but Jaconelli, Saville, Harris cannot be considered to be Pakistani males.

As for the numbers involved Jaconelli and Saville allegedly ran a ring for decades so who can say how many children, boys and girls were involved.

So unless your contacts are as wide in the Police service as you claim them to be in the Armed Forces you have absolutely no idea how many adults or children were involved.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Teribus
Date: 20 Feb 17 - 03:37 PM

What is it about presented recorded fact that disturbs you Jim? Are your "debating" skills not up to countering those facts?

Rotherham
Aylesbury
Banbury
Bristol
Derby
Halifax
Keighley
Oxford
Peterborough
Rochdale
Telford

Quite a list - or is anybody about to deny it ever happened? That it did not raise questions by those entrust with enquiries into the reasons the problem wasn't dealt with properly.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 20 Feb 17 - 02:55 PM

Not more racist and Islamophobic shite ???
There goes the forum under the jackboot of tese fascists
Is there an overseer in the house?
B.N,P. trolls have no place on this forum
Interesting comparison with the Labour Party thread about gangs though
Keith starts his Nuremberg rant about implants and soon they're all goose-stepping
Can Joe or somebody half decent please bring this Hatefest to a close please?
Jiim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Teribus
Date: 20 Feb 17 - 02:45 PM

Try perspective Raggy.

"white caucasian groups of men who have perpetrated similar abuse."

You did say similar abuse?? didn't you Rags.

Please indicate where any of those you mention groomed girls and pimped them round for years then trafficked them. I know Saville was a prodigious offender but his tally came nowhere near even the Rotherham Abuse Circle of over 1,400 victims.

In his original posts on the subject Keith A gave the statements made by prominent Pakistani and Muslim Leaders who in condemning the abuse mentioned a possible cultural link. Carroll and the rest deliberately ignored that Keith A was quoting the words of others and attributed those statements to Keith himself. A well worn tactic of his that no longer has any traction.

On the Wheatcroft thing Shaw, the two historical works you were using to support your argument were described by Wheatcroft as being vulgar (That was A.J.P.Taylor's book) and fraudulent (That was Clark's). Personally I couldn't care a toss which was which, what was important was that it helped demolish your case and having done that all Shaw was left with was this petulant, pedantic bleat that has been going on now for years - what a sad b*****d you must be Shaw.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Raggytash
Date: 20 Feb 17 - 02:16 PM

Hmm Terikins,

I know you are fond of "research" would you like to conduct the same "research" into white caucasian groups of men who have perpetrated similar abuse.

Perhaps you would find information you didn't like.

Try starting with Peter Jaconelli, Jimmy Saville, Rolf Harris.

Just to give you something to begin with.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 20 Feb 17 - 02:14 PM

Well, Keith, as you repeatedly pontificate to us about quoting things, etc., I'll say it again. You declared that "the Guardian" said that AJP Taylor's book was "fraudulent." Which it didn't. You put it in quotes, Keith. Quotes. Yet it wasn't the Guardian and no-one said his book was fraudulent, nothing like. And you've never retracted that severe terminological inexactitude. So, until you do, it would be sensible for you to desist from lecturing anyone else about their quoting I should think, hmmm? And just look at your reply at 12.14. No retraction, more lies. Tsk. Disreputable.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Teribus
Date: 20 Feb 17 - 01:57 PM

Culturally implanted to abuse what Raggy? Themselves? Children? Women?

If it is the latter then Keith A's beliefs were shared By Napier who saw it at first hand over 160 years ago.

The scale of crimes perpetrated on those young girls in Rotherham at the hands of twenty British-Pakistani males can only be described as horrendous - the Police started out with over 300 suspects. Are you trying to tell us Raggy that a culture that regards women as being chattels is not abusive? But what is even worse was the fact that these men got away with it for so long (1997 to 2013) due to the "institutionalised political correctness" on the part of South Yorkshire Police force and Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council for their handling and covering up of the abuse.

An independent inquiry into child sexual abuse in the town, led by Professor Alexis Jay, was established in 2013 for Rotherham Council. The inquiry's initial report, published on 26 August 2014, condemned the failure of the authorities in Rotherham to act effectively against the abuse or even, in some cases, to acknowledge that it was taking place. The report estimated that 1,400 children had been sexually abused in the town between 1997 and 2013, predominantly by gangs of British-Pakistani men. Abuses described included abduction, rape, torture and sex trafficking of children.

