|
19 Jul 01 - 11:08 AM (#510284) Subject: Archer jailed for perjury From: GUEST Now, don't put me down as being horrid or vindictive... But, this news really made my day! Jeffrey's going to prison, tra la la la la! Restores my faith (a bit) in British Justice :-)
|
|
19 Jul 01 - 11:12 AM (#510286) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: Jon Freeman It's hard to put an unnamed guest as anything! Anyway, I hope the news is true - how long did he get? Jon |
|
19 Jul 01 - 11:12 AM (#510287) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: GUEST,JohnL Yes, but he still gets away with the novels! |
|
19 Jul 01 - 11:22 AM (#510295) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: Louisa four years apparently Louisa |
|
19 Jul 01 - 11:40 AM (#510314) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: pavane Hope that doesn't mean he has time to write more novels... |
|
19 Jul 01 - 11:50 AM (#510329) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: mousethief Who is this Jeff Archer who has created this tempest-in-a-teapot? Inquiring minds west of the Atlantic want to know! Alex |
|
19 Jul 01 - 11:50 AM (#510330) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: GeorgeH Yup, pavane, that was exactly the reaction round our office. Someone suggest the Islamic punishment of amputation of the hands might be appropriate but I'm afraid I'm too squeamish . . I note he will remain a member of the House of Lords. Which is, of course, the highest Court of Law in the land. So "perverting the course of justice" it seems is no impedement to remaining a member of our "Supreme Court". (OK, I know ordinary members of the HofL don't take part in its "Court of Law" functions . . ) G. |
|
19 Jul 01 - 11:54 AM (#510336) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: GeorgeH Arch fornicating bastard of the Tory party and popular author of apalling novels . . Oh, and a liar . . He's just been convicted of Perjury and Conspiracy to Pervert the Course of Justice . . this relates to a case where he sued a newspaper for Libel . . the newspaper was telling the truth, and Archer presented a totaly bogus version of events to the court. G. |
|
19 Jul 01 - 11:55 AM (#510337) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: Fiolar No doubt like so many more he'll find Christ in the confines of her Majesty's lock-up. A long time resident of the Old Vicarage, Granchester, I wonder if he is echoing tonight the words of one of the previous residents, Rupert Brooke - "...would I were in Granchester, in Granchester!" Four Years! It's farcical really, seeing as how one could get life for perverting the course of justice, which Archer together with perjury was found guilty of. |
|
19 Jul 01 - 11:55 AM (#510338) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: mousethief Can someone please provide a little background? Alex |
|
19 Jul 01 - 12:09 PM (#510353) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: Gervase It's made my day! Who'd have thought that Schadenfreude could be quite such fun!!!!! For those who want to know more, click here.
|
|
19 Jul 01 - 12:29 PM (#510367) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: mousethief Thanks for the link, Gervase! Ewwww, what a slimeball! I see why y'all are so pleased with his conviction! Alex |
|
19 Jul 01 - 12:30 PM (#510369) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: Grab Profile of the weasel in question from the BBC. Can we throw in a charge of Conspiracy to Pervert the Course of Literature? Graham. |
|
19 Jul 01 - 12:34 PM (#510371) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: GUEST,alanabit Archer was a member of the most vindictive, selfish and callous government of my lifetime. I can forgive him the rotten novels, because I don't have to read them and I have not always written things of unchallengeable quality myself! He was probably as guilty as Hell. I care nothing about his sexual adventures, because they are none of my damned business. It is rare for our over privileged judiciary to punish one of their own, so Lord Jeffrey may feel a little aggrieved this evening. Having said that, I can derive no pleasure from hearing that anyone who presents no actual physical danger to myself, my kin or my friends is being locked up in a slum with a chamber pot. It may satisfy some desire for retribution, but it is unlikely to make him a better man or have any lasting effect on our system. To quote the most atavistic Home Secretary of recent years (the only hanger in fact) "Prison is an expensive way of making bad people worse". |
|
19 Jul 01 - 12:34 PM (#510373) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: Fiolar BBC interviewed several of his friends whose attitude is "that he is a rogue, but you have to like him." Bollocks. I think he is an obnoxious little spiv. I wonder if an ordinary member of the public had committed the same offences as Archer whether he/she would have got away with four years. Make that about 18 months to 2 years and he'll be out for "good behaviour." Remember that other "pillar of the community" Jonathan Aitken? |
|
19 Jul 01 - 12:38 PM (#510378) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: McGrath of Harlow Hope that doesn't mean he has time to write more novels...
