Lyrics & Knowledge Personal Pages Record Shop Auction Links Radio & Media Kids Membership Help
The Mudcat Cafesj



User Name Thread Name Subject Posted
GUEST,Ian Pittaway Why reject the term 'source singer'? (100* d) Why reject the term 'source singer'? 23 Sep 06


At Sidmouth Festival this year I went to a very interesting on-stage conversation with Tony Engle, MD of Topic Records. During a discussion about the proper attitude towards those from whom we get our material, a remark was made by Norma Waterson to the effect that there was something wrong in calling someone a 'source singer'. Now this was only said in passing and the conversation moved back to the main point, but I was left wondering - and wonder still - why this often-used term is any way bad. I've heard lots of people use it since, unaware (like me) that there is any debate about it. I know the language we use is important, as it holds associated ideas that may or may not be appropriate. But I've racked my brain and can't see anything wrong with it. I'm not lying awake at night worrying about this! But I am curious to know what it's all about. Could anyone enlighten me?


Post to this Thread -

Back to the Main Forum Page

By clicking on the User Name, you will requery the forum for that user. You will see everything that he or she has posted with that Mudcat name.

By clicking on the Thread Name, you will be sent to the Forum on that thread as if you selected it from the main Mudcat Forum page.
   * Click on the linked number with * to view the thread split into pages (click "d" for chronologically descending).

By clicking on the Subject, you will also go to the thread as if you selected it from the original Forum page, but also go directly to that particular message.

By clicking on the Date (Posted), you will dig out every message posted that day.

Try it all, you will see.