Neither you nor I decide anything, Rabbi Sol--I am just pointing out that your analogy doesn't really work because it is possible for someone who , in word or deed, makes remarks that can be construed as threatening to the president to be prosecuted.

To clarify my point again, my thought is that it can be argued that anonymous and false utterances have been made and propagated with the intent of inciting hatred against a public official--


From my point of view, I am skeptical of anonymous bloggers who involve themselves in the political process--