03 Apr 00 - 05:17 PM (#206170) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: katlaughing |
04 Apr 00 - 10:11 PM (#206806) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Caitrin Just one question, Threadie... |
10 Apr 00 - 07:08 PM (#209893) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Mark Clark Not only that but importing the image causes the MIDI link to be left behind; we don't get to hear what it sounds like. - Mark
|
10 Apr 00 - 08:32 PM (#209928) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Tony Burns
|
10 Apr 00 - 08:42 PM (#209935) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Joe Offer ...and now you're tempting me to learn tables, Tony. I need help bad in the Glossary of Scottish Words thread. John in Brisbane sent it to me as a nice table in a Word document. When I used Word to change it into an HTML file, it came up to over 6 megabytes, far too large to post. Can anybody figure out how to make the glossary into an HTML table that doesn't take up a lot of space? Feel Free to copy John's glossary and post it again in the same thread. I'll delete all but the best one. Thanks. -Joe Offer- |
12 Apr 00 - 03:17 PM (#210736) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Mark Clark Ignore the man behind the curtain. He's just playing. <a href="http://urlstring">visible text</a>
|
13 Apr 00 - 01:06 AM (#211013) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: lloyd64
|
13 Apr 00 - 01:40 AM (#211024) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Sorcha Jonny, my boy, you are so naughty! (big grin) After all, El Papa Joe will clean this up, right? |
13 Apr 00 - 06:58 AM (#211073) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: MudGuard Which other stuff? Is there any stuff outside the Mudcat Cafe? I can't remember anything else but the Mudcat for the last few years... ;-) There are some previous threads about Mudcat addiction. Look for them the same way as for the html threads. cu, MudGuard |
25 Apr 00 - 09:12 AM (#217578) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: MudGuard Jon, I know myself pretty good (for almost 34 years now), that's how I know I am not katlaughing! TextPad is really good, I use it for some years now (licensed!). There are also some good add-ons on their home-page (e.g. a little program that calls textpad whenever the system wants to open notepad). MudGuard |
18 May 00 - 11:46 AM (#229915) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Jed at Work first line last line |
26 May 00 - 05:45 PM (#234520) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Noreen try again |
27 May 00 - 08:25 AM (#234723) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: MudGuard Noreen, the slash / at the end of an URL indicates that the URL is a directory (= file folder). In that case the webserver looks for a default file in that folder (usually that is index.html). There is no file folder called thread.cfm?threadid=11671 in the mudcat home folder, so your first two links failed. In your case, the url points to a file (called thread.cfm) and it gets parameters (threadid=11671). HTH MudGuard |
18 Jun 00 - 04:01 PM (#244108) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: MudGuard Jon, you need to put <br> to the ends of lines even in <tt> sections. The tt tag only tells the browser to use a typewriter font (a non-proportional one). You'd have to use it even in a <pre> section, but this is not due to html but due to the Mudcat input box - all line feeds are stripped from the input. Noreen, I think I will forgive you, but only if you promise not to do it again! And if I really can't stand it any longer, I might ask Joe to edit the marquee out of your post. MudGuard |
19 Jun 00 - 10:47 AM (#244428) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Noreen This is in bold text. This is in italic text. This is in bold italic text. This text is underlined. This is big text. This is small text. This text is big and underlined.
