|
19 Dec 05 - 02:54 PM (#1630678) Subject: BS: Lurkers' Register From: Doug Chadwick From time to time, we have threads asking "Where is Joe Bloggs?" or "What's happened to A N Other?". Often, 'Catters are able to fill in some of the blanks or the person involved chips in and identifies him/herself. I feel sure that a lot of people who used to be active, but who we no longer here from, may still be out there reading but not posting. This may be because they feel they have nothing left to say or maybe they prefer to stay out of the brawls that so often mar discussions hereabouts. I, myself, post sparingly for these very reasons although I am an avid reader of posts both above and below the line. When I do post on a topic of general interest, it would be nice to have an idea who might be receiving my words of wisdom. I propose that we have a "Lurkers' Register", updated once a year, where people who have nothing particular to say can let others know they are still around. All that would be required for a member who is logged on, would be to open the thread and hit the submit button, or to add a name first, if coming in as a Guest. Any additional messages would be optional. The beauty of a thread where no-one is required to add a message is that there would be nothing to argue about and censorship would not be an issue. If you are a lurker and would like others to know your still around, then why not tack on your name to this thread to form the 2006 LURKERS' REGISTER. DC |
|
19 Dec 05 - 03:09 PM (#1630684) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: jets I read a lot |
|
19 Dec 05 - 03:18 PM (#1630690) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: GUEST,Guest I only post occasionally too. |
|
19 Dec 05 - 03:24 PM (#1630692) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: gnu Wildebeeste here. I lurk constantly, in gnu's heart, but seldom get to post because gnu is so restrained, stoic, cautious, gentlemanly, polite, and full of ****. |
|
19 Dec 05 - 03:42 PM (#1630697) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: number 6 Good idea. In fact it's a great idea. sIx |
|
19 Dec 05 - 03:51 PM (#1630703) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: katlaughing Agreed, great idea!! |
|
19 Dec 05 - 03:56 PM (#1630710) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: Beer Sounds good to me. Beer |
|
19 Dec 05 - 04:22 PM (#1630739) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: Bee-dubya-ell But if you post here, don't you become a poster instead of a lurker and automatically disqualify yourself? |
|
19 Dec 05 - 04:23 PM (#1630741) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: number 6 I think you have a good point there Bee-dub. sIx |
|
19 Dec 05 - 04:32 PM (#1630748) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: Doug Chadwick Not if you don't say anything! DC |
|
19 Dec 05 - 05:22 PM (#1630782) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: Azizi I take it your Lurkers' Register is for Members and Guests with names who rarely if ever post on any threads. Since I like to post, and do so regularly [albeit sometimes with brief intermittent breaks],I guess I don't qualify for that list. But I post in only a few threads at any given time, and read other threads without posting in [on?]them. So I could be said to be lurking on those threads where I don't post. I think we all have a little bit of "lurker" in us... |
|
19 Dec 05 - 06:04 PM (#1630813) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: GUEST I'm here |
|
19 Dec 05 - 06:19 PM (#1630824) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: Mr Red you won't catch me being inconspicuous....... |
|
19 Dec 05 - 06:48 PM (#1630835) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: Deda I read a lot more often than I post, but I sometimes do neither for many months at a stretch. Usually I check back to see what brother Amos is up to lately. |
|
19 Dec 05 - 09:07 PM (#1630891) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: Joe Offer This thread looks like a good idea. I'd like to see checkins from Shula, and from Chet W and Tim Jacques - and from a number of other good people. -Joe Offer- |
|
19 Dec 05 - 09:17 PM (#1630899) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: wysiwyg Joe, maybe you could make it a permathread (or ask Doug to start one), and then the just-funnin' stuff could be moved around so that missing-in-action posts could be featured prominently. ~S~
-Joe Offer- |
|
19 Dec 05 - 10:10 PM (#1630948) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: bobad If you announce that there's free beer a lot more will show up. |
