Janie:

Just what the hell are you talking about? I try to explain how some companies really are boss hoggs who prey on poor people through the media and you make some sort of parody that seems to imply I am doing the opposite. This exploitation through the media must be identified and ended as part of the elimantion of the roots of poverty.

Your concept seems to be to try to mitigate the damage from exploitation through the media after it is done by blaming it on every body with money and forcing them to pay. That is reactive rather that proactive action.

I show how some of Bobert's imagined boss hoggs actuly contribute to poor people and that he is automaticaly biased against anybody that has money and he claims bias is good. "But what one can never say about me is that I pre-judged an indivudual" How about me Bobert? You have called am a shill, a rich guy, etc.