|
05 Feb 07 - 07:24 PM (#1958441) Subject: BS: Economic Truth From: folk1e I have been working round Manchester U.K. and the number of new buildings is realy amazing! This got me thinking, the city was built on heavy industry yet all of the new buildings are of service industry or housing! How little does a country have to produce (in hard merchandice) to sustain growth? It seems to me that unless you actualy produce some goods the same money will circulate throughout the economy causing inflation! Or am I having a blond moment? |
|
05 Feb 07 - 07:33 PM (#1958453) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: kendall I've wondered the same thing. How can a country that has no manufacturing base survive? Flipping each others burgers don't do it. |
|
05 Feb 07 - 07:36 PM (#1958459) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: Bainbo It's not just you, folk1e. I live in an area which, until just a few years ago, really, was dominated by shipyards and coal mines. Now it's call centres. I know times change, and nothing can stay the same - but, honestly. How fragile is that? That industry's only guaranteed until the rate relief on the offices dries up, or we're undercut by Bangalore. My wife and I have been racking our brains to think what Britain does produce any more. We think there's a couple of shoe factories somewhere (though even Doc Martens are made in Indonesia now), woollen mills in the Scottish borders, and some foreign-owned car plants. (Flippin' foreigners. They come over here, they give us jobs ...). But you're right. We still appear to be prosperous. And we can't work out how Mr Brown has managed this particularly clever trick. |
|
05 Feb 07 - 07:41 PM (#1958471) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: folk1e One of the only things we seem to "produce" is animation. I had to go to Cosgrove House and Danger Mouse seemed to be O.K. |
|
05 Feb 07 - 07:47 PM (#1958485) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: artbrooks Well, its kind of like the old story of the three guys stuck in a hole who got rich trading hats back and forth... Inflation isn't a problem unless there is an actually scarcity of goods and people start competing with each other to buy them. There really isn't any need, considering that we are all part of the global economy, for any particular nation or region within a nation to produce hard goods. All will be well as long as the country that does so is willing to accept YOUR currency for what they produce. The problem appears when YOU don't produce anything, or offer any services, that they want to spend that money on. Of course, in the US we have solved that problem by selling bonds to the Chinese, etc., so that they will eventually own the country anyway. |
|
05 Feb 07 - 07:56 PM (#1958492) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: folk1e Inflation was a problem in Germany in the 30's! It just means that everyone is playing "catch up with me" with everyone lagging further behind! Ask the first time buyers (of houses) in the U.K. about inflation! |
|
05 Feb 07 - 08:08 PM (#1958498) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: artbrooks Actually, the inflation problem ("hyperinflation") in Germany was a post-war phenomena of the early 1920s, and it was entirely because nobody (including the Germans) would accept the old German mark in payment for anything. This was ended with the introduction of a new mark in, I think, 1924-5. By the 1930s, the Germans were producing LOTS of hard goods (tanks and bullets). |
|
05 Feb 07 - 09:11 PM (#1958533) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: GUEST,Eekonamist The U.K. produces money. The City of London (square mile area in the city), is the center of the global fiat money industry. That's the main reason why the U.K. is a have rather than a have not. You folks ought to demand your FULL share of your wealth. You'd all be billionaires. |
|
05 Feb 07 - 09:48 PM (#1958554) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: Rapparee I look at it this way: China and India have begun to flex their manufacturing muscle. By 2010 India will have rear-ended China in the production of engineers, etc. -- the "hard" fields, the fields needed to produce things. NOT business degrees, not liberal arts -- the sciences and engineering. They won't go to war over it, because both of them will carve up the global pie and there will be money to go around. The US, of course, will react like it did to Sputnik and throw money around in all directions, hoping that mere money will give the US the "lead" again in those fields. The UK will follow suit, but in a lower key. By 2015 the world will be on the start of a post-petroleum society. But the technology needed will come from China and India, both of which may very well have manned orbiting space stations. By 2020 the US and the UK will no longer be powers to be reckoned with -- the Middle East and Africa will both be under the influence of India and China (it's starting already). By 2030, India and China will both have lunar colonies and manufacturing facilities at L-5 points. I wouldn't be at all surprised if by 2050 China and India merged into one huge nation-state. But, since I'll be 105 then I probably won't really care very much.... |
