If she does somehow make good points and have her remarks taken out of context, the sensible thing to do is not produce so much material that's essentially name-calling and likely to be taken out of context. Why not just make her points (giving her the benefit of the doubt for a second and assuming she has something to offer besides shrill cries for attention) and be done with it?

I mean, calling someone a faggot, accusing him of taking cynical advantage of his dead son for publicity, and wishing he'd be killed by terrorists? That kind of stuff is only acceptable in an internet debate.