|
19 Dec 05 - 10:13 PM (#1630952) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: Beer Right on Bobad. Beer |
|
19 Dec 05 - 10:16 PM (#1630955) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: bobad I knew that would bring out Beer. |
|
19 Dec 05 - 10:35 PM (#1630966) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: Peace Winter has arrived in Canada. Especially eastern Canada west of the Maritimes where a certain two posters live. CABIN FEVER. |
|
19 Dec 05 - 10:40 PM (#1630974) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: bobad Hey, I resemble that statement. |
|
19 Dec 05 - 10:58 PM (#1630988) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: Beer Yep... I'm already thinking of jumping in my country cadalic and heading off to Nova Scotia for a week or two after Christmas. Got a brother in law down there whom I call bro and is a great friend. Maybe I'll contact number6 and see how things are in New Brunswick. |
|
19 Dec 05 - 11:01 PM (#1630990) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: bobad I'd like to get away to warmer climes 'till, oh, around April myself. |
|
19 Dec 05 - 11:11 PM (#1630993) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: Briagha I'm here... mostly lurking, occasionally posting. |
|
20 Dec 05 - 05:12 AM (#1631081) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: bill\sables |
|
20 Dec 05 - 05:22 AM (#1631082) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: George Papavergis |
|
20 Dec 05 - 06:01 AM (#1631110) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: GUEST, Free at last I did join Mudcat, but it took over my computer so that it was impossible to post without my name coming up. Maybe it is possible to sign in and out easily but I didn't know how to do it. This meant that if anyone else used my computer and posted on Mudcat it came up in my name. I was quite relieved when my cookie disappeared in the big mudcrash - and now I can post either anonymously or under my own name or a pseudonym whenever I like. Bobert may have felt free when he got his cookie back, but I feel freer now I have lost mine. |
|
20 Dec 05 - 06:16 AM (#1631121) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: Oaklet |
|
20 Dec 05 - 06:42 AM (#1631144) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: JohnInKansas Free at last - Should there be a valid reason for being anonymous for a post, all you have to do is "delete cookies," or just any cookies that have mudcat as part of the name. To return to being a real person, just log in again. You can copy (or export) your mudcat cookie(s) somewhere, and then just paste them back (or better- import them back) when you want to be real, but you should keep a recent copy handy if you do that. Isn't this thread something like the "Guest register" some sites use? Maybe "Guests and Inactive Members Hello Register" - but we'd need a note in the FAQ that Inactives can note occasionally that they're still around. (And a way to get people to read the %$!@))! FAQ.) John |
|
20 Dec 05 - 06:59 AM (#1631158) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: John MacKenzie There's a drop down menu at the top of the page 'Quick Links' 4th choice down Log Out, it's easy. G |
|
20 Dec 05 - 07:35 AM (#1631176) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: GUEST, Free (and thick) Thanks Giok. I'll join again and do it properly in future. Now totally free! |
|
20 Dec 05 - 08:31 AM (#1631212) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: GUEST,Frug Lurk Lurch Belch.........Crash |
|
20 Dec 05 - 10:57 PM (#1631885) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: alison still around slainte alison |
|
21 Dec 05 - 06:13 AM (#1632001) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: GUEST,jOhn |
|
21 Dec 05 - 09:47 AM (#1632120) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: Lepus Rex I rarely have time to do anything but lurk anymore, and I do even that only rarely. When I'm reading quite a bit, though, I tend to post something, just because lurking gives me an icky, reading-someone-else's-diary type feeling. So I guess I'm a Lurker, in a half-assed sort of way. ---Lepus Rex |
|
21 Dec 05 - 10:18 AM (#1632134) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: PoppaGator I've been pretty inactive of late, during my temporary career as a hurricane evacuee. When I do check into Mudcat to catch up, I usually find it impossible to resist the temptation to add a comment or two ~ maybe just in one or two threads. So, I am not normally a "lurker," and have generally been truly absent during those periods when I don't create any postings. Of course, if I pop in for a half-hour or so after a monthlong absense, not everyone will notice that I may have posted a brief comment or two, hidden away within one or two obscure threads... |