Oh but it does. Lots and lots more time. And short stories. And plays. And an autobiography. And lots of new material to put into them.
And he'll probably be in an open prison with a computer with internet access. He could turn up here. God, he might start writing songs...
And when he comes out he'll be all over the place. We ain't seen nothin' yet.
And the thing is, I doubt very much if, in the context of the rest of his cronies in politics, he's unusually crooked. If he was a Yank I think there's a high chance he'd be in a governor's mansion. Or maybe the White House.
I'm sure that in a popularity poll in a year or so, he'll probably score higher than most other politicians. Higher than Tony Blair or George Bush anyway. |
|
19 Jul 01 - 12:44 PM (#510384) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: TamthebamfraeScotland Archer, that shit. I'm glad that he's been put away for 4 years. Mind you he'll proberly get out in two, even so that better than being found not guilty. I really feel sorry for his fellow prisoners, what more punishment. They'll all be saying get us out of here. As you can tell I really don't like shitty Archer very much or the party that he belongs too. |
|
19 Jul 01 - 12:52 PM (#510388) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: GeorgeH Sadly, McGrath, I fear you are right again . . Sequestration of his lovely mansion in Granchester would have been far more effective . . However I can't say I feel there's much wrong with the sentence, after all Perverting TCoJ could include obtaining a false verdict in a murder trial . . And I reckon a spell in the squalor enjoyed by "guests of her majesty" would be good for all our politicians, since they seem to think there's nothing amiss with our prisons . . except, as McG again points out, he's unlikely to be in one of those prisons . . G. |
|
19 Jul 01 - 12:53 PM (#510390) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: alanabit I don't like Archer or his party either. The fact that you or I would have been punished more severely is hardly justification for spending large sums of public money on humiliating a man who does not endanger us. Jonathon Aitken was a different class of criminal. The bottom line of his story is that the man was a "weapon sales connsultant" - I prefer term "gun runner", to some of the more unlovely Arab dictators. That really does give me the creeps. |
|
19 Jul 01 - 12:54 PM (#510393) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: English Jon Well, it's a start. Now to get Thatch for the Belgrano. EJ |
|
19 Jul 01 - 01:00 PM (#510398) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: alanabit Now you're talking... |
|
19 Jul 01 - 01:03 PM (#510401) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: Ralphie Much as I concur wholeheartedly !!! I don't think I've ever seen so many rude words on one thread!! Ralphie Anyway, he's just about to contract "Altzheimers" disease,apparently.... be miraculously cured on Monday, and be out by next weekend....! |
|
19 Jul 01 - 01:42 PM (#510482) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: nutty Latest news is that he's going to appeal and that it's unlikely that he will have his knighthood rescinded even if he does serve time in prison. So he will still expect to be called SIR. |
|
19 Jul 01 - 01:46 PM (#510488) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: mousethief Yeah, but we all know what knighthood is worth any more.
