|
19 Feb 07 - 01:18 PM (#1972653) Subject: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: George Papavgeris The full title should have been: "UK folk scene - do clubs have a future, and how to secure it"; in other words, a more positive approach than simply an autopsy. Perhaps a clone could amend the thread title accordingly? We know that the majority of folk clubs are struggling to maintain numbers; when you add to that the pressures (and costs) linked to licencing, pub chains opting for no live music, the struggle to find a decent venue and the inevitable - albeit slower than inflation - rise in performers' fees, many clubs are living hand-to-mouth and some are closing (two announcements this month alone). We know that the folk club scene is nowhere near as vibrant as it was in the 60s and 70s. This is more about survival than revival, at least for the clubs, if not necessarily for the folk scene in general. Being linked to the running of Herga, I clearly have an interest in this. There is such an enormous variety in the 120+ clubs I have visited in the last 5 years in terms of venue quality, entrance cost, membership or not, raffle or not (and how many prizes)... And also in the numbers and type of people they attract, and how they go about promoting their venue. Some are clearly doing at least some things right, others equally clearly are coasting towards (presumably) an eventual grinding-to-a-halt. What are the causes for the falling numbers, then, and what are the trends impacting club audience sizes today, and how to deal with them? One cause is that we are not moving with the times in terms of audiences' needs; the simple truth is that every 12 months the average audience age goes up by 1 year for most clubs (yes, I know there are notable exceptions - but don't just simply post here to brag about it, tell us HOW you achieve it); the folk club scene in the UK appears overall like a baby-boomer generation phenomenon, destined to disappear in another 10 or 20 years. The small-talk in the breaks is as much about reminiscing as about the havoc the cold weather plays with the knees, and much less about the future, hopes and aims. We are stilted, set in our ways, and of course the youngsters see it and run a mile - we would have too, once. What we see as entertainment, is not their idea of fun. And as a generation they are much more cynical about the future and do not necessarily sympathise with much of the starry-eyed 60s and 70s repertoire (Where Have All the Flowers Gone etc), neither do they want the commitment and cliquiness implied (fairly or not) by club membership. Neither do we seem to be able to capture the emerging 40-year olds, whose children are now older and therefore they could start having a life again; the folk club scene is unknown to most of them, the image perpetuated by the media is unattractive, and as a generation they have pretty much forgotten how to sing or play, being more used to passive entertainment. And sure as hell, they won't be seen dead in some of the club venues. That's another issue. In the 60s it was OK to be gathering shoulder-to-shoulder in an upstairs pub room; it was not the venue that attracted us, but the explicit or implied membership in something alternative, our love for the music, our politics even. The out-of-the-way venues added to that "clubiness" rather than detract from it. These motives don't apply to those that follow us, and suddenly the dingyness of some of the venues is starting to be noticed. And those that take their entertainment passively (rather than participatively) are critical of any fluffs in performance or in-jokes or waffling in introductions. The very things that used to reinforce our "clubiness" now work against us. Heck, people could stay home with a six-pack and watch some professional (if inane) concert on the telly, for less money! No, if they will pay a tenner each, they want some guarantee that THEY will enjoy THEMSELVES, not watch others doing so. And when they have to go to the loo, they want it to smell as sweet as the Hilton's. That is an area where clubs like Les Worrall's (Faldingworth Live) and Dartford, and Montrose and Hitchin etc score well. Neat, comfortable venues, clean facilities, minimum introductions, emphasis on quality of performance - and lo! some previously non-folkies are trickling through the door. Promotion is another very variable factor. I have seen all permutations, from distributing fliers to other clubs in the region (preaching to the converted), posters in the local library, ads in the local freebie papers, websites and email campaigns to paid ads in reputable magazines and promotion through local radio (sometimes with a pre-gig artist interview). Clearly, the early mentions in that list would do little to attract new punters, and they are the only methods the poorer clubs can afford, so a downward spiral seems inevitable there without investment. The comes a touchy subject: the predilections and preferences of the organisers, both in how the club is run and the bookings the go for, also vary enormously. All organisers do it for the love of it, but they interpret that love in different ways: Often they are influenced by personal musical likes and dislikes and they promote the former and discourage the latter. Even committee-run clubs do this, unsurprisingly, as committee members generally are like-minded by virtue of the selection process for committee membership. It is a very forward-thinking club that goes out of its way to recruit committee members with widely varying tastes - hey, who needs the argument and aggro? Some, and I will use Les Worrall again as a shining example (Breezy is another, by the way), actually start from a "what will the audience stomach?" perspective, and several more at least try to. But very few approach the subject from a purely business perspective, i.e. how to maximise revenue or bums on seats; and why should they? they are not in it for money, they are dedicated, hard-working amateurs and it is right and proper that they should get some fun out of it for themselves too. This aspect puts them in conflict with the touring performers, who of course are doing it at least partly for money, and would dearly love to see the clubs taking the same approach. In the words of a Big Name who shall remain nameless: "The trouble with trying to make money out of folk is that we are trying to be professionals employed by amateurs" - and he did NOT mean it derogatorily, but as an honest assessment of his career's chances. Yet the folk scene is not dying. Festivals are doing well, generally. Bands like Bellowhead fill huge venues with non folkie youngsters. Cafes spring up, operated not as clubs but as "open mic" events. And there are some sessions (like the Half-Moon on Sunday nights in Oxford) where the ages truly mix, audience and beginners rub shoulders with seasoned professionals, tunes alternate with repectfully listened-to songs, you have to plan a visit to the loo and combine it with getting a round in - because of the crowds - like in the old days, and the craic is fantastic. It's a case of horses for courses, of course. Sessions like the Half-Moon's have their place, and so have festivals and cafes. But what is the role of the average folk club in this changing scene? Clearly some will just continue on their current tack, to close eventually when audiences drop below survival level or when the organiser is too old and no-one else is willing to take on the thankless task. But it doesn't have to be so for all clubs, surely? |
|
19 Feb 07 - 01:28 PM (#1972667) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: GUEST 'kay, I'm copying this post from the other thread: But the artist doesn't have your local knowledge and contacts. The responsibility for promoting suely lies with promoters and artists. If the promoter is going to say "not my job, mate" they can't moan ehen nobody turns up. Let me share my experience of a folk club promoter: For our festival, we wanted to work with a local folk club. We offered to subsidise a gig for them, so they could aim a bit higher than normal and take on an artist they couldn't normally afford. Well, after lots of umming and aahing, the organisers decided who they wanted, an artist that would cost around £500. Because of the complexity of ticketing, we decided to pay for the whole gig for them. We were also putting the artist up. There was never any offer from the club to pass on any money they might make from the raffle or the few tickets they might sell on the night (a tiny amount, I'm sure, but it is the principle of the thing) to the festival. Now, this was supposed to be a partnership. So I asked if we could send out our leaflets in their next newsletter. Yes, came the answer - if we payed for the postage. So we ended up stickering their envelopes and franking their whole mailout. Next came the phone call loftily demanding six free full weekend tickets for the festival. What for? What on earth had they done to deserve them? Still wanting the partnership to develop, we offered them 2 free tickets, and suggested their other friends/club helpers might want to steward. They grudgingly accepted the free tickets, but their friends were not the stewarding type, apparently. After the festival, we got an earful about how we hadn't tried hard enough to promote their gig as it wasn't absolutely heaving. Well, it was in our festival programme, as was a map and directions to their club. It was on the website and in all of the flyers. Surely they bore some responsibility for promotion, too? The arrogance, meanness and lack of professionalism we experienced made us reluctant to repeat the experience. I don't know how common our experience was, but I confess I did think at the time, "If this is what the promoters are like, no wonder the club network is in trouble." |
