|
04 Feb 03 - 03:19 PM (#882508) Subject: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: banjomad (inactive) Wow does he seriously need help or what. This man should not be allowed near children. period |
|
04 Feb 03 - 03:20 PM (#882510) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: greg stephens I found the Bashir bloke more alarming. |
|
04 Feb 03 - 03:53 PM (#882536) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Firecat I've not seen it yet, but I've taped it. |
|
04 Feb 03 - 04:01 PM (#882539) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: GUEST Thank you for sharing that, Firecat. |
|
04 Feb 03 - 04:07 PM (#882543) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Liz the Squeak It's on ITV2 right now - 9.00pm GMT. Shame I can't get ITV2... not! The man is seriously deranged, needs help and has no taste in furnishings. LTS |
|
04 Feb 03 - 04:27 PM (#882560) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: greg stephens Well, I dont know Liz. i think if I had the money a copy of Tutankhamen's coffin would set my study off a treat. |
|
04 Feb 03 - 04:48 PM (#882575) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Sorcha So, what did he say???? |
|
04 Feb 03 - 05:02 PM (#882585) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Linda Kelly He came over as incredibly sad and lonely during the first half of the programme and focused on how disfunctional his family life had been. I felt he seemed reasonably rational until the second half of the programme when we met his children and from then on I concluded that he was seriously disturbed. Behaviour like that from anyone else would have found the children placed in care. I really feel he needs help to convince himself that he is not a child but an adult and having 12 year olds sleep in his bedroom is not acceptable. I felt quite sickened by him. |
|
04 Feb 03 - 05:05 PM (#882587) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: GUEST The huge painting, in his recording studio, depicting himself as Jesus surrounded by cherubs was a little disturbing too. |
|
04 Feb 03 - 05:16 PM (#882597) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Kim C He's a freak. And it's too bad, because he's an incredibly talented individual. |
|
04 Feb 03 - 05:19 PM (#882600) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: nutty I coudn't bear to watch it all .... had to switch channels eventually. I found him so disturbingly wierd. |
|
04 Feb 03 - 05:24 PM (#882608) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Little Hawk I just feel very, very sorry for MJ. He is a soul in torment. |
|
04 Feb 03 - 06:25 PM (#882656) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Helen I stuck it out and agree totally with Linda Kelly's thoughts. I couldn't have said it better myself. Sad individual - he needs help, and so do his kids. Helen |
|
04 Feb 03 - 07:38 PM (#882705) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: GUEST I've not had much time to be on line today but found it quite interesting periodically looking in on news sites and reading reactions. I'd also expected to see this one raised earlier here to guage what a "Mudcat reaction" would be... Where I have read, I have seen opinions ranging from "shock horror" to criticism of the progam with all sorts in between. One place that was inviting replies was the ITV website. Mine didn't make the grade but here it is:
The same (ITV news) site had a poll asking:
Intrestingly enough the last time I was able to view the results, say about midnight GMT, over 3/4 said YES. Jon |
|
04 Feb 03 - 08:01 PM (#882719) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: GUEST Sorry, I mst correct maths... The figure saying he should be allowed was more like 72% - a little under 3/4 not more than as I stated above. Jon |
|
04 Feb 03 - 08:20 PM (#882731) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Alice The way Michael Jackson has approached parenthood was like adding more animals to his zoo. The children are like his posessions. What a sick life. |
|
04 Feb 03 - 09:45 PM (#882772) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Bobert The man apparently can't stand the skin he's trapped in. Too bad, very sad. What a tragic figure... It's like he is dead and hasn't figured it out yet. Bobert |
|
05 Feb 03 - 04:22 AM (#882898) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Hrothgar Poor bastard. He's sick, and no-one wants to help him. To make it worse, too many of the people with whom he comes into contact seem to perceive more gain for themselves in his problems than in the cure for them. |
|
05 Feb 03 - 05:37 AM (#882924) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: GUEST,Taliesn (quote) "Poor bastard. He's sick, and no-one wants to help him." Whoa. Bakc up there a moment. What makes you believe that MJ would "accept" any help from those that disturb his wealth-fed bubble life. Elvis certainly refused help and was rich enough to just surround himself with only those that would support his psychosis. Why are you so convinced MJ is any less unwilling to "accept" the pychiatric help he obviously needs. No one is more blind than one whom refuses to see. Throw in mega $millions$ to reinforce one's fantasies and you have a pretty intractable illusion system that one can do no wrong so long as they stay in that bubble. Witness Peter Townsend's recently come to light "issues". |
|
05 Feb 03 - 07:34 AM (#882978) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Ritchie I'm with you on that one Taliesn. The voyeuristic in us and our quest to read/view and gossip about others is also rather sad. Do you think that Micheals 'children' will have a better life than he had as child? hopefully they will and sadly that could be thought of as progress. |
|
05 Feb 03 - 07:41 AM (#882982) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Tam the bam fraeSaltcoatsScotland I never saw the programme because I was in Australia for 3 months, but what I have heard the man is really silly or as they say here in Scotland a real heidbanger. He's 41 years old and yet he allows children to sleep in bed with him or if not in the same bedroom as him. I mean if that was anyone else they would be classed as a child molester, and yet he can get away with it. Hopefuly not for long, he really needs to go to a head shrinker. |
|
05 Feb 03 - 08:16 AM (#883005) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: catspaw49 Hope his head shrinker does a lot better job than his nose shrinker........... Spaw |
|
05 Feb 03 - 11:11 AM (#883126) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Rick Fielding Damn you Spaw! Have you no class at all? I was just WAITING for someone to come in here and trivialize this.....I should have known it was going to be you! Michael (by his own admission) has had a mere TWO SURGERIES (far fewer than YOU'VE had) and they were simply to help him breathe better. Try it yourself: #1: Twist off nose. #2. Take deeeep breath. There, now wasn't that relaxing? Ricky (also very immature, who sleeps with 8 and 9 year old cats....and Heather) |
|
05 Feb 03 - 11:25 AM (#883132) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Mark Clark As any right-thinking bloke should know, the real Michael Jackson is a widely read and well respected author on brewing high-quality beers at home. The pretender to the name that people seem to be disgusting [sic] here is merely a Fig Newton of his own imagination and certainly not worthy of mention. - Mark |
|
