|
22 Mar 01 - 02:03 PM (#423364) Subject: Women in space From: mousethief Please forgive me if this is just really stupid, or really sexist, but ever since they said a female astronaut was goign to be living on the space station for 3 months, this has been gnawing away at my mind. Also forgive me for indelicacy of phrasing but it's a pretty graphic topic. Isn't menstruation a gravity-dependent process? If you were weightless during your menses, would the fluids find their way to the exit? Maybe a little time spent on a human-sized centrifuge each day would do the trick? Or does Mom Nature take care of such things automatically?
curious in Seattle, |
|
22 Mar 01 - 02:14 PM (#423384) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: annamill Sounds like the makings of a song. Kinda like "If it doesn't snow on Christmas". L.A. |
|
22 Mar 01 - 03:08 PM (#423430) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: mousethief Surely somebody here must have an opinion -- or some medical insight -- that can help here? I mean it's idle curiosity, I'll admit. And more than a little prurient. But by golly, there have been far worse threads and this does have SOME scientific value. |
|
22 Mar 01 - 03:27 PM (#423445) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: Naemanson Kimmers is a doctor. Maybe she knows and will enlighten you when she signs on again. |
|
22 Mar 01 - 03:31 PM (#423449) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: Hawker Don't know, but I have heard that the pill taken constantly can prevent the monthly event occuring, but I don't know how safe that would be with blood pressure, clots etc and being in space? Lucy |
|
22 Mar 01 - 03:34 PM (#423452) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: mousethief Yes, I'm told by my wife the pill will prevent IT from happening. And presumably if it's not safe to have IT happen in zero gravity, that's what they would do. But can IT work in zero G's? That's the real question.
curioser and curioser, |
|
22 Mar 01 - 03:34 PM (#423454) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: Amos I believe gravity is not the only force at work. Capillary action and whatever the muscular equivalent of peristalsis is probably also come in to play here. It's a much more dynamic situation than, say, a cup of water turned upside down in a zero-grav environment. My 2 cents' worth. A |
|
22 Mar 01 - 04:10 PM (#423466) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: GUEST,Fretless Why not ask NASA? Presumably, this is a question they've had to answer. http://science.msfc.nasa.gov/faq/ask-a-scientist.htm |
|
23 Mar 01 - 09:27 AM (#424024) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: Mrrzy Fascinating question, I'm very interested in the answer. Now on the same topic, have they solved the problem of how a woman can PEE in free fall? Male astronauts have a tube thingie, but women have tended to have to use a catheter... ouch... what do they do now? About the actual question, I would assume that the periods would be skipped by using birth control or similar pills. It is nowadays quite safe to do that, lower dosages and all that. In fact, some medical people are beginning to think that menstruating every month may actually be harmful, since Mother Nature indended us to be pregnant so much of the time, it might actually be safer to have fewer periods... but the data aren't in on that. Do we have any members that are affiliated with the Space program? |
|
23 Mar 01 - 10:26 AM (#424087) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: sian, west wales I'm still trying to work out how the Pill can keep Information Technology (IT) from working... puzzled sian |
|
23 Mar 01 - 10:45 AM (#424102) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: mousethief I read on the NASA web site that both men and women pee into what amounts to a large vacuum cleaner tube. I'm too chicken to ask this question on the "Just ask NASA" page. That's why I came here. Sian: LOL. Alex |
|
23 Mar 01 - 10:51 AM (#424110) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: kimmers Well, if I were in space for 3 months, I would sure as heck not want to deal with the whole mess. I wouldn't be surprised if the women astronauts used Depo-Provera or something like it to manipulate their cycles. On the other hand, prolonged weightlessness leads to bone loss, and the absence of a normal menstrual cycle also leads to bone loss... so maybe suppressing the menses ain't such a hot idea. As far as your original question, Alex, gravity is part of the process but not all. The non-pregnant uterus isn't very big, and liquid would find its way out eventually even if we all hung from gravity boots during our periods. Which would, I suppose, be an interesting test.