|
19 Feb 07 - 01:34 PM (#1972677) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: The Sandman folkclubs have a future ,but not if they price themselves[without taking into consideration the local economics] it is stupid to try and say all clubs should charge 20 sterling[or whatever]without taking into account local considerations[the rate of unemployment in the area etc |
|
19 Feb 07 - 01:52 PM (#1972695) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: Fidjit Remember your audience is made up of individual persons that think about doing something else on that particular night - Aunty Flo has her birthday and she's not a folkie. The fooball is on, bugger it's always on. but you know what I mean. Idividuals make up their owm minds what to do. Go to the club? Well who's on? Oh not for me this week. OK. Chas |
|
19 Feb 07 - 02:27 PM (#1972720) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: jimlad9 The UK folk scene is in trouble because all us 'Baby Boomers' who were around for the scenes peak in the 60s and 70s are going to the 'Big Folk Club In the Sky' and are not being replaced by a younger audience. Last weekend we went to see Vin Garbutt who quipped " I would like to thank the young lady I met during the interval for lowering the average age of this audience to 57" |
|
19 Feb 07 - 02:47 PM (#1972751) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: Ruth Archer yes, Jim - but why not? Where are all the younger audiences? I went to an event at The Magpie's Nest folk club in Islington the other week. It wasn't their regular club night, but I got a sense of the club: funky venue, nice food, young promoters, and a fresh and exciting buzz about the place that made me think: if there were more folk clubs like this, the club scene would be in rude good health. Mind you, they need to sort the beer out... There are plenty of younger, cooler folkies who go to festivals and e-ceilidhs and such. And I'm sure that they'd similarly be going to folk clubs if those clubs were youthful and fresh and fun. |
|
19 Feb 07 - 02:53 PM (#1972764) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: Rasener George You have made me blush. that doesn't happen very often :-) Thankyou. Les Worrall |
|
19 Feb 07 - 03:03 PM (#1972780) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: Folkiedave In answer to George's question I think it will be different and whilst I have not been lucky enough to go to the Magpie's nest, there is no doubt that younger organisers are possibly part of the answer. I have brought this across from the other thread... Whenever I go to festivals and it must be the same for others there are loads of young people. Ever tried asking them why they don't go to folk clubs? Let me say again as I have on numerous other threads. Sheffield one of Britain's largest city's struggles to keep a folk club in the traditional sense going in the city centre. But it has a vibrant folk scene with loads of young people (and a few of us old ones) taking part also in the city centre. Great for the music - not much use to the professional artist I am afraid. |
|
19 Feb 07 - 03:12 PM (#1972787) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: GUEST,Andy I'm in my mid-forties, which makes me practically a foetus at most folk clubs, but I do enjoy folk clubs and festivals when they work. One reason that I don't go as often as I could to my local folk club - which shall be nameless - is having to sit through the same darned residents, doing the same darned songs, practically every darned time. I'm prepared to humour them once in a while if there is a guest who is a "must see", but for those who are only "might sees", the pain of the resident endurance test is just too much to bear and I usually choose to do something else. I know that the residents are nice people, and they're playing for nothing, but a bit of common sense would indicate that there should be a change of routine every now and again. Even if they were individually wonderful performers (some are far from that) they surely still wouldn't be to everyone's taste. As it is, most of them have occupied their slots for donkeys' years and seem to have a perennial right to be listened to respectfully and uncritically. Well, sorry, I'd rather bale out.... I know I'm a nasty, nasty, person (but I'm also a paying customer choosing to go elsewhere). |
|
19 Feb 07 - 03:14 PM (#1972790) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: GUEST OK, so younger organisers are the answer. Until the 20 somethings start their Folk Clubs, its still us oldies that keep booking the performers! |
|
19 Feb 07 - 03:27 PM (#1972803) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: Bernard Guest Andy - I know exactly what you mean. As a club resident I do try to vary what I do, and people's reactions suggest that mostly I succeed. As we are blessed with a few residents, we only use two per guest, which provides a degree of variety in itself. Even so, there is the running joke about the 'chara' arriving just before nine - people who deliberately avoid the 'warm-up', and arrive in time for the first guest spot. However, there is also a different type of club that does not use 'residents'. Two North Manchester clubs, the Full Circle and the Open Door book guests, but the 'support' is floor singers. I'd spent thirty years visiting folk clubs before I encountered this phenomenon! Is this common elsewhere? |
|
19 Feb 07 - 03:43 PM (#1972820) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: Dave Wynn I don't think we should complain about the "older end" of the audience spectrum. They (me included) have been maintaining clubs for over 35 years. Without them the scene would completely collapse. Think about it, remove all clients over the age of 45 and you will have no venues left within weeks. Getting the young in is a different matter. We at Swinton have had some mixed results. Tonight I will try (diplomatically as possible) to ascertain what our average age is. For reasons too complex for me to understand the music scene in general in the late 60's and 70's created the revival and we are probably still surviving on the back of that even now. How to create the same scene now in the 2K's could not, in my opinion, be done. We didn't create it in the 60's/70's. It was created for us and we are the product of it. As stewards we may have not done as well as we should have perhaps but that is where we are. My pithy philosophy is one of "some clubs work and some clubs don't", it is a philosophy not a methodology or cure. Our club has worked (some would argue that :-) for 24 years at the same venue. Audiences have rose and fell over that time but we have survived. I won't bore you with details of how we work because there are so many complex reasons. As an amateur who pays the professionals I did take mild offence at the comment "The trouble with trying to make money out of folk is that we are trying to be professionals employed by amateurs" even though it was meant without harm. If I had overheard that comment they would be one professional who wouldn't work at our club again. I understand the professionals problems, I think I understand the ethos of providing professional performers as the shop window of the genre. There is a difference between the good amateur and the professional, I hear the difference regularly. I am a good amateur but realise my shortcomings when hearing a good professional. I have offered no solutions just comment. I doubt that there are any solutions but in the meantime we keep trying. Dave Wynn (A.K.A. Spot the Dog) |
|
19 Feb 07 - 03:50 PM (#1972826) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: stallion So, no, crowing.......ok, then lets try to explain why the York Tap & Spile session attracts so many youngsters. Firstly it doesn't cost anything to get in, secondly it is fun, lots of chorus songs. I have asked some of the young uns, who are not "performers", what attracts them to the session the reply is along the lines of "a good sing and a laugh", I know that the same crowd frequent Chris Barnes' session on Wednesdays which has a much more contemporary feel to it, again it's free, so, why, when I go to the Black Swan on a Thursday are they not there in the same numbers? the Black Swan is excellently run, friendly, dare I say thriving and puts on some great performers and I don't think the prices are that expensive. It could be economic, it could be a preference for a more informal atmosphere, I really can't come up with an answer has anyone any ideas? I shall work on it. I myself don't go to the Black Swan as often as perhaps I ought because I am out wednesdays and Fridays already and if I were to add Thursdays on a regular basis my wife would have me singing castrato |
