|
01 Mar 11 - 06:27 PM (#3105252) Subject: BS: Lady Gaga? From: Fossil "BS/Non-Music" seems about the right place for this thread, and for a little while it might appear right next to the ad for Lady GG's new record which Mudcat seems to be promoting. Oh, come on! We're a site devoted to *real* music, aren't we? (However you define it). Has the 'cat finally sold out? Answers, please... |
|
01 Mar 11 - 06:29 PM (#3105253) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: GUEST,999 What is a lady gaga. |
|
01 Mar 11 - 06:36 PM (#3105257) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: Greg F. Ya mean Lady Tits and Ass, Dontcha? What the hell does that have to do with music? |
|
01 Mar 11 - 06:40 PM (#3105260) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: Jeri The ads are not FROM Mudcat, however, don't let that get in the way of the enjoyment you're getting out of being pissed off. Heaven knows there haven't been nearly enough threads on Mudcat to appease the folks addicted to rage. Here ya go: Lady Gaga, Speechless |
|
01 Mar 11 - 08:04 PM (#3105292) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: Bobert Hey, I don't dig her music 'cause it sucks... But as an artist, she's far-fuckin'-out... I mean, way outta the box... B~ |
|
01 Mar 11 - 09:11 PM (#3105311) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: artbrooks I don't see the ads on Mudcat. Thank you, Adblock Plus. |
|
01 Mar 11 - 09:24 PM (#3105313) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: Q (Frank Staplin) Those advs. help pay for mudcat. Don't shirk your duty! Do your part and read them (a little pain......). And BOOYAH! (Whatever that is). |
|
01 Mar 11 - 09:33 PM (#3105314) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: Bobert BOOYAH, Q??? Maybe I haven't read the ads??? B~ |
|
01 Mar 11 - 10:02 PM (#3105316) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: olddude I think she is cool .... sorry :-) poker face ... cool song |
|
02 Mar 11 - 12:26 AM (#3105360) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: alanabit She is basically the update of Madonna: A highly effective and well organised businesswoman, who knows how to present and market her products. As a fan of folk and blues music, I find her products uninteresting. Good luck to anyone who does. It is a little baffling to find her as a topic for discussion here - a bit like finding a discussion of a an elephant on an engineering site. Still, folks talk about whatever they want to - and I have no problem with that! |
|
02 Mar 11 - 12:39 AM (#3105364) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: Little Hawk Hmmm. I was certainly aware that Lady Gaga existed, but I hadn't actually heard her at all until seeing that video of "Speechless". I like the piano playing, and she does a good vocal performance too, although she's not in a type of style that interests me much. Definitely the update of Madonna, I'd say, and I expect she will continue to do well with it. But Jeri has it absolutely nailed when she says, "don't let that get in the way of the enjoyment you're getting out of being pissed off. Heaven knows there haven't been nearly enough threads on Mudcat to appease the folks addicted to rage." Bingo, Jeri! ;-D The existence of Lady Gaga does not trouble me, and why should it? |
|
02 Mar 11 - 12:48 AM (#3105367) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: Stilly River Sage She has mostly been off of my radar, but her latest song that she performed at the Grammy's is a good message for the times. I Was Born This Way. It might help if you don't watch the video - It's part of a larger alien kind of storyline. SRS |
|
02 Mar 11 - 01:02 AM (#3105371) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: MGM·Lion What alanabit & LH said ~ + that my wife, who is more of a poppie than a folkie [she greatly enjoyed a Bon Jovi concert at Madison Sq Gardens last week while she was away on a film acting course at NY Film Acad], much admires Lady G tho fully aware of the Madonna-clone aspect. For heaven's sake, the Cat is surely the place for a bit of live·&·let·live ~~ esp as the engineering aspects of the use of elephants in transportation &c might even be of some interest, eh alanabit? ~Michael~ |
|
02 Mar 11 - 02:44 AM (#3105400) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: Backwoodsman As a grumpy old git, whose wife is many years his junior and makes damn sure that he stays awake and keeps up, I think Lady Ga-Ga's music is a great, undemanding respite from the navel-gazing, body-counting, "issue"-laden stuff I'm wont to perform myself. Switch off brain and enjoy. And the miserable moaners needn't worry, like most of her pop-industry ilk, she'll be forgotten within twelve months and that world will move on. Anyway, they surely can't hear her with their fingers in their ears can they? :-) :-) |