|
|
23 Mar 01 - 10:53 AM (#424113) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: GUEST,Midchuck upstairs Speaking of zero gravity and bodily fluids...I think it was Spider Robinson that saw the design for a zero-gravity toilet. One of the engineering features was, as I understand it, a centrifuge to separate solids from liquids. Spider (or whoever it was) pointed out that this was some kind of an ultimate engineering triumph. The shit is supposed to hit the fan. Peter. |
|
23 Mar 01 - 11:11 AM (#424127) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: Mrrzy Where is this Just Ask Nasa page? I'm no shrinking violet, I'll ask... |
|
23 Mar 01 - 11:19 AM (#424132) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: mousethief This is probably your best bet: http://quest.arc.nasa.gov/mars/ask/question.html Good luck!
your neighborhood shrinking violet, |
|
23 Mar 01 - 11:26 AM (#424139) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: Mrrzy OK, I asked somehow (not the above link, will try that next) and got this, not an answer, but pretty: sts-102-crew_low.jpg |
|
23 Mar 01 - 11:27 AM (#424140) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: Sorcha The URL is above, in Fretless' post......I tried it and none of the proper links (microgravity and biology or archived questions) would work......... |
|
23 Mar 01 - 11:30 AM (#424144) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: Mrrzy I tried it too, all links worked for me, but it is specifically about the Mars part. Not that it matters, they'll have to pee/whatever on their way there too... but the question form pops up an Outlook email from me, so I can't try it here (at work) but I'll try later when I get home. This issue is brought up a lot by Larry Niven. Will try to ask him, too, or Jerry Pournelle, or anyone who writes well-researched SciFi. |
|
23 Mar 01 - 11:33 AM (#424149) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: Blackcatter Greetings all I think it can be accomplished with muscular action. There's not a lot of vaginal room and I believe the process is a more gentle version of solid waste removal (and for that matter urine removal as well - we don't pee because of gravity). Also a little regular cleaning during the time would be of help. Mousthief is correct about peeing into a vacuum. That's pretty much how they do it. When you think about it, it may be easy for a man to pee in space but where does it all go without some other encouragement? I'm going to ask NASA as well - maybe this should be a concerted effort. You know how government is when it comes to answering questions they don't want th answer. |
|
23 Mar 01 - 11:36 AM (#424156) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: Linda Kelly Well this is a disappointing thread-I thought it was goign to beabout women we would like sent into space -I was going to nominate Margaret Thatcher and Scary Spice. |
|
23 Mar 01 - 11:41 AM (#424165) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: Blackcatter My vote would be for Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris - but then again, her mind is probably already orbiting Pluto (or Goofy . . .) pax |
|
23 Mar 01 - 11:43 AM (#424169) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: Mrrzy All the women from my town. Maybe then I could get some! Also, I can't find anything that isn't a fan-based thing for Larry Niven. Might have to use snail mail, quelle idée! |
|
23 Mar 01 - 11:47 AM (#424178) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: Blackcatter Here's the response about personal hygene from the NASA FAQ page - unfortunately it doesn't discuss menstruation: How do astronauts in space go to the bathroom and take care of their personal hygiene? Astronauts brush their teeth just like they do on Earth. There is no shower on the Shuttle, so astronauts must make do with sponge baths until they return home. Each Space Shuttle has a toilet that can be used by both men and women. Designed to be as much as possible like those on Earth, the units use flowing air instead of water to move waste through the system. Solid wastes are compressed and stored onboard, and then removed after landing. Wastewater is vented to space, although future systems may recycle it. The air is filtered to remove odor and bacteria and then returned to the cabin. pax yall |
|
23 Mar 01 - 11:48 AM (#424179) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: mousethief Hmmm. Women we'd like to shoot into space? Besides my ex-wife, I assume. Hmmm. I'll have to think about that. But you can send Hillary while I'm thinking. |
|
23 Mar 01 - 11:49 AM (#424180) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: Pseudolus Very interesting thread, although next time I'll be smart enough to not read it during lunch!! *g* Frank |