On this horrendous crime on 16 February 2015 Labour Party leader Ed Miliband said that the Labour Party "did let people down in Rotherham, absolutely".

But that wasn't the only instance was it Raggy?

The Aylesbury child sex abuse ring was a group of six men of British Pakistani heritage who committed serious sexual offences against two under-aged girls in the English town of Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire.

The Banbury child sex abuse ring was a group of seven men who committed serious sexual offences against under-aged girls in the English town of Banbury, Oxfordshire. Those convicted - Ahmed Hassan-Sule, Kagiso Manase, Takudzwa Hova, Mohamed Saleh, Said Saleh, Zsolt Szalontai, Shane Bonas.

The Bristol child sex abuse ring was a group of 13 Somali men who committed sexual offences against underage teenage girls in Bristol, in southwestern England. - The gang coerced the girls into sex with small payments of money, gifts of drugs and alcohol, and by persuading them that having sex with many men was part of "Somali 'culture and tradition'

The Derby child sex abuse ring was a group of thirteen men, most of whom were from Pakistani backgrounds who sexually abused up to a hundred girls in Derby, England.

The Halifax child sex abuse ring was a group of 15 British Pakistani men who committed serious sexual offences against two under-aged girls in the English town of Halifax and city of Bradford, West Yorkshire.

The Keighley child sex abuse ring was a group of 12 Muslim men who committed serious sexual offences against two under-aged white girls in the English town of Keighley and city of Bradford, West Yorkshire.

The Oxford child sex abuse ring was a group of seven men who, in May 2013, were convicted of sexual offences including rape, conspiracy to commit rape, arranging or facilitating child prostitution, trafficking for sexual exploitation, and procuring a miscarriage.

"In March 2015, a report revealed that more than 300 people, mostly girls from the city of Oxford, had been groomed and sexually exploited by such gangs in the area. It accused the Thames Valley Police, then led by Chief Constable Sara Thornton, of disbelieving the girls and failing to act on repeated calls for help, and Oxfordshire Social Services of failing to protect them despite compelling evidence they were in danger. The report also called for research into why a significant number of perpetrators of child grooming came from Muslim backgrounds.

Those responsible for perpetrating these crimes: Mohammed Karrar (38) & Bassam Karrar (33) and Akhtar Dogar (32) & Anjum Dogar (31) with three other men: Kamar Jamil, 27, Assad Hussain, 32, and Zeeshan Ahmed, 27. Five were British Pakistani and two, the Karrar brothers, of Eritrean heritage.

The Peterborough sex abuse case involved 10 men of Pakistani, Iraqi Kurdish, Czech and Slovak Roma heritage who committed sexual offences against under-aged girls, some as young as 12, in the English city of Peterborough, Cambridgeshire.

The Rochdale child sex abuse ring involved under-age teenage girls in Rochdale, Greater Manchester, England. Twelve men were convicted of sex trafficking and other offences including rape, trafficking girls for sex and conspiracy to engage in sexual activity with a child, on 8 May 2012. The men were British Pakistanis except for one Afghani which led to discussion on whether the failure to investigate them was linked to the authorities' fear of being accused of racism.

The Telford child sex abuse ring was a group of seven men, mainly British Pakistanis who were found guilty of sexual offences against four teenage girls, aged 13 to 16. The offences occurred between 2007 and 2009 in Telford, England.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 20 Feb 17 - 01:18 PM

"I have no reason to disbelieve all those people."
What people - where are their quotes
If yoyu believe all male Pakistanis are prone to ral[ping children - you are a raving racist - even if Nelson Mandela and Bishop Tutu had sung it as a chorus
Claiming such a thing puts you on par with the Auschwitz executioners - such things gets petrol poured through letter-boxes.
Take your scummy racism off this forum
As Raggy said, THANK YOU FOR CONFIRMING YOUR EXTREME RACISM
Jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 20 Feb 17 - 12:47 PM

I have no reason to disbelieve all those people.
Do you?

It is their opinion and not mine. I know nothing about that culture.