|
19 Jun 00 - 11:03 AM (#244436) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Noreen OK, I know, I'll try again This is in bold text. This is in italic text. This is in bold italic text. This text is underlined. This is big text. This is small text. This text is big and underlined |
19 Jun 00 - 01:02 PM (#244496) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: BlueJay Ok, I'm just guessing at most of this: |
19 Jun 00 - 01:09 PM (#244499) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: BlueJay Hmmm, nothing happenned at all. Trying to do bold, italics and underline. I'm only guessing, but like for bold, I started with less than, B/ then the word, ending with greater than. Didn't work. Maybe it's |
19 Jun 00 - 01:31 PM (#244512) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Sorcha Jay, its less than, B greater than, then the word. |
19 Jun 00 - 01:31 PM (#244513) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: BlueJay OK, Bold Underline Italic Italics underlined |
20 Jun 00 - 02:53 AM (#244820) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: MudGuard Noreen, regarding your 1:02PM post: <B/Bold><BR> <I/Italics><BR> <U/Unterline><BR> <BIU/Bold Italics, underlined> The only html tags in that line of yours are the <BR>. For bold text, enclose the text in <b>your bold text</b> For italic text, enclose the text in <i>your italic text</i> For underlined text, enclose the text in <u>your underlined text</u> You can combine these, for example <b><i>your bold italic text</i></b> If you wonder why the tags show in my example, i put them in twice. Once normal to get the effect, and once with the < and > replaced by < and >. MudGuard |
20 Jun 00 - 09:13 AM (#244889) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Noreen You confused me there, MudGuard, but after studying your post I think you must be referring to BlueJay's post @1.02pm. I seem to have have got this limited amount of HTML sussed, not to mention the marquee... you said not to mention the marquee! Two more things though while you're here; thanks for explaining how to make the tags show, and howdid you see what html had been written in BlueJay's post, when it didn't show up? Thanks> Noreen |
20 Jun 00 - 09:26 AM (#244895) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Wolfgang How to see what doesn't show? In Netscape: ctrlU Wolfgang |
20 Jun 00 - 07:28 PM (#245125) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Snuffy In Internet Explorer ALT+V C (View Source) |
21 Jun 00 - 02:13 AM (#245291) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: MudGuard Noreen, sorry if I confused you. This was not my intention. It is my fault - even me is not perfect!. I answered to BlueJays html code addressing you. I think when I looked up the name of the poster I just looked one post further up then I should have. I promise not to do it again (at least not intentionally) - hope you will forgive me ;-) I did never say you must not mention the marquee. It is okay to mention it if you damn it ;-). MudGuard |
21 Jun 00 - 05:52 AM (#245334) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Noreen Thank you, Wolfgang and Snuffy. MudGuard: |
21 Jun 00 - 09:02 AM (#245374) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: MudGuard As most of this has been answered before, here just the link to More of the HTML stuff. If this is not enough, search the forum for HTML and you will find some more threads about HTML. MudGuard |
30 Jun 00 - 01:02 AM (#249626) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Mark Clark Here are the lyrics to "Coot From Tennessee." I copied these down from the Greenbriar Boys' record but I'm afraid, on my old copy at least, some of the words are pretty hard to make out. I've numbered each line so I can easily refer back and give other possibilities for the words on that line. Coot From Tennessee
Possible errors are as follows: Line 7 is probably wrong but the words above are the only ones that make any sense. The line is garbled but probably ends in some kind of an "ard" sylable like "bard." Line 8 may then end in the word "hard." Line 11 should match whatever translation is used for line 7. Line 14 may not begin with the word "would." The word is passed over very quickly so I'm not sure. Line 16 actually sounds as if they are singing "Little Billy in the steeple.." but that makes no sense so I imagine what I've used is what they're actually singing. Lines 23 and 27 have the same problems as lines 7 and 11. If anyone knows for certain what the questionable words should be, please post them. I'd rather have it be correct if it's headed for the data base. - Mark
|
10 Jul 00 - 04:41 AM (#254959) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: MudGuard RichM, badly copied! To turn off bold, it needs </b>, not <b>! And all three of your marquees are incorrect (even if the last one might look correct! But as I disencourage use of the internet explorer specific marquee (as well as the netscape specific blink) I won't tell you what is wrong with them! MudGuard |
10 Jul 00 - 10:38 AM (#255081) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: RichM Um...thanks...I think... This reminds of Wordperfect, and its "reveal codes"... I think I will wait till technology catches up... |