|
05 Feb 07 - 11:09 PM (#1958600) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: Amos England sells services outside England. For example, the Baroness Symons is friends with Lynn Cheney in the US and tells her what she ought to have her husband Dick make George Bush do. This is a valuable service. A |
|
06 Feb 07 - 07:42 PM (#1959748) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: Ebbie Yeah, Amos. You know how the Brits are. :) |
|
07 Feb 07 - 03:07 PM (#1960274) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: autolycus Apparently,when thinking of UK exports,to consider goods only is to ignore more than half of British exports. The bulk of British income is from services,especially banking,insurance and other financial services,and some other services like hi-tech and music (one of our biggest earners. More down to Thatcher than Brown. She was the one to kill off a lot of British industry. Ivor |
|
07 Feb 07 - 03:39 PM (#1960304) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: Scrump No-one seems to be worried about the UK economy being a house of cards. More and more service industry jobs are being "offshored", and more and more people are getting deeper and deeper into personal debt, partly because of property prices going through the roof. The next recession, when (not if) it arrives, will make those of the early 1980s and the early 1990s seem like the proverbial vicarage tea party. We be doomed, doomed! |
|
08 Feb 07 - 02:40 AM (#1960779) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: autolycus Energy prices are coming down. We're saved,we're saved. Ivor |
|
08 Feb 07 - 09:29 AM (#1961108) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: Grab More down to Thatcher than Brown. She was the one to kill off a lot of British industry. "Kill off" by not subsiding the unprofitable ones out of taxpayers' money. So we pay twice over, once for their overpriced, low-quality products, and again for higher taxes. Oh joy. Let's be honest here, who really thought British Leyland was worth saving? Anyone? Do I hear a big "hell no"? (If I didn't, I damn well should have.) They were producing stuff that was unreliable, performed worse than the competition, was poorly designed and was made by shoddy workmen who didn't care that they're turning out crap. Add to that the unions who ensured that you couldn't do anything about the crap workmen or reorganise to get better productivity, and the country gets what it deserves, I'm afraid. Yes, Britain is doing little physical manufacturing. But it's doing an absolute shitload of design work and intellectual-capital stuff - cars, phones, software, buildings, etc, etc - and that's where we as a country are making money these days. Graham. |
|
08 Feb 07 - 02:25 PM (#1961438) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: GUEST,pattyClink Just wanted to echo what was said earlier. England is a giant center for banking. Not sure that's a terrible thing, your country has already learned to survive in a world where the big production is done elsewhere. USAers are in for a nasty generation of adjustment to such. |
|
08 Feb 07 - 05:46 PM (#1961690) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: Richard Bridge The big problem with the few things England and the rest of Britain (but mostly the city) still do is the Wimbledon effect. World class arena, all the top players are foreigh - and taking most of their winnings away. There is only so long that we can glean the crumbs from their tables, get paid to wipe their arses, and use that money to buy the bread made from the corn we don't grow. Yes, British Leyland was worth saving. Now we buy cars from foreigners. Who makes the money? Yes, coal mining was worth saving. Now we buy coal from foreigners. Who makes the money? When it gets cold, who shuts the pipelines? Who makes the money? When we make the films - who owns the rights and who makes the money (clue, some still post here)? Software? Don't make me laugh. Computer hardware? Ditto. Brand values? Yeah right. House of cards is right. |
|
09 Feb 07 - 04:02 PM (#1962568) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: folk1e Thanks Richard, that was the point I am worried about! Anyone remember when we had a "made in U.K." badge on things? Having a cutting edge technological advantage only benifits you if you can do something with it (like USA did to Russia in the space race) |
|
10 Feb 07 - 02:26 PM (#1963354) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: autolycus And yet we in GB are described as having the 4th or 5th most powerful economy in the world. Ivor |