I believe them as I would believe a doctor's diagnosis or a meteorologist's weather forecast.
They are in a position to know. I am not.
It is their opinion, not mine.
I just need a reason not to believe.
What is yours?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Raggytash
Date: 20 Feb 17 - 12:26 PM

Thank you Keith for confirming that you believe Pakistani males are all culturally implanted to abuse.

I really could not have any clearer than your last post.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 20 Feb 17 - 12:14 PM

Rag, I said I believed it, but only because all those Left Wingers were adamant it was the case.
Read the whole post and read it in the context of the previous posts in that thread from six years ago.

You people are so desperate to make this thread about me that you have to go back six years and still come up with nothing!

Steve,
You mean like you did when you declared that "the Guardian" said that AJP Taylor's book was "fraudulent?" Which it didn't?

I had already quoted both the actual words used to rubbish the books, so it was no deception to lump them together when referring to it again.

The FACT is that both books were rubbished.
The FACT is that in rubbishing them he rubbished your case and supported mine.
The FACT is I had no need to misquote. He was on my side and rubbished your case.
You are so desperate to make this thread about me that you have to go back over two years and still come up with nothing!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 20 Feb 17 - 11:25 AM

"If it does, please quote it."
You have been given the blatantly racist poster twice
Is illitracy yet another of your qualities
Your entire response is to ignore facts
Any progress on thoe quotes about imlantes yet?
No?
Then you lied
Jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 20 Feb 17 - 10:48 AM

"Yes, so when claiming someone has said something, you should be able to quote it.
I always do."

You mean like you did when you declared that "the Guardian" said that AJP Taylor's book was "fraudulent?" Which it didn't?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Raggytash
Date: 20 Feb 17 - 09:40 AM

Lets have a look at exactly what you posted;

"Don I do now "believe that all male Pakistani Muslims have a culturally planted tendency"

The first phrase makes it abundantly clear you believe this, no if's, no but's, no maybe's.

"Don I do now"

Quite clear, quite unequivocal.

Kept for prosperity on the Internet for all to see.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 20 Feb 17 - 09:24 AM

Rag,
I think you will find that Jim has quoted with the thread name, posters name, time and date for all to see.

Yes, and if you read it you will see that the suggestion that it was the British Pakistani culture that led to the abuse came not from me but from a number of Left Wing people (though not extreme Left Wing like you and Jim.)
Most were from that culture, and all had close links.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 20 Feb 17 - 09:21 AM

Jim,
Any party who has a racist policy, who attracts Britain;'s lunatic fringe and who settles leadership contests by PUNCH-UPS is a standing joke - certainly not a serious party

I agree, but UKIP does not have a racist policy.
If it does, please quote it.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Raggytash
Date: 20 Feb 17 - 08:47 AM

Jim's Link


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 20 Feb 17 - 08:32 AM

Incidentally - the numerical rise in the Ukip vote mirrors exactly the decline of the BNP
Jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 20 Feb 17 - 08:26 AM

"Jim, your piece on that election was written by a Lib Dem."
It doesn't matter who wrote it, and unless you claim they are lying the figures quoted are official
Ukip's vote may have risen numerically, as has all party's but their share of the vote has steadily declined as the chart shows
The fact that they have lost the only Member of Parliament is indicative of that decline and the fact they have no MPs makes them a super-fringe party on par with the Monster Raving Loony Party
As Ukip was a one-policy Party , since Brexit and the Government's statement that it will act on immigration, it has no reason for existence
Any party who has a racist policy, who attracts Britain;'s lunatic fringe and who settles leadership contests by PUNCH-UPS is a standing joke - certainly not a serious party
Can't blue clickie this one but a nice summing up of Ukip's approach to violence and crime
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/ukip-knowingly-let-violent-criminals-and-racists-stand-for-election-a6866776.html
Jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Raggytash
Date: 20 Feb 17 - 07:52 AM

I think you will find that Jim has quoted with the thread name, posters name, time and date for all to see.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 20 Feb 17 - 07:46 AM

Rag,
One of the "problems" about posting on a forum like Mudcat is that your posts are there for all to see.

Yes, so when claiming someone has said something, you should be able to quote it.
I always do.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 20 Feb 17 - 07:45 AM

"a female Labour MP"

Ann Cryer.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Raggytash
Date: 20 Feb 17 - 07:40 AM

One of the "problems" about posting on a forum like Mudcat is that your posts are there for all to see.