Alex |
|
19 Jul 01 - 01:48 PM (#510493) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: Ralphie How do spell "SIR" nutty??? "CUR" perhaps ? R |
|
19 Jul 01 - 02:14 PM (#510539) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: Gareth As much as I share the Nations joy over the banging up of Lord Archer of Weston-Super-Mare I do think that the suggestion that he should be tried for crimes against litriture over the top. I mean it would be cruel and inhumane for a jury of 12 to read his novels. Still you never know - we might get "The ballard of Ford Open Prison" out of it. Gareth |
|
19 Jul 01 - 02:20 PM (#510548) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: GUEST,Neil Ah Joy! Right thinking folk always thought he was an odious wee shite! He has always been particularly unpopular up here in Scotland for some of his more absurd and xenophobic rantings....and for being a Tory bastard as well! Maybe M'Lud will get some new story ideas when 'big Bobby the block daddy''touches base' with him in the jail tonight......couldn't happen to a nastier, slimy little turd. NEIL |
|
19 Jul 01 - 02:24 PM (#510551) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: GeorgeH Ah! A beautiful, rare moment of unanimity (?sp?) on Mudcat . . I always thought Archer was good for nothing, but now I know better . . G'night all, I'm off home . . (Bought two new CDs last saturday and haven't even played them yet. George |
|
19 Jul 01 - 04:07 PM (#510676) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: smallpiper SO I take it no one likes litle lord Jeff! I think it would be really good if he and not we had to pay for his time inside and I'm talking £'s here afterall he is loaded (and not just by the block daddy!!) |
|
19 Jul 01 - 04:25 PM (#510696) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: Richard Bridge I think I probably disliked him more than I did Robert Maxwell |
|
19 Jul 01 - 04:27 PM (#510701) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: Richard Bridge Perhaps there should now be a proper enquiry into the death of Benny the bullshitter. After all the lovers of Diana the martyr were never shy of suggesting that the establishment had caused her car crash. What might have hapened to Archer if Coghlan had also been available as a witness? |
|
19 Jul 01 - 04:30 PM (#510706) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: Penny S. I have an impressive memory of the guy - I didn't know it was him at the time - if it was - (he wasn't anyone then, anyway). Last year, a photo of the event appeared in the paper, attributed to a different time, place and circumstance, where I could not have seen it. I once saw a man who appeared as Puck in an amateur production of the Dream, outdoors in a Dover park, with the stage background provided by high privet hedges. Puck's entries were made over these hedges, aided by a small trampoline. V-e-r-y impressive. And last year, a picture of this production appeared in the press. It looked like the shots I remember, and it looked like Archer, and my family concur with me. Why it was necessary to set it somewhere else I can't think. But it was good! Penny |
|
19 Jul 01 - 05:13 PM (#510719) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: McGrath of Harlow Well it's the kind of thing that doesn't matter - but if we were talking about the ceremonial customs of the Sea Dyaks we'd try to get it tight, so you might as well when it's the quirks of the English honours system.
Anyway the man isn't a Sir - if he was there's no problem in taking the knighthood away. It just needs the Queen, under instruction from the Prime Minister, to say off with his title, and he's no more a "Sir" than I am.
It happened to Anthony Blunt a few years ago when they found that before advising the Royal Family on their impressive art collection, he'd done a bit of spying for the Russians. Or rather, when the papers found out - the Royal Family and the Government had known about it for years, and they'd all decided to keep schtum, and he promised to stop the spying lark, and appears to have done so.
But Lords are another matter - it'd take a special act of parliament to do it, and the last time it happened was in 1917 when the peer in question was fighting in the German Army.
I couldn't work up a head of steam against Jeffrey Archer, not like against most of his mates. Of you think of the fella George Clooney played in Oh Brother Where Art Thou - well there's something of that about him. A conman on a roller coaster taking everyone for what he could get.
And I feel a certain gratitude to anyone who could show up everyone in the Tory party from Maggie Thatcher up look quite such pathetic dupes and sycophants.
Maybe he'll suddenly announce that he's really been a leftie all this time, and that's precisely why he did it all these years, to destroy the Tories. Yet another twist of the plot. And if he did there are some people who would believe him - and that's yet another twist...