27 Aug 00 - 01:20 AM (#285950) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Mark Clark Now is the time for all good men of the party |
27 Aug 00 - 03:39 AM (#285980) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: CarolC |
27 Aug 00 - 04:20 AM (#285986) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Joe Offer |
27 Aug 00 - 05:37 AM (#285997) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: CarolC |
27 Aug 00 - 06:05 AM (#286001) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Roger in Sheffield Don't they work in Netscape? I was just looking at this thread in Netscape and non of that moving multicoloured stuff was happening - WHY??? |
27 Aug 00 - 06:13 AM (#286002) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Roger in Sheffield ...one more thing can you put in moving links? like a shooting range? |
27 Aug 00 - 06:44 AM (#286004) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Jon Freeman Yes and no Roger, you can put a link in a Marquee but clicking anywhere on the line will activate the link - you don't have to hit the words. The other thing to note about marquees in apart from being irritating, they are an Internet Explorer extension to HTML. They won't work with other browers like Netscape. Netscape have blink instead. Jon |
27 Aug 00 - 07:48 AM (#286013) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: GUEST,Roger in Netscape Thanks John this HTML stuff gets more and more confusing So how about Opera? does that have its own querks too? roger |
27 Aug 00 - 08:14 AM (#286022) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Jon Freeman Roger, I only dabble with HTML. I haven't got time to search right now but there is an HTML standard (in fact more than one as HTML has been "upgraded"). All browsers designed to adhere to that version of the standard should behave in a consistent and defined manner but anything outside such as Netscapes blink, IE's marquee may or may not work in another browser. The same applies to errors in HTML. It is down to the browser to decide how to handle them. With regard to the versions, as an example, older browsers do not support frames and these issues need to be considered when designing a web site. Personally, I would err towards compatibility and I think that is what Max does with Mudcat - IMO it is better to have something relatively simple that is accessible to everybody than to use all the latest all singing and dancing features and find that you are excluding a large number of people who would like to access your site. One final comment, if you ever do attempt to design a web site, test it on whatever browser you have available before putting it on the web. It is easy to make a mistake that will not show up on one browser but will cause problems or not work with another. Jon |
27 Aug 00 - 08:22 AM (#286026) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: GUEST,roger in Opera Thanks John Those marquees don't show here either Roger |
27 Aug 00 - 08:28 AM (#286027) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Pene Azul Standards, etc. from W3C: HyperText Markup Language Home Page |
27 Aug 00 - 10:43 AM (#286051) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Roger in Sheffield Thanks Pene it looks complicated but I will look through it A couple more things though if anyone can help How do I put sound into webpages? and do pages load top down? If so can I put a sound file at the bottom of the page so that the text can be read while the sound loads? Roger |
27 Aug 00 - 12:22 PM (#286098) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Pene Azul Embedding Sound in Web Pages from WebReference.com, a very useful site. Jeff |
29 Aug 00 - 08:39 AM (#287102) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Quincy Click here |
29 Aug 00 - 08:50 AM (#287109) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Quincy Yeeeessssssss!!!! First attempt at a blue clicky thing and it worked!!!!!!!!! |
31 Aug 00 - 02:48 PM (#288670) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: wildlone as Joe pointed out I should have used a link to a page I found yesterday so I will try and see if this works click . |
31 Aug 00 - 02:56 PM (#288679) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: wildlone That seemed to work okay lets try a link to the re-enactment group I belong to. Due to the way that the site is made it can take a long time to load. The Royal Welch. |
31 Aug 00 - 09:26 PM (#288916) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Joe Offer |
03 Sep 00 - 12:29 AM (#290168) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Terry K Here goes nothing - Map of LLanstock |
03 Sep 00 - 12:34 AM (#290171) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Terry K Map of LLanstock |
03 Sep 00 - 09:47 AM (#290268) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: GUEST,Crazy Eddie Roses are red, Blickies are blue Can I make a line-break Or 'cos I can't make a rhyme? |
15 Sep 00 - 07:21 AM (#297889) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Jon Freeman Test |
27 Sep 00 - 11:38 PM (#307099) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: campfire Try this campfire |
27 Sep 00 - 11:41 PM (#307102) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: campfire Try again... Angel from Montgomery |