I suspect that some contributors make copies of contentious posts so that if the thread is deleted they still have the reference.

Thus one cannot say at a later date "I did not say that"

It is there for posterity, it is how we will be remembered.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 20 Feb 17 - 07:36 AM

Jim, your piece on that election was written by a Lib Dem.

Here is the BBC on it.

"UKIP leader Nigel Farage hailed "breakthroughs" following a series of gains made by his party during the UK-wide local and assembly elections.
After 113 results out of 124 councils, UKIP has 55 seats so far, a gain of 26.

It won six seats on Thurrock Council and just missed out on being the largest party by a single vote.
Ex-Tory MPs Neil Hamilton and Mark Reckless were among seven gains on the Welsh Assembly, and UKIP came second in two Westminster by-elections.
It was beaten by Labour in Ogmore, in South Wales, and Sheffield Brightside in South Yorkshire.
But it gained two seats on the London Assembly, for David Kurten and mayoral candidate Peter Whittle, from the London-wide top-up list, where it came fourth with 171,069 votes, its best performance in London for some years."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-36219659


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 20 Feb 17 - 07:29 AM

Jim,
You are lying - but you are free to show me wrong by producing one single statement

I do not lie Jim.
I quoted Safique Khan, Lord Ahmed and Yasmin Alinhai-Brown who are all of that culture and Left Wing.
Also Jack Straw and a female Labour MP who both had large communities in their constituencies.

The chart you were given shows that the Ukip vote actually declined in the 1916 election and it has no MPs - it is a friing party whose fringe is shortened
'YR 'TIS AGAIN - A STEADY DECLINE IN THE SHARE OF THE VOTES


No. Not a "steady decline."
Up to that point their vote had been steadily rising, and they actually gained seats in that election anyway.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 20 Feb 17 - 07:18 AM

"came not from me but from a number of Left Wing people"
You are lying - but you are free to show me wrong by producing one single statement - so far you have refused
It doesn't make any difference who said it - it is an extremely racist statement and anybody who believes it is an extreme racist.
Anyway - where are those quotes - no? - then you are a proven extremist.
The chart you were given shows that the Ukip vote actually declined in the 1916 election and it has no MPs - it is a friing party whose fringe is shortened
'YR 'TIS AGAIN - A STEADY DECLINE IN THE SHARE OF THE VOTES
Don't forget those quotes now!!!
Jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 20 Feb 17 - 06:56 AM

Yep It increased from one to no M.P.s in the last election

Yep, its share of the vote increased dramatically and overtook the Lib Dems, making it the third party.
Deny that Jim? Read that Guardian piece I linked to for confirmation that you were wrong again.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 20 Feb 17 - 06:53 AM

Jim, the suggestion that it was the British Pakistani culture that led to the abuse came not from me but from a number of Left Wing people, though not extreme Left Wing like you.
Most were from that culture, and all had close links.

I know nothing about it that culture, but I do know that we are all implanted, to some extent, with our culture.
(I would not use that word but that was how the question was put to me.)

Reporting that Left Wing view hardly makes me an extremist, and I am not.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 20 Feb 17 - 04:10 AM

"About the most idiotic stance I have ever heard."
It's idiotic to claim you don't support a party than break your neck to prove you do.
"You see Jim you can come out with totally unsubstantiated slurs and accusations"
I provide back up to my claims - you refuse to do so
You pontificate and then try to bully your contractions through
Even your claims, when actually lifted from genuine information are edited to disguise their true purpose - as with your latest efforts in Bevin, Attlee and nuclear power
About the most dishonest stance I have ever come across
"I am probably the most A-political person on this forum."
And it shows
Jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 20 Feb 17 - 04:02 AM

Not forgetting
SOMEONE WHO SUPPORTS BRITAIN ABROAD AND IS LOYAL TO FELLOW RIGHT-WINGERS
AND FOREVER ON THE UP AND UP
Maybe it's all this non-support you've been giving them - waddya think??
Jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Teribus
Date: 20 Feb 17 - 03:59 AM

"I have no intentions in entering into a dialogue with someone who is supporting a party he doesn't support - I think that sort of madness might be infectious." - Jim Carroll

About the most idiotic stance I have ever heard. It is also very demonstrative of Jim's greatest failing when it comes to any discussion.