|
10 Feb 07 - 03:44 PM (#1963404) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: Richard Bridge But we don't own any of it..... |
|
10 Feb 07 - 04:33 PM (#1963423) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: McGrath of Harlow The idea that there's going to be a permanent living made from "financial services" and stuff like that because other people in other parts of the world aren't going to be able to do that is a very temporary illusion which is already evaporating. "sustain growth" It isn't going to be about "sustaining growth", it's going to be about surviving (touch wood). A hi-tech, but at the same time a subsistance economy. |
|
10 Feb 07 - 05:05 PM (#1963440) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: Peace '"sustain growth"' That is THE lie about economics. Even a child knows that when you have no more water in the glass, it's gonna be a thirsty time. |
|
10 Feb 07 - 06:29 PM (#1963504) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: The Fooles Troupe Anybody remember "Limits to growth"? You should really read "Play Little Victims" by Kenneth Cook (Hardcover - Jun 1978) |
|
11 Feb 07 - 03:35 AM (#1963765) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: Richard Bridge Nope. Tell us about it. |
|
11 Feb 07 - 05:36 AM (#1963808) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: autolycus I remember seeing it about. I think the idea is that the resources of our planet are,a priori,finite. I don't know whether 'Limits to Growth' made the point that capitalism assumes infinite growth. As the song had it, "Something's gotter give,something's gotter give, something's gotter give." Capitalism is going to continue trying to square that circle by analogy with a Heath Robinson machine that has to get increasingly contorted to do the simplest thing. Ivor |
|
11 Feb 07 - 07:37 AM (#1963870) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: The Fooles Troupe "'Limits to Growth' made the point that capitalism assumes infinite growth." Been a while since I read it. Out of that era grew the concept of ZPG - Zero Population Growth. China certainly took it seriously enough to forbid more than 2 children per family. Capitalism firstly assumes infinite resources, including 'suckers'. |
|
11 Feb 07 - 02:33 PM (#1964146) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: folk1e It reminds me of an episode or "Red Dwarf" ! The whole economy of earth was sustained by someone leaving a light on before going on a long trip! The light was using a resource and the power company kept on supplying and billing the guy who was away, sending him regular bills .... which he never got so didn't pay .... causing the power company to issue legal procedings ...... thereby generating the sum total of planet earth's wealth! Amazing how thought provoking these cheap Sci-fi's can be! |
|
12 Feb 07 - 01:38 PM (#1965019) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: McGrath of Harlow Unpaid debts count as a resource. They can even be bought and sold. |
|
12 Feb 07 - 02:32 PM (#1965076) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: autolycus Foolestroupe,you misquote me by omission. Please re-read my post. Also,can you say more about your last sentence,which is a vague one. Thanks Ivor |
|
12 Feb 07 - 02:36 PM (#1965085) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: GUEST,petr re: financial services - already a number of financial services are being outsourced to India such as accounting etc. so I wouldnt count on it. read Jared Diamonds Collapse, it has a lot to say about sustainability, right now the way the whole western world standard of living is not sustainable. our economy is based on constant growth - ie if youre not growing its bad, at the same time the system does not account for 'externalities' ie. overfishing, deforestation, pollution of water and air, not to mention green house gases. |
|
12 Feb 07 - 06:44 PM (#1965393) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: The Fooles Troupe Capitalism assumes 1) raw materials will never run out 2) the market for processed goods is infinite 3) 2 implies that there will always be some sucker to buy the junk - just how many refrigerators does one person need? 4) if the market is saturated, then you make the products last less time.... 5) you can then flog the more shoddy product to suckers more often as it wears out faster... 60 all this broken stuff can be dumped - and the size of the dump is infinite... |
|
12 Feb 07 - 07:05 PM (#1965416) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: McGrath of Harlow It's basically like pyramid selling in the long run. |
|
12 Feb 07 - 07:09 PM (#1965420) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: The Fooles Troupe 4a) If the market is saturated, brainwash the market that they REALLY need something else. |
|
