|
08 Dec 09 - 08:47 PM (#2784244) Subject: Unusual autoharp technique From: Jack Campin Can any autoharp experts tell what's going on in this track, from the Excavated Shellac site? Tysons Autoharp Band The autoharp is tuned to an African pentatonic scale. What if anything are the chord bars doing? |
|
09 Dec 09 - 12:56 AM (#2784388) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: GUEST,guest This blog leads one down some lovely rabbit tracks of music from around the world. it sounds as if they destrun the harp and tuned to their five note scale as written...like a thumb piano? Thanks for it. |
|
09 Dec 09 - 03:00 AM (#2784429) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: Mavis Enderby I'm more of an expert on Google than autoharp, but a bit of digging has found Johannes Mohlala as a more recent exponent of this style - this album cover (scroll down the page a little) suggests the tone bars are not used. Thanks for introducing me to the Excavated Shellac site. I know what I'm doing this evening now... Pete. |
|
09 Dec 09 - 08:28 AM (#2784536) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: MGM·Lion What point of using autoharp without tone or chord bars? ceases then to BE 'auto' doesn't it? Why not just a harp in appropriate tone [clarsach?], or lyre or zither or whatever? |
|
09 Dec 09 - 08:41 AM (#2784547) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: Jack Campin In this instance, the reason seems to have been availability. Autoharps are cheap and they had been imported into the region. Maybe they retuned them with the strings paired, getting more power out of each note of the pentatonic scale and making a larger target to strike? |
|
09 Dec 09 - 08:55 AM (#2784550) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: MGM·Lion Good points, Jack. Thank you. But in that case is not your thread title a bit of a misnomer, as there was no actual autoharp technique, as such, being used; but an adaptation of an available instrument to another purpose - would you not agree? |
|
09 Dec 09 - 08:57 AM (#2784552) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: GUEST,guest The strings are not paired. I think they came off or were taken off and the chord bars taken off as well and played like a zither or thumb piano. |
|
09 Dec 09 - 12:24 PM (#2784701) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: autoharper Julie Davis plays an autoharp with a pentatonic scale string schedule. Mike Seeger could hardly keep his hands off this instrument when he first encountered it at a festival at which Julie and he performed. The unusual autoharp technique you're hearing on this record sounds, to my ears, like they are ignoring the chord bars and plucking a repetitive melodic pattern on the open strings, obtaining a sound like a kalimba. -Adam Miller |
|
09 Dec 09 - 12:33 PM (#2784709) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: Bill D It 'sounds' like the same series of notes played over & over. Whether they have tuned a few string to the set of notes they want and are just holding down one chord bar, or have removed or doubled some strings is hard to tell. |
|
09 Dec 09 - 12:43 PM (#2784715) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: The Sandman interesting up to a point but[imo] rather repetitive. |
|
09 Dec 09 - 01:12 PM (#2784732) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: Bill D ...therefore superfluous is better than repetitive? ☺ |
|
09 Dec 09 - 03:35 PM (#2784827) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: autoharper On further listening, I am not convinced this instrument is correctly identified as an autoharp. |
|
09 Dec 09 - 03:44 PM (#2784836) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: The Sandman it sounds like that has been someone plucking up the inside of a piano,that has ben accidentally left out in the rain. |
|
09 Dec 09 - 03:49 PM (#2784840) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: M.Ted There are actually two antiphonal parts being played on the autoharp, and they create what is sometimes called a sound canvas for the other rhythmic instruments and the voices. The individual parts are simple, and repetitive, but over the course of the performance there is a complex interplay between of each of the parts that is neither simple nor repetitive. |
|
09 Dec 09 - 04:40 PM (#2784881) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: M.Ted As per Michael's comment that this is not autoharp technique, per se--assuming for a moment that the instrument is an autoharp and not a zither or folk kanun of some type, and also assuming that, as claimed, it has been used in this manner since it was adopted by this musical culture in the 19th century, then this is very definitely qualifies as "autoharp technique", and, in fact, is an older and more established system than the style that are more familar with. |
|
09 Dec 09 - 05:22 PM (#2784912) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: The Sandman well it may not be repetitive to you,but it is for me. |