05 Feb 03 - 11:35 AM (#883146) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: catspaw49 Oh thank you Rick!!!! THANK YOU!!! You see, I was getting very worried about myself. It was as if I was becoming more mature, responsible......even adult in some ways. I had been wanting to pop in and trivialize this thread from the gitgo but had held off. It's scary to think about but............hey, wait a minute...........okay, it's alright.......I now realize it wasn't judgement and patience (sure signs of maturity) at all.....I was just waiting for the set-up line!!! WHEW!! That was close......... But I do still worry about me, otherwise I'd have posted this on the Karen Carpenter thread: Such a feeling's coming over me I am barfing on most everything I see Not a thing in my gut I've got a real skinny butt But it's still far too large a butt for me I'm on the top of the world Throwing up on creation And the only explanation I can find Is that control of my weight Just makes me feel great Though the problem's not in my ass, but in my mind. Yeah, maybe I do need to worry................ Spaw |
|
05 Feb 03 - 11:45 AM (#883158) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: cockney Didn't see the programme, saw some pictures in the press - Has anybody noticed The baby is WHITE!!! The person who sold the poor wretch to this pervert to use as a plaything should be prosecuted. |
|
05 Feb 03 - 11:50 AM (#883163) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Bagpuss In the interview, he claimed that the mother (who he has never met) is black. |
|
05 Feb 03 - 11:59 AM (#883179) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Sliding Down The Bannister At My Auntie's House If he had no money, he couldn't practice this perversion. He got his dosh through selling millions of records! So all those who bought Michael Jackson records must feel a bit bad about indirectly/unknowingly sponsoring paedaphilia. I feel sorry for those who bought MJ records anyway. By the way I can't find my Who album "The Kids Are Alright" SHOOT'EM ALL!!!! |
|
05 Feb 03 - 11:59 AM (#883181) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: C-flat He certainly cut a tragic figure as he "nursed" his veiled baby. The morning press had got him in such an agitated state that I thought the poor baby was about to be dropped. He claims to be "at one" with children and is at his happiest when surrounded by them but appeared to be using them as stage props for his fantasy life-style. I suspect that he is trying to have the childhood he so obviously missed out on and genuinely believes he can be a child by being around children but I certainly wouldn't let him baby-sit mine! The more he spouted on about spreading love to the children, the more naive he sounded. Who could have imagined, when we were buying those Jackson 5 8-track cassettes, how sad his life would turn out. |
|
05 Feb 03 - 01:46 PM (#883277) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Beccy i'm glad there's something on which we can all agree. Michael Jackson's a fruitcake and he shouldn't be allowed near children. Now... what to do with those lou-lous of parents who let their small boys sleep in the same room with Jacko... |
|
05 Feb 03 - 02:01 PM (#883295) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Sliding Down The Bannister At My Auntie's House Some people will do anything for money!!! It's really a form of child prostitution. |
|
05 Feb 03 - 03:15 PM (#883366) Subject: The real Michael Jackson From: Mark Clark Here is a link to the real Michael Jackson for beer lovers of all stripes. Enjoy! - Mark |
|
05 Feb 03 - 03:27 PM (#883376) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: GUEST Years ago the Houston-based preacher Louis Farrakhan told his followers (black men...won't allow whites or women in his church), that MTV was being used to set up American blacks for the coming race war. He cautioned that Rap music...was being beamed everywhere, and the images were not lost on the rest of the world. Sumner Redstone runs MTV, and Farrakhan pointed out the white owner was making sure the rest of the world came to think of American black men as menacing in their gestures, foul-mouthed, abusive towards women, obsessed with gold chains and sex, etc. He said when the whites began the eradication of the blacks in America, the rest of the world would have been presented with 'evidence' and would sit back while the slaughter took place. The Michael Jackson obsession is much the same thing, in my opinion. He's held up as a 'success' so that we who earn less or are less well-known will REALLY feel bad about ourselves. Don't fall for it. Media manipulation. The global crime syndicate is pushing the racial and economic-class buttons, WHILE they present the idea of pedophilia in mainstream, prime-time. Pedophilia will be taunted as the next big 'sexual liberation' issue. All the 'politically correct' people in the world will be reminded that bi-racial marriages used to be frowned upon, as was homosexuality, and now the time has come to liberate children from the artificial sexual restraints placed upon them by society. Seriously. It's coming. So is the repeal of bestiality laws. And ALL of this will be done in order to make us despise ourselves. God I hate TV. |
|
05 Feb 03 - 04:11 PM (#883415) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Kim C Fig Newton of his own imagination!!!! ROFL!!! He's sort of like Gollum in a way... living in his own little world, with people on the outside feeling sorry for him. |
|
05 Feb 03 - 04:25 PM (#883428) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Kim C PS I believe he's had his nose worked on AT LEAST 4 times. |
|
05 Feb 03 - 04:49 PM (#883448) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Ebbie GUEST, may I introduce you to GUEST? Between the two of you, you got it all covered... |
|
05 Feb 03 - 05:18 PM (#883479) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: GUEST In case you're talking to me, Ebbie, I'm the 'Tyranny' 'Moloch' guest. See, it's ALL tied together...the denigration of society, the dumbing down of people, the distractions while the chains are applied. The first thing American troops helped distribute in Afghanistan a year ago (besides opium seeds) were televisions. Can't have people going without CIA brainwashing. |
|
06 Feb 03 - 09:56 AM (#883976) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: GUEST,fretless There's a review of the TV program in this morning's Washington Post, restating much of what was said above. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A32132-2003Feb5.html |
|
06 Feb 03 - 10:24 AM (#883992) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Strupag I quite believe that MJ has had only two plastic surgery jobs. First one - The famous nose job Second one - To remould the face to fit the nose |
|
06 Feb 03 - 10:49 AM (#884006) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Bill D If you're poor and act strangly, you're crazy...if you're rich, you're 'eccentric'.... I have the wicked sort of mind that imagines Michael Jackson locked in a house with Howard Hughes, Gary Larson, Gahan Wilson and assorted others....give them some paper, video cameras, etc...and see what happens. (No not REALLY!) but it makes me both sad & angry that MJ is allowed to continue associating with children, his own or anyone else's. |
|
06 Feb 03 - 11:02 AM (#884013) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: charlie mudslinger yea Kim only Gollum is one handsome dude in comparison |
|