To illustrate this point

Jim Carroll states some point of view on a political party or event. What he states is viewed by someone else as being incorrect and that person responds to Jim's post pointing out the errors and details what they think is the real and factual case. Jim then flies into a rage, accuses whoever of being every sort ".....ist" under the Sun, guilty of every "...ism" imaginable with the added certainty that they must be the most fervent supporter of the party and ideology he is criticising - which of course is "complete and utter" bollocks to use Shaw's expression (Please note the expression of Shaw's that I am referring to is the word "Bollocks" - the "Complete and utter" bollocks is my opinion of Jim Carroll's debating style)

You see Jim you can come out with totally unsubstantiated slurs and accusations aimed at UKIP, or any other party, and I can criticise you for doing so without being a supporter of that party. My motivation for drawing your attention to the errors in your statement being simply to establish what the real facts of the matter are. When it comes to politics on this forum I have very little respect for ANY politician or any political party. I am probably the most A-political person on this forum.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 20 Feb 17 - 03:54 AM

"I do insist I am not an extremist, and await an example of extremism from me."
Anybody who describes all make Pakistanis as being implanted to rape underage women is as extreme as a bag of frogs
Subject: RE: BS: Muslim prejudice
From: Keith A of Hertford - PM
Date: 13 Feb 11 - 07:10 AM
"Don I do now " believe that all male Pakistani Muslims have a culturally implanted tendency" but only because of the testimony of all those knowledgeable people, and always acknowledging that only a tiny minority succumb.
Do you dismiss all that just because it does not fit your preconceptions, or do you have some powerful evidence to the contrary that you have not shared with us?"

As I said - extreme as a bag of frogs
"No it never has. Remind us of this proof."
Just have Keith - don't staryt pretending you haven't been given it again Keith - old trick of yours
"Their vote has steadily increased."
Yep It increased from one to no M.P.s in the last election
A SERIOUS PARTY
A RESPONSIBLE PARTY


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 20 Feb 17 - 03:28 AM

Jim,
Ukip's racism has been debated and proved over and over again

No it never has. Remind us of this proof.
You linked to an article where some people claimed a poster was racist.
The police decided it was not and took no action.

I do insist I am not an extremist, and await an example of extremism from me.

There is no obvious increase in their popularity, no sign that they have made any grounds as a party,

Admit you are wrong about that Jim.
Their vote has steadily increased.
In the general election Ukip came second in 118 of the 650 parliamentary seats.
They had more support than the Lib Dems and half Labour's vote.
"Overall, Ukip secured 12.6% of the vote, an increase of 9.5 percentage points from the 2010 election, the largest of any major party and more than three times the size of the SNP's improvement."
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/may/09/margate-ukip-greens-electoral-reform-farage


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 19 Feb 17 - 09:43 AM

"How on earth can someone who holds such sensible and informative views on folk music, write such drivel on politics?"
Probably the same way somebody who declares himself a "socialist" can express such contempt for the left and everything it stands for.
Why not try answering the points rather than indulging in cowardly stone-throwing from the sidelines.
Feel free to expose my arguments as "drivel" any time you feel up to it - but don't leave it too long - none of us are getting any younger
Jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: akenaton
Date: 19 Feb 17 - 05:52 AM

How on earth can someone who holds such sensible and informative views on folk music, write such drivel on politics?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 19 Feb 17 - 04:44 AM

I have no intentions in entering into a dialogue with someone who is supporting a party he doesn't support - I think that sort of madness might be infectious.
No more dialogues Keith
Ukip's racism has been debated and proved over and over again - his posters, his campaign message, his taking up where Powell and B.N.P. left off - his party's attraction for the racist nutters of society - all old ground.
"Can you give an example of them doing that, "
YES
I won't raise your racist smear about "cultural implants" or Jewish parliamentary 'silence on antisemitim, or Irish children brainwashed to hate Britain" here, but I am happy to do so if you insist your not an extremist.
Petrhaps I won't - as I said, no more dialogues for "love of the party" (or in our case, 'forum@ eh Keith
But as I have said "once stated publicly, forever written in stone".
Jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 19 Feb 17 - 04:01 AM

Jim,
Ukip has always campaigned on a racist ticket - they took up where Powell
and B.N.P. left off


You make the claim but can not back it with a single fact.
Where is your evidence of racism?