|
19 Feb 07 - 04:31 PM (#1972863) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: Fidjit Yes GUEST Andy. I agree too. It's the "Time Warp" thingy. I was running a club in the seventy's and it was always a problem to get the lads to sing something new. The club is now a session and they're still turning out the same stuff! Sessions today can be like that. Come with something new and they all look at you as if you're an alien. Chas |
|
19 Feb 07 - 05:26 PM (#1972915) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: McGrath of Harlow I have a feeling that the Folk Club as such may have the same kind of future that Music Hall had before it, and the Glee Club before that In other words it'll die off, and there'll be something else that replaces it and carries on some of the repertoire and some of the tradition. That doesn't mean folk music will die off, but it'll be happening in different settings - probably ones which we already have. There'll be sessions of one sort or another. There'll be programmes of concerts in theatres or halls. There'll be dances. And Ritual Dancers. And there'll be festivals of of variouskinds. And maybe other things that haven't emerged yet. But the Folk Club with floor singers and residents and booked guests all squeezed into a room above a pub, I doubt if that'll continue once the generation that invented it has given up or passed on. It came out of a particular time, and particular circumstances. Like Music Hall. Like the Elizabethan Theatre. Like Mystery Plays. These things don't last for ever - and the moral of that is, cherish them while you've got them. |
|
19 Feb 07 - 05:42 PM (#1972937) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: GUEST Spot on McGrath..."round like a circle in a spiral....etc! The Singing rooms, the music hall are the roots of the folk clubs which were most successful when they carried out the same function and had Jasper Carrot etc on one week and The Watersons on the next. Variety was the spice. Now it's very much a muchness and only the die hards are left singing and playing to each other. That's life! |
|
19 Feb 07 - 05:48 PM (#1972942) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: Bernard The festivals are taking over - they provide all the elements of folk clubs... Something for everyone - you can pay to see high flight guests, or join in a singaround/session for nowt. The only drawback is having to travel and sort out accomodation. I'm too old for a tent... |
|
19 Feb 07 - 05:52 PM (#1972946) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: GUEST Problem is festivals only employ artists for a few months of the year and when you read the list of performers it's the same names on most of them. Festivals need to be more diverse. |
|
19 Feb 07 - 06:11 PM (#1972963) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: Tootler In general; The young 'uns will go where there are other young 'uns The older folk will congregate where there are other older folk. That's how it is because both age groups feel most comfortable that way most of the time. The generation in between are mostly too busy rearing families - at least I was. I did say "In general" but as someone said at a session this lunchtime "Generalisations are always wrong" :-) In the end, what really matters is that the music survives, and I am sure it will, though it will change in the process. |
|
19 Feb 07 - 06:12 PM (#1972965) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: GUEST,lox I think that live music in general is suffering, unless we talk about bands who have already made it, and that young folk today are happier to be spoon fed their cultural diet by the multimedia industry, with its movies, their soundtracks, their magazines that hypr the movies and the soundtracks, their news programs that discuss the reviews the movies and the soundtracks etc etc etc etc There will hopefully be a backlash one day aganst all this dumbing down and individuality squashing, but till then I think we can expect young people to continue worrying about having the right track on the right MP3 player, whilst on their way to the right club so they might be seen to pull the right sort of girl/boy (wearing the right clothes). The corporate propaganda (advertising) machine is too powerful and getting too good at pushing young peoples buttons and manipulating their insecurities to allow the type of individuality that the folk movements of the 60's are allegedly typical of. And as long as young people represent the longest term market for short term profit, the machine will continue to work in this way. |
|
19 Feb 07 - 07:03 PM (#1973026) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: GUEST,John Robinson I think someone should create something to get a bit of national publicity. Maybe a tie in with a radio show on a national network. Get some PR going, maybe some news items on, oh I don't know, Radio 4's Feedback programme. Get a bit of controversy in there to get the journalists going, get some headlines. Hey, I've got an idea. Why not make it ... an awards show! |
|
19 Feb 07 - 07:07 PM (#1973028) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: GUEST,lox Or buy kate moss a banjo |
|
19 Feb 07 - 07:36 PM (#1973065) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: McGrath of Harlow A folk club could make a great sit-com. With real guests. |
|
19 Feb 07 - 08:29 PM (#1973134) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: Dave Wynn Oh Dear. The answer tonight is approx 54. Dave Wynn (A.K.A. Spot the Dog) |
|
19 Feb 07 - 08:42 PM (#1973145) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: oggie There is more live music today than there has been for many years, there are more young people playing instruments than ever, there are more sessions and open mic nights than before BUT young people are making their music largely outside the established folk clubs. It was ever thus. Some of us stumbled in and were welcomed (but as a 15 year old unaccompanied singer I'd struggle to get a floor spot today in most clubs) but I was the only kid in a school of 400+ who was into folk. I was also lucky in the generous people I met. I didn't meet the fiddle player my son met when I took him to a session. I'll explain, Peter is a trained ex-chorister played fiddle, mandolin and concertina. Age 15 I took him to a session, tune he knew was being played, he played his concertina but played a low harmony part "we only play the tune here, if you can't play shut up" said fiddler. Peter smiled, said nowt. Bit later he started a tune, "It's too slow" said fiddler (it wasn't) who promptly took it over and played way to fast and badly. "You should learn to play properly before you come here" said fiddler "You should learn some manners and to play in tune" said Peter as we packed up instruments and left. That was 3 years ago, Peter still plays at home but hasn't and won't go back to another folk event. He plays keyboards in a rock band instead. I didn't go to any session for 3 years either, it left a bad taste, especially as the other players there didn't seem bothered. So do Folk Clubs have a future, a dying one unless we care for the few youngsters who come our way. Rant now over, I'll go back in me box. All the best Steve Ogden |
|
19 Feb 07 - 09:00 PM (#1973155) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: Dave Wynn Oggie, I had a different experience. I went to a session some 30 years ago and sat next to an old guy playing fiddle. I was playing guitar and said to him that I was pretty new to session tunes. He said, with a twinkle in his eye, have a go lad but while you are learning, learn quietly. Dave Wynn (A.K.A. Spot the Dog) |
|