27 Sep 00 - 11:42 PM (#307104) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: campfire Try again... Angel from Montgomery |
27 Mar 01 - 10:49 PM (#427180) Subject: Guitar Tab? From: Mark Clark C Ab E
C A |
27 Mar 01 - 10:55 PM (#427188) Subject: Try Again From: Mark Clark C Ab |
13 Apr 01 - 06:44 AM (#439645) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Geoff the Duck Hello there. I am just testing something out for my own information - Checking out a formatting command. Please do not take much notice of this bunch of drivel. |
13 Apr 01 - 12:45 PM (#439846) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: MudGuard problem with pre tag is that the linebreaks do not even reach the server - they are taken out before the browser sends the content of the window to the server as the textarea has the wrap attribute set to "soft" MudGuard |
13 Apr 01 - 08:40 PM (#440136) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Geoff the Duck If you are still reading this stuff I was led to believe that by using the "pre" tag in "<" brackets would leave text formatted elsewhere with paragraph breaks intact when it appeared on screen. Am I mistaken or is it just something which does not work with Mudcat? Line Breaks <br> added. Mudcat is set to ignore carriage returns in all cases except double-spacing (two carriage returns in a row). The <pre> affects most things, but not line breaks. It's set to ignore carriage returns because there are some problems associated connected with accepting them. I saw the bad advice you must have read, but didn't have time to post an explanation. |
14 Apr 01 - 12:11 AM (#440252) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Louie Roy Joe Offer This is where I get my feet wet I hope that I read your instructions right If this turns out the way it is suppose to I will be sharing a lot of info with others If not I am just practicing the way I anyway Anyway let me know allthe mistakes I've Made |
14 Apr 01 - 12:18 AM (#440255) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Louie Roy Old mother Hubbard went to the cubbard To get her poor daughter a dress But when she got there the cubbard was bare And so was her daughter I guess |
14 Apr 01 - 12:34 AM (#440260) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Mark Clark Goeff, If you were building your own Web page, the <pre> tag would indeed cause everything to display just as it looked when you entered it. For Mudcat posts, however, any hard return all by itself—separate lines with no intervening blank line—is stripped out causing the lines to flow together when viewed. If there are two or more hard returns in a row—one or more blank lines—they are replaced with a <p> tag. You can observe me discovering this fact just eight posts above this one. - Mark |
14 Apr 01 - 12:35 AM (#440261) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: catspaw49 Really LR???
Old Mother Hubbard Spaw |
17 Apr 01 - 12:11 PM (#442576) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: mousethief blicky
|
18 Apr 01 - 11:20 PM (#444059) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Jim Dixon Here is some text above the table.
Here is some text below the table.
Text line chorus linetext line |
21 Apr 01 - 01:19 PM (#446135) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Tiger Testing, testing, testing 1 2 3 Testing, testing, testing 1 2 3 |
21 Apr 01 - 01:22 PM (#446138) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Tiger Testing, testing, testing |
21 Apr 01 - 01:36 PM (#446146) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: MudGuard Within pre, tt is usually not necessary as most browsers use a nonproportional font anyway. But it does not hurt to use tt as well. MudGuard |
21 Apr 01 - 01:53 PM (#446152) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Tiger :s1 |s1 :m :m |m :r :r |r :-.d :d |d :- |
22 Apr 01 - 08:18 AM (#446543) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Crazy Eddie Just practicing. To boldly go, where no man has gone before |
22 Apr 01 - 08:21 AM (#446545) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Crazy Eddie To boldly go, where no man has gone before. |
22 Apr 01 - 01:37 PM (#446681) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Bernard
|
23 Apr 01 - 06:34 AM (#447171) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: MudGuard the marquee is not HTML, it is Microsoft's invention and will work only in Microsoft browsers. Similarly, blink is a netscape invention and only works in Netscape browsers. both pseudo-tags should not be used on web-pages, not only because they are not HTML, but also because they are annoying! MudGuard |
23 Apr 01 - 09:22 AM (#447231) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Bernard Just having a laff! They look daft enough in Netscape, so I didn't bother with the blink... They can be quite mesmerising... the different text sizes make them move 'randomly'! I used <table width="75%"> so that it adjusts to your screen width for maximum annoyance!! |
23 Apr 01 - 11:56 AM (#447347) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: RichM Crazy Eddie, Picard should have said Tobaldly go, where no man has gone before |