|
23 Mar 01 - 11:54 AM (#424183) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: Blackcatter There has to be a website out there that discusses the indelegate issues of space flight - I just hope it's not a porn site . . . pax yall |
|
23 Mar 01 - 12:12 PM (#424201) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: Blackcatter Here we go: From this website : www.eff.org/Net_culture/Misc/technoculture.paper I got the following info: (an interviewer talking to a NASA scientitst (supposedly)) (2) About menstruation in space, he said "Even if there were a problem - and there isn't - there still wouldn't be a problem." Not only can flow be arrested with pills or endometrial fibulation (extraction), but the imagined problems of retrograde (backflowing) menstruation has never been found to have any consequences. "So do they just bring tampons along on the space flights?" I asked. "Basically, yes," he said. (He referred me to an article he wrote on the reproductive functions of men and women in the space environment in Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey, vol 45, #1, p. 7. (1989) |
|
23 Mar 01 - 12:16 PM (#424207) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: mousethief Imagined problems of retrograte menstruation include horrible cramping in women where pieces of the sloughed-off endometrium (sp?) get into the abdominal cavity. But I don't imagine zero gravity would make it much worse; even being in earth's gravity can't prevent it for the women who get it (I dated one; I know). But thanks for the answer. Finally, we know the truth. Alex |
|
23 Mar 01 - 12:42 PM (#424238) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: Mrrzy WAIT a minute. Backflow WHERE? There is only one exit, and that's the cervix. There IS no opening from the uterus to the abdominal cavity. I can see why these problems are "imagined" - and I find "Even if there were a problem - and there isn't - there still wouldn't be a problem" to be a great example of a nonanswer. Tampons have positive absorbency, so inserting one will PULL fluids from wherever it can, perhaps substituting for gravity. Hadn't thought of that. Bet they just skip their periods while offplanet, though, must be easier, the way it is down here. And mousethief, what exactly did you date - a woman? (*BG*) |
|
23 Mar 01 - 02:00 PM (#424302) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: Ely Well, if they pee into a vacuum, mightn't that help, um, move things along, too? Not that I'm anxious to find out, because the experience is unpleasant enough without needing that kind of extra help. On the other note, I'd send Britney Spears to space. And some of those super-skinny actresses (can you send two actresses/models for the price of one if they both weigh half as much as a normal woman?). |
|
23 Mar 01 - 02:08 PM (#424307) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: mousethief How much does a normal woman weigh? |
|
23 Mar 01 - 03:33 PM (#424414) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: GUEST Ickle; you mean together? Wonderful! |
|
23 Mar 01 - 04:48 PM (#424470) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: Kim C I'm glad someone besides me worries about this kind of stuff. I was beginning to think I was really weird or something. |
|
23 Mar 01 - 11:52 PM (#424722) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: kimmers Mrrzy, there *is* another opening... two, to be exact. The uterine tubes or Fallopian tubes come out the top of the uterus and end in fringed openings. Normally, the ends of the tubes, with their little fingers, sit around the ovaries, ready to tickle that egg on its merry way. But under the right circumstances, things can escape out the tubes and enter the abdominal cavity. If bits of sloughed endometrium do this, you get endometriosis. Even plain menstrual blood can do this (rarely) and cause a lot of pain. A fertilized egg can get lost and do this, and give the poor woman a condition known as an abdominal pregnancy. Very bad news. |
|
24 Mar 01 - 12:13 AM (#424729) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: Amos Holy Moly!! Another design flaw!!! The System Engineer isn't gonna like this!!! Who spec'ed this thing, anyway?? |
|
24 Mar 01 - 01:34 AM (#424748) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: Sorcha Thanks, kimmers. I knew that, but could not have put it so well. Back when I used to have this "problem", albiet not in null/micro gravity, I used tampons only on the last 2 or 3 days, so that I was certain I was finished. Stained knickers are just the pits.
One of the glorious things about menopause is that you can buy clean, white panties and they will stay that way!
Tampons do "draw", hence, Toxic Shock Syndrome if they are used too much or left in too long.
