sj | ||
|
User Name | Thread Name | Subject | Posted |
GUEST,John Garst | Is the 1954 definition, open to improvement? (105* d) | RE: Is the 1954 definition, open to improvement? | 21 Sep 07 |
I don't follow you, John Garst. I have a huge record collection of American folk music, and it fits the definition perfectly in every respect. From Leadbelly to Charlie Poole, Robert Johnson to Georgian Island singing, Jean Richie ballads to chain gang songs. All straight from that definition. Wonderful music. Pure folk. How do you mean that most American folk music doesn't fit? |