Also been taking a break for a bit, but this was a good one.
Jon - your accusation was - your continued abuse of him and the volunteers.
If you cannot supply evidence of this 'abuse' - perhaps you will withdraw that accusation and apolgise?
For over two years, you've said that he's not telling the truth when he gives his reasons for restricting/renaming your posts, so we have "liar" as the primary one. I have to say that if I'd been called a liar by someone every day for two years, I'd be a bit unhappy too.
For the Chief of the Mudcat Editing Team to be seen to repeatedly do this - repeatedly attempt to minimise, justfy and excuse it - is just total hypocrisy
OK, we have "hypocrite" too.
insecure and unsure of the ability of their authority in achieving its stated aims but determined to hang on to this authority
So we have "power-mad" too.
Shambles, you seem to believe that just because you haven't actually used any swear-words, you haven't insulted anyone. Believe me, that isn't so.
You also seem to feel that you've not insulted anyone because you've not said outright "you're a hypocrite" but instead said "this is hypocrisy", or you've not said outright "you're a liar" but instead said "why should I accept that to be the truth?". Frankly that just makes you gutless, playing semantics just so that you can say "I never actually said that".