|
09 Dec 09 - 11:24 PM (#2785106) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: M.Ted To each his own, said the lady... |
|
10 Dec 09 - 10:26 AM (#2785368) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: PHJim Some years back, George Foss (Captain Pentatonic) wrote a piece in the Autoharpoholic magazine called Going Pentatonic. He had retuned one (or more) of his Autoharps to a pentatonic scale and was successful at promoting this type of 'harp. After reading this I used a yard sale 'harp to make a pentatonic Autoharp and used it for a while before giving it to my brother. This was played as an Autoharp, with the chord bars, refelted of course, still on the instrument. I must agree with others who have said that once you remove the chord bars, an Autoharp is no longer an Autoharp, but becomes a zither. |
|
10 Dec 09 - 11:11 AM (#2785400) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: MGM·Lion I agree with PHJim. Even if the bars retained but unused, I would ask MTed - if someone with a sense of rhythm habitually turned a violin over & tapped rhythmically with his fingers on the back as he sang because the timbre of the resonance appealed to him, would that be a fiddle technique? |
|
10 Dec 09 - 02:38 PM (#2785554) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: Jack Campin The band that made that recording called it an autoharp, and you'd have a hard time arguing with them now. My autoharp has "Autoharp" on the soundbox. Take the bars off and it'd still have that label attached, so I wouldn't argue with anybody who used the word for the result. There is a piece by John Cage where the piano is played with the lid and keyboard cover down - you use it like a big cajon. It's still a piece for the piano. Dick: listen harder to the vocals. |
|
10 Dec 09 - 03:02 PM (#2785569) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: MGM·Lion John Cage a kingsize pseud & I frankly couldn't give a flying u·no·wot what he chose to call anything, thanks Jack. I think he'd have done better to use it like a big dildo... Labels don't prove a lot either: when I worked many years ago in the drink trade, they used to say that the way to make a fortune in England was to ship a sweet sherry and label it 'dry'. |
|
10 Dec 09 - 04:06 PM (#2785621) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: Jack Campin The Cage piece is a short song on words from Finnegans Wake, "The Wonderful Widow of Eighteen Springs". Nothing pseud about it to me. There are several performances of it on YouTube and Spotify; I don't think any of them quite hit the spot with both the vocal part and the percussive accompaniment simultaneously, but most are worth hearing. |
|
10 Dec 09 - 04:12 PM (#2785626) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: PHJim Although it doesn't bother me if you call it an Autoharp, The name "Autoharp" refers only to instruments made by the Oscar Schmidt company and the companies who have had ownership of the name since. It, like "Dobro", is a brand name and its owners don't appreciate it being used to refer to other "chorded zithers" like Chromaharps or Evoharps. I guess they're afraid of the term becoming generic like kleenex or celophane. |
|
10 Dec 09 - 04:13 PM (#2785627) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: Mavis Enderby Similar but different. But still a fiddle technique... Pete. |
|
10 Dec 09 - 04:45 PM (#2785653) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: Jack Campin The name "Autoharp" refers only to instruments made by the Oscar Schmidt company and the companies who have had ownership of the name since. They may have conned the US legal system into agreeing with that, but autoharps were being made, labelled and sold as "autoharps" in the 19th century. Mine must predate Schmidt's trademark by about 30 years. I presume the Lutheran missionaries who introduced the instrument to the Pedi brought something made in Germany, not an Oscar Schmidt product. |
|
10 Dec 09 - 04:54 PM (#2785669) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: M.Ted Michael--Flamenco guitarists, among others, tap the rasgueados on the top, back, and sides of their instrument, and, since it is part of the process of playing the music, it is indeed part of the technique. |
|
10 Dec 09 - 10:49 PM (#2785873) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: MGM·Lion Certainly, Ted; and a fascinating part of flamenco guitar technique at that: & we all do things like rat-tatting on the wood as we sing 'I'd make it into drums for me Bold Fenian Men', don't we? ··· but if they[/we] didn't use the strings at all it would be different, wouldn't it? |
|
11 Dec 09 - 10:36 PM (#2786607) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: M.Ted "Bold Fenian Men"? That's not happening here. |
|
11 Dec 09 - 10:49 PM (#2786613) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: MGM·Lion And your point is, Ted ··· ? |
|