(my god, the things we discuss on Mudcat........any other personal stuff you want to know about? Childbirth and episiotomies for instance? PAP smears? Piles?) Something that has not been mentioned here is that females who "train" heavily, such as Olympic atheletes, quite often skip menses while in training, and then later have trouble regularizing their cycles. When the body is over stressed, it deletes functions, often to the body's own detriment. |
|
24 Mar 01 - 03:07 AM (#424764) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: Blackcatter Yeah, I remember something about the route from the ovaries to the uterus not being a tube like the vas deferens (sp?) is for men and having from what I remember something similar to a jump set-up with my old Hotwheels track. Goodness, isn't education a wonderful thing? I'm SO glad I learned that back in 9th grade health or biology or somewhere . . . I guess whoever wrote the specs for women & men, must of assumed that eggs knew where the hell they were going, while sperm had to be shown the way (and prpelled at a high-rate of speed as well). Hmmmmm - that makes me wonder one thing - just how fast does sperm travel during ejaculation (i.e. relative to their size). Bicycle? Cheetah? Bullet? pax yall, |
|
24 Mar 01 - 06:07 AM (#424775) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: Penny S. Sorcha, isn't it great to leave a whole aisle of the supermarket out, and never have to go there again! Penny |
|
24 Mar 01 - 07:28 AM (#424784) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: Naemanson "I guess whoever wrote the specs for women & men, must of assumed that eggs knew where the hell they were going, while sperm had to be shown the way..." Does this explain the difference between men and women when it comes to giving and receiving directions? |
|
24 Mar 01 - 11:18 AM (#424855) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: mousethief Actually it's not that sperm have to be shown the way. It's that Mom Nature knew that unless there was ONLY ONE WAY they could go, they would go the wrong one. Eggs, on the other hand, could be relied upon to stop and ask for directions if they needed to. |
|
24 Mar 01 - 11:46 AM (#424870) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: kimmers Hee hee. Not to throw cold water on this amusing analogy, but the little egg has no independent means of going anywhere. It must depend on the wavelike contractions of the Fallopian tube to get it to its destination; otherwise, it just sits there looking pathetic. I don't know how fast the little wigglers are, though. I'll see if I can find out for you. Hey, surely there's a song parody on this subject, somewhere? |
|
24 Mar 01 - 11:55 AM (#424875) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: Sorcha Penny, I still can't skip the aisle; I have a daughter and the dog food is on the other end, LOL! |
|
24 Mar 01 - 02:48 PM (#424978) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: Blackcatter Dog food & feminine hygene - boy I DON'T want to go there . . . |
|
24 Mar 01 - 04:04 PM (#425029) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: mousethief Did someone say tuna? Bad, bad mouse. |
|
25 Mar 01 - 06:02 PM (#425412) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: Blackcatter Maybe we could do a song thread about "speedy lil wigglers " Pax |
|
26 Mar 01 - 06:37 AM (#425673) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: JulieF Sian I've always found that the Pill helps IT to work rather than stops IT - I don't end up throwing the bloody computer out the window. Julie |
|
26 Mar 01 - 12:15 PM (#425837) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: Mrrzy OK, I stand corrected, thanks. That was really worrying me. I was taught that sperm swim an inch an hour. If anyone knows their dimensions, you can do the math. My guess is Bullet, faster than Cheetah. But back to the actual question... |
|
26 Mar 01 - 12:36 PM (#425859) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: mousethief Always glad to oblige, Blackcatter.
