Why don't I address Bobert's concerns instead of attacking Treehouse. Let me explain. For one, Bobert's concerns weren't on this thread when I posted, and even if they were, I'm not required to respond in the way that someone, later, wishes I would've. This goes back to my point about absurd, unrealistic, autistic fantasies of social interaction.

Second, I'm not really attacking Treehouse, or his futile desire to control a coalescence of social tone and manners by dictating what he or she prefers. A previous post in which I simply made fun of Treehouse in my preferred pathetic manner didn't take, for some reason. So I then decided to post "seriously" in my best version of what manner I can gather that Treehouse prefers. If I'm now also required to share Treehouse's point of view and concerns as well, because Bobert seems to reflect some of them in another post, then you are an absolute moron, no joke intended, and you should try to get help that I'm not qualified to provide.

I've answered those concerns anyway. I obviously don't share them and can't be drafted by hook or crook. I know where to go for more polite discussions, on subjects of particular interest to me, where more on-topic ettiquette suits me better. Here I'm satisfied with letting others post in ways I may not like, if I can post in ways they might not like. Treehouse simply doesn't like it, and as simply, I do. I'm sorry, that's all.