|
21 Dec 05 - 10:48 AM (#1632162) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: Donuel I have always found that if I stop posting to a site, that tons of old familiar friends return. I'll see what I can do to help. |
|
21 Dec 05 - 06:32 PM (#1632481) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: GUEST,Bizibod Lurk , Lurk ...... |
|
21 Dec 05 - 07:37 PM (#1632513) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: Peter K (Fionn) John in Kansas, is it necessary to delete cookies? What's wrong with simply logging out and then posting? (Not that I've ever done it, as I expect the Joe Clones could confirm.) |
|
22 Dec 05 - 04:21 AM (#1632709) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: suzi |
|
22 Dec 05 - 06:49 AM (#1632776) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: RolyH |
|
22 Dec 05 - 04:13 PM (#1633219) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: GUEST,DaveA |
|
22 Dec 05 - 04:39 PM (#1633248) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: DaveA Woops - cookie had gone missing |
|
23 Dec 05 - 10:08 AM (#1633785) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: C-flat |
|
23 Dec 05 - 01:11 PM (#1633923) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: Edain |
|
24 Dec 05 - 01:31 AM (#1634362) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: rangeroger |
|
24 Dec 05 - 02:40 PM (#1634659) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: Cattail |
|
26 Dec 05 - 03:18 PM (#1635076) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: Doug Chadwick Refresh |
|
27 Dec 05 - 12:31 AM (#1635247) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: Chip2447 I'm still not here. |
|
27 Dec 05 - 12:36 AM (#1635250) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: GUEST This post intentionally left blank. |
|
27 Dec 05 - 06:37 PM (#1635656) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: JohnInKansas Fion - Sorry I haven't looked in on this thread for a while. A Log Out should do. Note that the usual result of Logging Out is to delete the cookie for the site. When you log back in, you'll get a new cookie. John |
|
28 Dec 05 - 06:47 AM (#1635902) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: GUEST I post a lot |
|
28 Dec 05 - 01:13 PM (#1636103) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: Terry K Hey - this thread may help me to resist being drawn into nonsensical exchanges with some of the less gifted compulsive posters who think they know stuff! Or does that count as a post...... |
|
28 Dec 05 - 09:03 PM (#1636392) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: Peter K (Fionn) Thanks John - didn't know logging out killed the cookie. I live and learn.... |
|
29 Dec 05 - 12:17 AM (#1636507) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: GUEST Me too. |
|
11 Dec 06 - 09:48 AM (#1906312) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: GUEST,jOhn feresh |
|
11 Dec 06 - 04:17 PM (#1906704) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: aussiebloke G'day to all... |
|
11 Dec 06 - 05:51 PM (#1906839) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: Bizibod Hello there, can I help you at all ? No thanks, just lurking....... |
|
12 Dec 06 - 12:23 AM (#1907115) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: Azizi That's a good one, Bizibod. It took me two reads before I got it. -Azizi [who lurks more than she posts, really]. |
|
12 Dec 06 - 09:52 PM (#1907994) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: Slag Or how about a "peeper's post". If you are just lookin in, well, that's peeping and if you just sound of a little or every now and then, that's peeping also. Lest you think I'm a peeping "Tom" I'll pop out now and leave you to peep peep around this post! |
|
13 Dec 06 - 02:19 AM (#1908103) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: Rasener Peep :-) |
|
13 Dec 06 - 03:21 AM (#1908125) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: Rasener Are you playing at the Reely Grim Christams Folk Dance next Tuesday Doug ? Les |
|
13 Dec 06 - 01:17 PM (#1908545) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: Doug Chadwick I wasn't planning on it, Les. I've sent you a P.M. DC |
|
13 Dec 06 - 06:37 PM (#1908852) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: Leadfingers |
|
14 Dec 06 - 06:16 AM (#1909224) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: Rasener Replid Doug by PM |
|