It really is a shame he can't write better. Badly maybe, but a lot better. |
|
19 Jul 01 - 05:34 PM (#510730) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: Linda Kelly Little to add really - other than the man typified the Tory ethos of money over morals. Having just watched Panorama it seems evident that the Tory leadership knew of his outrageous deceits and preferred to turn a blind eye - It will be sweet revenge if the Daily Star decide to sue him for the return of costs and damages -which is reckoned in today's terms to be around 2.2 million. Anyway -another one banged up to rights - let's hear it Hoorah Hoorah Hoorah! |
|
19 Jul 01 - 05:51 PM (#510741) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: McGrath of Harlow the man typified the Tory ethos of money over morals.
True, but he'd fit just as well in the New Model Labour Party, which has in effect adopted that same ethos.
(And The Daily Star incidentally is a really disgusing newspaper, even by the standards of the British tabloids.) |
|
19 Jul 01 - 06:04 PM (#510744) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: mousethief Every time I see the thread title, I think "Jailer (Gaoler) purged for archery" Alex |
|
19 Jul 01 - 06:08 PM (#510747) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: Linda Kelly I agree about the Daily Star McGrath, utter shite. Just to clarify I meant the money over morals remark in the context of those individuals within the Tory Ranks who sold their souls for personal gain, as opposed to New Labours strategy for public/private partnership a matter on which you and I may or may not agree. |
|
19 Jul 01 - 06:20 PM (#510751) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: Lanfranc Your Stars for Today Sagittarius An unexpected decision will give you a nasty shock, but never mind - time is a great healer! FIAT IUSTITIO, RUIT COELO (Let justice be done, though the heavens fall) |
|
19 Jul 01 - 06:21 PM (#510752) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: Bagpuss Yes, Archer will now have plenty of time in which to steal ideas for new stories..... And maybe he will study for a real degree instead of the ficticious one he has held for many years. Bagpuss |
|
19 Jul 01 - 06:27 PM (#510756) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: McGrath of Harlow Oh dear - I'm a Sagittarian...
I'd like to believe in the distinction Ickle Dorrit made there. Then I remmember Robert Maxwell - to name a total crook who was really big in the Labour Party, but who's not in a position to get litigious, unlike... |
|
19 Jul 01 - 07:06 PM (#510774) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: 8_Pints Don't forget either the point raised by Emma Nicholls on the Newsnight programme. He raised millions of pounds for the Kurds following the Sadam Hussein persecutions, but none of it appears to have reached the intended beneficiaries. Bob vG
|
|
20 Jul 01 - 03:48 AM (#511043) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: Patrish(inactive) Never liked Archer, but I do feel for his wife. The latest news suggests that she may be facing charges. She always seemed so honest. Perhaps living with a shit rubs off? Patrish |
|
20 Jul 01 - 04:21 AM (#511050) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: Gervase Don't waste too many tears on Mary. She was fully aware of his serial philandering before the '87 libel trial, and yet told the court that theirs was a rock-solid marriage. And, during the trial, the probity of poor Monica Coghlan, the prostitute to whom he admitted giving £2000 to "disappear", hinged at one point on whether or not Archole had a spotty back. The fragrant Mary told the drooling judge, Mr Justice Caulfield, that his back was of marmoreal smoothness and that therefore the drab must have been lying. Yet I have a friend who, for his sins, has played squash against Archer (a testy, irritable sportsman) and shared a locker room with him - and he could have testified that the odious little shit has a back like a nutmeg grater. Mary was also supposed to be in charge of the disbursement of Archer's £500,000 libel winnings to various charitable causes. Funnily enough, very few of them received anything. Yet the summer-house in the grounds of the Old Rectory at Grantchester (where Mary lives - and where the poet Rupert Brooke once stayed and wrote "stands the clock at ten to three...") was lavishly restored as an office for her. It is said by unwiser men than me (who would hate to be sued, so what follows if obviously pure fantasy) that an "arrangement" was reached between the two scheming, conniving spouses (spice?) - to whit, that in return for support in court, Mary would trouser the winnings and then be allowed to lead a separate life from Jeffrey - which she certainly has. She is, undoubtedly, a very gifted chemist and one of the brightest academics of her generation at Cambridge. She is