24 Apr 01 - 08:11 AM (#447973) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Crazy Eddie RichM, Good one. :o) Though I think to boldly go where no man has gone before, had been updated to to boldly go where no-one has gone before, by the time Pickard arrived on the scene. And just to try something else |
24 Apr 01 - 08:17 AM (#447977) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Crazy Eddie Hmmm.... Enterprise Klingon Hows that? |
24 Apr 01 - 08:29 AM (#447987) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Patrish(inactive) |
24 Apr 01 - 08:32 AM (#447990) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Patrish(inactive) |
24 Apr 01 - 03:23 PM (#448342) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: MudGuard to boldly go where no man has gone before - the ladies' toilet? Btw, I hate marquee. Was that named after the Marquee de Sade? MudGuard |
24 Apr 01 - 03:38 PM (#448349) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Bernard Or the Refreshments Marquee? Give me a good beer tent any day!! Then again, who needs the tent... |
25 Apr 01 - 04:31 AM (#448775) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Crazy Eddie Bernard, please!Without the tent, the rain dilutes the beer. Not a happy outcome! |
27 Aug 01 - 04:33 PM (#536296) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Geoff the Duck "Is this how you do quotation marks??" |
27 Aug 01 - 05:09 PM (#536318) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: GUEST,iamjohnne here i go trying to get the gist of this this is a test it is only a test |
27 Aug 01 - 05:12 PM (#536320) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: GUEST,iamjohnne well at least i got that part right I am not even gonna try all the moving stuff yet Johnne "goin where the weather suits my clothes" |
27 Aug 01 - 11:35 PM (#536547) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Armen Tanzerian |
28 Aug 01 - 06:40 AM (#536632) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: JohnInKansas JOE OFFER: RE: SCOTTISH GLOSSARY I don't know whether it might be an improvement, but there seems to be a potential 3 to 1 reduction in file size if the Scottish Glossary is formatted as a Dictionary entry rather than as a table. My wimpmobile machine (Win98, 64MB) wouldn't convert the whole thread in one pass, but did it in two. My attempt to send the resulting 456K file broke off at about 50K, but there seems to be some reduction in total file size. I certainly didn't get multiMegs. I'll forgo further messing with it, until I hear from some experts about whether this is an improvement, but I can provide fairly detailed description of the approach used. PM me if it looks like it might be helpful, or ignore if not. I'm off to Winfield in a few days, so may be out of touch after next weekend. John |
06 Sep 01 - 08:27 PM (#543972) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Geoff the Duck "Quotation marks in HTML?" |
07 Sep 01 - 06:55 PM (#544822) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Mark Clark Ah yes... quotation marks. Here on Mudcat we can simply type the double quote symbol in simple text posting and it will be displayed as we intend. Sometimes, like in the middle of a hyperlink tag, it's best to enter a double quote by using it's HTML name, ". That way it won't be confused with the " symbol used to deliniate the URL in the HREF attribute of the anchor (<a...></a>) tag. The HTML name " produces two small vertical tick marks, not a real set of typesetter's quotation marks. Often, when I wish to place quotes around some text in a post, I'll use the HTML names &ldquo and &rdquo which produce “proper” quotation marks more in keeping with the Roman font. Cheers, - Mark |
07 Sep 01 - 07:15 PM (#544838) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Mark Clark Well, I didn't anticipate that the semi-colons would disappear in my previous post. I don't have a handy HTML name for a semi-colon so I'll just use ; to represent the semi-colon since its decimal value in the ASCII representation is 59. The HTML names I mentioned above should have appeared with terminating semi-colons as follows:
" produces " I hope that's clear. - Mark
|
27 Jan 05 - 02:26 PM (#1390363) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: RichM |
27 Jan 05 - 02:27 PM (#1390364) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: GUEST |
28 Jan 05 - 12:47 PM (#1391452) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: open mike FF3399 so if i want the text to be large,bold and this color, what do i do?? FF3399 and then what do i do to make it move around? |
28 Jan 05 - 12:52 PM (#1391460) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Cluin You mean like this? |
28 Jan 05 - 01:09 PM (#1391483) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: open mike yes, like this? like that.. |
28 Jan 05 - 01:10 PM (#1391484) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: open mike You mean like this? not just copy and paste... |
28 Jan 05 - 01:12 PM (#1391487) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: open mike |
28 Jan 05 - 01:13 PM (#1391490) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: open mike ok i got the color part down now,, |
28 Jan 05 - 01:14 PM (#1391492) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: open mike 100 |