06 Feb 03 - 11:09 AM (#884021) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: GUEST Thanks, fretless. I particularly liked thier conclusion Perhaps most poignant is the scene where Michael sits with Bashir in his movie screening room, watching old television of himself performing "I Want You Back" with the Jackson 5. The camera jumps from the young Michael -- cute, brown, innocent -- to the middle-aged Michael -- ravaged, white and clinging to the illusion of innocence, and that moment says more than nearly two hours of shock TV that comprises "Living With Michael Jackson." I don't think it got Bashir starting off sypathetically then doubting right though. I think the game was one of convincing Jackson he had a real friend with the plan of making him out to be a child pervert later and, personally, I found that more sickening than any of Jackson's revalations. Jackson's relationship with childern is certainly questionable but I can't pass judgement on that except to say that given Jackson's screwed up state and attempts to remain a child, I suppose it is quite possible that he genuienly believes what he does is innocent and that there is no sexual motive. What I can be sure is that if there are questions that are felt need to be answered, that this should be done by the proper authorities (whatever they are in the US) rather than by the media who love public outcry and rub thier hands with glee when they see controversial articles increasing thier sales. Jon |
|
06 Feb 03 - 12:18 PM (#884085) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Kim C Gahan Wilson! Ohmagawd!!!! I used to LOVE Gahan Wilson! There was a series of children's books I read long ago that he illustrated. i can just see how he would draw Michael Jackson....... |
|
06 Feb 03 - 12:30 PM (#884090) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Alice Children are born into the world without legal control over their environment - it is the adults around them that influence what happens to them and it is the responsibility of the adults to protect children from harm. Jackson says he loves to sleep with other people's children and in the interview I saw, that it is "charming" to tuck them in. This attitude of what he thinks is fun and charming completely misses the point that it isn't mentally healthy for kids to be toyed with like pets, even if he says there is no sex involved. |
|
06 Feb 03 - 12:40 PM (#884097) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Kim C (It was the Matthew Looney books by Jerome Beatty, illustrated by Gahan Wilson. Great for little kids if you can still find them.) And now back to our regularly scheduled programming... |
|
06 Feb 03 - 12:46 PM (#884100) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Mrs.Duck Exactly, Alice. Somehow I doubt MJ to be capable of an adult sex relationship but he is still using children to amuse or console himself - his own included (personally I also doubt that they are!)and that is a form of abuse. By all means invite them to his home accompanied by parents, throw jelly and ice cream parties but sleeping in the same bed is definitely WRONG!! I have no sympathy for him. |
|
06 Feb 03 - 03:21 PM (#884211) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: GUEST I've been thinking today about sleeping with kids. I can't come up with anything in my life that I could relate to Jackson or indeed any real life situation where I would be doing any such thing but I did come up with this scenario: I don't have kids of my own but I have brothers that do. I then took the highly unlikely scenario that I was looking after the house for the brother to let him and his wife had a weekend away. Together with the house, I'm looking after my 7 yr old niece. There is a severe thunder storm and she rushes into my bedroom saying "Uncle Jonny, I'm scared, can I sleep in your bed?" (after all in my scenario, that is how her parents confront such issues when they are tired and it's late at night). Maybe 10 years ago, I would have just said "yes". Now, I'd probably say "OK, you can sleep in my bed, let me just go and find a sleeping bag for me so I can sleep on the floor". I've not changed, but society (or perhaps more accurately my awareness of attitudes within society) has changed. I guess If I'd taken that imaginary step 10 yrs ago, I'd now be a child pervert, perhaps worse still, the way things are, the child could remember sleeping in a bed with an adult and think that must mean perversion, not because of anything that happened but because of public reaction... It's scarey... Please don't get me wrong, I'm not saying child abuse is fanatsy - it is a sick and horrible reality and for my part, if I ever stumbled on a site promoting it, I'd ensure authorities were aware of it... I've also never slept with a child. The closest I have come to children in my bedroom have been times where the niece I was thinking of above together with her younger brother have decided I should be woken up in the morning... Believe me being woken up by your room invaded and then being used as a trampoline is a "grit your teeth job", not a pleasure, particularly after a late night. Jon |
|
06 Feb 03 - 04:00 PM (#884230) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Ed. Thanks for that post, Jon I've worked in a Probation Centre, and know that paedophilia ('Schedule One' is how it's defined) is actually a rare condition. Michael Jackson is obviously very mixed up mentally, but I doubt that he's a paedophile. Paedophilia is, to many people, the most henious crime possible, and maybe it is. Today at work several people said that they'd "shoot Michael Jackson on sight" I don't see that as being very helpful. I started a teaching course a couple of years ago, but due to personal problems never finished it. I hope to try again in September, but I'm only applying to teach adults. A male trying to teach at primary level is so full of potential pitfalls, that it's not worth bothering with: You touched my boy! No thanks, but a shame |
|
06 Feb 03 - 05:12 PM (#884279) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: GUEST http://www.nambla1.de/ This is what the media obsession with Michael Jackson is pointing you at, so just go to damn the site and save hundreds of hours of brainwashing. All of us who have been brainwashed to be 'politically correct' will eventually be told to support the NORTH AMERICAN MAN BOY LOVE ASSOCIATION because...well, pedophiles aren't so bad, when you think about it. They're human TOO. How dare WE judge them. This is television's primary function now. It used to be just the 'opiate of the masses' in America, but now it is being used to incrementally brainwash people into accepting the despicable. The liberal 'political correctness' movement has been hijacked by the dehumanizers, just as the 'environmental' movement has been hijacked by the real-estate developing land-grabbers. |
|
06 Feb 03 - 05:49 PM (#884305) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Rustic Rebel The special is on here in a few hours. I suppose I will watch it to see what the deal is. From what has been said, MJ is pissed because everything was taken out of context. Only shown what made him look bad.There is the media for you. Child Services made a statement this morning that they would be watching it closely. I see nothing wrong with sleeping with your kids. Since my niece was a small child when she visits me she has slept with me. She is now fourteen years old and she still wants to sleep with me when she visits. We cuddle and talk and and talk and talk...(kid won't shut-up and go to sleep!) But does that make me a pervert or a lesbian? No way. I just love my niece and she loves me. To tell you the truth it has become so second nature, she will still probably want to sleep with me when she's fourty and I'm seventy! As for MJ's kids wearing masks in public, maybe he doesn't want them being recognized and harrassed by media when they get older. Maybe the kids just like doing it? Like I said I will have to watch. ABC 7:00 central if anyone wants to know when it's on. Peace. Rustic |
