Yes indeed. You're philosophers with a capital F. With so much gray matter having put the matter of 9/11 to rest, I don't know why any wackos out there would pay attention to statements like this:

...Add to his (Torins') resume the fact that he designed and implemented well over 100 controlled demolitions. He was not just helping at a lower level in the demolitions - he was the guy responsible for calling the shots....

... With his demolitions experience, he immediately knew those towers could not have fallen like that without explosives....

..."But the craziest, most truly unhinged conspiracy theory for the towers falling on 9/11?" Torin asks rhetorically. "Fire." The official story cannot be recreated by any experiment. NIST is the government agency involved in attempting to model what happened to the world trade center on 9/11, and they fail horribly. NIST never models what happens after the collapse initiation, and even what they do model before that is easily debunked. NIST created 16 separate physics programs to simulate the WTC 1 & 2 collapses and only got 1 to collapse partially. Torin adds, "When they did, [in the computer model] they removed 40% of the structural support." The cross trusses that the towers received a significant amount of their strength from had to be removed to have a collapse in the computer simulation....

...A few slides are shown of progressive collapses throughout the world. None of them are anything like what happened to the world trade center with its pulverized concrete 100 microns or smaller just seconds after the start of collapse, and then its complete destruction....

...Several slides are then presented that show the hard physics and observed time of WTC 2 falling. Worst-case scenario would require 0.5 seconds per floor for collapse. "The absolute minimum amount of time for a progressive collapse would be 43 seconds." How long did it take for the building to fall in reality? About 8.6 Seconds....

..."For the towers to fall at so close to free fall speed, over 110,000 separate and independent structural support points had to fail simultaneously. 'Pancake theory' does NOT explain the failure of the cores." Torin explains passionately, obviously upset with the lies being told to the American people. "Nothing is holding the building up - No resistance. 110,000 structural failures at the same time."...

http://nationalwriterssyndicate.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=128&Itemid=2

It goes on and on and on, but the man is obviously a raving psychotic. And I don't care if he saved over a hundred lives in Iraq and is more decorated than a wedding cake, he's dangerous. Imagine talking like that about the OFFICIAL government version of 9/11. What should we do with people like this? They're obviously guilty of treason, questioning the government and all, when we're at war with terrorism. Should we just toss them across the border the government has wisely left open in this war? Should we force them onto drugs, for their own safety? Forced-labor camps, to make them pay for the harm they've done to the American way of life? I mean, this 9/11 wacko talk is endangering my educatation, dammit. If I can't graduate and serve the Homeland, then why bother? These people threatening our Homeland need to be dealt with.