also, however, an odd fish. And I used to fancy her something rotten, long ago! As for Archer writing another book - that would be interesting. He has actually "written" very little since his first novel, Not a Penny More, Not a Penny Less, which was written to save his arse after he went bankrupt thanks to some dodgy dealing in a company called Aquablast. Since then, much of his work has actually been ghosted by his long-suffering editor, with Jeffrey providing merely the thinnest of outlines - and those frequently plagiarised from other sources. And when he bangs on about how successful he is, that is because he is an accomplished salesman and an unrelenting bully. The staff at his publisher's loathe him with a passion, because he is constantly ringing up to badger them to plug his dreadful books, organise signings and roadshows and general force the pap down the throats of the public. Sorry for the vitriol here, but I have had dealings with the man and have long had reason to despise and detest him. I can only shake my head at Mary Archer's apparent perfidy. As I said, a strange woman. |
|
20 Jul 01 - 04:33 AM (#511052) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: Rt Revd Sir jOhn from Hull I think it serves him right, if he did'nt lie and make trouble they woud'nt send him to jail.john |
|
20 Jul 01 - 04:34 AM (#511053) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: Gervase "Help Desk, what appears to be the problem?"
"Ah, I'm having a little problem with Microsfoft Word."
"And the nature of this problem, Sir?
"I've just written another novel and I can't get the text to justify..."
"....is it full justification you're after, Mister....er?"
"Not Mister - Lord. It's Lord Archer, Jeffrey Archer. I'm quite well known in writing circ...."
"I'm sorry, Sir. There's nothing that can justify another Jeffrey Archer novel. Goodbye." |
|
20 Jul 01 - 04:36 AM (#511054) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: GUEST,Patrish Thanks for the info, don't feel sorry for her anymore. I agree she is a strange one....... I wonder what the basis of his appeal is going to be(or ever was) Patrish |
|
20 Jul 01 - 06:54 AM (#511083) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: GUEST,Roger the skiffler OK, so we start a "Free the Grantchester One" campaign, get Larry Otway over here to defend his human rights and....Oh, sorry, I must have forgotten my medication... When this news filtered into our training session yesterday thanks to an e-mail from Herself, the place erupted in spontaneous joy, whatever the political leanings of the persons present! RtS |
|
20 Jul 01 - 07:32 AM (#511092) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: Les from Hull Pat - the basis of his appeal will be "I've got lots of money and can afford really expensive lawyers who are more interested in money than justice" Les |
|
20 Jul 01 - 08:01 AM (#511101) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: CET Les: That was a silly and juvenile comment. Anybody over the age of 18 ought to know that it is the advocate's duty to represent his client fearlessly and vigorously, in accordance with the law, whatever his personal opinion of the client might be. Dr. Johnson understood that more than 200 years ago. CET |
|
20 Jul 01 - 08:35 AM (#511110) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: Les from Hull So if anyone without vast financial resources was in Archer's situation they would get a fearless, vigorous and skilful advocate to argue their case for them, would they? It must be awful for these lawyers, having to accept money to defend someone who is convicted of perverting the course of the justice they believe in so much. And the more money you have, the more fearlessness and vigour you can afford. I certainly didn't say that all lawyers are like that. I have lots of respect for lawyers who use their skills to defend the weak and oppressed. But I'm sure that there will be teams of lawyers looking through the transcripts of the trial to see if they can find some nebulous legal hook to hang a case on. Would that happen if Archer was poor, or black, or Irish? Les |
|
20 Jul 01 - 09:49 AM (#511131) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: Patrish(inactive) "Would that happen if Archer was poor, or black, or Irish? "
He probably would not be where he is now |
|
20 Jul 01 - 01:36 PM (#511270) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: GeorgeH Gervaise, thank you so much for those contributions . . I didn't think I could enjoy this saga any more than I was already doing, but you proved me wrong!! I'd love to say "tell me more"!! but I don't think it would be wise for you to do so . . However I notice no-one has mentioned Anglia TV share dealings . . . G. |
|
20 Jul 01 - 01:40 PM (#511275) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: Mr Red hands up those who believed him in the first place. |
