>>Ron and I have been asking for some sort of specificity about the "royals" you allege invented (or perhaps historicized?) Jesus, and you have been singularly unforthcoming on that point. But the quote (1) above suggests it was not so much "royals" as "Flavians" you are fingering, and much closer to the time of both Jesus and Josephus than most of your hints on the subject have suggested. So, let me try again. Who are these royals and what period do you allege they were operating in?<<

This is once again changing the subject. The Roman royal theory is my own conjecture. I never said I had proof of it and I never said you have to accept it. The subject of this thread is the historicity of Jesus Christ, which you are failing miserably to make a case for.

Forget about the Roman royals. If it will make you happy--I completely lied about it. There were no Roman royals. They never existed and had no hand in the creation of anything. I was completely off my rocker to suggest it. I apologize for my error and will never suggest it again. I WAS WRONG!!!

Okay?

Now--what is your evidence for the historicity of Jesus Christ? That is the subject of the thread and for which you have the burden of proof and for which are attempting to prove nothing so far. Please lay it out for me.