13 Feb 07 - 02:44 AM (#1965664) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: autolycus Thanks. All that's a bit Westerncentric. Capitalism's latest solutions to its problems are China,India and the Iraq war,never mind mobile phones and the latest technology generally. Then it'll be Africa and anywhere else that's not yet properly into consumerism. Ivor |
|
13 Feb 07 - 05:03 AM (#1965746) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: The Fooles Troupe China and India are following teh Capitalist/Consumerist model rather closely - just look at the stats for growth of motorised vehicles. |
|
13 Feb 07 - 05:42 AM (#1965776) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: Grab Yes, coal mining was worth saving. Now we buy coal from foreigners. Who makes the money? Say it cost British Steel £500 to extract a ton of iron ore, and £100 for a US mine (for a comparable amount of iron out). And say it cost British Coal £1000 for the coal to smelt the iron ore, whereas a US strip-mine would cost £200. Then the same amount of steel would cost five times as much if produced in the UK as produced in the US. You could make this work if you wanted - but only by going the North Korea route and banning all imports from abroad. The moment you get imports from abroad, the vastly cheaper cost of raw materials shows up how much it's costing you to dig this stuff out. To continue the same argument, we should maintain cotton plantations in the UK too for our clothing. OK, they'd need to go under vast greenhouses, and they'd take huge quantities of water and heating, so the simple cotton T-shirt you'd buy down the market would probably cost you a hundred quid. But we'd be self-sufficient, and that's the important thing, right? Yes, British Leyland was worth saving. Now we buy cars from foreigners. Who makes the money? Who "made" money on BL? The government spent a bloody fortune trying to prop them up, because they made a loss for ages! Why? Because what they were selling was unmitigated crap. What was the effect of the government propping them up? They assumed they had a right to exist and continued to churn out even shoddier cars at even higher prices, ignoring any thought of efficiency or build quality, until no-one in their right mind would buy one and the cost to keep the whole crumbling pile aloft was too much. A house of cards? I give you BL as the classic, all-time example. Graham. |
|
13 Feb 07 - 06:47 AM (#1965817) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: The Fooles Troupe "Yes, coal mining was worth saving. Now we buy coal from foreigners. Who makes the money? - etc SNIP" Well eventually their coal will run out, and will get more expensive... "maintain cotton plantations in the UK .... etc SNIP" Well, we Aussies are currently going thru arguments about growing cotton and rice in Aus - we are running out of water you see - driest continent in the world, and all that... we are exporting most of the cotton and rice, and we shut down our clothes making industry decades ago anyway... |
|
13 Feb 07 - 06:55 AM (#1965828) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: McGrath of Harlow Cotton isn't the only fruit. Linen, wool and hemp all do reasonably well in our climate in England. Though of course "our climate" isn't something we can take as permanent, even in the fairly short run. |
|
13 Feb 07 - 07:06 AM (#1965834) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: The Fooles Troupe Grapes for wine were once grown in England. |
|
13 Feb 07 - 08:00 AM (#1965870) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: Scrump Grapes for wine were once grown in England. Er... they still are, unless global warming has put a stop to it? |
|
13 Feb 07 - 08:01 AM (#1965871) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: Bunnahabhain Of course in the long run, and assuming we don't manage to wipe ourselves out beforehand, then fairly much every country will get to similar level of development, so people will demand wages of similar levels. There's no incentive to shift the factory to China if the workers want much the same wages, and the pollution controls are as tough as the West. It might still be a house of cards, but it wouldn't be sitting on such an unstable base. BTW Foolestroupe, grapes for wine are currently grown for wine in England, and in increasing amounts. |
|
13 Feb 07 - 09:39 AM (#1965981) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: Scrump Linen, wool and hemp all do reasonably well in our climate in England. Maybe we should grow more hemp then, and we can all stop worrying about the economy and the climate #-} |
|