|
02 Mar 11 - 04:20 AM (#3105436) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: GUEST,Patsy It is going to come to a point as it did with Madonna back in 'the day' that anything Lady Gaga does next is not going to suprise or shock people anymore unless she re-invents herself dramatically, eventually another Lady Gaga type person (mark 2) will fill her place in time. I am more of a Lily Allen person myself but disappointed in her reasoning lately that Lady Gaga is really a fella beneath the clothes, that's just daft. |
|
02 Mar 11 - 06:08 AM (#3105474) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: GUEST,lively Her act is an example of form over function IMO. Initially I found her theatrical packaging to be very engaging, but my interest quickly died on hearing predictable formulaic pop that could have been made twenty years ago. Her presentation promises much but the musical product is seriously underwhelming and fails to deliver. Which is a pity because the music industry could do with some innovators and movers and shakers out there in the spotlight. That said, she's not going to go away any time soon. Most definitely a successful self-promoter easily slipping into the glamorous shoes and basque of older divas such as Madonna and Kylie, who are also mainly known for sparkly spectacle and for their devoted (gay in particular - she's got that Judy Gardland factor) fan base. Perhaps her success may set a style precedent which will encourage the music industry to take a few risks with genuinely innovative artists, but I won't be holding my breath. |
|
02 Mar 11 - 06:20 AM (#3105478) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: GUEST,Eliza I'm sure I read recently that the poor lady has LUPUS and gets very tired! One would wonder why, if so, she lives this mad and exhausting life in the maelstrom of the pop world. (tons of money I expect) I have to say I do like her songs, and prefer her to Madonna. 'Just Dance' is one of my favourites. But that dress made of MEAT? Why?? |
|
02 Mar 11 - 06:47 AM (#3105492) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: GUEST,Patsy That's what I mean Eliza, what next after the dress made of meat? It certainly isn't going to gain her any fans from vegetarians that's for sure. |
|
02 Mar 11 - 07:01 AM (#3105510) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: GUEST,Eliza LOL Patsy! What about a nice ensemble made of Spring Greens? Very seasonal and should be acceptable to all, including vegetarians. |
|
02 Mar 11 - 09:15 AM (#3105577) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: olddude She writes he own music. Before she started performing on her own she has written hit songs for a pile of people. Yup she is a master marketing person for sure. Knows how to push it ... but I have listened to a bunch of her music. I find her very creative. She actually plays and sings and doesn't just recite bad poetry to a bass drum as in most modern music. I think she is better than Madonna - as she writes her own stuff. I like the young girl. |
|
02 Mar 11 - 09:29 AM (#3105586) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: Becca72 While I don't often admit it in public, I actually kinda like Lady Gaga. Her performance at last year's |
|
02 Mar 11 - 09:30 AM (#3105587) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: Becca72 (damn it!) Grammy's was great, especially since I LOVE Elton John: I was lucky enough to see it live |
|
02 Mar 11 - 09:35 AM (#3105590) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: olddude Most people hate gaga because of the crazy outfits she wears. But In the mid 70's I saw Elton John come on stage with pink hot pants, a head dress from a show girl and his glasses with the windshield wipers on them. she is a master at marketing. I guess speechless was written for her dad when he said he wasn't going to allow the doc to do chemo or something like that. She got mad at him .. he eventually did what the docs wanted |
|
02 Mar 11 - 09:56 AM (#3105601) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: Becca72 So what if she does dress weird? Look at Queen, Judas Priest, KISS and, as Dan mentioned, Elton John. She's certainly not the first and she won't be the last. |
|
02 Mar 11 - 10:57 AM (#3105625) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: olddude Absolutely Becca that was my point. I do like her music ... I think she is very talented for sure. She writes and performs her own music and I appreciate that a lot. So many today the music is just manufactured and not original. Heck in modern country music they have a staff of writers that just churn out the same melody with different lyric and the performer never wrote a song in his or her life. All done for them. At least she writes her own stuff. I like her voice. She is a fine musician and I could care less about the crazy outfits. That is just for marketing and there aint nothing wrong with marketing |