|
06 Feb 03 - 06:04 PM (#884317) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Ed. Rustic Rebel, If you were male, your post would be enough to consider "worth investigating" by some. I don't wish or intend to make any judgement by the above comment. |
|
06 Feb 03 - 06:45 PM (#884339) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Rustic Rebel Well Ed, I don't understand the difference of being male or female here. And either do the kids I would imagine. There is nothing wrong with cuddling and loving your children! And certainly a big difference between loving them and molesting them, but I highly doubt MJ is molesting his kids. With my niece it has always been her choice. She was scared of sleeping in another room by herself, that started it, but it is purely innocent and loving. If people see something wrong with cuddling with kids, not only do I feel sorry for them but the kids as well. Peace. Rustic |
|
06 Feb 03 - 10:42 PM (#884481) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: GUEST,Taliesn Well after seeing the ABC ( Walt Disney-owned ) Special broadcasting this UK-Granada Productions docume I must say "the" most disturbing thing that jumped out at me about this wackjob is the way he blythefully dismisses any need for his children to have a mother . Everything surogates , from conception to upbringing to God knows what when they go through their teenage years , and I half wonder if the Raelians are trying to contact Micheal to order a clone thorugh them. Welcome to the 21st Century and the celebrity worshipping halfwits that make give the micheal Jackson's all the bubbleworld reinforcing adulation they need. My God , just what is this world setting itself up for next .... Anti-Christ Superstar ? ( A Marilyn mansonb album title ) |
|
06 Feb 03 - 11:26 PM (#884502) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Little Hawk Right on, Sparrownoid. It's empty distraction. I regard the entertainment media and TV in general as far sicker and more destructive to the human race than Michael Jackson will ever be. They suck on him and anyone else that they can find to pull in viewers, just like some huge vampire sucking on its victim. So they distributed TVs in Afghanistan, did they? How kind of them! And here I have been, in the heart of the affluent society, deliberately choosing not to have a TV for the past 15 years. It's like Orwell's 1984, only more subtle. The brutality is a little less obvious. The poisons are coated with sugar. The Newspeak is so patently absurd that anything Bush says about Saddam could just as well be spoken by Saddam about Bush. Even more so, in fact, specially when it comes to weapons of mass destruction and warmongering. It doesn't matter about Michael Jackson. He's just one incredibly lost soul with a lot of money. But it does matter that the media are brainwashing and sedating everyone on a daily basis and have been doing so for decades. |
|
06 Feb 03 - 11:27 PM (#884503) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Rustic Rebel Oh please. He said there were plenty of women around and himself to take care of the kids. Sure the kids are going to grow up with a different lifestyle, but the question is who is making it that way for them? Press, public, fans. I am sure they are quite happy and content children when not in the eyes of the public. I think this man Martin B. who did the interview came off looking like the asshole. He was troubled about MJ's facination with children. Give me a break! I found myself actually respecting MJ for what he is doing for kids. If more people would do for kids like he does, showing them it's ok to have fun, it's ok to love and it's ok to pay attention to them, maybe this world would be a better place. Peace. Rustic, who has a Peter Pan sticker on her guitar. |
|
06 Feb 03 - 11:30 PM (#884507) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: GUEST,G T Wrisley Why do you watch this crap? The man is obviously a walking mental health diagnosis. He is a sociopath. He has no feelings for others. He is a narcissist. If you watch it, you support it. Do not give me any excuses. Ignore the bastard. Turn off the TV. It will damage you spiritually if you get involved in this. If any of you lives in his jurisdiction, file a complaint.That is a different matter. Other than that it does not help to watch him. It is similar to being a voyeur. Besides, every one of you wackos could put the time to better use in practice or teaching or maintaining your instruments. G T Wrisley |
|
06 Feb 03 - 11:54 PM (#884517) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: GUEST Yeah, LH, a convoy of TVs going around Afghanistan. Saw it on the news. Village to village, getting the propaganda tools in place even before medical facilities were up and running. Television...Super Sunday I watched about 10 minutes of the Super Bowl half-time show. One commercial for one of the on-line job-finders...Monster.com?...had an interesting piece of propaganda. At least, I recognized it as propaganda. A large semi-trailer truck is careening down the road, out of control. Lots of sparks and collisions. Cut to someone at a computer typing in Monster.com. A moment later, the guy is in the driver's seat of the truck, rasslin' it back onto the road and all is well. Some lip-flap about finding the job that's right for you. So I see that and I think about the trucking industry in the U.S. A year ago, union drivers were struggling to get by driving for thirty cents per mile, I think it was. Then, within the last year, the border with Mexico was absolutely destroyed, and now Mexican drivers are driving around our country, working for THREE cents per mile. My research on this is old and I'm working from memory, but I think that's the basics. So I sit there and watch this ad, which is a cute ad, but it DIVERTS the viewer's attention from the fact that American trucking is dead. And any viewer who saw that ad probably thinks he or she can ALWAYS get a job as a trucker, because that's what the ad implied. And the Bush junta has started paying Hollywood to insert this kind of idea into television spots. Like 'product placement' of Coke and Pepsi, the government is now actually budgetting money to go to Hollywood to insert messages in scripts. Things like Torture is good, Constitution is bad, Concentration camps are needed, etc. Seriously. They call it 'idea placement'. Television is making lemmings of you, people. It will lead you off a cliff someday. In 1947 the U.S. govt brought the Nazi death-camp doctors to this country to carry on their psychological 'research', and you're seeing the result of it now every time you turn on the tube, whether you know it or not. |
|