|
20 Jul 01 - 02:18 PM (#511312) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: McGrath of Harlow "Twang."
That was the title of a musical Lionel Bart wrote about Riobin Hood. It turned out to be a fair disaster. Maybe it's time to revive it with a revised contemporary script.
The whole thing cries out to be put into song. Not a musical. Maybe a ballad opera. Or Gilbert and Sullivan. Wouldn't Gilbert have loved it! |
|
20 Jul 01 - 02:27 PM (#511324) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: ard mhacha Gervase, I have just read the "Guardian" on Archer, and "poor Mary" my ass, a conniving bitch. Eng;and still breeds them and that oul bastard Thatcher and the rest of her hole crawlers being made to look bloody fools. Great stuff. Slan, Ard Mhacha. |
|
20 Jul 01 - 03:59 PM (#511433) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: Linda Kelly Then of course there is the curious way in which as a student he was able to buy a house for the equivalent of £100000, whilst also fund raising for Oxfam, and didn't he promise the money he won for the libel case would go to charity. It appears it didn't. He really is an utter shite isn't he. McGrath, I take the point about Maxwell. |
|
20 Jul 01 - 04:43 PM (#511475) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: CET Les, my language was a little strong, for which I apologize. However, you don't seem to have grasped the point. If Archer, as despicable as he may be, wants to retain counsel, it is that counsel's professional duty to raise every point and press every argument that may assist his client, as long as he does so honourably and professionally. In your post you referred to "expensive lawyers who are more interested in money than justice". That is to say, any lawyer who represents Archer must not be interested in justice. That kind of reasoning is on a par with the rhetorical question "How can a lawyer represent somebody he knows to be guilty". The answer to that, as Dr. Johnson knew, is that the client wants his lawyer's advocacy, not his judgment. Jeffrey Archer may not be as sympathetic as a poor black Irishman, but his lawyers are doing nothing improper by representing him. CET |
|
21 Jul 01 - 03:41 AM (#511833) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: ShankhillPhantom Jesus Oliver and heres me thinking you thought that the English were not a bad race,I did not think you thought so highly of them HA! hA! fRANCIE |
|
21 Jul 01 - 04:20 AM (#511836) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: GUEST,bobbi Geesh! You guys.. Get a grip! If he were here in the United States of America and had a girlfriend named Monica, he'd be presidential material! Obviously, you all don't have Democrats in GB! Tsk! |
|
21 Jul 01 - 05:43 AM (#511855) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: Fiolar A beautiful little item in the Guardian of July 20th says it all about Archer. Apparently while at Oxford in 1963, he somehow managed to get the Beatles to play at Brasenose College. Sheridan Morley who was a contemporary of Archer there, was at the concert. During the interval, he happened to meet Ringo Starr in the toilet. Starr asked him if he knew this chap Archer and then stated "He strikes me as a nice enough fella, but he is the kind of bloke who would bottle your piss and sell it." Wise words, Ringo. Shame that other people hadn't the same insight, or perhaps they did and were blinded by the Krug and Shepherds Pie. |
|
21 Jul 01 - 08:07 AM (#511885) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: Linda Kelly Reread this thread and noticed PennyS's comment that she saw his play Puck in Midsummer Noight's dream. It occurred to me that he is well and truly Pucked now! |
|
21 Jul 01 - 08:22 AM (#511888) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: ard mhacha I do not agree that Archer should be barred from The House of Turds, here we regard all members of that house of fat farts as despicable scum-bags. So when he departs from the decent people he will be with for the next two years, send him back. Slan Ard Mhacha. |
|
21 Jul 01 - 03:54 PM (#512125) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: Tweedie All I'm hoping is that in the time between now and Archer's appeal (or the time until he is 'sprung' from jail due to 'illness') the combined might of the UK media can dig deep enough and thoroughly enough into his and Mary's dealings to establish enough reason for him never to bounce back. Reading between the lines it seems that his "vigorous and skilful advocate" was none too happy to be representing Archer towards the end of the trial. Let us hope other former friends/colleagues/business partners take this opportunity to isolate this dreadful excuse for a human-being. |
|
21 Jul 01 - 04:38 PM (#512155) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: McGrath of Harlow I see that he's in the same stir as Ronnie Biggs, and they shook hands. I never thought the Great Train Robber would sink that low.