12 Dec 09 - 12:55 AM (#2786671) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: GUEST,DonMeixner I was not moved or fascinated. That isn't to say in someones tradition it is brilliant work. I had a music teacher who used to suffer the clas with Ostenato (sp). That is what this recording reminds me of. Don |
|
12 Dec 09 - 01:44 AM (#2786678) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: M.Ted Just that if I was rat-tat-tatting, it would be on something else entirely. At any rate, as per Don Meixner's comment--everyone has different interests and tastes. But this music is "real" folk music, field recording type stuff, and not revival stuff, not contemporary music derived from roots music, or any such stuff, and I think, probably it sounds a lot more like the old forms of our American/Anglo-European folk music than we might first think. It makes me wonder how many of the self-professed folk music lovers here would have actually liked listening to "our" music, the way it was originally played. |
|
12 Dec 09 - 03:10 AM (#2786691) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: MGM·Lion I don't think you would, Ted, if you wanted to intro a rat-tat-tat drum effect into the middle of a song you were accompanying on guitar when the lyric demanded it — "when the drums begin to rattle [rat-tat-tat] and the pipes begin to play [back to strings]" - surely you see what I mean? Don't you ever do anything of the sort? Nobody denies the traditional folk status of the piece of music under consideration. We are just disputing whether this can be described as an 'unusual [or for that matter any sort of] autoharp technique' as rubricated in the thread title. |
|
12 Dec 09 - 01:22 PM (#2786985) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: M.Ted I don't really don't know or play songs such as "Bold Fenian Men", so the drumming is lost on me. As to the other, there is no dispute, the fact simply is that anything that you use to play music is an instrument, and any method of getting it to produce whatever sounds it is capable of producing is "technique". |
|
12 Dec 09 - 02:13 PM (#2787001) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: MGM·Lion The song is not Bold Fenian Men, but One Sunday Morning, which I learned from singing of Theo Bikel. Same effect used in many songs, e.g. Bonny Lass Of Fyvie. |
|
12 Dec 09 - 03:10 PM (#2787028) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: Art Thieme Once, in the 1960s, we had a strange elongated instrument come through our music store -- the Old Town Folklore Center in Chicago. It had keys/buttons to push that stopped the strings at various adjustable/changeable positions on the strings. Called a NAGOYA HARP, I think it probably was made in Japan. It sounded quite oriental--as does the instrument here -- to my ears anyhow. Nagoya, I think, is a city in Japan. Art Thieme |
|
12 Dec 09 - 04:52 PM (#2787082) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: The Sandman But this music is "real" folk music, field recording type stuff, and not revival stuff.quote. here we go again making judgenments that are not based on quality but on labels,it must be good because its a field recording. well its ok,but, sorry, I would rather listen to a really good revival singer interpreting a song well, Peter Bellamy singing Yarmouth Town,Tony Rose singing Banks of Green Willow, Jean Ritchie singing Loving Hannah,Martin Carthy singing Thorneymore woods[of course none of this is real folk music] |
|
12 Dec 09 - 07:11 PM (#2787164) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: Jack Campin Once, in the 1960s, we had a strange elongated instrument come through our music store -- the Old Town Folklore Center in Chicago. It had keys/buttons to push that stopped the strings at various adjustable/changeable positions on the strings. Called a NAGOYA HARP, I think it probably was made in Japan We've had a long-running thread about it under the name "taishogoto". There is also an Indian instrument of the same type (organologically, it's a kind of clavichord) which is usually made using bits of typewriter or adding machine mechanism. But this music is "real" folk music, field recording type stuff, and not revival stuff. here we go again making judgenments that are not based on quality but on labels,it must be good because its a field recording. Nobody's saying that. But southern Afica has its revival singers too, and what do you think they turn to for sources? |
|