|
02 Mar 11 - 11:00 AM (#3105627) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: Jeri Becca, that duet with Elton John was brilliant, even if I had to watch it at home! I think there's this "I hate anyone who's successful, especially if I don't like their music" thing going on. Most sane people would just avoid things they don't like, but this is the internet. As for comparisons to Madonna... They keep playing very old videos of Madonna at my gym. She really was pretty shaky, pitch-wise when she started. She got better. Gaga's vocals are incredibly strong. What's underneath all the avant-garde decoration and performance art is a lot of solid talent. If she ever wants to re-invent herself, all she has to do is lose some of the outer layers. All the adoration, all the hatred, and she won't be 25 years old until the end of this month... |
|
02 Mar 11 - 11:38 AM (#3105652) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: Lighter She mixes conceptual art with her music. She hatched from a space egg carried into the Grammies by paid acolytes. I can't argue with that riff. |
|
02 Mar 11 - 11:39 AM (#3105654) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: Becca72 "All the adoration, all the hatred, and she won't be 25 years old until the end of this month..." Ok, NOW I hate her! LOL |
|
02 Mar 11 - 11:47 AM (#3105660) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: catspaw49 Hmmmm......I remember years ago Cheech Marin using the line "Gidget's gaga gets gooey."................BTW, I think there's a band named Gidgets Gaga. Spaw |
|
02 Mar 11 - 01:41 PM (#3105689) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: GUEST,999 Only you would remember that--bloody reprobate. Hope you're feeling lots better, Pat. Bruce |
|
02 Mar 11 - 02:12 PM (#3105712) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: Q (Frank Staplin) I'd like to see Lady Gaga sing the national anthem at the next superbowl. |
|
02 Mar 11 - 02:43 PM (#3105745) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: Lizzie Cornish 1 In The Days Before The World Went Gaga... A 16 year old Janis Ian, a guitar, and not a thong or a meat dress in sight... I mourn the loss of real music, real musicians, who had no need to shock to get people to notice them...they simply did that through writing and performing great songs. If Lady Gaga is acceptable today, then what will be acceptable in the next few years? Where does it stop? The influence upon our children, as a world, is pretty devastating I feel...but then I'm old and gettin' cold about talentless twits who are hero worshipped by those within The Circle of the Emperor and his New Shiny Way of Life... |
|
02 Mar 11 - 02:43 PM (#3105746) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: gnu Ahem... Fossil made a reasonable request and it was answered. Jeri answered it. Now, as far as enjoying being pissed off... alanabit... "...like finding a discussion of a an elephant on an engineering site." I'll have you know that elephants are a source of great discussion on many engineering sites. They have been employed as a valuable resource in engineering works for thousands of years in many countries and such continues to this very day. As for The Lady, I am gonna vote yes and send her on to Hollywood. |
|
02 Mar 11 - 04:17 PM (#3105798) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: Fossil Well, a nice set of responses, thanks Mudcatters. No, sorry I actually quite like Lady GG myself and am in no way addicted to rage and am not particularly pissed off. Just was a leetle bit surprised to find the Mudcat advertising her product. For - to paraphrase several of the posts above - "product" is exactly what it is, isn't it? |
|
02 Mar 11 - 04:53 PM (#3105814) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: Jeri Oh, never mind what I said about rage, then. Mudcat doesn't choose the ads. I know cookies from places such as Amazon may track where you've been in order to personalize your ads, so maybe you were watching Lady Gaga videos. Or maybe you'd been somewhere that had discussions of paparazzi or bad romance, or maybe it was just random. I'm not sure how they personalize your ads, but I don't see any, so I have even less "evidence" to figure it out than others might. |
|
02 Mar 11 - 04:56 PM (#3105816) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: GUEST,999 Well, I think anyone who can make a living at music deserves to make a living at music. |
|