By playing on people's Xenophobia, Brexit helped to swing the vote

Can you give an example of them doing that, or is it just another baseless smear?

There is no obvious increase in their popularity, no sign that they have made any grounds as a party,

Yes there is. Their vote has steadily increased.
In the general election Ukip came second in 118 of the 650 parliamentary seats.
They had more support than the Lib Dems and half Labour's vote.
"Overall, Ukip secured 12.6% of the vote, an increase of 9.5 percentage points from the 2010 election, the largest of any major party and more than three times the size of the SNP's improvement."
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/may/09/margate-ukip-greens-electoral-reform-farage

You'll be telling us your not an extremist next

I am not an extremist.
You will find no extreme view in any post of mine, but do try to prove me wrong.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 19 Feb 17 - 03:40 AM

"How little you know or understand Jim.
You must be in a constant state of confusion."
Don'y you start hiding your ignorance behind defensive insults Keith - one ignorant talking-down o-brain is enough and you certainly have no grounds to start
Ukip has always campaigned on a racist ticket - they took up where Powell
and B.N.P. left off
Ukip was an element in winning (funny how reisking the economy and the future of the British people can bed described that way) Brexit.
By playing on people's Xenophobia, Brexit helped to swing the vote - they won nothing.
There is no obvious increase in their popularity, no sign that they have made any grounds as a party, they have no policy beyond their hate stirring
Their antics as an organisation, their attraction for extremist loonies, their public fisticuffs, their inand about turn leadership, the clownish behaviour of their leading figures....... - a serious contender - I don't think so.
Come out from bihnd your insulting bluster and tell us why anybody would support this party you don't support (or claim not to)
They are so electable even you don't have the bottle to admit your support for them, and who can blame you
You've broken your neck trying to prove that a decent political party is antisemitic (and failed miserably) and now you are supporting a party (you don't support!!) that has a history of racism and hate stirring against the most desperately needy members of humanity.
You'll be telling us your not an extremist next
Jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Teribus
Date: 18 Feb 17 - 09:45 PM

Oh dear Shaw a thread where you have run out of steam and cannot resort to meaningless waffle - Otherwise recognised as "Complete and utter" bollocks, to use your expression to divert everybody's attention ( Please note the expression of Shaw's that I am referring to is the word "Bollocks" - the "Complete and utter" bollocks is my opinion of what Steve Shaw normally writes on any question under the Sun).


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 18 Feb 17 - 05:22 PM

Why don't you just evaporate, Keith? The word "tiresome" was invented just for you. Just toddle off and enjoy life.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 18 Feb 17 - 03:29 PM

Jim,
And led Britain out of the EU - that's how principled a party they are - get people to vote for them and destroy the thing they voted for.
People who voted for EU candidates presumeably believed in the EU otherwise they wouldn't have bothered voting.


How little you know or understand Jim.
You must be in a constant state of confusion.
UKIP has ALWAYS campaigned to get us out, and that was how they won the last EU election and the referendum.

But for all the fears stirred up by the establishment the referendum would have been even more clear cut. They almost persuaded me to vote against.

It is a one shot party based on a racist campagn to get the UK out of Europe

They deny racism, and in the other threads none of you could identify any racism in their publications.
If there is nothing there, how do you know they are racist?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: UK nuclear subs
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 18 Feb 17 - 06:56 AM

A follow up point about Ukip
It is a one shot party based on a racist campagn to get the UK out of Europe
Now that Britain is out and Ukip has no MPs, it has no role whatever nationally - as marginal as that
Talk about shooting yourself in the foot
Jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate
Next Page

 


You must be a member to post in non-music threads. Join here.


You must be a member to post in non-music threads. Join here.



Mudcat time: 21 February 12:29 AM EST

[ Home ]

All original material is copyright © 1998 by the Mudcat Café Music Foundation, Inc. All photos, music, images, etc. are copyright © by their rightful owners. Every effort is taken to attribute appropriate copyright to images, content, music, etc. We are not a copyright resource.