12 Dec 09 - 07:18 PM (#2787166) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: jrmw Greetings. Pardon the intrusion from a newbie. I'm Jonathan, the person behind the Excavated Shellac site, and the owner of the record in question. There's been many people visiting my site from Mudcat Café, so I thought I'd pop by to view the discussion. I am glad to see that the post has generated such a variety of responses from very knowledgeable people. To touch on a few questions that have popped up during the thread: Regarding tuning - the Pedi do indeed remove the chord bars of the autoharp and tune the strings to their own scale. Whether or not the instrument is still an autoharp if the chord bars are removed, I cannot answer, and it certainly wouldn't be my place to do so. However, 95% all the writing on the Pedi's music by various writers and ethnomusicologists that I consulted refer to the instrument as an autoharp, regardless of the methods the Pedi use to play the instrument. Maybe further scholarship and discussion with Pedi musicians should warrant a change in the name of the instrument to "zither," - it could be a good subject of study. I naturally hadn't considered this and I appreciated the comments. Thanks to Jack Campin for posing the question and having an interest in the piece. For MtheGM - the label to this piece is probably precisely what it was meant to be. In other words, it is safe to trust. Hugh Tracey, the ethnomusicologist who recorded this track, will probably always be in high regard. He was scrupulous in his notes about African music, wrote numerous books, and made thousands of recordings. This piece is catalogued by both the ILAM (International Library of African Music - founded by Tracey) and the South African Music Archive. (Both use the term "autoharp" for what it's worth.) That said - I would hesitate to say that this is a "field recording." Field recordings tend to be marketed to adventurous listeners of another culture than the one recorded. This track was recorded in 1945/1948. If it wasn't recorded in a South African city studio (labels would pay for travel for musicians and this happened all the time), it was probably recorded on portable electric equipment in a structure that could double as a studio, with good miking capabilities. These records were marketed somewhat to curious westerners and the then relatively nascent study of international folk musics, but primarily the records were marketed toward the culture recorded. Tracey did release field recordings on both Gallotone and Trek – he also recorded and released lots of popular music he recorded in studios. For those that find the piece interesting, I thank you again for visiting my site. I hope you poke around some more. |
|
12 Dec 09 - 07:25 PM (#2787168) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: GUEST,hg thanks jrmw for the information. Do you know the notes in the scale? I think your site is very interesting and I hope to see more of it soon. harpgirl |
|
12 Dec 09 - 08:25 PM (#2787189) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: jrmw Sorry harpgirl, I do not. However, I should point out that some sources list the scale as 6 notes, though my primary source listed the scale as 5 notes. |
|
12 Dec 09 - 09:04 PM (#2787198) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: Art Thieme It seems from here, to me, that the autoharp body is serving as a convenient box and sounding-board for the actual instrument that these people have chosen to play as, essentially, a psaltery. Also, the strings can be conveniently tuned to whatever they desire their notes or scale to reflect using the tuning posts already installed. So using an actual autoharp in this way is perfect. They might even grow a potted plant in it to enhance it being roots music. (Just a JOKE; no need for anyone to get bent oughta shape!! ;-) In my previous post about the so-called Nagoya Harp, I was responding to the sounds I was hearing only as this musical performance was downloading, bit by small bit, into my computer. I only have a dial-up connection. Being unable to hear the whole piece, I was talking about my first impression of sounds I was hearing. ArtThieme |
|
12 Dec 09 - 10:58 PM (#2787227) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: GUEST,hg arf!arf!....Art... harpgirl |
|
12 Dec 09 - 11:18 PM (#2787235) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: dav_byn i just read all this stuff... wow!!! what a debate !!!! actually the autoharp really is a chorded zither.... for several generations they were referred to as autoharps... Oscar Schmidt called them autoharps.... one maker calls his instruments Dulci-harps... so call them what you will... but take the chord bars off one of them and it becomes a zither... tuned however you want... diatonic.. pentatonic... septonic... Phrygian.... and maybe just some crazy off the top of the head tuning.... it's all about the music !!!! thanks for reading... |
|
13 Dec 09 - 02:08 AM (#2787261) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: M.Ted I was looking for a way to qualify, and "field recording" was what popped into my head. Jack has used the term "Source music", and that really fits better. Beyond that, though, my judgement is that it's great music, and I extend my sincere appreciation to Jonathan for sharing it, and other wonderful recordings. |
|
13 Dec 09 - 09:48 AM (#2787371) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: The Sandman my aoplogies mted,Ithink the music is ok,unusual,interesting up to a point but it doesnt excite me wildly,just slightly different taste,hope I did not appear abrasive. |