02 Mar 11 - 05:18 PM (#3105839) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: alanabit To clarify my remarks, I have no intention of putting down Lady Gaga or the people who like her. I simply think she is more interesting as a business/marketing phenomenon than as a musician. Silly, ephemeral pop music has always been with us and I have liked - and even bought it - in the past. This young woman knows how to present and market her product remarkably well. I am not interested, but I mean no disrespect to anyone who is. |
|
02 Mar 11 - 06:01 PM (#3105862) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: josepp I didn't like her initially but she can play the hell out of a piano so you have to respect that and the costumes are hilarious--like an Aubrey Beardsley portrait come to life. |
|
02 Mar 11 - 06:03 PM (#3105866) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: GUEST,999 Alan, I don't think anyone took anything you said in that way. You've always been a prince amongst men on this site. |
|
02 Mar 11 - 07:03 PM (#3105900) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: josepp ////If Lady Gaga is acceptable today, then what will be acceptable in the next few years?//// I'm more hopeful now than I was a few months back. Ever since I started listening to this lady--she has singlehandedly rescued the course of modern music as far I am concerned: I Know You Know Superb bassist, superb singer, superb songwriter, I think she even produced her album. Suddenly, everything changed. I'm hopeful for the future of music again. |
|
02 Mar 11 - 09:30 PM (#3105951) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: Mrrzy Fascinating article in today's Washington Post, about interpreting her(?) into Sign Language... without signing things like I wanna ride your disco stick as I wanna ride your small piece of a tree dancing like John Travolta, or something, read the article, it's got Bon Jovi in there too... Now that I think of it, that in itself might be a thread above the line... |
|
03 Mar 11 - 04:15 AM (#3106043) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: GUEST,Patsy She is an all rounder, a singer, dancer, entertainer and actor (as in making her character believable) which a lot of poppie UK popstars seem to be unable to copy. It remains to be seen though if Lady Gaga is ever going to be listed on the Glastonbury bill, anything is possible these days. I prefer other styles of music for my taste but then again she is mostly aimed at the younger generation. Luckily there are still enough young folk, metal, punk, goth fans around to keep with the music they like so it doesn't really matter if Lady Gaga is around or not. |
|
03 Mar 11 - 04:55 AM (#3106061) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: gnu I too would like to clarify that my remarks were my remarks. No offense intended nor taken toward or from any previous or future posts be they actual or interpreted or from any previous or future posters be they real or fictional. |
|
03 Mar 11 - 12:10 PM (#3106287) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: KB in Iowa Bad Romance by my son and his friend at a high school variety show. I prefer this to Lady Gaga but that's just me. |
|
03 Mar 11 - 12:48 PM (#3106311) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: Little Hawk Why would she choose the name "Lady Gaga"? Did she maybe get the idea from that old song by Queen (Radio Gaga)? |
|
03 Mar 11 - 01:25 PM (#3106347) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: KB in Iowa Right you are LH. From Wiki: Lady Gaga was born Stefani Joanne Angelina Germanotta. Music producer Rob Fusari, who helped her write some of her earlier songs, compared some of her vocal harmonies to that of Freddie Mercury. Fusari helped create the moniker Gaga, after the Queen song "Radio Ga Ga". Gaga was in the process of trying to come up with a stage name when she received a text message from Fusari that read "Lady Gaga." He explained, Every day, when Stef came to the studio, instead of saying hello, I would start singing 'Radio Ga Ga'. That was her entrance song. [Lady Gaga] was actually a glitch; I typed 'Radio Ga Ga' in a text and it did an autocorrect so somehow 'Radio' got changed to 'Lady'. She texted me back, "That's it." After that day, she was Lady Gaga. She's like, "Don't ever call me Stefani again." |
|
03 Mar 11 - 01:33 PM (#3106351) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: KB in Iowa I should have kept reading. The very next line on Wiki reads: The New York Post, however, has reported that this story is incorrect, and that the name resulted from a marketing meeting. Ga-ga is a sport in Israel, where she later performed in 2009. The same Post report speculated she may be lying about her real age, and that myths existed about the singer. |
|
