I am not anti-semitic. I have never said one hateful thing towards any Jewish person, and it is a total shock to me to see my thread, Bill D. Hates Christianity,still inthe data base, even more shocking was to see its title changed to: Bill D. Hates Christianity/Dewey Hates Judaism.

I figured it would INSTANTLY and RIGHTFULLY be deleted, not vengefully modified, It was posted only to make a point, not to accuse. I'm a big believer in tolerance especially in the field of religion and politics.

Are our little ears so sensitive we cannot tolerate a few religious ideas every once in a great while?they were topical and with today's news. From a Chirsitian perspective (god forbid I mention it)


To clarify, The Star of David is a six pointed symbol, one triangle facing upward, one facing downward.

As opposed to the New World Order symbol which is NOT the Star of David, because it also has a CIRCLE encompassing the star. It is that circle as well as many other circle symbols, that are used by the NWO. (see Madame Balvatsky, who will explain to you the ADDITIONAL MEANING behind the circle portion of this modified symbol in her prophecies)

The bottom triangle is the self actualized man (see abraham maslow) as one keeps growing in spiritual intelligents and capacity the based of the triangle (that is.... YOU!!) keep on growing fueled by the power of your source. (infinite intelligence)

The Top triangle is (the base which expands towards the heavens) is the source from which you came and it is infinite in its capacity directiveness and source supplication. This is GOD, according to the symbol and we are driven upward and onward by it, becoming a part of the Godhead.

I would also like to clarify FOR THE RECORD, that I don't think Bill D. Hates Christians.

He just hates it when Christians talk about anything chirstian with each other here on mudcat.

Its the liberal bias. Sick and perverted content is to be un-filtered bushbashing is fine. But God save us from those divise know it all christians.

Why am I Back? Well, Human nature I guess, I was checking to see what might have been said since, then I happened to run across the line,

DEWEY HATES JUDAISM

It is my obligation to any Jewish person to repond to this so I am. I do not hate any Jewish person, or any person of any religious persuasion different from my own, or any atheist, or any liberal thinker, bush-hater,Re-incarnated UFO aductee, intolerant dirty-minded data base administer etc.

I just don't like having my speech impaired and for me religion IS a big part of my life, its a regular part of my speech and lexicon. I even like learn about eastern religions. I have even studied them for myself over these past sixth months with great eagerness and awareness of their revelations.

In the end each of us have to decide for ourselves. I never came to mudcat citing John 3:16. There is a difference in talking about your religion and preaching various verse followed by hell and brimestone and the, You must be saved" admonition. I told my belief for certain, but I never told anyone what to believe. Telling people what they must believe in preaching, just mentioning your sincere beliefs isn't, and even if it were, which it is not, it is not something I do daily. Just like the topic of bush bashing gets old so does talking about christianity. But I think it is people hatred toward Chirsitianity that is more of the issue than how much it is discussed. Bush-bashing is talked about far more frequently here and it seems to work out just fine for the liberal crowd all gathered here. (so to me the issue is audience more than topic)

I've never preachedhere, and I have always been honest and sincere in my beliefs. But I just don't like mudcat anymore because it doesn't allow people to be themsleves. I'm not trying to change you guys, when I heard something I don't like I just ignore it not ban it.




Not that anyone would actually care, But I still resigned from mudcat and I am only resonding out of concern for the misleading post:

"DEWEY HATES JUDIASM"

Which miraculously is STILL in the data based. Don't worry Bill D. I won't sue you if you don't sue me (LOL)

But it does show your bias here and your liberal agenda towards the direction of the message board on mudcat. I thought you would erase the post, not add to it!!!!

Power Corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. So stop telling me what to write! and I'll still gladly go way. But everyone has bias, I just chose to ignore the things I don't like and you chose to stamp them out or revise them in the data base.

Dewey (who will seek unfettered speech elsewhere, but needed to correct the mudcat administrators assertion that he (Dewey) is a neo nazi)

---

Hi, Dewey. Sorry I didn't notice this earlier, but I've been busy with school. We generally try to keep a limit of one thread currently running per subject. If there are multiple threads on a single subject, we sometimes combine them. If you wish to reply to something somebody says within a thread, the usual place to put your reply is in the thread where a discussion takes place, not in a new thread.
If it makes sense to do it, we combine "reply" threads with the threads they reply to. I'm the person who combined the two threads. As part of the combination, I simply combined the two thread titles. By rights, you should have replied to Bill D's comments in the thread where he made his remarks, instead of starting another thread which generated yet another "answer" thread.
I can't respond to your "neo-nazi" allegation, because I can't find it. It does not seem to be something that the administrators Max, Jeff, or I would say.
-Joe Offer-