07 Feb 03 - 02:09 AM (#884567) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: GUEST,Jim Clark..London.England Yes Micheal Jackson has to be one of the strangest people on the planet,but he does rather bring to mind earlier mad artistic types like Shelley,Byron,William Blake and numerous other poeticaly or artisticaly inclined types who were truly eccentric extremely odd,but brilliantly creative people...None of us know if he is being totaly truthful(of course it just shouldnt be happening) that the children who sleep over at his homes do so as he says in an entirely innocent childlike cocooned enviroment..crazy as it may seem...I think he may be being truthful on this matter,even if he doesnt qiute hit the full tone of truth about his possible encounters with the plastic surgeons knife...Seeing him with his motherless dispossesed children walking about wearing masks and the baby dangling and baby feeding episode through a a fishnet mask was qiute unforgetably disturbing to my mind...surely other celebrity parents manage to raise their children without such excruciatingly extreme measures to conceal their identities... As for Martin Bashir...what a truly dark macheaveleon character he comes across as...I think a show about him possibly called "Living with Martin Bashir"(possibly Louis Theroux could be the interviewer)would be an equaly dark and depressing foray into television voyeurism... |
|
07 Feb 03 - 05:20 AM (#884611) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: jimlad Lets leave the poor bugger alone right,sure he is a sad,sad,human being....but "there but for fortune go you or I" Now what I say is that it's the parents of the litle kids sharing his bedroom who need a 'RIGHT GOOD SLAPPING' They have a personal agenda that defies understanding by any caring parent(or Grand-Parent in my case.) |
|
07 Feb 03 - 12:02 PM (#884827) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Rick Fielding Martin Bashir was certainly manipulative, but isn't that what he's supposed to be? Heck, I grew up with Mike Wallace being (snickeringly) accused of "setting up" his victims. People were outraged (wink wink nudge nudge) but they SURE loved the info that he squeezed out of Corporate crooks et al. Apparently Barbara Walters was able to do the same thing, but I could never bear to watch her long enough to find out. Michael did an absolutely astounding "softball" interview with Oprah Winfrey a few years ago, and I'm sure a great many folks came away from it wanting to wash their TV screens. So..the bottom line (for me) is, yes, Martin Bashir used his skill and his deviousness to get Michael to be (I gather) reasonably honest...and naturally, the results are ugly. I'm afraid we live in times where the spotlight is always on....whaddya gonna do. In the past, the sheer amount of wealth an eccentric person had, could guarantee their privacy. Not any more. Michael, Anna Nicole Smith, Michael's buddy(!!) who married Liza Minelli, etc, etc, etc, are out there for us to watch, just like the animals in Michael's zoo. Rick |
|
07 Feb 03 - 02:10 PM (#884921) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Don Firth I can't say that I liked Martin Bashir very much. A short time after watching the thing, I suddenly flashed on something. "Rosebud." Anybody seen Citizen Kane? If you note the parallels in the possible deep-seated, unconscious motivations behind the actions and behavior of Michael Jackson and those of the fictional Kane, I think it becomes pretty clear. He's trying to buy back the childhood that was stolen from him. Don Firth |
|
07 Feb 03 - 03:55 PM (#884994) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: GUEST,Taliesn From Rustic Rebel: (quote) "Oh please. He said there were plenty of women around and himself to take care of the kids." Oh, puh-lease your own self. Yeah plenty of women "for hire" surrounding them , but not a one that has that "connection" and the day will come when they will question their Wacko sperm-doner of a father about whomtheir motrher is/was. One can only imagine telling them some fantasy story of how they miraculously came as a gift to him and then show them the "Non-disclosure Contract". I guess Rustic subscribes to the "It takes a *hired* village to raise a child pychology ". Hiring & firing of surogate mums should prove interesting. Yeah, then add in the wealth-fed "bubbleland" and the constant wearing of masks in public and you're really got the makings of some maladjusted lives mishapen by the wealth-fed self-indulgences and fantasies of a disturbed Peter Pan-manbo fixated upon his own image. Ferdinand Marcos comes to mind. Yeah I guess money "does" buy everything...including credability as a parent. This is just the type of wealth-prey that the Raelians prey upon promising a perect clone so you can life forever. Give me an 'f-ing" break. |
|
07 Feb 03 - 08:26 PM (#885206) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: GUEST,Jeep Man I saw the first half and my stomach became upset so I turned to Animal Planet. Much more credible. Thing about Michael Jackson is -Why Do We Give A Damn? Jim |
|
07 Feb 03 - 08:56 PM (#885229) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: GUEST |
|
08 Feb 03 - 01:42 PM (#885623) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: *daylia* Psssssssst .... wanna see just how nurturing Michael Jackson can be? click here :-) daylia |
|
08 Feb 03 - 04:34 PM (#885693) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Rosebrook From Rustic Rebel: (quote) (referring to her neice)"She is now fourteen years old and she still wants to sleep with me when she visits. We cuddle and talk and and talk and talk...(kid won't shut-up and go to sleep!) But does that make me a pervert or a lesbian? No way." I take umbrage at the use of the word "lesbian" as thrown into this scenario. It suggests the lesbian-baiting stereotype of women "recruiting" younger females "into the lifestyle". Or it is used interchangeably with the word "pervert". What was the intention behind the use of this word here? Rose |
|
08 Feb 03 - 05:06 PM (#885718) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: The Shambles I think the interviewer was trying very hard not to make his subject a cause for concern. It was also pretty obvious that his subject was a cause for concern who was not able to relate to others, his own children or the real world at all. The excuse is made that with his background and childhood, this is not surprising. No it is not surprising but those who make this excuse feed the dangerous idea that this has created a special human being, to whom special rules apply. I saw Elizabeth Taylor introduce him on his recorded 30th anniversary show which was also screened this week, as the next best thing to the Messiah. He is talented but this talent does not overide or excuse his basic shortcomings and the problems that less talented people do not exhibit. He is rich but this should not be able to blind those who do get close, to the care and guidance he should be receiving fom them. Rather than their unquestioning adulation added to that which fanatical strangers need to show and which Michael Jackson is so used to feeding off, like some vampire or junkie. He plainly thinks he is Peter Pan and will live forever, and this is generally seen as mildly amusing and not a barrier to raising his own children. Who he abuses, as plainly as his father abused him in exactly the same way (less the belt - so far). The masks? With other visiting children he plainly becomes one of them but does not see that they do see him as a child like them or that this pretence is an abdication of responsibilty that aldulthood places upon all adults. An identical individual behaving like this, less the wealth and private fairground, would be viewed with much suspicion by these same children and with even more by their parents. When it came to the 'cured' child, the hand holding and the adoring head on Michaels shoulder, the interviewer was still trying not to be concerned. He was forced to become concerned when the children were placed at real risk during the tour of Germany, which Michael seemed to see as a triumphant palm waving entrance to Jerusalem. Where every concern seemed to be secondary to obtaining a fix of adulation. The most revealing aspect of the bed sharing was that Michael Jackson, even after his wealth and his lawyers had previously saved him, was totally unaware of the implications or of the dangerous position he was openly placing himself it. At the end, I had the impression that the interviewer was like an angler who had caught so many big fish, with so little effort, he was embarrassingly trying to push them back in the water Michael needs help, I doubt if he will get it. I trust that his children will...... |