03 Mar 11 - 01:35 PM (#3106352) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: Little Hawk Hmmm. |
|
03 Mar 11 - 05:26 PM (#3106502) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: Mrrzy I thought she was a man, like boy george? |
|
03 Mar 11 - 05:35 PM (#3106507) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: Little Hawk Going by her appearance, I think not. |
|
04 Mar 11 - 04:59 AM (#3106707) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: GUEST,Patsy They can do a lot with hormones these days I have seen/met transexuals who are gorgeous and with a figure to match so it is possible. |
|
04 Mar 11 - 06:15 AM (#3106736) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: Smedley She's unquestionably the defining figure in popular culture at the moment, has been for over a year and could continue to be so for some time, though the speed of pop careers gets ever more rapid and the intensity of burn-outs ever more severe. She is, at present, immeasurably more significant as a cultural figure than 95% of the people more typically discussed on this site. That doesn't mean her music is better, though I do think she has made some classic pop hits and her stylistic influence is huge and global. As for her being a 'bad influence', I think that's what those old preachers said about Elvis. |
|
04 Mar 11 - 01:53 PM (#3106971) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: Sandy Mc Lean A 10 year old kid who taught herself to play piano was asked by LG to perform with her in Toronto. Maria Aragon |
|
04 Mar 11 - 02:01 PM (#3106975) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: gnu Sandy... don't wanna sound all mushy but that gave me a few goosebumps and certainly a smile. Charming and talented... at ten years old. |
|
04 Mar 11 - 02:16 PM (#3106983) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: Jeri Later on, Lady Gaga talks to Maria |
|
04 Mar 11 - 02:31 PM (#3106994) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: gnu Oh, well, fuck mushy... thatbrought tears. How sweet is that? |
|
05 Mar 11 - 03:49 AM (#3107294) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: alanabit Hell, I hate admitting stuff like this, but Lady Gaga has just climbed a few rungs in my estimation. I am not likely to become a fan of her products, but there is a proper human in there among the packaging! |
|
05 Mar 11 - 06:01 AM (#3107336) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: GUEST,Arthur_itus Lady Gaga is great. I love what she does. At the age of 65 am I one of the only pensioners that still listens to radio 1 ? I have heard so much good music. Yes even the new performers can be good. Lady who? :-) |
|
05 Mar 11 - 12:43 PM (#3107536) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: Sandy Mc Lean I'm not a fan of her type music but I do believe she has talent. I think her costumes are a prop that she doesn't need to support her voice. Like with kd Lang her talent comes through better to the ear if the eyes are closed. There is no doubt of the Madona or kd influence in strange costumes but she seems to be doing very well in her career. In her treatment of Maria Aragon she has earned my respect for her empathy and encouragement to a very talented child. I would love to hear from anyone who was at that concert the other night. I think that this thread deserves to move above the line. |
|
05 Mar 11 - 01:35 PM (#3107574) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: Smedley Why on earth would anyone want to close their eyes when listening to k d lang ? |
|
05 Mar 11 - 02:15 PM (#3107605) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: GUEST,Arthur_itus LOL Smedley |
|
05 Mar 11 - 02:24 PM (#3107611) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: GUEST,lively 'elvis is alive, and a woman' to paraphrase mags - ditto smedley |
|
05 Mar 11 - 03:19 PM (#3107647) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: gnu I believe Sandy was referring to KD's costumes... even tho some are "traditional" they look a touch odd in this day and age. She has the most amazing voice I have ever heard. |
|
05 Mar 11 - 04:14 PM (#3107680) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: Sandy Mc Lean What gnu said. |
|
05 Mar 11 - 11:00 PM (#3107871) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: Stilly River Sage This shouldn't be below the line. Lady Gaga, as much as some may hold their noses, performs music. She is a musician. And that's what Mudcat is about. Music. SRS |
|
06 Mar 11 - 06:39 AM (#3107987) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: skarpi Lady Gaga is fine artist , she like Björk , she is she and no one else . she not pretending to be some one she is not . I like her music , but does her music belong here on mudcat ? sure thats a question Mudcat has been folk/blues/bluegrass/country ....roots music ... kv Skarpi |