Speedy Little Wigglers
Ain't but one of them little wigglers
(chorus) Well back in the corral
These little wigglers' lives are hard (repeat chorus)
(C) 2001 Alex Riggle. All Rights Reserved. |
|
26 Mar 01 - 01:21 PM (#425911) Subject: um, gee... From: cait it tends to make its way out while lying in bed or standing on head. gimme a break. |
|
26 Mar 01 - 01:27 PM (#425918) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: mousethief huh? |
|
26 Mar 01 - 01:39 PM (#425932) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: kimmers Alex, that's a hoot!! Did you write that on the spot, or was that sitting in your collection just waiting for an opportunity? Tune-wise... when I read the words, my brain sings it to something country-ish with three chords that resembles John Prine's "Flag Decal". |
|
26 Mar 01 - 01:40 PM (#425934) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: mousethief Wrote it on the spot, of course. If you want to put music on it and sing it in public, that's your never-mind. :) Alex |
|
27 Mar 01 - 09:12 AM (#426470) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: Mrrzy (from our genetics class way back when) Let me tell you how it's gonna be |
|
27 Mar 01 - 09:50 AM (#426490) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: GUEST,Fibula Mattock Umm, someone please explain what happens about a 28 day (lunar) menstrual cycle when a woman's in space. Seriously - will it change in length or anything when not on Earth??? |
|
27 Mar 01 - 10:05 AM (#426503) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: MMario That really doesn't enter the equation until after you exit the earth/moon system - say for a trip to mars. but they suspect (since there is no way to test it) that it would depend on how many women are there - as women living in close proximity tend to synchronize cycles eventually - |
|
27 Mar 01 - 10:10 AM (#426506) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: GUEST,Fibula Mattock Cool. So how does it work outside of the earth/moon system? Oh, and that's definitely noticeable about the sychronised cycles. Used to happen to me and my mates when we all shared a house. |
|
27 Mar 01 - 10:24 AM (#426517) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: Mrrzy Interesting question, that last one. I'm not sure how the moon works with coordinating menstruation anyway, perhaps the 4-week cycle is only artifactually lunar? I mean, do women's pit hormones actually feel the tides, like a homing pigeon or something? VERY good question, I'm gonna take that one to my staff meeting and see what everyone thinks... |
|
27 Mar 01 - 10:34 AM (#426529) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: MMario SF authors have mused about that question for some time - whether it's coincidence that the average cycle matches the moon cycle - or not. The cycle is not CLOSELY tied - or there would be a few days a month when ...uhmm - forget I even thought that. *shudder*
|
|
27 Mar 01 - 11:02 AM (#426547) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: GUEST,Fibula Mattock Right, I did a quick Google search and came up with a heap of websites, mostly Feminist* and/or New Age* talking about the effect of the lunar cycle such as: "Certainly for a woman a key way to be sensitive to the lunar cycle is through her menstrual cycle. A woman's menstrual cycle may not be a perfect 28 days or link to the phases of the Moon, in ovulating at the Full and bleeding at the New Moon. There is some evidence that this used to be the order of things but that the amount of artificial light in our environment combined with the conditioned disconnection from our bodies has changed this. Now this bothers me. If a woman's cycle used to be "perfect" and in line with the phases of the moon, what about all the societies where menstruating woman had to be segregated? Does that mean they all went off at once leaving the men and kids behind? A whole community? hmmm. Also, artificial light is nothing new - it's been around since the advent of fire - although we have a lot more of it nowadays. Do they mean electric light? I'm not convinced. I'd like to know more about this subject, but I wish these sites would state the bloody (pun intended) "evidence". (* Not intended to be derogatoty. And I consider myself to be a feminist in that I want equality between sexes. Or does that make me an equalist? ) |
|
27 Mar 01 - 11:07 AM (#426551) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: Mrrzy That makes you a feminist, don't be afraid of the label. Anyone read The Mists of Avalon? They go deeply into the mystical significance, and getting yourself in tune with the earth and moon so that you will be at mid-cycle at the full moon, and menstruate in the dark phases. But I doubt, even with the women-who-live-together-bleed-together effect, if all women of any village menstruated together. The segregation thing is a good point. Then, who'd make dinner? As the quaint saying goes. |
|
27 Mar 01 - 11:11 AM (#426555) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: mousethief Please let's not get started on the Mists of Avalon. It's been such a pleasant conversation so far. |