|
13 Dec 09 - 09:57 AM (#2787377) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: GUEST,DonMeixner This could be a new thread actually. How long does a song or musical style have to begone to make it's reemergence a revival? I'd argue that from a culture that relies on example and not written document to carry on a tradition then gone is gone after a few generations. You can't revive what you've never heard. Bending a new instrument to your use and playing the old music you know on isn't revivalism is it? Is it revival to play a formerly un accompanied song with guitar or is it revision? Don |
|
13 Dec 09 - 01:18 PM (#2787467) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: GUEST,DonMeixner I didn't notice the clicky to the album cover before. Unless the photo was printed backward that isn't an Autoharp. I suspect that it is a chord zither. The variety with four chords at the long side and the rest are chromatic, high to low. I imagine was already discovered and mentioned but I missed it in a hasty reread of the thread. So sorry if I am redundant. Don |
|
13 Dec 09 - 01:32 PM (#2787476) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: MGM·Lion === the fact simply is that anything that you use to play music is an instrument, and any method of getting it to produce whatever sounds it is capable of producing is "technique". === I remain exercised by this assertion. I just don't think it is the case. Children like to take 2 pencils, or 2 table-knives, or whatever, & use them as drumsticks on any surface handy. If one did this on the top of the family piano, would you regard that as 'unusual piano technique'? When [as has been confirmed in this case] the bars are removed, the instrument that started as an 'autoharp' can no longer be so named or described — by definition, you might say, as it is the use of the bars that account for the 'auto...' part of the instrument's name. Without them there is nothing 'auto...' [derived obviously from 'automatic'] about it, is there? |
|
13 Dec 09 - 01:33 PM (#2787477) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: Jack Campin You can see a light-coloured band across the instrument where the bars used to be (probably only three of them, like the first instruments called "autoharps" back in the 1880s). The strings are equally spaced, whereas on the chord zithers I've seen the chord sets are more tightly spaced than the melody strings. "Left-handed" autoharps like that one have been made to the present day. But the result of removing the chord bars on an autoharp or ignoring the chords on a chord zither would be identical. |
|
13 Dec 09 - 01:56 PM (#2787489) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: GUEST,hg Oh now I see the picture. That is indeed a zither. It is not and has never been an autoharp. The band you see is not from taking the bars off because there were never bars on this instrument. Autoharp is the trade name of Oscar Schmidt and refers to a zither with the automatic chord bars attached to it. harpgirl |
|
13 Dec 09 - 01:58 PM (#2787491) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: GUEST,hg Here is a photozither with a map of the chords at the bottom |
|
13 Dec 09 - 01:59 PM (#2787493) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: The Sandman look, its like removing the fret from a banjo the result is a fretless banjo,it is no longer aa5 string fretted banjo. remove the bars from an auto harp, it is not an auto harp,its something else,and in this particular case it sounds like the inside of a piano that has been stood under a shower |
|
13 Dec 09 - 02:25 PM (#2787508) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: GUEST,hg The bars were not removed. It is a zither. |
|
13 Dec 09 - 02:29 PM (#2787513) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: Jack Campin Autoharp is the trade name of Oscar Schmidt In American law only, and not in most people's usage anywhere. Probably more instruments were made and labelled as "autoharps" by other manufacturers in the decades before Schmidt registered the word than Schmidt themselves ever made. I'm certainly not about to stop calling my instrument an autoharp on Schmidt's say-so (it was made around 1900 and has a label saying "Müller's Autoharp"). I very much doubt if Schmidt's legalistic marketing chicanery had any force at all in South Africa in the 1940s. Tyson's band could call their instruments whatever they wanted, and we pretty much have to follow them if we want to make sense when talking about their music. (And if Schmidt don't like it they can get stuffed. This proprietorial attitude to the English language really puts me off ever wanting to own one of their instruments - at least, not without scraping their logos off and putting a Hohner or Yamaha decal on it instead). |
|