19 Feb 07 - 09:04 PM (#1973158) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: The Fooles Troupe Oggie's tale is rather unfortunately rather common regarding 'musicians who have had formal training' butting up against ignorant poorly self taught I can think of more than one 'session' where some mature aged person with no previous musical experience has spent all of a couple of months 'learning' (well they can tootle a few 'Irish Tunes' almost in time, but usually far too fast!) the whistle, then starts ordering around people who have 40 years or more musical experience, musical training, or who play multiple instruments, and often in multiple musical styles. What is even worse, is when some members of 'the audience' who never 'put themselves up as soloists' do much the same... No matter WHAT their age, who would bother putting up with that sort of arrogant crap for long? Better to 'let them have their fun on their own' - as long as their 'supporters' are happy, why not let them be so until the place falls apart? Those with real talent are too busy getting on with their life to worry too much about them, they will always move on somewhere else to do something else that they enjoy - I do pity these poor ignorant arrogant sods, they HAVE no other life... Remember that poem ... The Indispensable Man Sometime when you're feeling important, Sometime when your ego's in bloom, Sometimes when you take it for granted You're the best qualified in the room. Sometimes when you feel that your going Would leave an unfillable hole, Just follow these simple instructions And see how they humble your soul. Take a bucket and fill it with water, Put your hand in it up to your wrist, Pull it out and the hole that's remaining Is a measure of how you'll be missed. You can splash all you wish when you enter, You may stir up the water galore, But stop, and you'll find that in no time It looks quiet the same as before. The moral in this quaint example Is do just the best that you can, Be proud of yourself, but remember--- There's no indispensable man. :-) |
|
19 Feb 07 - 09:09 PM (#1973161) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: The Fooles Troupe Oops... The point I wanted to make is that when sufficient individuals each decide (through bitter experience) 'that they won't be missed' do the numbers add up to a significant quantity? Of course they do! And people complain that the numbers are dwindling... "while you are learning, learn quietly" I couldn't agree more... - exactly in line with what I said.... :-) |
|
20 Feb 07 - 02:30 AM (#1973311) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: oggie Learning quietly was also what Peter was trying to do, surprisingle maybe it is one of the things that being a chorister teaches you. He'd been to Folk Festivals since he was 4, the afternoon Kid's Folk Club at Cleethorpes was brill, had dropped out in his early teens and then decided to go back, asked to go to a session and whoops....... More importantly if the music and clubs is going to thrive WE need young people. Like Dave I was lucky, I now worry about the future. At a recent, well run, session there was one player under 20, a couple of others under 30 and at 50 I was still one of the younger ones there, scary. All the best Steve |
|
20 Feb 07 - 03:02 AM (#1973337) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: Captain Ginger An interesting and reflective thread, and thank you George for starting it. It's an issue that seems to have been addressed both directly and tangentially many times over the years on this forum, and each time I think the answer has been the same - that the days of the folk club as we know it are probably numbered, but that the music will survive. My own take on it is that, for many of us, life is such that the ability to give up one night a week (or even one night a month) is a now a luxury. Look around at other hobbies and you'll see the same things and hear the same complaints; there has been a 'drawing in' to the point where only the die-hards and the veterans continue to come to the room above the pub/the village hall/the local library to discuss photography/share their stamp collections/build model railways/sample home-brews/display model soldiers/whatever. The 'hobby' as we know it is going the way of grey flannel trousers and the cardigan, and folk clubs constitute such a hobby. I mentioned the pressure of life in general, but there are other causes. One is an increasing insularity and lack of cross-generational mixing in society today, and another is the rise of this medium - the internet. And, of course, there also seems to have been a national collapse in self-confidence. It's mirrored in our culinary skills - people will happily sit and watch television programmes about cooking but they can't/won't cook themselves. We have shifted from an active to a passive role and would rather have entertainment beamed at us than make our own. All of which sounds pretty negative, I know, but I do think festivals are a beacon of hope in an otherwise depressing landscape. However, I believe there will need to be more crossover between genres if folk is to survive with any strength as a participatory art. It's something that is already happening at the younger end of the spectrum and which is making its way into the mainstream - look at Bellowhead with their kletzmer and salsa-inspired rhythms adding spice and colour to very traditional material. I know the purists probably wring their hands at such desecration, but to me it's a healthy sign. The music is still respected but it is played without kid gloves and allowed to live. Even festivals have their problems, though. Sadly, however, I often see a musical 'apartheid' in action at sessions. The strictly traditional stuff is played well and with gusto by the greybeards in the back rooms of pubs, while the youngsters play among themselves around the food stalls and the beer tents. Too many have experienced the sort of patronising attitude that Oggie describes and have voted with their feet. And, for many kids festivals are expensive and therefore exclusive. Many are there only because their parents are into the same sort of music and are willing to pay for a ticket, so it's unlikely that 'outside' blood or working-class youngsters will be drawn into the tradition. So what's the answer? I'm b*ggered if I know. It would be great if a campaign like CAMRA could be mounted with the same success for traditional music, or of a cult figure could do for folk what someone like Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstal has done for food. One can dream... |
|
20 Feb 07 - 03:12 AM (#1973344) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: The Fooles Troupe I believe that most of the kids who DO have any musical training outside and before any interest in 'f*lk music' will be driven away by such mentioned attitudes - just how many youngsters (under 40!!!!) turn up with NO previous musical training experience unless "their parents are into the same sort of music"? |
|
20 Feb 07 - 03:28 AM (#1973356) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: GUEST,Neovo I agree with GUEST Andy above about having to sit through the same darned regulars before reaching the guest artist. Sometimes instead of. Our local folk club has singers nights when the regulars sing and then on guest nights the regulars do support (not floor spots you understand but support) for the guests. These tend to be people who never made it in the folk scene up to now and are hanging on for their break which they hope will surely come in their 40s and 50s, still waiting to be "discovered". Quite sad really. You would not pay a going concert rate to hear them. If a club charges a concert rate (£10+ a ticket) for a good artist I suspect the audience would be rather thin if they are expected to sit in a dingy back room and plough through darned regulars for 40 minutes of the booked artist. At festivals you can choose a concert packed with good artists of various types or you can go to the singaround/session. It's not expected to be a mixture of both. And folk clubs hide themselves away in dingy back rooms and are spoken of as mystery and intrigue by the pub regulars. |
|
20 Feb 07 - 03:32 AM (#1973358) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: selby I have 2 sons 19 & 17 both brought up at festivals and both accomplished players they have been in sesions and concerts all their lifes with us. The choice is now theirs and they choose to go into sessions where they can share with others and show off a bit by learning a new tune and getting it accepted and they are accepted for what they are. If they ever go to a folk club with us with their instruments they have to wait while Tom Dick or Harry who always open goes second etc do their bit and then get an oppertunity at the end, usually rushed to show their skills and knowledge. We do not encourage the young ones enough unfortunately when we do we are looking for stars not journeymen who enjoy folk music,song and dance. Through my sons and other outlets I know that there are loads of youngsters who perform to a high standard getting them into folk clubs is a failing on our side perhaps we are scared of them. Folk music will always excist but not as we know it, the clubs have had there day and will return later. |
|
20 Feb 07 - 03:46 AM (#1973365) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: The Fooles Troupe In all human endeavours, people play "Power Games" - like "I always go first", or "I always go last", etc... |
|