28 Jan 05 - 01:16 PM (#1391495) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: open mike |
28 Jan 05 - 01:17 PM (#1391498) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Amos
|
28 Jan 05 - 01:38 PM (#1391521) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: open mike color=FF3399 |
28 Jan 05 - 01:50 PM (#1391525) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: open mike |
28 Jan 05 - 01:52 PM (#1391527) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: GUEST |
28 Jan 05 - 02:36 PM (#1391562) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Amos 1. The text to be modified is typically placed in a container, which means a beginning of the desired effect on th eleft, and an end on the right. So if you were trying to bold the text, it wold go: [b]the text[/b] The b starts the bolding and the "/b" ends it. If you use angle brackets < and >, only!! What you would get is the text. The commands vanish and the text shows the effect. For a font color you would make a container defining the color like this: [font color=red]the text[/font] which if you used angle brackets would look like this: the text Does that make sense? You can then put one container inside another to double up on effects: [b][font color=red]the text[/font][/b] would produce (using angle brackets): the text. See? Adding a third container to make it italic woud look like this: [i][b][font color=red]the text[/font][/b][/i] which produces (using angle brackets): the text. Regards, A |
28 Jan 05 - 03:19 PM (#1391585) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: GUEST i bet this doesn't work. |
28 Jan 05 - 03:21 PM (#1391587) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: GUEST amos why didn't it come out pink. Do you actually haveto write font colour, or just pink? I wrote font colour=pink and put it in angle brackets? |
28 Jan 05 - 03:23 PM (#1391589) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: GUEST YOU LOSE! |
28 Jan 05 - 03:32 PM (#1391595) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: GUEST say that in pink! |
28 Jan 05 - 03:32 PM (#1391596) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: GUEST color. html speaks US-ese |
28 Jan 05 - 03:33 PM (#1391597) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: GUEST |
28 Jan 05 - 03:33 PM (#1391598) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: GUEST YOU LOSE! |
28 Jan 05 - 03:35 PM (#1391602) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: GUEST,Jon <font color=pink>Guest, it throws me sometimes... You need to spell colour the American way - color</font> |
28 Jan 05 - 03:35 PM (#1391603) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: GUEST if at first I don't succeed |
28 Jan 05 - 03:36 PM (#1391605) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: GUEST |
28 Jan 05 - 03:38 PM (#1391607) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: GUEST ok so why didn't it blink!!!!! i told it to blink!!! |
28 Jan 05 - 03:48 PM (#1391611) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: GUEST |
28 Jan 05 - 03:50 PM (#1391612) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: GUEST |
28 Jan 05 - 04:10 PM (#1391627) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: GUEST,Jon Guest, all your blink examples work. You might not see it because of the browser you use. It was non standard HTML provided by Netscape. Microsoft had marquee instead. |
28 Jan 05 - 04:16 PM (#1391636) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Amos |
28 Jan 05 - 05:04 PM (#1391665) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: GUEST amos stop confusing me!, What is h3? thanks for your patience chapswish i could see my handiwork though. yes jon i have microsoft? |
28 Jan 05 - 05:10 PM (#1391669) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: GUEST |
28 Jan 05 - 05:13 PM (#1391672) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: GUEST |
28 Jan 05 - 05:16 PM (#1391677) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: GUEST |
28 Jan 05 - 05:20 PM (#1391682) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: GUEST,Jon Guest, 2 of the big players in the browser game got into competition to see who could claim power by providing the most irritating feature that only thier browser supported... If you really want to know more about marquee, etc. try Mudguard here but ask him nicely. |
28 Jan 05 - 05:21 PM (#1391683) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: GUEST |
28 Jan 05 - 05:25 PM (#1391684) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: GUEST |
28 Jan 05 - 06:31 PM (#1391775) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Cluin MARQUEE is a stupid tag. BLINK is another. One works in Internet Explorer, the other works in Netscape. I don't know which work, if at all, in Mozilla or Firefox. But small loss if they don't. |
28 Jan 05 - 07:19 PM (#1391804) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: GUEST,Jon Cliun firefox 1.0 on Suse 9.2 here. Both tags are working. |
28 Jan 05 - 11:29 PM (#1391987) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: JennyO |
28 Jan 05 - 11:38 PM (#1391996) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: JennyO |
29 Jan 05 - 07:46 AM (#1392158) Subject: RE: HTML practice thread From: Cluin
|