|
28 Mar 01 - 04:26 PM (#427845) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: Penny S. I started to write this last night, but when I got up to research the lunar months part, the computer crashed. The variation due to artificial light is susceptible to test - we still have primitive societies with none, and it should be possible to discover what cycles women there follow. Then there are communities of nuns, who are synchronised, live with much less artificial light, and run a longer cycle. What happens with women above the Arctic circle? The strongest influence is apparently, the presence or absence of men - research in a convent in which the researcher introduced testosterone into the air-conditioning(?), a terminated experiment, showed a speeding up of the cycle. There is the comparison with our close primate relatives, the females of whom run an average 33 day cycle. when observed. There is no 28 day lunar cycle, anyway. The synodic month, New Moon to New, is 29.53 days. The other cycles, such as the sidereal, in which the Moon returns to the same position against the fixed stars (27.3217 days), are mostly less than 27 and a half days. (The others are the tropical month, in which the Moon returns to the point where the celestial equator crosses the ecliptic - 27.3216 days, the anomalistic, from perigee to perigee - 27.55, and the draconic, from the node where the Moon's orbit crosses the ecliptic, either up or down, to the same node again - 27.21 days.) Only the anomalistic month and the synodic month seem to have any likelihood of influencing anything down here much, but clearly, anything running at 28 days, as a woman whose cycles are constrained by the Pill would be, will be noticeably out of step by nearly a full phase after four cycles. I wouldn't rule out an influence. There was a time in my life when for much of a year, my cycles did seem to be irregular in such a way as to keep menstruation at around the time of Full, not New Moon. As I recall, my cycle ran short, becoming closer to a Full Moon, and then lengthened, to stay with the lunar cycle longer. This was the time that I started to suffer from migraines, which tended to happen at about the same time, on Saturdays. However, I suspect there are far more natural influences closer at hand, not least in each woman's head. It would be interesting to compare samples of women not on the pill who a) believe their cycles to be influenced by the Moon, and b) don't. But given that the identification of menstrual and lunar cycles depends on linking a very variable phenomenon in some living systems (which originally may not have experienced them much, due to pregnancy) with a more regular cycle of a different length from that claimed, which two cycles are of similar but different frequencies, the identification seems to be more poetic than actual, and therefore very unlikely to have any importance to women travelling in space. What could be worrying though is if the known relationship between body mass and menstruation, which leads to women who lose weight drastically ceasing to menstruate and developing other serious effects, should turn out to be between body weight and menstruation. Penny |
|
29 Mar 01 - 02:55 AM (#428151) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: Wolfgang great post, Penny. Wolfgang |
|
29 Mar 01 - 05:01 AM (#428202) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: GUEST,Fibula Mattock Thanks Penny - that's really interesting. |
|
29 Mar 01 - 09:25 AM (#428328) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: Mrrzy Penny, I didn't understand your very last sentence. But great post, good info. However, I must pick one teeny nit - please (this it to everyone, not just Penny) don't say Primitive when you mean Ancient. Any human society is just as complex as any other, it's just some forms of society have been around longer than others. (This is just one of my pet peeves. Feel free to ignore.) |
|
29 Mar 01 - 09:48 AM (#428341) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: Wolfgang Mrrzy, Penny's last sentence focuses on the difference between mass and weight. In space, the mass of a person is the same as on earth whereas the weight is zero. I do understand your concern about 'primitive' for all its unwanted associations, but when I look into my Webster's I find that 'primitive' covers the sense Penny has meant, whereas 'ancient' doesn't. 'Ancient' doesn't relate to a society still being here today for testing, whereas 'primitive' does. Wolfgang |
|
29 Mar 01 - 10:36 AM (#428383) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: GUEST Partners, Incubus and Secubus. |
|
29 Mar 01 - 10:38 AM (#428386) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: GUEST,Fibula Mattock Yeah, but I agree with Mrrzy on this aspect (though I'm not countering Penny's use of it). It's one of the things I have against anthropology (maybe just my archaeological bias) but sitting in our western society today there can be a tendancy to view other forms of society with different ways of life as inferior. There's also often a temptation to view past societies as being "primitive". Consider people expressing amazement that "oh, imagine, a society like that could build Stonehenge/the Pyramids/Roman roads etc!". We constantly underestimate the people of the past and write them off as "primitive" when most of the evidence I've seen seems to be to the contrary. Primitive in my wee Collins English Dictionary says: "of an early, simple stage of development; basic, crude" - but that's a subjective and relative definition. |