20 Feb 07 - 06:21 AM (#1973449) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: Scrump I don't have the experience of visiting a wide range of clubs across the country, but the best ones I go to locally do book "up and coming" young acts as well as the established older hands. The reaction to these younger people is usually positive in my experience, and the (mainly middle-aged) punters usually express the view that it's good to see younger people performing in the clubs, as it indicates hope for the future, etc., etc. You often do get young friends and fans of the performers coming along as audience members too. I wonder if some clubs don't invite or book young performers because they don't think they would go down well with the predominantly older audience? If this is the case then I guess these clubs will die out with the audience and organisers. Good organisers will try to balance the 'tried and tested' with the new acts, and from what I've seen, this works, by and large. But I don't claim to be an expert, as I'm not an organiser, just a punter and performer. How to get young people to come along? One of the things that got me to come along to my then local folk club as a teenager was when the club did a show at our school. This was free to the attendees (us schoolkids). It got at least me interested enough to start going along to the club, and after a short while, performing as a resident myself. I don't know whether any clubs still do that sort of thing, but it might be worth thinking about? Once you get younger people in, you need to encourage them and not stamp on their efforts by saying "that's not proper folk music" or whatever. Once they get involved they will want to learn from the older performers anyway, but to start with you need to nurture them and not frighten them off before they've got started. I do appreciate the problem of the boring resident singers who churn out the same old songs week in, week out, and I've often experienced it myself, even at one well known club that is otherwise exemplary. I'm not sure what the answer to that is. I often appear myself as a floor singer or support act, and I always try to sing as many 'new' songs (i.e. that I haven't previously done at the same venue) as I can - I enjoy the challenge of learning and trying out new material and I continually aim to widen my repertoire. I could just sing the same half-dozen songs each time, but that would be just as boring for me as for the audience. Of course I occasionally do sing songs I've done before (songs are after all not just meant to be sung only once), but I try not to do anything I've done recently - unless as occasionally happens, I get a request! So why do these 'boring' singers keep doing the same old stuff? If we could analyse that it might help. Perhaps they like to stick to the tried and tested, instead of going through the hassle of remembering words to new songs? Or are they just complacent or even arrogant? How can the organiser deal with them? I guess many of these people are old friends and the organiser may find it difficult to deal with them without upsetting them. Maybe they need to organise more sessions and invite the best people from those to do the odd floor spot or support slot (depending on how the club operates), to widen the pool of floor singers/residents. Then they could say to the 'stage hog' that they will alternate with someone else. If these people take umbrage that's tough. Hopefully they will understand that they have no 'right' to a particular spot every week, which from the above posts I gather is the position in some clubs. Apologies for the rambling nature of this post, but I hope it might lead to further discussion about how to deal with the various problems that seem to lead to clubs dying out. |
|
20 Feb 07 - 06:25 AM (#1973451) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: George Papavgeris Don't they just, Robin...yes, I've seen plenty of that. God help me, even I have my own preferred seat at Herga and always make a beeline for that; at least I have the grace to shut up if someone else makes it there before me. So far! Who would be an MC at a folk club on a singers' night - now there's a thankless task. If you get it right you get no reward, if someone feels slighted you get an argument. I have to say that George (dragonzorg), who MCs Herga, is a master at putting together a mix from what is available in the room while making allowances for those who have to go early to catch a bus, ensuring a reasonable closing 2-3 spots, giving newcomers and youngsters an extra turn if possible etc. |
|
20 Feb 07 - 08:13 AM (#1973531) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: Scrump The other thread whence this one sprang is still going along in parallel. One point to come out of it is that the term "folk club" might have an 'image problem'. Maybe calling a 'folk club' something else would be a good idea, if you want to attract more people in. The old stereotype of fingers-in-ears, Aran sweater clad pipe smoking sandal wearing bearded old blokes warbling their way through 78-verse Child Ballads in reverent silence is perhaps too strong to overcome. Calling it something else might help. The question is, what? Let's have your suggestions. That said, there are still plenty of thriving folk clubs that don't seem to be suffering from this problem, so not all clubs need to change their name, it would seem. But for the rest, it might help, and I don't think you'll get many outraged by a simple name change. Or am I wrong? |
|
20 Feb 07 - 08:14 AM (#1973534) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: McGrath of Harlow You get bad mannered people like oggie's fiddler of all ages. I suppose we all find it harder to cope with that kind of stuff when it's from someone of another generation, whether it's a grumpy old sod like that or a sneery young lout. When it's someone of our own age it's a lot easier to shrug it off or come back with a put-down, while still sticking around. The great thing about folk music is that has always tended to resist the corralling of people into generations, but in doing so it goes against the spirit of the time. That isn't to say that there isn't always a tendency of people to hang around a lot of the time with contemporaries, but that has been balanced by the tendency to get together with fellow enthusiasts of all ages, in all fields - and that seems under threat these days. It's been said, accurately enough, that at one time the clubs were full of young people, and the only older ones you'd see were among the guest performers. Now it's the other way round - the members are the old ones, and the only young faces are liable to be paid guests. The truth is there are probably more good, and potentially good, young musicians around than there ever have been. The difference is that when the clubs came into existence there wasn't any significant number of older people breathing down their necks while we learnt. |
|
20 Feb 07 - 08:28 AM (#1973547) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: GUEST Well if the clubs I attend are anything to go by, the demograph gives them another 20 years at the most. I tend to be one of the youngest ones there at 46. Some members have retired, some are about to, some don't come any more due to age and health. 30 years ago when I first went to folk clubs (when I was still at school), the people involved were in their 20's and 30's - now they're telling us about their grandchildren! I have never seen an influx of younger people coming in behind me - maybe the odd one or two but not enough to keep the interest alive over the next 30 years. Yes we do see younger people around at Festivals but I don't believe the festival environment is enough to keep the interest there - it's a very seasonal thing and as has been pointed out - not cheap. On top of the ticket cost there's travel, accommodation, food, beer... The club that I now run would probably have folded last year if I hadn't agreed to take over the running of it. Most of the regular attendees are very parochial in the sense that Monday night is folk night and they're not interested in going anywhere else but they're not bothered - it's a night out listening to songs and poems - until I decide I've had enough or circumstances dictate that I can't commit myself. Don't get me wrong - we all have a good time and enjoy the crack but sooner or later it will no longer be running. Cheers Mark |
|
20 Feb 07 - 08:29 AM (#1973549) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: GUEST,Mark Dowding at work The above was me! |
|
20 Feb 07 - 08:31 AM (#1973551) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: GUEST Advertise live music with guitarist/vocalist/multi-instrumentalist. |
|
20 Feb 07 - 09:09 AM (#1973584) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: George Papavgeris Scrump, I don't think the cosmetics of the name make that much difference; it's the content, the experience you get when you go to a club that will be either good (and you'll return, and tell others) or bad (and you'll run a mile and also tell others). Sort of "a rose by any other name..." in reverse. |
|