|
06 Mar 11 - 10:05 PM (#3108593) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: Stilly River Sage So who is going to draw the distinction between which music is suitable for Mudcat and which is BS? I think it more prudent to leave music discussion threads about the line. Simple and neat. SRS |
|
07 Mar 11 - 03:32 PM (#3109119) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: gnu With respect, SRS, it is a blues and folk site. Many discussions that certainly do not "fit" have been, and continue to be, placed above the line and remain there. Perhaps it is in the eye of the OP as to where the thread should be. Having said that, I have had threads moved above the line by mods who felt it was appropriate. I have no qualms with that. She's into marketing too. |
|
07 Mar 11 - 05:44 PM (#3109205) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: GUEST,Guest from Sanity Say what you will about Lady Gaga, you can tell, in this clip, underneath the 'froo-froo' act, that there is someone who has done their homework! with less gizmos GfS |
|
07 Mar 11 - 06:11 PM (#3109222) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: olddude Her song speechless is nothing short of brilliant I think ... her is what she said about the song "Well, my dad has had a heart condition for about 15 years. He has or he had a bad aortic valve, and his body for a very long time was only pumping a third of the blood that you're supposed to get every time his heart beat. So he [was] resigned that he wasn't going to get the surgery and told my mother and I that he was going to let his life take its course.... And I was on tour and I couldn't leave, so I went into the studio and I wrote this song 'Speechless'.... My dad used to call me after he'd had a few drinks and I wouldn't know what to say. I was speechless and I just feared that I would lose him and I wouldn't be there....I wrote this song as a plea to him and it worked, he had the surgery with no complications.'' |
|
08 Mar 11 - 11:37 AM (#3109682) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: GUEST,Patsy Was the dress really made of meat or was it made to appear like it? Did anyone touch it to find out? We only have the tabloids and media coverage's word on that. |
|
08 Mar 11 - 11:41 AM (#3109688) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: GUEST,lively It was a meat dress. I saw the dress itself mentioned in fashion news some time prior to Gaga wearing one. I can't recall who the designer was though. |
|
08 Mar 11 - 12:56 PM (#3109740) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: GUEST,Guest from Sanity You might think this is a stretch, but, she has made a persona for herself, much like Redbone made for himself. Though the style is different, as the music. I'm still not decided how much I like all of it, but, ya' gotta' give her credit for all the homework, and effort she's put into it, to bring something different to the table. I'd like to point out, too, that you have to give a 'hats off' to her sound engineers, and their trick mix downs...I'm sure that other groups have been criticized, for much less, by the 'folkies'. GfS |
|
08 Mar 11 - 10:34 PM (#3110088) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: Fossil Thanks to all - have learned some interesting things about Lady Gaga, but only a very few people seem to have addressed the original question which was - leaving aside the question of Lady GG as a performer, whether her music, showmanship, performance art or whatever it is, is any good - it surely isn't folk, or blues music, *which is what the Cat's about*. Isn't it? In short, do ads for "pop" genres have a place within these hallowed halls, or not? Max's economics, I guess say yes, anyone who can ante up whatever the fee is (probably not a lot by Lady G's standards) can take an ad on the site and why not? I have a lot of sympathy for this point of view, mitigated by comments below. Others might say in addition (and some have) that the 'Cat is a *music* site, and anyone who's a musician and a performer should be given space here. I don't totally disagree with this point of view either, but think we are stretching the definition a bit far in the case in question. Other - purists - might say that the "cat is in danger of losing its way a bit and that some effort should be made to match the ad content to the expressed interests of the site's participants. How this would be done I have no idea, but couldn't it be considered? |
|
08 Mar 11 - 10:49 PM (#3110093) Subject: RE: BS: Lady Gaga? From: Jeri I answered the question, but you must have missed it. Max doesn't choose ads. I believe they may be based on what's in threads or where you've been surfing. There are ways to block them. |