|
29 Mar 01 - 05:17 PM (#428737) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: Penny S. OK, societies with a way of life more closely linked to the outdoors, and to natural diurnal rhythms, without excessive dependence on artificial light. Penny |
|
29 Mar 01 - 06:06 PM (#428773) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: Penny S. And I couldn't agree more about underselling the peoples of the past - saying that a society would have been too primitive to do something usually means that the person making the comment couldn't do it. Penny |
|
29 Mar 01 - 08:42 PM (#428877) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: GUEST,Sass Well, this is bizarre place to enter a conversation. Hi everyone! I've found this thread pretty interesting, and at the risk of being too late will go ahead and give my personal answer to the above questions. If gravity was needed for menstruation, they wouldn't sell huge all-night pads, right? And, 28 days -- not 29+, which is the lunar cycle -- is the AVERAGE length of the menstrual cycle. It's considered "normal" to be anywhere from 21-35 or so. Also, women mestruate for as little as 2 days or as long as a week, and can mestruate at any time of the lunar month. I haven't yet met a woman whose cycle correspopnds with the moon, but i'll bet it's possible. Mine doesn't -- it's 31.5 days, give or take a few hours. Oh, and I have no electricity in my house, or streetlights nearby. Not that one person means anything, statistically... Sass |
|
29 Mar 01 - 10:15 PM (#428913) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: Amos With your kind permission, Sir Mousethief: Now wigglers have their tales to tell, Regards, A |
|
30 Mar 01 - 01:54 AM (#429013) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: Blackcatter Boy! (or Girl!) You go away for a few days, thinking that a thread is dead and boom - it gains new life - I love this place. To get back to my last bit of theread - I love the lil - wiggler song! And I was wondering how fast the little guys travel during ejaculation, not during their inside travels. Any ideas? It there an average distance we can use to calculate with some Newtonian physics? Also - an update from early on in the thread - I emailed NASA on the women in space and I have yet to hear back (and I swear I was really nice too!) pax yall. |
|
30 Mar 01 - 02:14 AM (#429020) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: mousethief Amos, nicely turned. Mrrzy, with all due respect, not all human societies are at the same level of complexity. A simple hunger-gatherer society with no visible leadership is worlds apart, complexity-wise, from a society with permanent classes based on economic and career path factors, an established, multi-layered government, standing laws, etc. This is not to say the one is "primitive" and the other something else (what exaclty is the opposite of "primitive," anyway?). While it is true that the simpler one can often "evolve" into more and more complex ones, the complex ones can also be turned back into simpler ones due to disease, war, etc. Is one superior to the other? Well that obviously depends on whom you ask. For a really good look at human societies, both from a historical perspective and from a complexity-scale standpoint, please see Guns, Germs and Steel (I forget the author's name; easily found on Amazon.) Alex |
|
31 Mar 01 - 05:22 PM (#430194) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: Penny S. Oh, and thanks for the praise, Wolfgang, Fibula and Mrrzy. A friend has pointed out that the near coincidence of cycles involves a body which is also associated with another coincidence. ie, the Moon, which is coincidentally almost the same size in the sky as the Sun. More than one such coincidence is odd. Penny |
|
01 Apr 01 - 11:14 AM (#430550) Subject: RE: BS: Women in space From: lady penelope This is one of THOSE THINGS. I doubt you can nail the female cycle down to any one or even two or three things. As far as I can make out the main thing is your oestrogen / prooestrogen levels and how they interact with several other endochrinic systems within your body. These, in turn, are affected by 'loadsastuff' ( technical term there) externally. Circadian/ diurnal rythmns, men or their lack, food/ vitamins,essential minerals, how physical your usual routine is, aparantly how many pregnant women you are in regular contact with ( 'en famille' , for some reason it doesn't seem to work with women who work in obstetrics ) has an affect. It would not be untruthful to say that the medical profession is still trying to retro-engineer this one. Much to my disadvantage, typical, huh! TTFN M'Lady P. |