|
08 Feb 03 - 05:11 PM (#885723) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: GUEST,someonewhowontleavetheiraddy@hotmail.com Call me stupid but I thought that bit was easy - she's a woman dope head! |
|
08 Feb 03 - 05:16 PM (#885726) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: GUEST,asabove@hotmail.com ie - she would be a pervert to sleep with someone in her family or underage and does the fact that she sleeps with another female cuddling etc. make her a lesbian! |
|
08 Feb 03 - 05:16 PM (#885728) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: *daylia* Cut'n splice maybe? ;-) daylia |
|
09 Feb 03 - 10:49 AM (#886057) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: jimlad Well said Shambles |
|
09 Feb 03 - 11:25 PM (#886518) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Rustic Rebel Rosebrook- No offense intended to lesbians. I was using those examples based on the names MJ is called, for letting boys sleep in his bed. I suppose I could have used the term paedophile also. I was making a point. Just because he has slept with children, it does not prove he is, what he has been labeled. Taliesn- Guess what- there are many children raised by 'women for hire'. Call them babysitters, call them day care, call them nannies. What ever you call them those three Jackson kids aren't the only ones. Daylia- No need for cut and splice if you were referring to my posts, I can handle it! Peace, Rustic |
|
10 Feb 03 - 10:26 AM (#886768) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: *daylia* Rustic I was responding to 'GUESTsomeonewhowon'tleavetheiraddy'. I thought s/he was referring to the silly picture of Michael with boobs that I posted above. My mistake? Always liked Michael Jackson - he's a creative phenomena. And a lot of the world's greatest artists were more than just a little 'unique'. (Sounds better than 'strange'). And that makes them 'bait' for the mud-slingers and the money-hungry instigators of civil suits. IMO anyway. daylia |
|
11 Feb 03 - 01:20 AM (#887385) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: fox4zero Rick I can understand sleeping with the cats, but sleeping with heather.... It isn't a native CT plant. Where do you pick it? In the "old Borsht-Belt days", the only one that slept with cats was Mrs. Katz! Larry |
|
11 Feb 03 - 10:34 AM (#887670) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Rick Fielding Oi vay! |
|
11 Feb 03 - 10:41 AM (#887678) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Bagpuss The main thing that disturbed me was that Jackson seemed to be suffering under the delusion that as long as he didn't let his children suffer in the way he suffered, then they couldn't come to any harm. Thus in his mind, as long as their faces were covered and they couldn't therefore be recognised, then he was doing fine. Even if he dangles a baby over a balcony to show to his adoring fans, or exposes his other children to a media scrum in which they were almost trampled underfoot. |
|
14 Feb 03 - 10:29 PM (#890759) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Rick Fielding Lordy Lordy Lordy, did I go off half-cocked!! I shot my mouth off without seeing the documentary.....but now I HAVE seen it. Bashir set him up big time over the whole film. Michael is not a huge intellect, and I think he got raked unfairly about a number of things. Look, yes, he's seriously weird, but I didn't get the feeling that he was dangerous (to kids or anyone). The whole "Peter Pan Child thing" IS legit...it really IS how he sees himself, and I really think he DOESN'T understand that he's had all the plastic surgery.....but I also got a picture of a very disturbed, but kind creature, and I shouldn't have been giving opinions til I'd at least seen the damn film. Cheers Rick |
|
14 Feb 03 - 11:00 PM (#890768) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: GUEST Glad you got to watch it Rick. I've never been a MJ fan (though I did like Billy Jean), had read about some of his strangeness and when Pip said to me "this is on the tv", I couldn't resist watching a little of it to see how obnoxious he really was... My reaction to the program was one I never could have predicted. Jon |
|
15 Feb 03 - 12:43 AM (#890827) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: The Shambles Look, yes, he's seriously weird, but I didn't get the feeling that he was dangerous (to kids or anyone). The whole "Peter Pan Child thing" IS legit...it really IS how he sees himself,- From just watching the show, I don't get the feeling that he is dangerous either, but he was using the same langauge that dangerous people use. And these people would also have you believe that they were not dangerous and they come across as very plausable too. This idea that they, (the adult) are subject to the wishes of the children is interesting. In MJ's case this was that it was the children who wished to sleep in his bed, in other cases many serious abuses are justisfied by the perpetrator in exactly the same way..... I am not in any way defending this industry or the damage that is caused by producing the images, but in the current climate where thoudsands of people are being charged for simply looking at these images of children on the net, many of those charged also being famous, we have to ask if our feeelings here and the actions of authorities are right..? Is it a double standard? |
|
15 Feb 03 - 11:32 AM (#890984) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Rick Fielding You're absolutely right Roger, about "using the same language that dangerous people use..." Unfortunately I couldn't see between the lines enough to exonerate the guy in that area....I'm just not sure. BUT....the way he talked about his obvious cosmetic surgery (he says he's done absolutely "NOTHING", just a couple of things with the nose to "help him breathe better and hit high notes(!!) Awww shit. I simply don't know WHAT I think.....BUT....Bashir set him up again and again. That's a fact. AND..I was criticizing him (with my usual "jokey" approach) when I hadn't seen the film. So Jon, what DID ya think? Rick |
|
15 Feb 03 - 02:39 PM (#891076) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: GUEST Well Rick I've already given most of my thoughts in previous posts to this thread. In biref, I thought more of Michael Jackson than I thought I would and ended up with a strong dislike of Martin Bashir. If you are meaning "do I think he's dangerous?" I can't KNOW any more than anyone else here. Michael Jackson's life is strange but the overall impression I got was that he is genuine in his "Peter Pan world" and has no sinister motive in his relationship with children. Jon |
|