I suppose the next chapter will see JA coming out of jail with lots of new contacts, set on becoming a master criminal - not white collar crime this time, the hard stuff. |
|
22 Jul 01 - 02:49 AM (#512308) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: GUEST,Liz the Squeak I'm just such a happy bunny.... Bet the bastard gets out after two though..... Vengeance is a dish best served cold, and boy, was it cold!!! All we need now is for the frozen faced accomplice to be investigated and found wanting.... Ah, it does a Socialist good to see how the mighty (big heads) are fallen.... LTS |
|
22 Jul 01 - 04:36 AM (#512315) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: Penny S. Here's confirmation of my account above, from a book review section in the Guardian last December. "While he is talking, Archer's manner fluctuates between aggrieved headmaster and naughty schoolboy, and his face never seems absolutely sure which side of the detention desk it is supposed to be on. Oddly, the image that stayed with me long after I finished Crick's book was of Archer playing Puck at Dover College, where he taught PE. He gained his entrance to the stage by leaping over a hedge from a platform or a trampoline. It has often seemed as though he has since perfected this two-footed entrée into most areas of his life. 'I was a wicked Puck,' he agrees now, 'dancing about, kicking everyone, jumping over them, causing trouble ... it was an ideal part for me.' Archer likes to think of himself as mischievous, surprising. With all his teasing and game playing, does he, I wonder, ever fear he might lose sight of who Jeffrey Archer really is?" There was, unfortunately, no picture, and this is accurate as to personal history (though the play was performed in Kearsney Abbey grounds by the Dover Players. It is possible that the report I saw which was wrong was wrong because of the reporter, not the source. Penny
|
|
22 Jul 01 - 05:26 PM (#512442) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: Dave the Gnome I came onto this thread a little late. May I add my two penn'urth? A good anagram of Jeffrey Archer is - Racy Jeff, he err! Not as good, I'm afraid as his old pal, Cecil Parkinson (Lock penis in car) or the other good Tory statesman, Neil Hamilton (Lola, I'm in then) but it will suffice. Anywho - here is my last word on the subject. Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. Not that I'm vindictive or anything....;-) Cheers DtG |
|
23 Jul 01 - 08:54 AM (#512503) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: Fiolar The latest whisper is that Mary may be going to write a book about her life with Jeffrey. A figure of £250,000 is being talked about. |
|
23 Jul 01 - 09:08 AM (#512507) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: Gervase Hmm - a woman with a price. No wonder she and Jeffrey are so suited! |
|
23 Jul 01 - 03:11 PM (#512740) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: alanabit Point taken about Ronnie Biggs, McGrath, but it can't have escaped your notice that the last government stole the country's electricity, gas, telephones, coal and railway system. Our Ronnie was a vicious thug, who beat a train driver half to death. However, his crime netted a measly couple of hundred grand. That leaves me wondering, which sort of crime is really "the hard stuff"... |
|
23 Jul 01 - 03:47 PM (#512767) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: Mr Red archer / 'a:tfe(r) / n. (colloquial) a wadge of 2000 UK pounds, a cash silencer. Not to be confused with a Hamilton which is an Archer hidden in plain brown envelope. (f OE TV series B'stard) |
|
23 Jul 01 - 04:57 PM (#512836) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: Gareth I suppose that a 4 year stretch in an open prison will be known as an "Archer" Gareth |
|