13 Feb 07 - 10:42 AM (#1966046) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: McGrath of Harlow "Hemp, Natures Perfect Plant" "Industrial hemp is an incredible resource. Hemp is harvested for its fibers for hemp clothing and seeds for hemp oil. With a relatively short growth cycle of 100-120 days, it is an efficient and economical crop for farmers to grow, however, industrial hemp cannot be commercially grown in the United States because it is erroneously confounded with marijuana. In fact, industrial hemp and marijuana are different breeds of Cannabis sativa. Smoking large amounts of hemp flowers can produce a headache but not a high!" |
|
13 Feb 07 - 10:44 AM (#1966048) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: Scrump Smoking large amounts of hemp flowers can produce a headache but not a high! Sounds a bit like keg beer to me :-( |
|
13 Feb 07 - 12:10 PM (#1966175) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: autolycus Nobody here is meeting the crunch question head-on. We live on a planet of finite resources. Capitalism assumes growth for ever. Aren't those two FACTS irreconcilable? Ivor |
|
13 Feb 07 - 08:06 PM (#1966736) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: folk1e what happens when the "capitalists" start selling ideas? Define infinite! In the models above it just means it is bigger than needed at the present time! |
|
13 Feb 07 - 08:06 PM (#1966738) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: The Fooles Troupe Totally. But greedy powerful bastards won't admit it - at least just yet - they want to make their own pile first.... |
|
13 Feb 07 - 08:24 PM (#1966761) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: McGrath of Harlow Aren't those two FACTS irreconcilable? Of course they are. But the bigger crunch question is, what happens when it all breaks down. |
|
14 Feb 07 - 03:24 AM (#1967048) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: autolycus Exactly. Ivor |
|
14 Feb 07 - 03:29 AM (#1967052) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: folk1e Just a thaught exercise here ..... China increases it's industrial base to supply most of european goods. The good people of europe slap an "environment tax" on ALL goods, suddenly Chinese goods are dearer, creating a niech for local "clean" local products! The Chinese economy cannot respond quickly to this and so a new industry is born! |
|
14 Feb 07 - 06:53 AM (#1967165) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: GUEST,Shimrod I suspect that, in the pre-Thatcher era, British Industry was crap partly because the bosses didn't value the skills of their workforces. If everything had become highly confrontational by the 70s it was mainly because of the ruthless elitism of the bosses. My Dad was a highly skilled sheet-metalworker, and worked his b....ocks off for 50 years, and was considered to be a 'nobody' by the pen-pushing money-grubbers. The end of his life was ignominious and squalid and made worse by the fact that all the authorities wanted him to do was to sell his house so that he could pay for his own nursing home place (so much for the fourth largest economy in the world - or whatever we're supposed to be!). It's now common-place to be thrown on the scrap-heap in your 50s (as has recently happened to me) while bosses moan about 'skills shortages'. If your philosophy is 'pile-it-high-sell-it-cheap-profit-now-and-sod-tomorrow' and everything, including people and their skills, is disposable it's not surprising that you get crap. I am convinced that the modern British economy is a hollow sham and it won't be long before the cracks begin to show ... |
|
14 Feb 07 - 10:12 AM (#1967378) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: Scrump I am convinced that the modern British economy is a hollow sham and it won't be long before the cracks begin to show ... That will probably happen later this year when Gordon Brown hands over the reins of the economy to whoever his successor will be (who the hell could it be, btw? I can't think of any member of this lot I'd want to run the economy) - just in time to get out before the water starts to seep into the ship's engine room. Talking of selling your house to pay for a nursing home, an aged relative has recently been told it will cost a staggering 900 quid a week for a place in a nursing home. His house is worth about £150,000 (if he's lucky, it's in a poor state of repair). That means he will be able to survive for 3 and a bit years before the money runs out and he presumably gets kicked out. Naturally he's not too keen on moving. |
|
14 Feb 07 - 10:56 AM (#1967425) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: McGrath of Harlow One problem is that after Thatcher and her lot had totally screwed things up for so long, Labour gave up hope and effectively handed itself over to a leadership that was essentially neo-Thatcherist, just with a kinder face. Even when pumping money into public services it has felt obliged to do it in a thoroughly Thatcherist style, subsidising private companies to skim off the money and hype up the cost for the public so as to provide the required profits. But whatever, it's all short term politicking, and and none of them are able to adjust to the idea that the only way to survive long term (ie more than a few decades) is to move to a no growth economy, and to find ways in which that can be reconciled with a decent life for all. |