20 Feb 07 - 09:16 AM (#1973590) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: Scrump I agree George, if the experience of going to the club is bad, its name won't make any difference. I was thinking of a club that might be having difficulty attracting younger people, and they might be put off by the name 'folk club'. If the club's a good one (as we understand it - enjoyable artists and good atmosphere, as opposed to the boring floor singers doing the same 3 songs week in week out), then the challenge is to get people in the door, especially the young people that will hopefully give it a future when we're gone. Once there, the chances are they will enjoy themselves and come back in future. But if the club is suffering from the problems some have mentioned (immovable floor singers who insist on their right to bore the audience every week, and an organiser too timid to do anything about it) then more drastic changes will be needed. |
|
20 Feb 07 - 09:31 AM (#1973605) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: Dave the Gnome Clubs will either survive or they won't. Quite simple realy. While us 'oldies' (Just turned 54 myself) are willing to support them they will continue. If no-one supports them when we are gone they will fail. What I suspect will happen in reality is that the young who do not want to support folk clubs today will be quite happy to do so in 10 or 20 years time when they have had enough of dance clubs, raves and expensive concerts. It is a cycle of changing audiences. We may see ups and downs but I feel it highly unlikely that clubs will disappear altogether. Cheers Dave |
|
20 Feb 07 - 09:39 AM (#1973618) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: GUEST,JeremyRS I don't think there is one answer that will address the problems of every folk club, but I do think the core problem for all of them is the same, audience age: if you don't get a younger audience then you're doomed no matter how nice the toilets are or how great the support act is. Folk clubs do have a bad image, but the problem isn't the f-word. Folk is going through one of its periodic upswings, festivals do well, there's lots of talented young performers, lots of publicity in the newspapers and music mags, in fact it's almost hip. Consider also nu-folk, (which I know isn't folk at all a lot of the time), a burgeoning and hip genre that attracts a wide but also much younger audience. But how is that audience attracted? By the same means that any audience is attracted, speaking to it in its language and answering the "what's in it for me?" question. To take the language point, do folk clubs make full use of the web, do they have a MySpace site, do they leaflet the Student Union rather than the folk club in the next town, do they present the performers as funky and interesting (not necessarily young), and so on and so on? I think not. I see a lot of folk club flyers, and almost without exception they're black and white, typed, possibly with a badly photocopied picture of the artist, some blurb that talks about their "musicianship" and perhaps a quote or two from a magazine that nobody under 20 reads or a musician that nobody under 30 has heard of. Not that likely to attract anyone young is it. I could go on, but the point is, understand what the people you want to attract want and how they communicate, and act upon it. If you do so they will come. |
|
20 Feb 07 - 10:06 AM (#1973657) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: Dave the Gnome No - sorry Jeremy - attracting a younger audience is not the answer either. If the average age of a folk club stays at 50+ it matters not one jot as long as the numbers keep up. Everyone gets older so as the 70+'s drop out of the scene the 30's become the 40's the 40's become the 50's and so on. I was not born a folky. I was in my teens in the late 60's and early 70's. I went to rock concerts, discos and consumed all manner of substances I have since substituted with good beer:-) I was nearly 30 before I went to a folk club. The same will happen with todays teens. Imagine the scene in 20 years - All todays teens sat around, dreaming of the good old 00's, sipping their designer water and listening to accoustic covers of Kaiser chief songs and concertina rap... :D |
|
20 Feb 07 - 10:14 AM (#1973664) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: melodeonboy I think a lot of interesting points have been raised on this thread and it's encouraging to note that there seems to be an absence of know-it-alls but plenty of knowledgeable people contributing who genuinely care about the subject. Just to add my twopenn'orth, I returned to Britain some 18 months ago after many, many years away and I have been welcomed, as a newcomer, in all clubs/singarounds/sessions that I've attended, even though much of my material is/was either unorthodox or unknown to most people there. As for welcoming younger people, they're certainly made very welcome and, indeed, encouraged at the clubs that I attend (mainly singarounds in the bar - do they count as clubs for the purpose of this discussion? - I like to think so). As I mentioned on another thread, young people will now, more than ever, listen to music on the basis of fashion, the peer group they belong to, the peer group they want to belong to, who they see in the media, what they're fed on mainstream radio etc, etc. It's not easy getting them to break the mould. |
|
20 Feb 07 - 10:19 AM (#1973670) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: GUEST,JeremyRS Dave, why do you think that enough of/any of todays teens will eventually come to folk clubs? If that was the case then there wouldn't be a problem, as every year there would be a natural refreshing of the audience, as people the reached the "folk club attending age" (whatever that is) and replaced the 70+s who left. In addition, the implication of what you say is that folk clubs provide "something" that is unattractive to people under a certain age and atractive to those over it, which I think is questionable. |
|
20 Feb 07 - 10:34 AM (#1973685) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: GUEST Hi Melodeonboy, I wouldn't disagree with what you wrote, and I'm sure it's true in lots of places, but the key part is that young people are made welcome once they walk through the door. It's getting them to do that that I think is the problem. I also think that the listening to music on the basis of fashion etc. was ever thus, perhaps even more so in the 60s when there weren't distractions like the internet, and yet that was when folk clubs were perhaps at their peak. This isn't about attracting a mass audience, it's about attracting enough to make your local club viable, from the point of view of both performers and organisers. |
|
20 Feb 07 - 10:57 AM (#1973717) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: Dave the Gnome I only think it may happen because I did it, Jeremy. Not at all scientific I'm afraid but if it has happened once I am sure it can happen again. As to changing tastes being a questionable state. How so? Surely you do not like the exact same things that you liked 20 years ago do you? If people did not change their musical leanings as they developed how did the musical age gap develop? I think that gap is less today than it has ever been, probably because people in their between 50 and 70 saw the explosion of popular music of all kinds from the late 1950s onwards and are now far more tolerant than their forebears. As well as that I realy do believe that a lot of todays popular music is very good indeed. A lot of which will be excellent 'fodder' for the clubs of both today and tomorrow. I think the answer in helping keep clubs alive is far more to do with the number of people that clubs attract than the age of the audience. I firmly believe the 'club scene' (whatever that may be!) is in the doldrums at present but that does not mean that their will not be another revival. And another. And another... Cheers :D |
|
20 Feb 07 - 11:12 AM (#1973733) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: Scrump I was not born a folky. I was in my teens in the late 60's and early 70's. I went to rock concerts, discos and consumed all manner of substances I have since substituted with good beer:-) I was nearly 30 before I went to a folk club. The same will happen with todays teens. With all due respect, Dave, you seem to be assuming everyone is like you in that respect. I started going to folk clubs as a teenager and was regularly singing in them before I was 20, but I also liked other sorts of music and went to rock concerts, discos, etc., too. I never considered there was anything wrong in that. Many of my friends were the same, as far as liking more than one sort of music goes. Maybe you just didn't discover folk music until later in life, but having discovered it you obviously liked what you saw/heard. What makes you think you wouldn't have liked it if you'd discovered it earlier? I see quite a few young people coming along to folk clubs, admittedly when someone young is performing that they like (possibly having found them via Myspace). And maybe this isn't everyone's definition of 'folk' (don't let's get into that again here, please!), but these are the people who will be carrying on when we've gone. I enjoy seeing a lot of these young artists, many of whom are very good musicians already, and they will presumably get better and better. I may not like every single thing they do, but then there are not many artists in that category, old or young. The key as others have said is to attract them in and make them welcome. The music will do the rest. |
