The top section is taller than it is wide, so it's not a cube, and it was top-heavy, with the reinforced roof, but fine, say it behaved like a cube.

It was falling sideways and rotating as it fell, then the videos show it righted itself and reversed its rotation as the building beneath it began to disintegrate.

The NIST report stopped at the point of the initiation of collapse. They didn't even try to explain the behavior of the top section of the building.

The top section righted itself and changed direction of rotation. The unnatural behavior could have been due to 1) unnatural outside forces (which could only be demolitions) or 2) natural forces that contradict OTHER natural forces which were at work that day. I know bombs were in the buildings because I see the video evidence and have read the chemical analysis of the debris, but I think #2 above is the primary reason NIST stopped short of addressing the actual falls.

The government said steel was weakened to the point of collapse by fires as hot as those you can achieve on your stove top (your stove doesn't melt). But the government said some puny little fires weakened the steel in the buildings. Then the top of WTC2 started falling over sideways, and the most likely thing that stopped it's falling and reversed its spin would be the steel columns on the opposite side of the building. It collapsed and fell towards one side, then the lower floors began to mysteriously vaporize and fall, but enough of the external supports were in place on the opposite side to pull the top section back into place.

That's what it LOOKS like happened, but how can that be so? The conspiracy theorists say steel is hardly more able to withstand heat than wood, so how could those opposing supports pull that amount of weight back into line? Reason is, steel is incredibly strong. Strong enough to withstand a few minutes of kerosene fire followed by burning trashcans. But the govt would have a LOT of explaining to do if they went into the true nature of steel, so let's just stop the report there and stamp "final" on it.

THE TOP 40
REASONS TO DOUBT THE OFFICIAL STORY OF SEPTEMBER 11th, 2001

http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041221155307646

Who pays you people to support the government's 19 cavemen story, by the way? Olesko works for one of the Homeland Security torture universities, so that's his paymaster, who what about the rest of you?