15 Feb 03 - 03:11 PM (#891095) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: wysiwyg Now that we have seen the rise and fall of so many superstars, it's easy (from our view) to see the sickness the Jackson entourage enables and exploits.... from inside Neverland, all that seems to sick and perverse to us seems (by now) totally normal. Can't go on forever, eh? ~Susan |
|
15 Feb 03 - 04:16 PM (#891125) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: fat B****rd A lot of people put up with MJ's eccentricities etc until the Jotdy Chandler situation. After that the whole question of child molestation has hung over him like the proverbial sword. Last week a couple of lads , The Baldy Brothers on Century Radio UK North East, raised the question of Chandler's parents and the huge pay off. I don't know if Americans are different but as Gary Baldy (yes, I know) pointed out, if anybody harmed or molested in any way the child(ren) of normal people in this country NO amount of money would compensate and the suspected molester would be on the recieving end of great violence. |
|
15 Feb 03 - 05:44 PM (#891178) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: gnu I haven't read this thread. I wanted to see the show for myself first. I watched the MJ interviews this afternoon. I have the same take on this as I had when the "scandal" about him fucking young boys broke out. If MJ wanted to fuck young boys, he would have spent some of his over a billion dollars to go do it discreetly. Perhaps he is childish, even childlike, but I cannot believe he is stupid. And to make the jump to perverted is, to me, perverted. Only people who want to believe that he is a pervert will see him as a pervert. Overall, I must admit that his fantasy lifestyle is a bit outside what I would do if I had that kind of money, but, then again, I don't have that kind of money. |
|
16 Feb 03 - 10:41 AM (#891500) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Rick Fielding Leaving out the strangest stuff..... Wouldn't most people love to have a Tree to climb whenever you wanted to,...their own TRAIN....a recording studio en suite..... everything but Liz Taylor and Liza's new hubby showing up for dinner??!! Rick Pan |
|
16 Feb 03 - 11:13 AM (#891523) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Jeri Thread creep "Your version of 'Neverland' might make a good thread subject. Not the adult stuff - we've probably all heard enough of other people's sexual fantasies to the point where they're boring. I'm thinking about the childlike indulgences. Rick would probably do the Indiana 'Mojo' Jones and the Search for the Holy Grail of Guitars thing: build a nice castle (with no wallpaper) with rooms like "The Really Good Japanese Knock-Off Room," "Magnificent Marvelous Martins," "Gibsons That Don't Suck," "Perfectly Playable Plastic Things," and who knows what else. Me, I'd buy a house over a giant pit. It would have trap-door floors to make cleaning easier. |
|
16 Feb 03 - 12:38 PM (#891574) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Kaleea Michael who . . .? |
|
16 Feb 03 - 05:45 PM (#891801) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Jeri For those in the US with cable, the interview is on VH1 at 8 tonight. |
|
16 Feb 03 - 06:15 PM (#891830) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: catspaw49 Also, Michael has his rebuttle show airing this Thursday on Fox. It usws the outtakes to show that he was portrayed badly.........I think he is naive, very childlike himself and a hundred other things, but I also do NOT think he's a pedophile. Confused and deep into the Peter Pan syndrome for sure, but I really don't think he's dangerous in the classic sense. Spaw |
|
16 Feb 03 - 06:58 PM (#891852) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: GUEST Wouldn't most people love to have a Tree to climb whenever you wanted to,...their own TRAIN....a recording studio en suite..... Rick, please could I have a tree house in the tree? And can I have one of those old fairground organs, and I want an old steam powered Merry-Go-Round (carousel) with the most fantastic horses you have ever seen, trains - I want "Oliver Cromwell" I remember standing in awe looking at that one at Bressingham when I was about 10) and "The Flying Scotsman" of course (I don't remember but I'm told Pip once picked me up to allow me to touch that one)... I'd like to think that somewhere we all do still have the child in us, Jon Pan |
|
16 Feb 03 - 07:04 PM (#891857) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: The Shambles Is possible for a 40 year-old man to pretend to be a child, to believe he will live forever and still maintain to be a responsible single parent to three children? If you have enough money, the answer would appear to be yes. |
|
16 Feb 03 - 07:19 PM (#891870) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Jeri Shambles, I don't know that the key is money, even if he certainly can afford fancier toys. Maybe there are many other adults stuck in childhood fantasies, but they aren't famous and so their lives aren't fodder for our voyeuristic tendencies. |
|
16 Feb 03 - 07:30 PM (#891875) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: harpgirl hmmmm...I have to disagree with those of you that believe he is not a pedophile. I believe he is. My opinion is that Mr. Jackson should not he be allowed to have any unsupervised contact with children under eighteen. |
|
16 Feb 03 - 10:26 PM (#891956) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Jeri My impression was that most of the interview wasn't that weird, but the interviewer sure tried hard to make it seem that way. The commentary added post-interview sounded like sensationalism. It didn't match what I saw: Jackson's behavior supposedly becoming more and more 'bizarre' - huh? He was walking down a street, waving at people! 'Complete humiliation' because Jackson missed a cue? Oh come on! Complete humiliation is when your trousers fall off. It was also quite obvious that last interview was the 'kill'. Did his damndest to get some sort of emotional reaction out of Jackson. |
|
17 Feb 03 - 02:10 AM (#892024) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: The Shambles It is not the nature of his fancy toys, unless you include other peoples children as that. It is MJ's fame, his need to feed on this and complete isolation from the constraints placed upon most of us, that permits this totally bizrre individual's activities, some of them very suspect, to be to be viewed as not only acceptable but as a even role model by some. This is dangerous in itself, as I sadly think we will find out, if at least his own children do mot receive some outside help. That he may not, or not have appeared to be in this show, to be as strange as the worst publications would have us beleive, is hardly the point. No favours are being done to anyone at real risk, by us turning on the makers of the show. And for what, doing their job, and feeding us? This is a dirty job and we are led to beleive, mainly by those that do it, that someone has to do it? |
|