|
20 Feb 07 - 11:14 AM (#1973735) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: GUEST,Peter Hood The UK folk scene caters for older people, we are older people clubs. Last night 50+ people turned up at the Red Bull Stockport for The Orpheus Supertones!! What a great night! We were all old people. There's loads of "young people" in clubs in Manchester, singing and playing, in young peoples clubs. Go to a few. See what's going on. They're into Dylan and a few folk icons, they all love Kate R. GO AND LOOK!!! It's interesting that some of the best are dirty dark holes with beer on the floor. They're nice people, a lot of them like folk music, they've heard of Nick Drake etc. but they don't want to come to old mens clubs. Look on my space, they're singing folk music. They like folk music, they have their own music clubs. They are my children and yours, they don't go to their old dads' club! Nor would I expect them to. Maybe one day when they're old as well they will. Peter |
|
20 Feb 07 - 11:23 AM (#1973753) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: Dave the Gnome I am sort of making that assumption, Scrump. But only because I am an average sort of person and guess that if I did some other people will. What would have been more correct was if I had said "The same will happen with SOME of todays teens." So apologies if I came across as saying that it would happen to them all! I did discover 'folk' much earlier than my first visit to a club for the record. Remember the late 60's and early 70's were full of bands like Steeleye Span, Pentangle, Fairport and, less discernably folky but my firm favourite, Jethro Tull. I think teens today listening to, for instance, Kate Rusby or Seth Lakeman will not particularly recognise that they are listening to 'folk' (whatever that is!) but in some years time they may well latch on to something that triggers a memory. Maybe the good work that such artists are doing now will facilitate the 201* revival? I hope so:-) Cheers D. |
|
20 Feb 07 - 11:35 AM (#1973770) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: Scrump Peter: good point. Maybe our existing folk clubs will close down, but the young people's clubs will continue as they grow older until one day they will be old people's clubs and replace ours. Meanwhile the future youngsters will have started their own clubs, and... Dave: no need to apologise! |
|
20 Feb 07 - 01:37 PM (#1973893) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: McGrath of Harlow "Folk is going through one of its periodic upswings, festivals do well, there's lots of talented young performers, lots of publicity in the newspapers and music mags, in fact it's almost hip." (GUEST,JeremyRS - PM Date: 20 Feb 07 - 09:39 AM) And one indication of the truth of that - today's Guardian carries this piece "Get your motor running Planning a long trip? Ian Clayton nominates the 40 essential driving LPs." And just have a look at the 40 essential driving LPs he picks - people like Margaret Barry, Norma Waterson, Chumbawamba, Fairport Convention, A Century of Song (English Folk Dance & Song Society)... Extracted from a book by Ian Clayton called Bringing It All Back Home, which I've clearly got to get hold of. |
|
20 Feb 07 - 01:42 PM (#1973897) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: The Sandman clubs involve local communities, or should do. Villans club and Swindon clearly do. people should feel the club belongs to them,they should be places where communities get to know each other using music to breakdown barriers. Festivals by their annual nature cannot do this as effectively,this is why clubs are important. multi national capitalism would love to see communities weakened,support your clubs. |
|
20 Feb 07 - 02:04 PM (#1973920) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: McGrath of Harlow A good festival should act as a kind of celebration of the local folk activities in the locality, drawing a lot of its volunteers and non-booked activities from that, and giving the whole scene a boost for the next year. My impression is that that is true of Fylde, for one, and Leigh-on-Sea for another. |
|
20 Feb 07 - 02:07 PM (#1973925) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: Ruth Archer A good festival should be whatever makes the attenders and the organisers happy. A celebration of local folk activities might work for some, but it wouldn't work for all. |
|
20 Feb 07 - 02:12 PM (#1973933) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: The Sandman yes but a festival is only annual,most clubs run weekly or fortnightly. |
|
20 Feb 07 - 02:53 PM (#1973991) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: Dave Wynn George. I fully agree about MC'ing a singers night. Sometimes it gives me the 'orrors. As club organisers, we have a responsibilty to the pub landlord (perhaps not a legal one but certainly a moral one) to help him stay within the drinking laws. Closing a club on time can, to some organisers, be essential to keep the club open. Singers with a few beers can overlook this and expect that if everbody else does two sets then they will too. It's a desparate tightrope act some nights. :-) Dave Wynn |
|
20 Feb 07 - 03:43 PM (#1974058) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: Dave the Gnome And then there are the ones that, half an hour after official closing time, will Medley 3 x 72 verse Child ballads. It isn't much fun getting home at 1:30 after the landlord has given you an earfull... Wonder if we could introduce the old shepherds crook thing for dragging them off? :D |
|
20 Feb 07 - 06:05 PM (#1974225) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: Dave Sutherland When I was a teenager in the sixties and making my first tentative steps into the folk clubs I received encouragement, advice and constructive critisism from lots of people all of whom were considerably older than I was and I felt honoured by it - at least they thought I was worth encouraging. Now as the big 60 looms ever nearer and I am part of the organisation of a folk club it is always a pleasure to welcome youngsters to perform at our club either from the floor or as guests. Age difference was something that you didn't worry about back in the sixties and I don't see why it should be now. Although we are a club that promotes traditional music and song I do hope that we don't present the forbidding image that seems to attach its self to traditionally based clubs. Please check out our web site www.tigerfolk.com and you'll see that we have just celebrated out sixteenth birthday with Damien Barber and Mike Wilson and that next month we have Chris Wood. |
|
21 Feb 07 - 07:28 AM (#1974729) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: Scrump clubs involve local communities, or should do. Villans club and Swindon clearly do. people should feel the club belongs to them,they should be places where communities get to know each other using music to breakdown barriers. Festivals by their annual nature cannot do this as effectively,this is why clubs are important. multi national capitalism would love to see communities weakened,support your clubs. Well said Cap'n. That's one reason I think the 'grass roots' type clubs (where anyone and everyone can 'have a go') are important, as opposed to the 'concert' type clubs, where only artists that are already established are invited to take the stage. Although I often attend the 'concert' type clubs, because I think they do have a role to play in terms of providing venues where established big names can perform and earn reasonable money, I note that many of the attendees are 'incomers' who may have travelled a long way to see a particular act. The next week at the same club, will largely be a different crowd, with the exception of a handful of locals. Nothing wrong with that per se, but if every club operated that way, there would be nowhere for new performers to learn the ropes and establish themselves enough to perform at the big venues. I'd like to see concert clubs do more to encourage local talent, perhaps by having occasional session nights instead of just guest nights. At present they seem to rely on other smaller venues to nurture new people, without doing their bit to help this process. One idea seen at a local club is to have a sort of local artists' 'festival' occasionally, with a reduced entrance fee (the artists won't be paid a fee, although they will get free entry). This will showcase up and coming local artists who might well manage to get the odd booking from it. The punters seem to like it as it's a change from the regular guest nights, and they get a (hopefully!) good evening's entertainment on the cheap for a change. Maybe some of the concert venues could consider staging something like this once in a while. As the Cap'n says, the community aspects are important, and that's one reason I like my local club, where I can perform occasionally myself, as well as see other, more established artists occasionally. Meanwhile I've made a lot of good friends who I enjoy meeting every week, whether doing a turn myself or not. I don't tend to know as many people at the concert club I regularly visit - not that they aren't friendly, just that the 'regulars' are few because most are 'incomers'. |
