Lyrics & Knowledge Personal Pages Record Shop Auction Links Radio & Media Kids Membership Help
The Mudcat Cafesj



User Name Thread Name Subject Posted
GUEST,Scary Kerry BS: Kerry acknowledges WTC7 demolition (167* d) RE: BS: Kerry acknowledges WTC7 demolition 04 May 07


The guys on the planes didn't know they were going to die. They were U.S. government operatives. They'd been trained by the U.S. and regularly participated in "drills." On the morning of 9/11 they thought they were just going through another drill like the one a few weeks before, when actor James Woods saw a couple of the "9/11 hijackers" on a flight.

http://michellemalkin.com/archives/002187.htm

The planes were taken over by remote guidance systems, which would account for the trick maneuvering some of them engaged in. The "hijackers" were unsafe in Cessnas, so they weren't at the controls of those planes.

And here's an interesting piece about Loose Change 2, the movie that put the 9/11 Truth movement into gear. The movie is being shown on in-flight movies. lol. The U.S. govt is in big, big trouble:

UK producer and distributor MercuryMedia International has licensed the 9/11 conspiracy internet movie Loose Change 2 – which features footage of exploding passenger jets – to Virgin Atlantic Airways.

The controversial film, made for just US$10,000, has attracted over 50 million downloads since its release in 2005, and will now be available for broadcast on Virgin Atlantic flights....

http://www.c21media.net/resources/detail.asp?area=100&article=35648

And here's a good bit of news. David Ray Griffin has finally come out with his "Debunking the debunkers" book. I think he's also released a film to go along with it. A review of the book (by a former Asst Director of the U.S. Treasury and current 9/11 Truth activist) can be found here:

http://mujca.com/debunking.htm

Some excerpts from the review:

Perhaps it is merely a coincidence that just prior to 9/11 Cathleen P. Black, who has family connections to the CIA and Pentagon and is president of Hearst Magazines, the owner of Popular Mechanics, fired the magazine's editor-in-chief and several senior veteran staff members and installed James B. Meigs and Benjamin Chertoff, a cousin of Bush administration factotum Michael Chertoff. It was Meigs and Benjamin Chertoff who produced the Popular Mechanics report that Griffin has eviscerated....

Griffin shows that the Popular Mechanics report consists of special pleading, circular reasoning, appeals to the authority of the NIST report, straw men, and internal contradictions in the report itself....

The two WTC towers did not collapse. They blew up and disintegrated, as did WTC 7. There is an enormous energy deficit in every account that rules out the use of explosives. Gravitational energy is insufficient to explain the pulverization of the buildings and contents and the severing of the 47 massive center core steel columns in each of the towers into convenient lengths to be picked up and loaded onto trucks; much less can gravitational energy account for the pulverization of the top floors of the towers and ejection of steel beams hundreds of feet horizontally just prior to the disintegration of the floors below....

NIST's final report stated that of the steel available to it for examination, "only three columns had evidence that the steel reached temperatures above 250 degrees Celsius" (482 degrees Fahrenheit). The self-cleaning ovens in our home kitchens reach temperatures higher than this, and the ovens do not melt or deform....

(This one is really good, about Flight 77, at the Pentagon) ...the absence of passenger luggage, fuselage, wing and tail sections--indeed the absence of a 200,000 pound airliner--is attributed to the vaporization of the airplane due to the high speed crash and intense fire. The incompatibility of vaporized metal but recovered flesh and blood stood unnoticed until Griffin pointed it out....


Post to this Thread -

Back to the Main Forum Page

By clicking on the User Name, you will requery the forum for that user. You will see everything that he or she has posted with that Mudcat name.

By clicking on the Thread Name, you will be sent to the Forum on that thread as if you selected it from the main Mudcat Forum page.
   * Click on the linked number with * to view the thread split into pages (click "d" for chronologically descending).

By clicking on the Subject, you will also go to the thread as if you selected it from the original Forum page, but also go directly to that particular message.

By clicking on the Date (Posted), you will dig out every message posted that day.

Try it all, you will see.