23 Jul 01 - 05:01 PM (#512844) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: Liz the Squeak Doing a Jeffrey I think is the correct term.... LTS - still sniggering and wondering when Mary will join her devoted husband - at least in there she can be fairly sure he isn't knobbing some other woman. |
|
23 Jul 01 - 06:42 PM (#512891) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: okthen He's probably someones rainy day woman now. cheers bill |
|
23 Jul 01 - 07:05 PM (#512908) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: Gervase Aye, they do say prison is a good way to widen your circle! |
|
24 Jul 01 - 02:39 AM (#513157) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: Liz the Squeak Yes, but in solitary you don't get the hole experience.... Is that for his protection or did the other inmates request it for humanitarian reasons?? LTS |
|
24 Jul 01 - 06:30 AM (#513223) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: Fiolar Any bets guys on when the film will be made? After all they made one about Nick Leeson and also a TV movie about the court case between Hamilton and Al Fayed. Wonder who could play Archer? |
|
24 Jul 01 - 09:37 AM (#513324) Subject: RE: BS: Archer jailed for perjury From: GUEST,Brian I had to laugh when JA's biographer said .... he'll be back, he's not the sort of person to settle for a headstone saying Here lies Jeffery Archer. I couldn't think of a more fitting epitaph. He's lied everywhere else. Brian |
|
24 Jul 01 - 03:39 PM (#513677) Subject: Archer explained From: Mr Red The Devious' Dictionary agent n. Formally a gentleman. Now this has devolved, in common parlance, to be a person who lies for you then duffs you up 10 years later. Somewhat like a teddy boy but without the oath.archereeze a. The style in which an entire fantasy is presented as fiction in order to earn stupendous dollops of wealth. archerooze a. The style in which an entire fantasy is presented as fact in order to earn stupendous dollops of wealth. coughlan n A person so unlucky, that when a piece of good luck materializes and is converted in to better luck it brings the whole sewer pipe down on them and anyone writing down their very words at the time. The words would have been unrecognisable when published anyway but the clean-up operation is very slow. Named for Monica Coughlan, a person so unlucky as to be mown down by a criminal's getaway car being chased by the police, just as the public vindication of her story was blossoming. diary entry n. Whatever you want it to be. Full of shit. (corruption of diarrhoea and treats) frank a. Mealy mouthed, avoiding lying by telling just enough of the truth. Familiar shortening of the phrase "doing a Francis". fund raising v. Smarmy sycophantasizing, with occasional visits to the car park. hairy mary a. 1 Stock exchange term, for insider share dealing, at two removes. Not especially risky or illegal unless accompanied by incontrovertable evidence. 2 Normal practice. lie n. Truth incarnate. v. To swear on oath making a meal of it vi. To consort with a whore. n. A dinner with a trusted friend. nv. Both at the same time. monica n. A casual sex partner who must be kept hidden. A secret co-respondant. (some sources give an American origin for this word c 1995 but it is definitely older than that) notapenney a. Swinging, excessive, as much as the victim can give. This is an archerooze back-formation of "not a penny more, not a penny less" (a popular trashy novel – apparently). pressing the flesh v. In a political context, shaking hands while screwing the pressee. More generally, shaking the body while screwing in a car park during a fund raising party. secretary n A diarist. See diary entry. star turn vt. To change the evidence prior going into the witness box. teddy boy n. A man who lies on oath for you then duffs you up 10 years later. See agent. truth n. Archaic. Now reserved for use by the lower orders (and some politicians – alledgedly). |