13 Dec 09 - 02:31 PM (#2787517) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: GUEST,DonMeixner Maybe a left handed zither or a reversed photo but it is a zither. I owned one just like this years ago. Four chords on the long side tuned in C - F - G - Am. The chords were strummed with a my left thumb and the melody was played with my right thumb and index fingers. Don |
|
13 Dec 09 - 03:34 PM (#2787557) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: GUEST,hg Muller's Auto Harp has an interesting chord set up. ABCDEFGHIJKL |
|
13 Dec 09 - 03:36 PM (#2787559) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: GUEST,hg I'd like one of these: The circle of fifths is right on the instrument Muller Auto Harp |
|
13 Dec 09 - 03:45 PM (#2787569) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: M.Ted Good Soldier Shweik--No need to apologize--I actually have some sense of your musical tastes because I've read your posts over the years and listened to things of yours that you have posted in various places--I also know that you are inclined to listen to things in order to figure out what they're about, rather than strictly for entertainment--so we're good-- As for you, MthGM--check this One person rap with pencils, then try to do it yourself. If you have trouble recreating the sound (particularly that repeating snap sound), it's because you haven't mastered the technique for producing the sound-- |
|
13 Dec 09 - 03:55 PM (#2787575) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: M.Ted Incidentally, the performer is known as Lyric AKA Lyrical God, the piece is called "Let this Beat Ride", the technique is called Penboxing, and he is from South Philly-- |
|
14 Dec 09 - 12:31 PM (#2788124) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: PHJim The photo posted by Guesthg is commonly called a guitar zither. It was one of those instruments, like the ukelin that never really caught on. I have one hanging on the wall in my back room which I tuned up when I first got it, but never really used much. It's been hanging on the wall for about fifteen years now. It comes down only to be dusted. Mine was made by the Oscar Schmidt company. |
|
14 Dec 09 - 01:59 PM (#2788202) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: MGM·Lion As for you, MthGM--check this One person rap with pencils, then try to do it yourself. If you have trouble recreating the sound (particularly that repeating snap sound), it's because you haven't mastered the technique for producing the sound-- Ted - I didn't say it wasn't a technique; but it's a pencil-tap technique, & doing it on top of a piano would still be a pencil-tap technique, NOT a piano technique, wouldn't it????? |
|
14 Dec 09 - 05:08 PM (#2788343) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: M.Ted You can hit a cymbal or a snare, or a tom or a cowbell with the same drumsticks, and you'd be playing either the cymbal, the snare, the tom, or the cowbell, not the drumsticks. You don't play the pick, you play the guitar with the pick. And "penboxing" is a technique for using pencils to play rhythms on a desk or tabletop. |
|
14 Dec 09 - 06:55 PM (#2788414) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: M.Ted I really think this has more to with the prepared piano, and John Cage, than anything else. I have, rest assured, made note of your feelings in my little book, next to my list of Mudcatters who play the ukulele. Here is something from Mr. Cage that you probably won't like at all, but it fits in with the discussion, owing to the fact that a piano is pounded on--Water Walk |
|
14 Dec 09 - 08:53 PM (#2788473) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: MGM·Lion Ted - I am glad, I think, to have seen that. But would you think the moments [2 I think] where he plays a single chord on the piano constitute 'piano technique'? (Interested that you, like me, are a compulsive list keeper. I have an online file for the purpose [soccer goalkeepers, one of which I was in my youth, is one of mine: it includes Pope John-Paul ii, A Conan Doyle, Che Guevara, all 3 Tenors {Carreras completed amateur forms for Barcelona}, et al]. I have not contribd to thread on topic as it is in the past; but I *used* to play uke-banjo years ago b4 I acquired a proper banjo, so u might wish to add me to that list. Or not? Up 2U.) |
|
15 Dec 09 - 07:48 AM (#2788717) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: M.Ted As per "technique", it does, most definitely. If you have ever played a composed piece that required that featured a stab or hit in your part, you know how hard it is to get that single sound exactly right--as a trumpet player, I agonized over the penultimate sound in this piece Sleigh Ride , which also features the sound of a whip crack, played on the slapstick--if it doesn't come at exactly the right time, and if it doesn't sound like a whip crack, the piece is dead, so technique is everything-- |
|
15 Dec 09 - 07:48 AM (#2788720) Subject: RE: Unusual autoharp technique From: M.Ted Oh, and you made the "list"-- |
