That sounds real cool and tough Bobert.

Can you explain how the President knew in August the conclusions of a report whose preliminary conclusions were only presented on 15th November to Vice President Cheney, national security adviser Stephen J. Hadley and other senior officials. And whose final conclusions were only reached on 27th November? As asked by T.

After that one Bob, you can explain how the economy has crashed. I was sliding into a recession when Bush took over from BJ Clinton. Bush turned it around despite 9/11 which was the result of BL Clinton's regime also and you have prospered as never before Under the Bush adminstration. At least in your posts you brag about economic gain.

Notice I said ***After*** you answer the first question so you don't change the subject which always you is you first method to avoid answering a question, you just dish up some more inaccurate information like A lot of people were busy outin' Valerie Plame" well which one did it?

You think that big tidal wave of "lies, half-lies and fantasies" you have built up over the years prove something. You think that repetition and volume can overcome logic and fact so you never stop to reason anything out. If you did that big balloon of truth you think you have starts loosing air.

The fact is that Bush could not have known what was in the report when he made the speech. The article from the reporter of a newspaper that has been loosing readership is speculation designed to sell newspapers to gullible people that want to hear such things. These people are objectively looking for something to reinforce their prejudiced opinions rather than subjective looking for the truth.

And lastly I don't need to need told by some self righteous pothead, what to do when. This is still a free country until jerks that think they know what everybody else do, change it.

If you think you are particularly qualified to tell people what to do, begin by telling us what we should do about Iran.