15 Dec 06 - 05:48 AM (#1910072) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: diesel Member some years now, but only rarely post - but always reading or lurking somewhere in the background. |
|
15 Dec 06 - 06:39 AM (#1910099) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: C-flat |
|
15 Dec 06 - 01:05 PM (#1910362) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: Gern I'm not sure that I'm a lurker, but I AM here. |
|
16 Dec 06 - 01:35 AM (#1910798) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: Alice On the road much of the time, can't read Mudcat every day like I used to. |
|
16 Dec 06 - 05:54 PM (#1911316) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: GUEST,Peter Woodruff I read the threads when I can otherwise busy with school and work or my pepper garden that got out of control. Peter AKA wdyat12 |
|
17 Dec 06 - 03:52 PM (#1912017) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: Penny S. Dropped out for a bit, various reasons, now back lurking with the occasional post. Penny |
|
29 Dec 07 - 04:57 AM (#2224171) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: Doug Chadwick Time to update the Lurkers' Register for 2008, where people who have nothing particular to say can let others know they are still here. Just to re-state from my first post………. All that is required for a member who is logged on, is to open the thread and hit the submit button, or to add a name first, if coming in as a Guest. Any additional messages are optional. If you are a lurker and would like others to know your still around, then why not tack on your name to this thread to form the 2008 LURKERS' REGISTER. DC |
|
29 Dec 07 - 09:53 AM (#2224264) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: Maryrrf I do post occasionally, but check the threads every day |
|
29 Dec 07 - 03:29 PM (#2224515) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: Waddon Pete Hello, I'm not sure that 'Lurker' is the correct noun to use! Mudcat is an amazing resource, a friend, and a virtual Aladdin's Cave. There are many doors and many different ways to get inside. When you arrive inside you wander from room to room...often forgetting why you came in in the first place and wander out again finding that rather a long time has passed! Just when you thought you had mined the site dry another gem is revealed which leads to another labyrinth of interest, fascination and erudition :0) I'm not sure this wandering through a cornucopia is best described as 'Lurking'? Sure, we drop a comment or two here and there... sometimes we look at the guest list at the top of a thread and pass quickly on....! Other times we read the guest list and know we are in for a treat! So...whatever it is....I do......! Best wishes, Peter |
|
29 Dec 07 - 05:37 PM (#2224581) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: wysiwyg You never know when a favorite MudBud may cruise in to look at PMs, either, and reply to them. Sometimes I run out of things to say in the threads; but for me, the longer I am a Mudcatter, the more it's about the PMs. ~S~ |
|
30 Dec 07 - 12:07 AM (#2224717) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: GUEST,Dulcimer42 I stop by almost every evening. Scroll through the topics, click on any that perk my interest, and occasionally I have something to say. Not real often. I've learned a lot here, and you guys have been here to answer questions for me many times. Thanks for being here. Proud to be part of such a group. |
|
30 Dec 07 - 12:39 AM (#2224724) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: Art Thieme |
|
30 Dec 07 - 02:16 PM (#2225010) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: Liz the Squeak Yo Art T, good to see you here! LTS |
|
30 Dec 07 - 04:30 PM (#2225078) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: Eric the Viking Well.Still alive. Moved to Orkney (Live in the Hope) Don't get to look at the 'cat too much, but drop in from time to time for a look round and see the threads. Read a few of them. Don't post a lot. But "Hi" and a very happy new year to all my old friends, near and far. I hope 2008 is good for you all. Cheers Eric |
|
01 Jan 09 - 10:27 AM (#2528992) Subject: RE: BS: Lurkers' Register From: Doug Chadwick The time has come, once again, to update the Lurkers' Register for 2009. The Register has been running for several years now and it may be that people who added their names at the beginning feel that there is no need to do any more. I feel sure that 'Catters would like to know if those people are still around. For that reason I have started a new thread here - Lurkers' Register 2009 - and I invite all lurkers, both new and old, to add their names there. DC |