>>What I have previously referred to were the UNSCOM Reports to the United nations security Council of January 1999 and the later Report of March 1999 in which they Reported the status regarding WMD, WMD Research & Development programmes, stockpiles of WMD agents & precursors, munitions and missile inventory. It was those reports that detailed the discrepancies that existed between raw materials purchased and used, agents produced and weaponised, munitions made and used against what they could verify as having been destroyed. The information used was that supplied by the Iraqi Authorities, their suppliers, manufacturing records, etc. The UNSCOM Reports were careful to state that the shortfalls as detailed could only indicate what Iraq might possess. In my posts I have provided links to both those reports by way of substantiation.<<

Yeah, I read those. So, you lied earlier when you asserted that the bullshit Bush put in his SOTU 03 was detailed in a 1999 UN report authored by Blix and Ritter. They wrote no such report. They wrote about discrepancies that were still on their books that they wanted to get cleared up. At no time did they say Iraq actually HAD that stuff or any stuff.

>>Now how exactly did us Brits embarrass ourselves fighting a ragtag bunch of kids in the Falkland Islands? - the floor is yours<<

The Falklands was the greatest, most decisive victory in the history of warfare. All hail Britain. what ho, pip pip, cheerio, right! Happy now?