|
14 Feb 07 - 07:44 PM (#1967980) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: folk1e If the U.K. is the 4th largest economy, what is this measured against? |
|
14 Feb 07 - 08:26 PM (#1968017) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: GUEST,American Kicked out of a nursing home? I thought you people had national health care or something like that. How could anyone be denied the nursing home under the national health care system? |
|
15 Feb 07 - 02:31 PM (#1968864) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: folk1e The NHS has tried (and succeded) over the last few years to have the patients assets used for their care package, but not their medication. This is being challenged in the courts ...... dont hold your breath! |
|
16 Feb 07 - 06:41 PM (#1970191) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: folk1e so will the last man standing (Chineese, Indian or Eastern European) corner the market for labor and therefore production? Or will the economies of the individual countries bounce back? Or will we be totally dependent on the multinational companies (who will need a market to sell their product)? |
|
18 Feb 07 - 06:01 AM (#1971397) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: autolycus I think both of the crunch points are being avoided by one and all. Capitalism requires unending growth. If a company/corporations don't grow, investors take their money elsewhere. On the other hand The planet has only finite resources. At some time,everything we require that can't regrow quickly enough (so food's o.k.,iron isn't) will run out - no 'might run out' - just will. [I loook forward to a time when there is no stuff,just ideas in an ideas economy.] As the planet does,what will happen to those corporations? Just wondering. Ivor |
|
18 Feb 07 - 08:49 AM (#1971501) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: The Fooles Troupe Well, so far they've tried two approaches Trade Planned Obsolescence oh and they've been using "Stimulated Artificial Demand" for ages... Remember the SF story about the future consumerist society built on "planned excessive consuming" and the guy who cam to notice as the greatest consumer? You see, he had programmed his robots to consume FOR him.... :-) |
|
18 Feb 07 - 07:37 PM (#1972061) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: McGrath of Harlow Perhaps EM Forster's story The Machine Stops, publisheb in 1909, contains as good an indication of what we can expect as anything. It is a remarkable story - read the first few paragraphs, and see how close to what's described we have come, and still heading in that direction... Here is The Machine Stops online. (Very appropriately.) |
|
18 Feb 07 - 08:02 PM (#1972080) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: folk1e Autolycus, I thaught the first post coverd your point! We do not appear to be producing as much as we used to, is this viable? |
|
19 Feb 07 - 05:33 AM (#1972274) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: The Fooles Troupe "We do not appear to be producing as much as we used to" Well, as I read 'the theory' that's ok, as long as you make proportionately more profit on it... :-) |
|
20 Feb 07 - 03:00 AM (#1973332) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: autolycus folkle - sorry,which first post are you pointing to? Ivor |
|
20 Feb 07 - 05:55 AM (#1973434) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: folk1e The thread was started by the question (crunch point) that we are afluent without being production rich and was this stable. Most posters seem to agree that it is a house of cards! |
|
20 Feb 07 - 12:17 PM (#1973807) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: autolycus Thank you,see what you mean. I think you're teensy-weensy error, in your first post, was to treat the UK in isolation. The answer to your original 'blonde' post (only joking) is that all that is required is for goods globally to be growing. Nationally ain't required. A reason i persisted with my, more global point, is that we are all dependant on that infinite growth. I just wondered if anyone had a solution to that impossibility. Looks like not, even amongast the free-marketeers among us. (No names, no packdrill.) Ivor |
|
20 Feb 07 - 01:54 PM (#1973911) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: McGrath of Harlow Stop seeing economic growth as something to aim for, and recognise that in many circumstances it is disastrous. I'd like to see the term "the overdeveloped world" used rather more often. |
|
21 Feb 07 - 03:12 AM (#1974570) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: autolycus Mr.Mcgrath,are you talking to the capitalist system or to me? Ivor |
|