|
21 Feb 07 - 07:58 AM (#1974764) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: GUEST,Mark Dowding at work Scrump said "I'd like to see concert clubs do more to encourage local talent, perhaps by having occasional session nights instead of just guest nights. At present they seem to rely on other smaller venues to nurture new people, without doing their bit to help this process." I think the problem you'd have would be that the reputation of that style of club would be offputting to people going for a singaround. I would imagine that most people go just to listen to the Big Name artist and wouldn't bother going for a singaround night - especially if most people are 'incomers'and there are few regulars. I don't think the Concert clubs are interested in encouraging local talent or they'd be running singers nights anyway. The small venue still has a place - if the people who sang at may club were invited to do something at a bigger venue they'd run a mile - I'm not being nasty it's just the way they like it to be - an intimate gathering in familiar surroundings. As an aside to this, there is mention of getting publicity in the local papers. Most towns have a local paper that covers a good area around it. My club had a piece in the "Village Life" section that the local rag had picked off a website and we got an extra 8 people in that week that didn't know the club existed! Some came back the week after and brought more people with them! I've also been able to get large photos and articles about guests appearing at another club I was a regular at simply by emailing the information to the contact address. They wrote the copy from what I sent them and put it alongside the photo. This backfired once when the guest was a threesome and the local council picked up on this and threatened the landlady with fine and jail as they'd had complaints about the noise from a recent beer festival and were looking for an excuse to apply the 2-in-a-bar rule. Unfortunately we had to find other premises but the club is still going in a new venue. Getting the folk to the people rather than getting the people to the folk - I've been involved in a couple of sell out evenings where a few of us have organised a concert in a village pub/venue, put the word around to the locals who've come along and enjoyed a good night's entertainment and gone away asking when the next one was going to be. Very few of them had been inside a folk club before and may not go to one at all but it goes to show that the interest is there if you put a bit of effort into organising and advertising. Cheers Mark |
|
21 Feb 07 - 09:46 AM (#1974891) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: Richard Bridge Lots of what's wrong, not a lot of how to get it right. But there is more than a sniff of stuff I remember from when I was at university - and I NEVER went folking. I just wanted music that made the women swing their pants. For most people, going out is not about music, it's about sex. Remember? There was a period when folk and access to the preferred gender might have coincided - now the closest one gets I suspect is the electro-ceilidh. Of course, offer a lusty teenager a grope with a wrinkle and you'll scare them even further away. Hmm, hmmm, problem here. Answer! Poster in local nurse's hostel, girls drink free up to 9pm. Now the lads will come crawling. Problem, how to hear the music? |
|
21 Feb 07 - 10:23 AM (#1974942) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: Folkiedave Problem, how to hear the music? Over the mass sounds of copulation you mean? Well we never had any problem in my day!! And I do remember a couple of wrinklies keeping a whole folk festival awake with their lusty sounds. I wanted to arrange a round of applause for them when they emerged next morning - but everyone was too exhausted listening. Moor and Coast did wonderful business, whilst we all stayed awake. But the general err.err.........OK I'll say it - thrust - of your argument is spot on. |
|
21 Feb 07 - 10:23 AM (#1974943) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: Big Al Whittle well i don't think we should encourage young people. If they turn up, we should say SOD OFF! This is a place for old and smelly people singing boring songs, so go and sling your hook, and stick it in your MP3 socket. And that was £50, for having the temerity to ask for a look round. Sorry we only do weekend tickets, and a fiver for the progamme.....and you haven't got a kagool........sorry, there IS a dress code mate....! This sensible and frank approach I believe, will pay dividends in the end and put the tradition back on track. |
|
21 Feb 07 - 10:30 AM (#1974945) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: Scrump well i don't think we should encourage young people. If they turn up, we should say SOD OFF! Hey, good idea - you may be onto something there, WLD. We all know the best way to get youngsters to do something is to tell them the opposite. So by making folk clubs for adults only (ooerr, missus!) they would be clamouring to get in. We would of course turn them away at first and then pretend to turn a blind eye when we let them in, on condition that they join in the songs and tunes properly :-) |
|
21 Feb 07 - 12:31 PM (#1975053) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: McGrath of Harlow Now if we could only get them to move on from the Music Licensing Act to full scale prohibition of free-range music, we could really get somewhere. Nothing like a bit of illegality to make initially unappealing stuff strangely alluring for young people. "Drop in, tune up, strike up..." |
|
22 Feb 07 - 04:44 AM (#1975769) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: The Fooles Troupe "Nothing wrong with that per se, but if every club operated that way, there would be nowhere for new performers to learn the ropes and establish themselves enough to perform at the big venues." That same sort of thing is what caused a big drop in the number of comedians - it required a change in society to get them practised and nurtured again.... |
|
22 Feb 07 - 04:48 AM (#1975775) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: Scrump Good point McGrath :-) Maybe we should be lobbying the government to make all forms of folk music illegal. Kim Howells, where are you when we need you? |
|
22 Feb 07 - 05:30 AM (#1975803) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: Banjo-Flower Hi Oggie try taking your son to the session at the Six Bells in Barrow the place is heaving with youngsters at the half term specials they have and they are'nt patronised either Gerry |
|
23 Feb 07 - 04:58 AM (#1976806) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: Anne Lister There's no shortage of younger performers, it seems to me, judging by the "friend" requests I get from MySpace, as well as the fine musicians I've seen at festivals and in clubs, and no worries about using the word "folk" in their descriptions of what they do. There are acoustic clubs all over the country catering for them, too, some specifically singer/songwriter focussed. When I started to go to folk clubs in my mid teens, the clubs were run by people in their twenties and thirties. So possibly these acoustic clubs are the folk clubs for the next generation - but I would be happier myself if some of the younger generation of performers were involved in running some of the better established folk clubs. Or if they invited some of us older performers to perform at their acoustic venues (ah, but would we be happy with the money ...see other thread ...). Anne http://www.annelister.com |
|
24 Feb 07 - 12:47 PM (#1978075) Subject: RE: UK folk scene - what future for clubs? From: BB A rose by any other name... Our club is not called a folk club - it's Shammick Acoustic Sessions - because we wanted people to be absolutely free to perform anything they wished, but because most of the people who come perform 'folk', it is, in effect, no different. And new people coming in who've not been involved in performing before tend to learn 'folk' material, as that is mainly what they hear there. Now we're not youngsters - we've been involved in the music for forty years and more, and unfortunately, most of those who attend are forties upwards, so we're still having the same trouble as those who call their venues 'folk' clubs - we're not getting the real youngsters in. Barbara |