17 Feb 03 - 11:35 AM (#892092) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Jeri It's his fame that permits his activities to be viewed - period. It is my opinion that if it's the job of the makers of the show to create a sensational story, to include their comments as truth, it certainly is a dirty job. It would have been a strange enough story without the creative commentary. If it weren't for his fame and wealth, I doubt he would have ended up so weird in the first place. It seems to me he's trying to remain in a childhood he never had. Maybe I'm wrong, but my opinion of molesters is that they're usually into the power thing, the control. They don't see themselves as one of the kids but the one in charge. One of the things that struck me was that the only people who treated Jackson like a person were the kids. Fans acting wacky, paparazzi acting wacky, interviewer acting insincerely respectful simply to gain trust (IMO) and employees, but the kids just acted like normal kids around him. As far as who's in danger, let's face it, our opinions are based mostly on gossip, rumors, and television interview programs which augment the facts with opinions designed to get ratings. I wouldn't trust any of these things. "No favors are being done anyone at real risk" - from whom? From child molester or a mob? Who decides where the risk lies? The best thing that could happen for anyone at real risk would be if an attempt were made to portray truth as imparially as possible, and that did NOT happen. Maybe it's because I read this thread before I watched the show, but there was a very obvious gap between what I was observing and the assumptions and conclusions the interviewer voiced. Frankly, I don't trust anyone who tries to not-so-subtly guide my feelings about what I'm seeing. Maybe it's just me. I don't like Jerry Springer either. |
|
17 Feb 03 - 11:55 AM (#892112) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Rick Fielding Ya know, I've watched it twice now...and I clicked into "minute detail mode" both times. I looked for reactions, body language, evidence of re-takes, facial expressions.....and I simply don't know (about him being dangerous). I've watched interviews where I was amazed at the sheer skill of the subject to lie convincingly (Bill Clinton). I've seen interviews, where the subject looked absolutely terrified (George Bush jr.) I watched a pretty good interview with Paula Jones (after having made fun of this poor creature for a couple of years) and suddenly realized that (despite being manipulated by the Republicans) she was telling the truth...completely. I simply don't think Michael is smart enough to be "That good". So....is he a paedophile? I don't think so......BUT....would I leave MY kids with him? No, No, No. Ya gotta admit, it was a fascinating program. Cheers Rick |
|
17 Feb 03 - 12:19 PM (#892134) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Big Mick I thought the interview was a load of aul shite. The guy did just as Jeri suggests, he tries to lead us to a conclusion that ain't so. Is Michael goofy? Yep. Does he appear to have some emotional problems? yep. Did I see anything that suggests he is a pedophile? Nope. I was molested by a scout leader as a child, so I have a jaundiced view of folks that try to get close to all kids. I watch them for signs very carefully. I didn't see that. Mick |
|
18 Feb 03 - 06:08 PM (#893098) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Rick Fielding I dunno Mick. The graphic physical descriptions provided to the police, resulted in Michael's being photographed in detail. They were apparently totally accurate, and immediately afterwards, Michael's 'people' went for the multi-million dollar settlement. That whole thing may be terribly ugly, but it's all available on the net now. My question now....is HOW experienced was the kid? Was there a 'set up' going on? It gets sadder and sadder, but I'm starting to see some stuff I didn't before. Rick |
|
18 Feb 03 - 06:42 PM (#893122) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Bill D you know...MJ was about all you could watch last night..ABC and NBC both had 2 hrs or more...NBC ran a documentary about his life that was in many ways scarier than the 'interview'..(I switched back & forth)... I have NO idea whether he had ever actually molested any kids (though one claimed so 10 years ago, and the detective who worked the case was NOT happy it got settled out of court)...but anyone who can lie so blatently about how much plastic surgery he has had, just 'might' strech the truth about other things..they had 2 or 3 plastic surgeons who said that the man has had so muck (much, but I kinda like that typo) work done that he is in real danger!...And no matter that his father & others made him so sensitive about his appearance, he has a serious problem with what his mind has done to his body. It makes me sorta sad...and if he weren't so damn rich, it would be even sadder! (anyone want to discuss his 'taste' in vases?) |
|
18 Feb 03 - 07:01 PM (#893134) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Alba pleez............ the vases...all that money and nay taste....that's a crime! Brutal is the only word for the gear in his "favorite store" As for his guilt or innocence...I don't know,Ihope not. Bashir though.....nasty piece of manipulation there but hey that's what he gets paid for.......not for the truth Michael jackson is now a celebrity freak and a sad in my eyes but then I can't imagine being in his world for one minute. His life has never been "normal" so................I am totally on the outside looking in and it was way too far removed from my life for me to understand his. |
|
19 Feb 03 - 11:49 AM (#893476) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Rick Fielding Ahhhhh the vases.....surely to god he was joking for Bashir's sake? He was wasn't he? But he doesn't joke, does he? Rick |
|
19 Feb 03 - 05:43 PM (#893812) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Jeri Urns. |
|
19 Feb 03 - 08:08 PM (#893927) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Rick Fielding Apparently over a billion Jeri. Rick |
|
19 Feb 03 - 08:18 PM (#893935) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Jeri I heard he bought a Hennwei, too. |
|
19 Feb 03 - 08:20 PM (#893936) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: catspaw49 Gee Miz Bones, What's a Hennway? Spaw.....just to keep the Vaudeville routine going |
|
19 Feb 03 - 08:36 PM (#893942) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Jeri It's a Hennwei, Spaw. Mr Hennwei made the first steam-powered bicycle. The trend never caught on - especially after that unfortunate accident in which the coal box fell off and squashed a Pomeranian that was chasing it. Made all the papers. Well, until it got squashed. Anyway, these Hennweis are very rare collectors items. |
|
19 Feb 03 - 09:31 PM (#893966) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: Big Mick Jayzus keeeeeeeerrrrrriiiissstttteee, Spaw, laid it out there and no one said the obvious: Mick |
|
19 Feb 03 - 09:45 PM (#893976) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: catspaw49 We need a thread about old Vaudeville and Burlesque jokes and routines....... Traveling salesman comes into a town feeling really bad and realizes he's lost his voice. He has an important call to make in the morning so he seeks out the home and office of the local doctor. He goes up and knocks on the door and a beautiful woman dressed in a negligee answers. He hoarsely whispers, "Is the doctor home?" She leans forward and with a smile whispers back, "No....Come on in." Spaw |
|
19 Feb 03 - 09:52 PM (#893980) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: katlaughing LOL!! I couldn't believe that was all the networks had on the other night. Reading what you all have said is much better than watching any of it, which I did not do; also makes me glad I didn't watch it! I can't stand that kind of crap. Who cares what he is or is not?! |
|
21 Feb 03 - 07:43 AM (#895058) Subject: RE: BS: Michael Jackson-UK TV interview From: GUEST It looks like the Jackson reply will be shon in the UK on Sky so I won't see it but have just read this. If nothing else it confirms my feelings about Bashir. Jon |