21 Feb 07 - 07:14 AM (#1974715) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: The Fooles Troupe Does it matter if neither wants to listen? |
|
21 Feb 07 - 11:44 AM (#1975000) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: autolycus Well,if he meant the system should stop thinking about economic growth, I agree and rather doubt if the system can. If he meant I should stop seeing economic growth as the aim,I don't;it's the system that does. hence my question. Thanks for your help. Ivor |
|
22 Feb 07 - 02:34 AM (#1975696) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: autolycus incidentally,I do see constant economic growth as disastrous;however, share/stockholders demand economic growth,or they'll take thewir money elsewhere,and politicians/journalists/broadcasters/opinion-formers/bankers/financiers all seem to think a growing GDP is a sign of health and correctness. Ivor |
|
22 Feb 07 - 04:24 AM (#1975753) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: The Fooles Troupe See the Evil inherent in the System! Sorry, I'll just have a cup of tea, a Bex, and a good lie down.... |
|
22 Feb 07 - 10:03 PM (#1976627) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: Peace * |
|
22 Feb 07 - 10:17 PM (#1976644) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: bobad Economic growth vs. the environment - a fight to the finish. |
|
22 Feb 07 - 10:25 PM (#1976651) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: Peace Where they make a desert they call it peace. |
|
23 Feb 07 - 12:34 PM (#1977108) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: autolycus Exactly so,bobad. Ivor |
|
23 Feb 07 - 12:39 PM (#1977114) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: Little Hawk I think we should aim to quadruple world production of all consumer goods, weapons, and junk food by the year 2020. They who die fattest and with the most toys win! |
|
23 Feb 07 - 06:21 PM (#1977388) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: folk1e I remember a story whereby an attacking army devised the most efficient way of invasion was to bombard the enemy lines with trade goods! The idea was that the people who picked up the goods, which were bulky, were more inclined to protect "their" goods than to fight. A good idea for Iraq / Afghanistan? |
|
23 Feb 07 - 08:43 PM (#1977562) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: fumblefingers Seems like all the people who know how to manage the economy are pickin' banjos and singing about unrequited love. |
|
24 Feb 07 - 06:38 PM (#1978414) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: Peace "Seems like all the people who know how to manage the economy are pickin' banjos and singing about unrequited love." Yaeh. So what's yer point? |
|
25 Feb 07 - 03:06 PM (#1979116) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: GUEST maybe WE should be running the country? |
|
25 Feb 07 - 07:41 PM (#1979366) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: The Fooles Troupe We aren't?!!! |
|
26 Feb 07 - 08:21 PM (#1980417) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: folk1e come the glorious day brothers! |
|
27 Feb 07 - 05:45 PM (#1981203) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: autolycus Will we get there in time? Ivor |
|
27 Feb 07 - 07:43 PM (#1981302) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: folk1e in time we will..... |
|
01 Mar 07 - 06:52 AM (#1982574) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: GUEST,folk1e How have places like cuba managed to "prosper" despite the might of U.S.A. being used against them? Is there a case for the multi national companies having enough power to dictate national policies? and is this necessarily a bad thing. Sorry ... I'm only asking. ;o) |
|
01 Mar 07 - 11:20 AM (#1982804) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: The Fooles Troupe Just watch yerself Comrade! Uncle Sam will get ya! |
|
01 Mar 07 - 03:01 PM (#1983059) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: autolycus What,you mean asking a question in a free country is,what,a crime? Ivor |
|
01 Mar 07 - 06:30 PM (#1983310) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: folk1e "Free" is a relative term! No it isn't a crime mearly an inticement to think (much more dangerous) ;o) |
|
13 Jun 10 - 10:01 AM (#2926731) Subject: RE: BS: Economic Truth From: Ed T I opened this older thread, rather than start a new one. What's your view of the current state of the Global economy? Has it improved? Where is it heading? Are we in a holding pattern, for further recession? Are situations in Greece (and elsewhere) early indicator to economic chaos,or an anomaly and we are on our way out of a Global financial mess? What's your personal view, and, how's your country doing? Here is a recent article (comment) from Canada, which seems to be doing OK: http://www.torontosun.com/comment/columnists/eric_margolis/2010/06/11/14355506.html |